skip to main content
10.1145/3658271.3658331acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagessbsiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Mental Health and Productivity in Software Development: A Study with the Bravo Central Platform

Published: 23 May 2024 Publication History

Abstract

Context: Software developers often experience a lot of pressure, including long work hours, tight deadlines, and high-stakes projects. In this context, the mental health of developers has gained increasing attention. Problem: The advent of remote work and the growing adoption of small and agile teams have introduced a new set of challenges. While remote work can offer flexibility, it can also lead to issues such as isolation, burnout, and difficulties in maintaining work-life balance. Small teams, on the other hand, often have fewer resources and less room for making mistakes. State-of-the-art approaches lack a systematic and organized framework to monitor the mental health and productivity of remote and small teams. Solution: We develop an approach based on the GQM (Goal, Question, Metric) methodology to collect, measure, and monitor metrics associated with mental health and productivity. IS Theory: The research is developed under the theoretical framework of Information Systems (IS) theory, specifically focusing on the dimensions of technology, business, and human aspects. Method: We apply the GQM methodology to define goals, questions, and metrics. Data is gathered through surveys and metric analysis, employing both, quantitative and qualitative analysis. Summary of Results: Our analysis confirmed a positive correlation between mental health and productivity. Additionally, it identifies weaknesses and areas for improvement and leads to the development of action plans. Contributions and Impact in the IS area: This research is valuable to support managers in creating healthier work environments, which is a significant concern in the industry.

