Life Histories of Taboo Knowledge Artifacts
Article No.: 505, Pages 1 - 32
Abstract
Communicating about some vital topics---such as sexuality and health---is treated as taboo and subjected to censorship. How can we construct knowledge about these topics? Wikipedia is home to numerous high-quality knowledge artifacts about taboo topics like sexual organs and human reproduction. How did these artifacts come into being? How is their existence sustained? This mixed-methods comparative project builds on previous work on taboo topics in Wikipedia and draws from qualitative and quantitative approaches. We follow a sequential complementary design, developing a narrative articulation of the life of taboo articles, comparing them to nontaboo articles, and examining some of their quantifiable traits. We find that taboo knowledge artifacts develop through multiple successful collaboration styles and, unsurprisingly, that taboo subjects are the sites of conflict. We identify and describe six themes in the development of taboo knowledge artifacts. These artifacts need resilient leadership and engaged organizations to thrive under conditions of limited identifiability and disjointed sensemaking, while contributors simultaneously engage in emergent governance and imagining public audiences. Our observations have important implications for supporting public knowledge work on controversial subjects such as taboos and more generally.
References
[1]
Julia Adams, Hannah Brückner, and Cambria Naslund. 2019. Who counts as a notable sociologist on Wikipedia Gender, race, and the professor test. Socius, Vol. 5 (Jan. 2019), 2378023118823946. https://doi.org/10.1177/2378023118823946
[2]
Leah Ajmani, Nicholas Vincent, and Stevie Chancellor. 2023. Peer Produced Friction: How Page Protection on Wikipedia Affects Editor Engagement and Concentration. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, Vol. 7, CSCW2 (Sept. 2023), 1--33. https://doi.org/10.1145/3610198
[3]
Keith Allan. 2019. Taboo words and language: An overview. In The Oxford handbook of taboo words and language first edition ed.), Keith Allan (Ed.). Oxford University Press, Oxford ; New York, NY.
[4]
Ofer Arazy and Oded Nov. 2010. Determinants of Wikipedia quality: the roles of global and local contribution inequality. In Proceedings of the 2010 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW '10). ACM, New York, NY, 233--236. https://doi.org/10.1145/1718918.1718963 tex.ids= arazy_determinants_2010--1.
[5]
Ofer Arazy, Felipe Ortega, Oded Nov, Lisa Yeo, and Adam Balila. 2015. Functional roles and career paths in Wikipedia. In Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing (CSCW '15). ACM, New York, NY, 1092--1105. https://doi.org/10.1145/2675133.2675257
[6]
Bunty Avieson. 2022. Editors, sources and the `go back' button: Wikipedia's framework for beating misinformation. First Monday (Nov. 2022). https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v27i11.12754
[7]
Yochai Benkler. 2006. The Wealth of Networks: How Social Production Transforms Markets and Freedom. Yale University Press, New Haven London.
[8]
Gauri Bhatnagar, Pushpendra Singh, Neha Kumar, and Anupriya Tuli. 2022. Unpacking Tensions in Designing Annotation System for Public Toilets to Support Menstrual Mobilities. In International Conference on Information & Communication Technologies and Development 2022. ACM, Seattle WA USA, 1--6. https://doi.org/10.1145/3572334.3572399
[9]
Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke. 2006. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, Vol. 3, 2 (Jan. 2006), 77--101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
[10]
Kaylea Champion and Benjamin Mako Hill. 2023. Taboo and Collaborative Knowledge Production: Evidence from Wikipedia. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, Vol. 7, CSCW2 (Sept. 2023), 1--25. https://doi.org/10.1145/3610090
[11]
Elizabeth G. Creamer. 2018. An introduction to fully integrated mixed methods research. Sage, Los Angeles.
[12]
Catherine D'Ignazio and Lauren F. Klein. 2020. Data feminism. The MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
[13]
Mary Douglas. 1978. Purity and danger: an analysis of the concepts of pollution and taboo repr ed.). Routledge, London.
[14]
Michael D. Ekstrand and John T. Riedl. 2009. rv you're dumb: Identifying Discarded Work in Wiki Article History. In Proceedings of the 5th International Symposium on Wikis and Open Collaboration (WikiSym '09). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 4:1--4:10. https://doi.org/10.1145/1641309.1641317
[15]
Frank Esser and Thomas Hanitzsch. 2012. On the Why and How of Comparative Inquiry in Communication Studies. In Handbook of Comparative Communication Research, Frank Esser and Thomas Hanitzsch (Eds.). Routledge, London, 3--22.
[16]
Ronald W. Evans, Patricia G. Avery, and Patricia Velde Pederson. 2000. Taboo Topics: Cultural Restraint on Teaching Social Issues. The Clearing House, Vol. 73, 5 (2000), 295--302. https://www.jstor.org/stable/30189601 Publisher: Taylor & Francis, Ltd.
