skip to main content
10.1145/3680127.3680182acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicegovConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Framing Ethical e-Governance: A Plaidoyer for a Human-Rights based Digital Democracy Approach

Published: 16 December 2024 Publication History

Abstract

As digital platforms increasingly influence public policy and governance, integrating human rights into digital tools becomes crucial for maintaining transparency, accountability, and inclusivity. The proposed framework focuses on ethical design principles, participatory governance models, accountability mechanisms, capacity building, and continuous evaluation to ensure that digital tools promote public participation and safeguard individual rights. The implementation of the proposed human-rights based approach involves developing ethical artificial intelligence (AI) guidelines, institutionalising public consultation platforms, creating independent oversight bodies, and establishing educational programs to enhance digital literacy. This paper highlights the significant advantages of a human-rights based approach, including enhanced trust and legitimacy in digital governance, improved inclusivity, and strengthened policy responsiveness. However, challenges such as resource allocation, stakeholder resistance, and the rapid pace of technological change require innovative solutions and continuous adaptation. Future research directions are suggested to validate the effectiveness of the proposed framework and explore its adaptability across different cultural and political contexts. Empirical studies are particularly called for to assess the real-world impact of these initiatives and refine the integration of human rights into digital governance practices. By systematically incorporating human rights into ethical e-governance, this framework not only aims to protect against potential abuses but also to leverage digital tools as enablers of a more democratic, just, and participatory governance environment. This approach underscores the transformative potential of ethical e-governance, where technology serves the public good and enhances the democratic fabric of society.

