skip to main content
10.1145/3640792.3675727acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesautomotiveuiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Open access

Bike to the Future: Designing Holistic Autonomous Vehicle-Cyclist Interfaces

Published: 22 September 2024 Publication History

Abstract

AV-cyclist interaction research has focused on individual interfaces, e.g., eHMIs or AR glasses. However, cyclists using multiple independent interfaces could receive redundant or contradictory messages, causing unsafe encounters. We introduce the Holistic AV-Cyclist Interface: multiple displays facilitating communication together to ensure safe road sharing. We used participatory design with cyclists and HCI researchers (N = 12) to develop holistic interfaces around an actual vehicle equipped with an eHMI. Participants created holistic interfaces communicating blindspot warnings and AV intent and accommodating two-way communication, e.g. through on-bike directional indicators. They mostly placed interfaces on the bicycle handlebars and cycling accessories, e.g. helmet. Holistic interfaces could overcome design challenges: they can be multimodal, facilitate communication between AVs and multiple cyclists, and work in varying weather/visibility conditions. We categorised participant designs into a taxonomy and developed a novel holistic interface based on our findings. Our results are important for the safe integration of AVs into traffic.

Supplemental Material

ZIP File - Sketches of participant design
Sketches of each group's design from the design sessions.

References

[1]
Ammar Al-Taie, Yasmeen Abdrabou, Shaun Alexander Macdonald, Frank Pollick, and Stephen Anthony Brewster. 2023. Keep it Real: Investigating Driver-Cyclist Interaction in Real-World Traffic. In Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1145/3544548.3581049
[2]
Ammar Al-Taie, Frank Pollick, and Stephen Brewster. 2022. Tour de Interaction: Understanding Cyclist-Driver Interaction with Self-Reported Cyclist Behaviour. In Adjunct Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 127–131. https://doi.org/10.1145/3544999.3552531
[3]
Ammar Al-Taie, Graham Wilson, Euan Freeman, Frank Pollick, and Stephen Brewster. 2024. Light it Up: Evaluating Versatile Autonomous Vehicle-Cyclist External Human-Machine Interfaces. In Proceedings of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, New York.
[4]
Ammar Al-Taie, Graham Wilson, Frank Pollick, and Stephen Anthony Brewster. 2023. Pimp My Ride: Designing Versatile eHMIs for Cyclists. In Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 213–223. https://doi.org/10.1145/3580585.3607161
[5]
Ashratuz Zavin Asha, Fahim Anzum, Patrick Finn, Ehud Sharlin, and Mario Costa Sousa. 2020. Designing External Automotive Displays: VR Prototypes and Analysis. In 12th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 74–82. https://doi.org/10.1145/3409120.3410658
[6]
Siri Hegna Berge, Joost de Winter, and Marjan Hagenzieker. 2023. Support systems for cyclists in automated traffic: A review and future outlook. Applied Ergonomics 111 (9 2023), 104043. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2023.104043
[7]
Siri Hegna Berge, Marjan Hagenzieker, Haneen Farah, and Joost de Winter. 2022. Do cyclists need HMIs in future automated traffic? An interview study. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour 84 (1 2022), 33–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2021.11.013
[8]
Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke. 2006. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology 3, 2 (2006), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
[9]
Debargha Dey, Azra Habibovic, Andreas Löcken, Philipp Wintersberger, Bastian Pfleging, Andreas Riener, Marieke Martens, and Jacques Terken. 2020. Taming the eHMI jungle: A classification taxonomy to guide, compare, and assess the design principles of automated vehicles’ external human-machine interfaces. Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives 7 (9 2020), 100174. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TRIP.2020.100174
[10]
Debargha Dey, Azra Habibovic, Bastian Pfleging, Marieke Martens, and Jacques Terken. 2020. Color and Animation Preferences for a Light Band eHMI in Interactions Between Automated Vehicles and Pedestrians. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376325
[11]
Marjan P Hagenzieker, Sander Van Der Kint, Luuk Vissers, Ingrid N L G Van Schagen, Jonathan De Bruin, Paul Van Gent, Jacques J F Commandeur, Ã Marjan, and P Hagenzieker. 2019. Journal of Transportation Safety & Security Interactions between cyclists and automated vehicles: Results of a photo experiment Interactions between cyclists and automated vehicles: Results of a photo experiment. Journal of Transportation Safety & Security 12, 1 (2019), 94–115. https://doi.org/10.1080/19439962.2019.1591556