[17]
Chaim Fershtman, Uri Gneezy, and Moshe Hoffman. 2011. Taboos and Identity: Considering the Unthinkable. American Economic Journal: Microeconomics, Vol. 3, 2 (May 2011), 139--164. https://doi.org/10.1257/mic.3.2.139
[18]
Élise Féron. 2015. Suffering in Silence? The Silencing of Sexual Violence Against Men in War Torn Countries. In World Suffering and Quality of Life, Ronald E. Anderson (Ed.). Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht, 31--44. https://doi.org/10.1007/978--94-017--9670--5_2
[19]
Clifford Geertz. 1973. Thick Description: Toward an Interpretive Theory of Culture. In In The Interpretation of Cultures: Selected Essays. New York: Basic Books.
[20]
R. Stuart Geiger and Aaron Halfaker. 2013. When the levee breaks: Without bots, what happens to Wikipedia's quality control processes?. In Proceedings of the 9th International Symposium on Open Collaboration (OpenSym '13). ACM, New York, NY, 6:1--6:6. https://doi.org/10.1145/2491055.2491061
[21]
R. Stuart Geiger and David Ribes. 2010. The work of sustaining order in wikipedia: the banning of a vandal. In Proceedings of the 2010 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 117--126. https://doi.org/10.1145/1718918.1718941
[22]
R Stuart Geiger and David Ribes. 2011. Trace Ethnography: Following Coordination through Documentary Practices. In 2011 44th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. IEEE, Kauai, HI, 1--10. https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2011.455
[23]
Jan Grabowski and Shira Klein. 2023. Wikipedia's Intentional Distortion of the History of the Holocaust. The Journal of Holocaust Research, Vol. 37, 2 (April 2023), 133--190. https://doi.org/10.1080/25785648.2023.2168939
[24]
Aaron Halfaker. 2017. Interpolating quality dynamics in Wikipedia and demonstrating the Keilana effect. In Proceedings of the 13th International Symposium on Open Collaboration. ACM Press, 1--9. https://doi.org/10.1145/3125433.3125475
[25]
Aaron Halfaker, R. Stuart Geiger, Jonathan T. Morgan, and John Riedl. 2013. The rise and decline of an open collaboration system: how Wikipedia's reaction to popularity is causing its decline. American Behavioral Scientist, Vol. 57, 5 (May 2013), 664--688. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764212469365
[26]
Aaron Halfaker, Aniket Kittur, and John Riedl. 2011. Don't bite the newbies: How reverts affect the quantity and quality of Wikipedia work. In Proceedings of the 7th International Symposium on Wikis and Open Collaboration (WikiSym '11). ACM, New York, NY, 163--172. https://doi.org/10.1145/2038558.2038585
[27]
Karey Helms. 2019. Do You Have to Pee?: A Design Space for Intimate and Somatic Data. In Proceedings of the 2019 on Designing Interactive Systems Conference. ACM, San Diego CA USA, 1209--1222. https://doi.org/10.1145/3322276.3322290
[28]
Benjamin Mako Hill and Aaron Shaw. 2013. The Wikipedia gender gap revisited: characterizing survey response bias with propensity score estimation. PLoS ONE, Vol. 8, 6 (June 2013), e65782. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0065782
[29]
Benjamin Mako Hill and Aaron Shaw. 2015. Page protection: another missing dimension of Wikipedia research. In Proceedings of the 11th International Symposium on Open Collaboration. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 15:1--15:4. https://doi.org/10.1145/2788993.2789846
[30]
Bryant Ashley Hudson and Gerardo A. Okhuysen. 2014. Taboo Topics: Structural Barriers to the Study of Organizational Stigma. Journal of Management Inquiry, Vol. 23, 3 (July 2014), 242--253. https://doi.org/10.1177/1056492613517510
[31]
Richard James. 2016. WikiProject Medicine: Creating Credibility in Consumer Health. Journal of Hospital Librarianship, Vol. 16, 4 (Oct. 2016), 344--351. https://doi.org/10.1080/15323269.2016.1221284
[32]
Elisabeth Joyce, Brian Butler, and Jacqueline Pike. 2011. Handling flammable materials: Wikipedia biographies of living persons as contentious objects. In Proceedings of the 2011 iConference. ACM, Seattle Washington USA, 25--32. https://doi.org/10.1145/1940761.1940765
[33]
Gary King, Robert O. Keohane, and Sidney Verba. 1994. Designing Social Inquiry: Scientific Inference in Qualitative Research. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
[34]
Aniket Kittur and Robert E. Kraut. 2008. Harnessing the wisdom of crowds in Wikipedia: quality through coordination. In Proceedings of the 2008 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW '08). ACM, New York, NY, 37--46. https://doi.org/10.1145/1460563.1460572
[35]