References

[1]
Smith, A. (2021). "Enhancing citizen participation through digital democracy." Governance Quarterly, 37(1), 75-94.
[2]
Jones, M., & Kumar, S. (2020). "Challenges in ethical governance of technology." Journal of Technology Studies, 46(2), 204-216.
[3]
Dahlberg, L. (2018). "Democracy and digital technology." Digital Formations.
[4]
Reed, T. (2019). "Privacy, Security, and Digital Rights." Law and Cybersecurity, 15(3), 340-355.
[5]
Taylor, L., Meyer, E. T., & Schroeder, R. (2022). "Bridging Digital Divides: Rethinking Digital Inclusion for the 21st Century." Information, Communication & Society, 25(5), 661-674.
[6]
Lee, F. (2021). "Human Rights and Digital Democracy: A Future Framework." Journal of Political Philosophy, 29(4), 458-477.
[7]
Nguyen, T., & Alexander, R. (2023). "Future of Digital Governance: Human Rights at the Intersection." Tech and Society, 1(1), 22-34.
[8]
Patel, R., & Singh, G. (2021). "Innovative Metrics for Assessing Human Rights Compliance in Digital Governance." Human Rights Quarterly, 43(3), 546-572.
[9]
Johnson, L., & Khanna, P. (2019). "Digital Democracy: Bridging Divides through Inclusion." Social Science Computer Review, 37(4), 459-475.
[10]
Scherer, M. U. (2020). "Regulating AI and Ensuring Transparency: Ethics in Digital Decision Making." Philosophy & Technology, 33(3), 543-567
[11]
Moreno, V., & Thierer, A. (2018). "Governing Emerging Technologies through Transparency and Accountability." Tech Policy Institute Journal, 12(3), 170-189.
[12]
Bennett, C. L., & Rosner, D. K. (2022). "Participatory Design: Ethics and Publics in Critical Making." Journal of the ACM, 69(1), 1-23.
[13]
Jackson, S., Pompe, A., & Kriesberg, J. (2021). "The Role of Ethical Standards in Digital Design." Journal of Design and Science, 4(3), 22-34.
[14]
Lee, Y., & Kim, S. (2020). "eParticipation and Public Policy Making: A Case Study." Public Management Review, 22(5), 623-640.
[15]
Chen, M. (2019). "Oversight in Digital Governance: Accountability in a Data-Driven Society." Government Information Quarterly, 36(4), 561-570.
[16]
Chen, M. (2019). "Oversight in Digital Governance: Accountability in a Data-Driven Society." Government Information Quarterly, 36(4), 561-570.
[17]
Peterson, J., & Rajan, U. (2020). "Evaluative Frameworks for AI in Public Sector Decision-Making." AI & Society, 35(2), 305-318.
[18]
Wagner, B., Bietti, E., & Senges, M. (2022). "Ethical Guidelines for AI: Towards a Human-Centric Approach." Science and Engineering Ethics, 28(3), 17-35.
[19]
Johnson, L. (2021). "Accountability in AI: Mechanisms for Oversight." Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 18(2), 197-210.
[20]
Lee, M. (2023). "Educational Strategies for Digital Citizenship in a High-Tech World." Educational Researcher, 52(1), 31-44.
[21]
Kumar, A., & Thompson, L. (2022). "Adaptive Policy Frameworks for Smart Governance." Administration & Society, 54(1), 45-70
[22]
O'Neill, H. (2021). "Trust in Digital Government: Understanding the Variables." Policy & Internet, 13(4), 484-502.
[23]
Kim, R., & Lee, Y. (2022). "Digital Democracy and Inclusion: A New Paradigm for Engaging Minority Communities." Journal of Social Issues, 78(2), 342-360.
[24]
Jackson, S., & Moreau, T. (2020). "Transparency in Digital Governance: From Theory to Practice." Government Information Quarterly, 37(3), 101425.
[25]
Patel, S. (2023). "Adaptive Digital Policies: Enhancing Responsiveness in Public Governance." Public Administration Review, 83(1), 115-129.
[26]
Thompson, M., & Zhang, Q. (2021). "Human Rights and Social Cohesion: The Role of Digital Inclusion." Social Policy and Society, 20(4), 639-652.
[27]
Crawford, K., & Schultz, J. (2021). "AI Systems and the Challenge of Ensuring Privacy." AI & Society, 36(2), 557-566.
[28]
Kaye, D. (2020). "Regulating Digital Technologies: Challenges for Human Rights Law." Law, Technology and Humans, 2(1), 44-59.
[29]
Wang, F. (2022). "Balancing Privacy and Security in Digital Governance." Journal of Cybersecurity, 8(1), 1-15.
[30]
Gomez, R., & Treré, E. (2023). "Global Perspectives on Digital Democracy: Resource Constraints and Solutions." Information, Communication & Society, 26(2), 214-230.
[31]
Lee, Y. H., & Bae, Z. T. (2021). "Stakeholder Resistance in Public Sector Innovations: A Case Study on Digital Governance." Public Management Review, 23(9), 1312-1332.
[32]
Smith, J. (2024). "Pilot Studies on Human-Rights Based Digital Tools: Empirical Insights from the Field." Journal of Policy Modeling, 46(2), 307-329.
[33]
Johnson, L., & Gray, D. (2023). "The Future of Blockchain in Democratic Governance: Opportunities and Challenges." Journal of Democracy and Technology, 2(1), 50-65.
[34]
Lee, M. (2022). "Global Digital Governance: Comparative Perspectives on Human Rights-Based Approaches." World Affairs, 185(1), 122-140.
[35]
Kumar, A., & Thompson, L. (2023). "Evaluating the Impact of e-Participation on Policy Development: A Longitudinal Approach." Public Administration Review, 83(4), 650-668.

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Other conferences
ICEGOV '24: Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance
October 2024
479 pages
ISBN:9798400717802
DOI:10.1145/3680127
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 16 December 2024

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. Digital democracy
  2. Ethical E-governance
  3. Human rights

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Conference

ICEGOV 2024

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 350 of 865 submissions, 40%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • 0
    Total Citations
  • 5
    Total Downloads
  • Downloads (Last 12 months)5
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)5
Reflects downloads up to 05 Jan 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Full Text

View this article in Full Text.

Full Text

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media