References

[1]
2023. Blazor. https://dotnet.microsoft.com/apps/aspnet/web-apps/blazor/. Accessed: 2023-05-13.
[2]
2023. ChartJs.Blazor. https://github.com/mariusmuntean/ChartJs.Blazor. Accessed: 2023-05-13.
[3]
2023. GDC State of the Game Industry report 2021. https://reg.gdconf.com/state-of-game-industry-2022. Accessed: 2023-05-13.
[4]
2023. Radzen: Rapid Application Development for the Web. https://www.radzen.com/. Accessed: 2023-05-13.
[5]
2024. Repositório da plataforma Bravo Central. https://github.com/nicopaes/Open_BravoCentral. Accessed: 2024-03-07.
[6]
Lingfeng Bao, Tao Li, Xin Xia, Kaiyu Zhu, Hui Li, and Xiaohu Yang. 2022. How does working from home affect developer productivity?—A case study of Baidu during the COVID-19 pandemic. Science China Information Sciences 65, 4 (2022), 142102.
[7]
Lisa Baudot and Khim Kelly. 2020. A survey of perceptions of remote work and work productivity in the United States during the COVID-19 shutdown. Available at SSRN 3646406 (2020).
[8]
Donald R Chand and Raghava G Gowda. 1993. An exploration of the impact of individual and group factors on programmer productivity. In Proceedings of the 1993 ACM conference on Computer science. 338–345.
[9]
Chiara Dall’Ora, Jane Ball, Alejandra Recio-Saucedo, and Peter Griffiths. 2016. Characteristics of shift work and their impact on employee performance and wellbeing: A literature review. International journal of nursing studies 57 (2016), 12–27.
[10]
Ben Etheridge, Yikai Wang, and Li Tang. 2020. Worker productivity during lockdown and working from home: Evidence from self-reports. Technical Report. ISER Working Paper Series.
[11]
Kerry E Evers, Patricia H Castle, James O Prochaska, and Janice M Prochaska. 2014. Examining relationships between multiple health risk behaviors, well-being, and productivity. Psychological Reports 114, 3 (2014), 843–853.
[12]
Stefan B Gingerich, Erin LD Seaverson, and David R Anderson. 2018. Association between sleep and productivity loss among 598 676 employees from multiple industries. American Journal of Health Promotion 32, 4 (2018), 1091–1094.
[13]
Adrián Hernández-López, Ricardo Colomo-Palacios, and Ángel García-Crespo. 2012. Productivity in software engineering: A study of its meanings for practitioners: Understanding the concept under their standpoint. In 7th Iberian Conference on Information Systems and Technologies (CISTI 2012). IEEE, 1–6.
[14]
Philip Hunter. 2019. Remote working in research: An increasing usage of flexible work arrangements can improve productivity and creativity. EMBO reports 20, 1 (2019), e47435.
[15]
Courtney Miller, Paige Rodeghero, Margaret-Anne Storey, Denae Ford, and Thomas Zimmermann. 2021. “how was your weekend?” software development teams working from home during covid-19. In 2021 IEEE/ACM 43rd International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE). IEEE, 624–636.
[16]
Edson Oliveira, Eduardo Fernandes, Igor Steinmacher, Marco Cristo, Tayana Conte, and Alessandro Garcia. 2020. Code and commit metrics of developer productivity: a study on team leaders perceptions. Empirical Software Engineering 25 (2020), 2519–2549.
[17]
Edson Oliveira, Davi Viana, Marco Cristo, and Tayana Conte. 2017. How have software engineering researchers been measuring software productivity?. In Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems, Vol. 2. 26–29.
[18]
World Health Organization 2022. World mental health report: Transforming mental health for all. (2022).
[19]
Paul Ralph, Sebastian Baltes, Gianisa Adisaputri, Richard Torkar, Vladimir Kovalenko, Marcos Kalinowski, Nicole Novielli, Shin Yoo, Xavier Devroey, Xin Tan, 2020. Pandemic programming: How COVID-19 affects software developers and how their organizations can help. Empirical software engineering 25 (2020), 4927–4961.
[20]
Mark R Rosekind, Kevin B Gregory, Melissa M Mallis, Summer L Brandt, Brian Seal, and Debra Lerner. 2010. The cost of poor sleep: workplace productivity loss and associated costs. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine (2010), 91–98.
[21]
Christian Winther Topp, Søren Dinesen Østergaard, Susan Søndergaard, and Per Bech. 2015. The WHO-5 Well-Being Index: a systematic review of the literature. Psychotherapy and psychosomatics 84, 3 (2015), 167–176.
[22]
Rini Van Solingen and Egon W Berghout. 1999. The Goal/Question/Metric Method: a practical guide for quality improvement of software development. McGraw-Hill.
[23]
Mikko Virtaneva, Polina Feshchenko, Abrar Hossain, Antti Kariluoto, Joonas Himmanen, Pasi Kaitila, Joni Kultanen, Kai-Kristian Kemell, and Pekka Abrahamsson. 2021. COVID-19 remote work: Body stress, self-efficacy, teamwork, and perceived productivity of knowledge workers. In Scandinavian Conference on Information Systems. Association for Information Systems.
[24]
Claes Wohlin, Per Runeson, Martin Höst, Magnus Ohlsson, Björn Regnell, and Anders Wesslén. 2012. Experimentation in Software Engineering (1st ed.). Springer Science & Business Media.
[25]
Novia Wong, Victoria Jackson, André Van Der Hoek, Iftekhar Ahmed, Stephen M Schueller, and Madhu Reddy. 2023. Mental Wellbeing at Work: Perspectives of Software Engineers. In Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–15.

Index Terms

  1. Mental Health and Productivity in Software Development: A Study with the Bravo Central Platform

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    SBSI '24: Proceedings of the 20th Brazilian Symposium on Information Systems
    May 2024
    708 pages
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 23 May 2024

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. GQM Methodology
    2. Human Aspects
    3. Mental Health
    4. Productivity

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

    Conference

    SBSI '24
    SBSI '24: XX Brazilian Symposium on Information Systems
    May 20 - 23, 2024
    Juiz de Fora, Brazil

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate 181 of 557 submissions, 32%

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • 0
      Total Citations
    • 43
      Total Downloads
    • Downloads (Last 12 months)43
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)7
    Reflects downloads up to 25 Dec 2024

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    View Options

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    HTML Format

    View this article in HTML Format.

    HTML Format

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media