skip to main content
10.1145/3638380.3638446acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesozchiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Open access

Broadening Participation and Insight in Codesign through Online Connectivity

Published: 10 May 2024 Publication History

Abstract

During the COVID lockdowns we moved our codesign activities, usually conducted in face-to-face workshops to online settings. We therefore created online adaptations of codesign techniques to achieve quality outputs. Fifty junior designers held virtual workshops with community participants to co-create a loneliness exhibition and a save-the-forest campaign. We argue that what we learned is of value for codesigning post lockdown. We found that online codesign broadens participation by supporting synchronous and asynchronous activities. Online participation helps those with time, mobility, or transport challenges, as they aren't limited to a single time slot or a physical venue, increasing possible participant numbers. Also, participating while isolated gave people a much-needed social connection. Our contribution demonstrates that online activities can contribute to positive, inclusive codesign evoking emotions, participation and empathy done with off-the-shelf software and people's existing technology. We propose the exploration of hybrid codesign to exploit the best of both worlds.

References

[1]
Charlotte Albrechtsen, Majbrit Pedersen, Nicholi Friis Pedersen, and Tine Wirenfeldt Jensen. 2017. Mobile Probes: Exploring the Work Processes and Everyday Life of Danish Students Writing Their Master's Thesis. SAGE Research Methods. SAGE Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781473971950
[2]
Peter Barker. 2017. How to Transform your Research into an Engaging Animation. Orinoco Communications, 4 December. https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/how-transform-your-research-engaging-animation-7-essential-barker?trk=portfolio_article-card_title. Accessed xx.
[3]
Jeffrey Boase and Lee Humphreys. 2018. Mobile methods: Explorations, innovations, and reflections. Mobile Media & Communication, 6, 2, 153–162. https://doi.org/10.1177/2050157918764215
[4]
Susanna Bødker and Martin Kyng. 2018. Participatory Design that Matters—Facing the Big Issues. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 25, 1, Article 4.
[5]
John Cacioppo and Stephanie Cacioppo. 2018. The Growing Problem of Loneliness. Correspondence, 391, 10119, 426. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(18)30142-9
[6]
Bert Carramans. 2018, Sentiment Analysis with Text Mining. Retrieved May 2023 from https://towardsdatascience.com/sentiment-analysis-with-text-mining-13dd2b33de27
[7]
John Carroll and Jordan Beck. 2019. Co-designing Platform Collectivism. CoDesign: International Journal of CoCreation in Design and the Arts, 15, 3, 272-287.
[8]
Paul M. Cozens. 2011. Urban planning and environmental criminology: Towards a new perspective for safer cities. Planning Practice & Research, 26, 4, 481–508.
[9]
Kirstein Daems, Ingrid Moons, and Patrick De Pelsmacker. 2017. Co-creating advertising literacy awareness campaigns for minors. Young Consumers, 18, 1, 54-69.
[10]
Annika Dean. 2019. Deforestation and Climate change. Retrieved May 2023 from, https://www.climatecouncil.org.au/deforestation/
[11]
James Durl, Jakob Trischler, and Timo Dietrich. 2017. Co-designing with young consumers – Reflections, challenges and benefits. Young Consumers. 18, 4. https://doi.org/10.1108/YC-08-2017-00725
[12]
David W. Eccles and Güler Arsal. 2017. The think aloud method: what is it and how do I use it? Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health, 9, 4, 514-531.
[13]
Pirjo Friedrick (nee Nakki). 2013. Web-based co-design. Social media tools to enhance user-centred design and innovation processes. Doctor of Science Thesis. Aalto University, School of Science. Dissertation 34. VTT.
[14]
Anne Forbes. 1996. Caring for older people: Loneliness. BMJ, 313, 352-354. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.313.7053.352
[15]
Douglas Harper. 2002. Talking about pictures: A case for photo elicitation. Visual studies, 17, 1, 13–26.
[16]
Sara Heitlinger, Nick Bryan-Kinns, and Rob Comber. 2019. The Right to the Sustainable Smart City. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Paper 287, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300517
[17]
Rachael Kelly. 2020. Learnings from remote Co-design. Symbiote, 14 September, 2020. https://www.symbiote.com.au/insights/learnings-from-remote-co-design. Accessed xx.
[18]
