skip to main content
10.1145/3658271.3658300acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagessbsiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Celebrating two decades of SBSI (2004 to 2023): A Comprehensive Descriptive and Meta-Scientific Analysis

Published: 23 May 2024 Publication History

Abstract

Context: SBSI ties together the Brazilian Information Systems community since 2004, 20 years ago. Through their research, the community has matured, grown and established, through authorships, institutions, research interests, and collaborations. Problem: complexity, diversity and plurality grew as the SBSI, and IS community, grew and spread; presenting self-monitoring challenges. There are few meta-scientific studies covering collaborations and quantitative studies, in different dimensions. Solution: we conducted a comprehensive and complete study, analyzing several SBSI aspects, with a materialistic emphasis on authorship (3595) and studies (1052), covering all 19 years of the event. IS Theory: Argumentative theory, Critical social theory. Method: we conducted a descriptive-analytical study, similar to a scope review. We use quantitative analyzes and Social Network Analysis techniques, prioritizing a temporal perspective, exposing the evolution of phenomena. We deal with different dimensions and interrelate the appropriate or plausible ones. Summarization of Results: this work reiterates or enriches the findings of previous works. Reinforces a low number of female authors, while several of the most prolific authors are women. As institutions, USP, UNIRIO, UFPE, UFRJ and UNISINOS stand out. The Southeast region, Rio Grande do Sul and Pernambuco stands out. Collaborations and authorship numbers differs. Brazilian Portuguese predominates as the main language, except in 2021, an outlier. The keywords are reflect an emphasis on information systems. Contributions and Impacts on the IS area: we present a multidimensional Brazilian IS panorama understanding, for better meta-scientific and organizational decision-making. It serves as input and complement to think about Brazilian IS challenges, current and future.