[12]
Ming Hou, Karthik Mahadevan, Sowmya Somanath, Ehud Sharlin, and Lora Oehlberg. 2020. Autonomous Vehicle-Cyclist Interaction: Peril and Promise. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376884
[13]
Liesbeth Huybrechts, Katrien Dreessen, and Selina Schepers. 2012. Mapping design practices. In Proceedings of the 12th Participatory Design Conference: Exploratory Papers, Workshop Descriptions, Industry Cases - Volume 2. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 29–32. https://doi.org/10.1145/2348144.2348155
[14]
Karthik Mahadevan, Sowmya Somanath, and Ehud Sharlin. 2018. Communicating Awareness and Intent in Autonomous Vehicle-Pedestrian Interaction. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Vol. 2018-April. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3174003
[15]
G. Markkula, R. Madigan, D. Nathanael, E. Portouli, Y. M. Lee, A. Dietrich, J. Billington, A. Schieben, and N. Merat. 2020. Defining interactions: a conceptual framework for understanding interactive behaviour in human and automated road traffic. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science 21, 6 (11 2020), 728–752. https://doi.org/10.1080/1463922X.2020.1736686
[16]
Andrii Matviienko, Swamy Ananthanarayan, Shadan Sadeghian Borojeni, Yannick Feld, Wilko Heuten, and Susanne Boll. 2018. Augmenting bicycles and helmets with multimodal warnings for children. In Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1145/3229434.3229479
[17]
Andrii Matviienko, Florian Müller, Dominik Schön, Paul Seesemann, Sebastian Günther, and Max Mühlhäuser. 2022. BikeAR: Understanding Cyclists’ Crossing Decision-Making at Uncontrolled Intersections using Augmented Reality. In CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1145/3491102.3517560
[18]
Hannah R.M. Pelikan. 2021. Why Autonomous Driving Is So Hard: The Social Dimension of Traffic. In Companion of the 2021 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 81–85. https://doi.org/10.1145/3434074.3447133
[19]
Petr Pokorny, Belma Skender, Torkel Bjørnskau, and Marjan P. Hagenzieker. 2021. Video observation of encounters between the automated shuttles and other traffic participants along an approach to right-hand priority T-intersection. European Transport Research Review 13, 1 (12 2021), 59. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12544-021-00518-x
[20]
Dirk Rothenbücher, Jamy Li, David Sirkin, Brian Mok, and Wendy Ju. 2015. Ghost driver. In Adjunct Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 44–49. https://doi.org/10.1145/2809730.2809755
[21]
Society for Automotive Engineers. 2021. SAE J3016 - Taxonomy and Definitions for Terms Related to Driving Automation Systems for On-Road Motor Vehicles.
[22]
Tamara von Sawitzky, Thomas Grauschopf, and Andreas Riener. 2021. “Attention! A Door Could Open.”—Introducing Awareness Messages for Cyclists to Safely Evade Potential Hazards. Multimodal Technologies and Interaction 6, 1 (12 2021), 3. https://doi.org/10.3390/mti6010003
[23]
Tamara von Sawitzky, Thomas Grauschopf, and Andreas Riener. 2022. Hazard Notifications for Cyclists: Comparison of Awareness Message Modalities in a Mixed Reality Study. 27th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces 22 (3 2022), 310–322. https://doi.org/10.1145/3490099.3511127

Index Terms

  1. Bike to the Future: Designing Holistic Autonomous Vehicle-Cyclist Interfaces

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Conferences
    AutomotiveUI '24: Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications
    September 2024
    438 pages
    ISBN:9798400705106
    DOI:10.1145/3640792
    This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution International 4.0 License.

    Sponsors

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 22 September 2024

    Check for updates

    Badges

    Author Tags

    1. Autonomous Vehicle-Cyclist Interaction
    2. Bicycle
    3. Cycling
    4. Participatory Design

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

    Funding Sources

    • European Research Council (ERC)

    Conference

    AutomotiveUI '24
    Sponsor:

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate 248 of 566 submissions, 44%

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • 0
      Total Citations
    • 173
      Total Downloads
    • Downloads (Last 12 months)173
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)55
    Reflects downloads up to 09 Jan 2025

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    View Options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    HTML Format

    View this article in HTML Format.

    HTML Format

    Login options

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media