Piotr Konieczny. 2012. Wikis and Wikipedia as a teaching tool: Five years later. First Monday (Aug. 2012). https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v0i0.3583
[36]
Srijan Kumar, Robert West, and Jure Leskovec. 2016. Disinformation on the Web: Impact, Characteristics, and Detection of Wikipedia Hoaxes. In Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on World Wide Web (WWW '16). International World Wide Web Conferences Steering Committee, Republic and Canton of Geneva, CHE, 591--602. https://doi.org/10.1145/2872427.2883085
[37]
Bruno Latour. 2005. Reassembling the Social: An introduction to Actor-Network-Theory. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
[38]
Jun Liu and Sudha Ram. 2011. Who Does What: Collaboration Patterns in the Wikipedia and Their Impact on Article Quality. ACM Trans. Manage. Inf. Syst., Vol. 2, 2 (July 2011), 11:1--11:23. https://doi.org/10.1145/1985347.1985352
[39]
Brendan Luyt. 2018. Wikipedia's gaps in coverage: are Wikiprojects a solution? A study of the Cambodian Wikiproject. Online Information Review, Vol. 42, 2 (Jan. 2018), 238--249. https://doi.org/10.1108/OIR-06--2017-0199 Publisher: Emerald Publishing Limited.
[40]
Bronisaw Malinowski. 1926. Crime and Custom in Savage Society. Harcourt Brace & Company, New York.
[41]
Nora McDonald, Benjamin Mako Hill, Rachel Greenstadt, and Andrea Forte. 2019. Privacy, anonymity, and perceived risk in open collaboration: a study of service providers. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '19) (CHI '19). ACM, New York, NY, 671:1--671:12. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300901
[42]
Zachary J. McDowell and Matthew A. Vetter. 2020. It Takes a Village to Combat a Fake News Army: Wikipedia's Community and Policies for Information Literacy. Social Media Society, Vol. 6, 3 (July 2020), 205630512093730. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305120937309
[43]
Zachary J. McDowell and Matthew A. Vetter. 2022. Wikipedia as open educational practice: Experiential learning, critical information literacy, and social justice. Social Media Society, Vol. 8, 1 (Jan. 2022). https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051221078224
[44]
Connor McMahon, Isaac L. Johnson, and Brent J. Hecht. 2017. The substantial interdependence of Wikipedia and Google: A case study on the relationship between peer production communities and information technologies. In International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media (ICWSM 2017). AAAI, Palo Alto, California, 142--151.
[45]
Amanda Menking. 2019. Speculum: Characterizing the creation, curation, reproduction, and neglect of women's health information on the English language Wikipedia. Thesis. https://digital.lib.washington.edu:443/researchworks/handle/1773/44838 Accepted: 2019--10--15T22:59:00Z.
[46]
Yiftach Nagar. 2012. What do you think?: the structuring of an online community as a collective-sensemaking process. In Proceedings of the ACM 2012 conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work - CSCW '12. ACM Press, Seattle, Washington, USA, 393. https://doi.org/10.1145/2145204.2145266
[47]
Mustafa Naseem, Fouzia Younas, and Maryam Mustafa. 2020. Designing Digital Safe Spaces for Peer Support and Connectivity in Patriarchal Contexts. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, Vol. 4, CSCW2 (Oct. 2020), 1--24. https://doi.org/10.1145/3415217
[48]
Yamur Nuhrat. 2022. Linguistic taboo, ideology, and erasure: Reproducing homophobia as norm and lesbianism as stigma in women's football in Turkey. American Anthropologist, Vol. 124, 1 (2022), 141--153. https://doi.org/10.1111/aman.13695
[49]
Peter Pirolli. 2009. An elementary social information foraging model. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, Boston MA USA, 605--614. https://doi.org/10.1145/1518701.1518795
[50]
Yim Register, Izzi Grasso, Lauren N. Weingarten, Lilith Fury, Constanza Eliana Chinea, Tuck J. Malloy, and Emma S. Spiro. 2024. Beyond initial removal: Lasting impacts of distriminatory content moderation to marginalized creators on Instagram. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction (2024). https://doi.org/doi/10.1145/3637300
[51]
Marc Miquel Ribé, Andreas Kaltenbrunner, and Jeffrey M. Keefer. 2021. Bridging LGBT Content Gaps Across Wikipedia Language Editions. The International Journal of Information, Diversity, & Inclusion, Vol. 5, 4 (2021), 90--131. https://www.jstor.org/stable/48641981 Publisher: The International Journal of Information, Diversity, and Inclusion (IJIDI).