References

[1]
Joseph Agassi. 2008. Science and its History: A Reassessment of the Historiography of Science (1st ed.). Springer.
[2]
ANPEd. 2019. Ética e pesquisa em Educação: subsídios – volume 1. Vol. 1. ANPEd, Rio de Janeiro, RJ.
[3]
E. Babbie. 2021. The Practice of Social Research. Cengage Learning, Boston, MA.
[4]
A.L Barabási, H Jeong, Z Néda, E Ravasz, A Schubert, and T Vicsek. 2002. Evolution of the social network of scientific collaborations. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications 311, 3 (2002), 590–614. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-4371(02)00736-7
[5]
Jaap Bos. 2020. Research Ethics for Students in the Social Sciences (1st ed.). Springer Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-48415-6
[6]
C. Boscarioli, R. Araujo, and R. S. Maciel. 2017. I GranDSI-BR Grand Research Challenges in Information Systems in Brazil 2016-2026. SBC, Porto Alegre. https://doi.org/10.5753/sbc.2884.0
[7]
Michele A Brandão and Mirella M Moro. 2017. Social professional networks: A survey and taxonomy. Computer Communications 100 (2017), 20–31.
[8]
Brasil. 2016. Ministério da Saúde. RESOLUÇÃO Nº 510, DE 07 DE ABRIL DE 2016. Retrieved 29-may-2023 from https://4658.short.gy/CEP_2016
[9]
Wayne Brockriede and Douglas Ehninger. 1960. Toulmin on argument: An interpretation and application. Quarterly Journal of Speech 46, 1 (1960), 44–53. https://doi.org/10.1080/00335636009382390
[10]
Carole Brooke. 2016. What Does It Mean to be ‘Critical’ in IS Research?Springer International Publishing, Cham, 40–57. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-29266-3_3
[11]
Maiane Carianha and Crescencio Lima Neto. 2013. Uma Análise dos Últimos 5 anos do Simpósio Brasileiro de Qualidade de Software. In Anais do XII SBQS (Salvador). SBC, Porto Alegre, RS, Brasil, 153–164. https://doi.org/10.5753/sbqs.2013.15280
[12]
Luiz Paulo Carvalho, Silas Lima Filho, Michele Brandão, Jonice Oliveira, Flávia Santoro, and Mônica Silva. 2023. Uma década de interações entre eventos e pesquisadores do CSBC: Um estudo meta-científico. In Anais do XII BraSNAM (João Pessoa/PB). SBC, Porto Alegre, RS, Brasil, 139–150. https://doi.org/10.5753/brasnam.2023.230632
[13]
L. P. Carvalho, J. A. Suzano, F. M. Santoro, and J. Oliveira. 2022. A meta-scientific broad panorama of ethical aspects in the Brazilian IHC. Journal on Interactive Systems 13, 1 (Aug. 2022), 105–126. https://doi.org/10.5753/jis.2022.2579
[14]
Mehran Badin Dahesh, Gholamali Tabarsa, Mostafa Zandieh, and Mohammadreza Hamidizadeh. 2020. Reviewing the intellectual structure and evolution of the innovation systems approach: A social network analysis. Technology in Society 63 (2020), 101399.
[15]
Rodrigo Choji de Freitas, Neide Ferreira Alves, Ramayana Assunção Menezes, Andrea Monicque dos Santos Silva, Beatriz Martires Paes, Fabio Santos da Silva, Luiz Fabio Bailosa Alencar, Mario Guilherme Carvalho, Matheus Miranda Matos, Tiago Ramos de Sá, Victor Brasil de Pina, Victor Yan Pereira Lima, Carlossandro Carvalho Albuquerque, and José Reginaldo Hughes Carvalho. 2022. Curupira Project: A Platform for Intelligent Monitoring of Waste in Amazon Rivers. In Proceedings of the XVIII SBSI (Curitiba, Brazil) (SBSI ’22). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 36, 9 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3535511.3535547
[16]
Edvaldo de Oliveira and Vania Dias. 2012. Redes sociais do SBSI e o corte de vertices como base para identificar atores importantes na coesão de grupos de pesquisa. In Anais do VIII SBSI (São Paulo). SBC, Porto Alegre, RS, Brasil, 204–215. https://doi.org/10.5753/sbsi.2012.14406
[17]
Luciano Digiampietri, Sarajane Peres, Fabio Nakano, Norton Roman, Bárbara Silva, Beatriz Teodoro, Douglas da Silva Jr., Guilherme Pereira, Guilherme Borges, Gustavo Pereira, Marcelo Santos, Maruscia Baklizky, Priscilla Wagner, and Vitor Barros. 2012. Complementando o Aprendizado em Programação: Experiências no Curso de Sistemas de Informação da USP. In Anais do VIII SBSI (São Paulo). SBC, Porto Alegre, RS, Brasil, 540–551. https://doi.org/10.5753/sbsi.2012.14439
[18]
Silas Lima Filho, Luiz Paulo Carvalho, José Suzano, Michele Brandão, Jonice Oliveira, and Flávia Santoro. 2023. CSBCSet: Um conjunto de dados para uma década de CSBC, seus eventos e publicações. In Anais do XII BraSNAM (João Pessoa/PB). SBC, Porto Alegre, RS, Brasil, 240–245. https://doi.org/10.5753/brasnam.2023.230688
[19]
Emmanuel Sávio Silva Freire, Daniela Medeiros Cedro, and Antonio de Barros Serra. 2018. An Analysis of Brazilian Symposium on Software Quality (SBQS): Retrospective, Relevance, and Trends in the Past 5 Years. In Proceedings of the XVII Brazilian Symposium on Software Quality (Curitiba, Brazil) (SBQS ’18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 31–40. https://doi.org/10.1145/3275245.3275279
[20]
Mohammad Reza HabibAgahi, Mehrdad Agha Mohammad Ali Kermani, and Mehrdad Maghsoudi. 2022. On the Co-authorship network analysis in the Process Mining research Community: A social network analysis perspective. Expert Systems with Applications 206 (2022), 117853.
[21]
J.P. Ioannidis, D. Fanelli, D.D. Dunne, and S.N. Goodman. 2015. Meta-research: Evaluation and Improvement of Research Methods and Practices. PLoS biology 13, 10 (10 2015). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1002264
[22]
J. P. A. Ioannidis. 2018. Meta-research: Why research on research matters. PLoS Biol 16, 3 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.2005468
[23]
Xiangjie Kong, Yajie Shi, Shuo Yu, Jiaying Liu, and Feng Xia. 2019. Academic social networks: Modeling, analysis, mining and applications. Journal of Network and Computer Applications 132 (2019), 86–103.
[24]
Eva Maria Lakatos and Marina Marconi. 2019. Sociologia Geral (8th ed.). Atlas.
[25]
Bruno Latour. 1987. Science in action: How to follow scientists and engineers through society. Harvard university press.
[26]
Wolfgang Lefèvre. 2005. Science as Labor. Perspectives on Science 13, 2 (06 2005), 194–225. https://doi.org/10.1162/106361405774270539
[27]
Fábio Lobato, Gleyce Sousa, and Antonio Jacob Jr.2021. BraSNAM em perspectiva: uma análise da sua trajetória até os 10 anos de existência. In Anais do X BraSNAM (Evento Online). SBC, Porto Alegre, RS, Brasil, 217–228. https://doi.org/10.5753/brasnam.2021.16143
[28]
Alex John London. 2022. For the Common Good: Philosophical Foundations of Research Ethics (1st ed.). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197534830.001.0001
[29]
Marina de Andrade Marconi and Eva Maria Lakatos. 2017. Fundamentos de Metodologia Científica (8ª ed.). Atlas, São Paulo, SP.
[30]
N. Mendonça. 2021. Abertura e Internacionalização do SBES: Um Oximoro Irreconciliável?. In Anais do I Workshop de Práticas de Ciência Aberta para Engenharia de Software (Joinville). SBC, Porto Alegre, RS, Brasil, 49–51. https://doi.org/10.5753/opensciense.2021.17146
[31]
Vânia Neves, Silvana Melo, and Lina Garcés. 2023. 18+ Years of Brazilian Symposium on Information Systems: Results of a Scope Review. In Proceedings of the XIX SBSI (Maceió, Brazil) (SBSI ’23). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 419–426. https://doi.org/10.1145/3592813.3592933
[32]
David Peterson and Aaron Panofsky. 2023. Metascience as a scientific social movement. Minerva 62 (2023), 147–174.
[33]
K. S. F. M. Ribeiro, C. Maciel, and M. Amaral S. Bim. 2020. Gênero e tecnologias. In Computação e sociedade: a profissão - volume 1, C. Maciel and J. Viterbo (Eds.). EdUFMT Digital, Mato Grosso, Brasil, 104–140.
[34]
Natan Rodrigues and Célia Ralha. 2015. Conhecendo a Comunidade de Sistemas de Informação no Brasil: um Estudo Comparativo Utilizando Diferentes Abordagens de Banco de Dados. In Anais do XI SBSI (Goiânia). SBC, Porto Alegre, RS, Brasil, 555–562. https://doi.org/10.5753/sbsi.2015.5861
[35]
Thalia Santana and Adriano Braga. 2020. Uma Análise Cienciométrica das Publicações do Congresso da Sociedade Brasileira de Computação na Perspectiva das Mulheres na Computação. In Anais do XIV WIT (Cuiabá). SBC, Porto Alegre, RS, Brasil, 279–283. https://doi.org/10.5753/wit.2020.11310
[36]
R. M. Stair and G. W. Reynolds. 2018. Principles of Information Systems (13 ed.). CENGAGE Learning, Boston, MA.
[37]
Shazia Tabassum, Fabiola S. F. Pereira, Sofia Fernandes, and João Gama. 2018. Social network analysis: An overview. WIREs Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery 8, 5 (2018), e1256. https://doi.org/10.1002/widm.1256
[38]
Raul Sidnei Wazlawick. 2014. Metodologia de Pesquisa para Ciência da Computação (2ª ed.). Elsevier, São Paulo, SP.
[39]
Wikipedia contributors. 2023. Federative units of Brazil — Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Federative_units_of_Brazil&oldid=1156016556.

