skip to main content
10.1145/3664476.3670439acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesaresConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Open access

A Web Browser Plugin for Users' Security Awareness

Published: 30 July 2024 Publication History

Abstract

Browsing online continues to pose a risk to the users’ privacy and security. There is a plethora of existing tools and solutions that aim at ensuring safe and private browsing but they are not used by the majority of the users due to the lack of ease of use or because they are too restrictive. In this work, we present a plugin for Google Chrome that aims to increase the users’ security awareness regarding the visited websites. We aim to provide the user with simple and understandable information about the security of the visited website. We evaluated our tool through a usability analysis and compared it with existing well-known solutions. Our study showed that our plugin ranking was high in the ease of use, and in the middle range for clarity, information provided, and overall satisfaction. Overall, our study showed that the users would like to use a tool that has ease of use but that also provides some simple security information about the visited website.

References

[1]
IP Quality Score API. 2023. Malicious URL Scanner. https://www.ipqualityscore.com/threat-feeds/malicious-url-scanner
[2]
Browser Audit. 2023. How secure is your browser?https://browseraudit.com/
[3]
Nicholas Carlini, Adrienne Porter Felt, and David Wagner. 2012. An Evaluation of the Google Chrome Extension Security Architecture. In 21st USENIX Security Symposium (USENIX Security 12). 97–111.
[4]
Serge Egelman, Lorrie Faith Cranor, and Jason Hong. 2008. You’ve Been Warned: An Empirical Study of the Effectiveness of Web Browser Phishing Warnings. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1065–1074.
[5]
Laura Falk, Atul Prakash, and Kevin Borders. 2008. Analyzing Websites for User-Visible Security Design Flaws. In Proceedings of the 4th Symposium on Usable Privacy and Security. 117–126.
[6]
José Carlos Coelho Martins da Fonseca and Marco Paulo Amorim Vieira. 2014. A Practical Experience on the Impact of Plugins in Web Security. In 2014 IEEE 33rd International Symposium on Reliable Distributed Systems. 21–30. https://doi.org/10.1109/SRDS.2014.20
[7]
Google. 2023. Google Safe Browsing and Transparency Report. https://transparencyreport.google.com/safe-browsing/search?hl=en_GB
[8]
Teemu Koskinen, Petri Ihantola, and Ville Karavirta. 2012. Quality of WordPress Plug-Ins: An Overview of Security and User Ratings. In 2012 International Conference on Privacy, Security, Risk and Trust and 2012 International Confernece on Social Computing. 834–837. https://doi.org/10.1109/SocialCom-PASSAT.2012.31
[9]
Matthew Malloy, Mark McNamara, Aaron Cahn, and Paul Barford. 2016. Ad Blockers: Global Prevalence and Impact. In Proceedings of the 2016 Internet Measurement Conference. 119–125.
[10]
Max-Emanuel Maurer, Alexander De Luca, and Sylvia Kempe. 2011. Using Data Type Based Security Alert Dialogs to Raise Online Security Awareness. In Proceedings of the Seventh Symposium on Usable Privacy and Security(SOUPS ’11).
[11]
Daniel T. Murphy, Minhaz F. Zibran, and Farjana Z. Eishita. 2021. Plugins to Detect Vulnerable Plugins: An Empirical Assessment of the Security Scanner Plugins for WordPress. In 2021 IEEE/ACIS 19th International Conference on Software Engineering Research, Management and Applications (SERA). 39–44. https://doi.org/10.1109/SERA51205.2021.9509274
[12]
Paulo Jorge Costa Nunes, José Fonseca, and Marco Vieira. 2015. phpSAFE: A Security Analysis Tool for OOP Web Application Plugins. In 2015 45th Annual IEEE/IFIP International Conference on Dependable Systems and Networks. 299–306. https://doi.org/10.1109/DSN.2015.16
[13]
Ignacio Redondo and Gloria Aznar. 2023. Whitelist or Leave Our Website! Advances in the Understanding of User Response to Anti-Ad-Blockers. Informatics 10, 1 (2023).
[14]
Jahanzeb Shahid, Muhammad Khurram Hameed, Ibrahim Tariq Javed, Kashif Naseer Qureshi, Moazam Ali, and Noel Crespi. 2022. A Comparative Study of Web Application Security Parameters: Current Trends and Future Directions. Applied Sciences 12, 8 (2022).
[15]
Peter Snyder, Cynthia Taylor, and Chris Kanich. 2017. Most Websites Don’t Need to Vibrate: A Cost-Benefit Approach to Improving Browser Security. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security(CCS ’17). 179–194.
[16]
Chrome Web Store. 2023. Avast Online Security Plugin. https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/avast-online-security/gomekmidlodglbbmalcneegieacbdmki?hl=en
[17]
Chrome Web Store. 2023. WOT Website Security and Browsing Protection. https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/wot-website-security-brow/bhmmomiinigofkjcapegjjndpbikblnp
[18]
Nitirat Tanthavech and Apichaya Nimkoompai. 2019. CAPTCHA: Impact of Website Security on User Experience. In Proceedings of the 2019 4th International Conference on Intelligent Information Technology. 37–41.
[19]
Nguyen Duc Thai and Nguyen Huu Hieu. 2019. A Framework for Website Security Assessment. In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Computer and Communications Management(ICCCM ’19). 153–157.
[20]
Pentest Tools. 2023. Website Vulnerability Scanner. https://pentest-tools.com/website-vulnerability-scanning/website-scanner
[21]
SSL Trust. 2023. SSL Trust Website Safety and Security Check Website. https://www.ssltrust.co.uk/ssl-tools/website-security-check
[22]
Min Wu, Robert C. Miller, and Simson L. Garfinkel. 2006. Do Security Toolbars Actually Prevent Phishing Attacks?. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 601–610.

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Other conferences
ARES '24: Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Availability, Reliability and Security
July 2024
2032 pages
ISBN:9798400717185
DOI:10.1145/3664476
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 30 July 2024

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. google chrome
  2. plugin
  3. security awareness
  4. usability study

Qualifiers

  • Research-article
  • Research
  • Refereed limited

Conference

ARES 2024

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 228 of 451 submissions, 51%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • 0
    Total Citations
  • 208
    Total Downloads
  • Downloads (Last 12 months)208
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)70
Reflects downloads up to 16 Jan 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

View Options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format.

HTML Format

Login options

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media