[52]
Aaron Shaw and Eszter Hargittai. 2018. The pipeline of online participation inequalities: The case of Wikipedia editing. Journal of Communication, Vol. 68, 1 (Feb. 2018), 143--168. https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqx003
[53]
Aaron Shaw and Benjamin Mako Hill. 2014. Laboratories of oligarchy? How the iron law extends to peer production. Journal of Communication, Vol. 64, 2 (2014), 215--238. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12082
[54]
Victoria Song. 2022. A top Wikipedia editor has been arrested in Belarus. https://www.theverge.com/2022/3/11/22973293/wikipedia-editor-russia-belarus-ukraine
[55]
Marie Louise Juul Søndergaard, Marianela Ciolfi Felice, and Madeline Balaam. 2021. Designing Menstrual Technologies with Adolescents. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, Yokohama Japan, 1--14. https://doi.org/10.1145/3411764.3445471
[56]
Dipendra S. Thakuri, Roshan K. Thapa, Samikshya Singh, Geha N. Khanal, and Resham B. Khatri. 2021. A harmful religio-cultural practice (Chhaupadi) during menstruation among adolescent girls in Nepal: Prevalence and policies for eradication. PLOS ONE, Vol. 16, 9 (Sept. 2021), e0256968. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0256968
[57]
Jacob Thebault-Spieker, Brent Hecht, and Loren Terveen. 2018. Geographic biases are `born, not made': Exploring contributors' spatiotemporal behavior in OpenStreetMap. In Proceedings of the 2018 ACM Conference on Supporting Groupwork. ACM Press, 71--82. https://doi.org/10.1145/3148330.3148350
[58]
Francesca Tripodi. 2021. Ms. Categorized: Gender, notability, and inequality on Wikipedia. New Media & Society (June 2021). https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448211023772
[59]
Ruth Tsuria. 2020. Discourse of practice: The negotiation of sexual norms via online religious discourse. International Journal of Communication, Vol. 14, 0 (June 2020), 19. https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/13811 Number: 0.
[60]
Nicholas Vincent, Isaac Johnson, and Brent Hecht. 2018. Examining Wikipedia with a broader lens: Quantifying the value of Wikipedia's relationships with other large-scale online communities. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '18). ACM, New York, NY, 566:1--566:13. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3174140
[61]
Alice Wang, Aasish Pappu, and Henriette Cramer. 2021. Representation of music creators on Wikipedia, differences in gender and genre. Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media, Vol. 15, 1 (May 2021), 764--775. https://ojs.aaai.org/index.php/ICWSM/article/view/18101 Section: Full Papers.
[62]
Morten Warncke-Wang, Vivek Ranjan, Loren Terveen, and Brent Hecht. 2015. Misalignment between supply and demand of quality content in peer production communities. In Proceedings of the Ninth International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media. 493--502.
[63]
Karl E. Weick. 1995. Sensemaking in Organizations. SAGE. gr
Index Terms
- Life Histories of Taboo Knowledge Artifacts
Recommendations
Taboo and Collaborative Knowledge Production: Evidence from Wikipedia
CSCWBy definition, people are reticent or even unwilling to talk about taboo subjects. Because subjects like sexuality, health, and violence are taboo in most cultures, important information on each of these subjects can be difficult to obtain. Are peer ...
Using a hybrid Evolutionary-Taboo Algorithm to solve Job Shop Problem
SAC '04: Proceedings of the 2004 ACM symposium on Applied computingIn this paper, we propose a new hybrid algorithm to solve the Job Shop Problem. Our algorithm, called Evoluntionary-Taboo uses an Evolutionary Algorithm (EA) to enhance results obtained by one of the best Taboo algorithms for this problem. We tested the ...
Eye-blinking artefacts analysis
CompSysTech '07: Proceedings of the 2007 international conference on Computer systems and technologiesBrain computer interface (BCI) is a device which allows the people to communicate without using their mouths or hands. The information about the subject's intention is issued by his brain and exists in his electroencephalogram (EEG), recorded from the ...
Comments
Information & Contributors
Information
Published In
November 2024
5177 pages
Copyright © 2024 Owner/Author.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution International 4.0 License.
Publisher
Association for Computing Machinery
New York, NY, United States
Publication History
Published: 08 November 2024
Published in PACMHCI Volume 8, Issue CSCW2
Check for updates
Author Tags
Qualifiers
- Research-article
Funding Sources
Contributors
Other Metrics
Bibliometrics & Citations
Bibliometrics
Article Metrics
- 0Total Citations
- 93Total Downloads
- Downloads (Last 12 months)93
- Downloads (Last 6 weeks)93
Reflects downloads up to 24 Dec 2024
Other Metrics
Citations
View Options
Login options
Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.
Sign in