Index Terms

  1. Celebrating two decades of SBSI (2004 to 2023): A Comprehensive Descriptive and Meta-Scientific Analysis

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Information & Contributors

      Information

      Published In

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      SBSI '24: Proceedings of the 20th Brazilian Symposium on Information Systems
      May 2024
      708 pages
      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      Published: 23 May 2024

      Permissions

      Request permissions for this article.

      Check for updates

      Author Tags

      1. Brazilian Computing
      2. Information Systems
      3. SBSI
      4. Social Network Analysis

      Qualifiers

      • Research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited

      Conference

      SBSI '24
      SBSI '24: XX Brazilian Symposium on Information Systems
      May 20 - 23, 2024
      Juiz de Fora, Brazil

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate 181 of 557 submissions, 32%

      Contributors

      Other Metrics

      Bibliometrics & Citations

      Bibliometrics

      Article Metrics

      • 0
        Total Citations
      • 9
        Total Downloads
      • Downloads (Last 12 months)9
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)3
      Reflects downloads up to 13 Jan 2025

      Other Metrics

      Citations

      View Options

      Login options

      View options

      PDF

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader

      HTML Format

      View this article in HTML Format.

      HTML Format

      Media

      Figures

      Other

      Tables

      Share

      Share

      Share this Publication link

      Share on social media