Jeawon Kim, Sharyn Rundle-Thiele, Kathy Knox, Kirsty Burke, and Svetlana Bogomolova. 2020. Consumer perspectives on household food waste reduction campaigns. Journal of Cleaner Production, 243 (10 January 2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118608
[19]
Samuel Lefever, Michael Dal, and Asrun Matthiasdottir. 2007. Online data collection in academic research: advantages and limitations. British Journal of Educational Technology, 38, 4, 574–582.
[20]
David Lindenmayer, and Tein McDonald. 2020. Large‐scale, long‐term ecosystem monitoring: Interview with David Lindenmayer. Ecological Management & Restoration, 21, 1, 26–34. https://
[21]
Deborah Lupton (editor) 2020. Doing fieldwork in a pandemic (crowd-sourced document). Retrieved May 2023 from https://docs.google.com/document/d/1clGjGABB2h2qbduTgfqribHmog9B6P0NvMgVuiHZCl8/preview#heading=h.ze8ug1cqk5lo
[22]
Tuuli Mattelmäki, Eva Brandt and Kirsikka Vaajakallio. 2011. On designing open-ended interpretations for collaborative design exploration. CoDesign: International Journal of CoCreation in Design and the Arts, 7, 2, 79-93.
[23]
Mental Health Foundation. 2020. Loneliness during Coronavirus. Retrieved May 2023 from https://www.mentalhealth.org.uk/coronavirus/coping-with-loneliness
[24]
Prijo Näkki and Maria Antikainen. 2008. Online Tools for Co-design: User Involvement through the Innovation Process. In Proceedings of NordiCHI 2008 Workshops: New Approaches to Requirements Elicitation & How Can HCI Improve Social Media Development?. Norway: Tapir akademisk forlag, 92-97.
[25]
Vicki O'Day, Daniel Bobrow, Kimberley Bobrow and Mark Shirley. 1998. Moving Practice: From Classrooms to MOO Rooms. Computer Supported Cooperative Work: The Journal of Collaborative Computing, 7, 9-45.
[26]
Jeni Paay, Simone Taffe and Sonja Pedell. 2023. Building relationships with remote participants through playful technology interactions in online codesign. Design and Technology Education, 28, 1, 77-99.
[27]
Parliament of Victoria. 2020. Bushfires 2019-20. Retrieved May 2023 from https://www.parliament.vic.gov.au/publications/research-papers/download/36-research-papers/13904-bushfires-2019-20
[28]
Celeste L. Paul. 2008. A modified Delphi approach to a new card sorting methodology. Journal of Usability studies, 4, 1, 7–30.
[29]
Maureen Placente. 2019. How to run a remote-friendly co-design. Optimal Workshop, 13 December, 2019. https://blog.optimalworkshop.com/how-to-run-a-remote-friendly-co-design/
[30]
Portable (2020). Remote Design Research – How to connect with your users and codesign online. Portable Webinar, 25 March 2020. https://www.portable.com.au/events/remote-design-research-webinar.
[31]
Michael Prilla, Oliver Blunk and Irene-Angelica Chounta. 2020. How Does Collaborative Reflection Unfold in Online Communities? An Analysis of Two Data Sets. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), 29, 697-741.
[32]
Eleanor Ringrose. 2020. Running a Remote Co-design. Medium-Future Friendly, 12 May, 2020. https://medium.com/futurefriendly/running-a-remote-co-design-4303e9f3ff52.
[33]
Elizabeth B. N. Sanders, and Pieter J. Stappers. 2008. Co-creation and the new landscapes of design. CoDesign: International Journal of CoCreation in Design and the Arts, 4, 1, 5-18.
[34]
Elizabeth B. N. Sanders, and Pieter Jan Stappers. 2014. Probes, toolkits and prototypes: three approaches to making in codesigning. CoDesign: International Journal of CoCreation in Design and the Arts, 10, 1, 5-14.
[35]
Andi Setiawan, Nick Dunn, and Leon Cruickshank. 2018. The Influence of Collective Culture on Co-design Practice in Indonesian Cities: Case Studies from Jakarta, Solo, and Malang. The International Journal of Architectonic, Spatial, and Environmental Design, 12, 4, 25–35.
[36]
Tilman von Soest, Maike Luhmann, Thomas Hansen, and Denis Gerstorf. 2018. Development of loneliness in midlife and old age: Its nature and correlates. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 118, 2, 388–406. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000219
[37]
Marc Steen, Menno Manschot, and Nicole De Koning. 2011. Benefits of co-design in service design projects. International Journal of Design, 5, 2.
[38]
Casey Swezey and Janet Vertesi. 2019. Working Apart, Together: The Challenges of Co-Work. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact. 3, CSCW, Article 204 (November 2019), 22 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3359306
[39]
Simone Taffe. 2018. Generate don't evaluate: how can codesign benefit communication designers? CoDesign: International Journal of CoCreation in Design and the Arts, 14, 4, 345-365. 
[40]
Kirsikka Vaajakallio and Tuuli Mattelmäki. 2014. Design games in codesign: as a tool, a mindset and a structure. CoDesign: International Journal of CoCreation in Design and the Arts, 10, 1, 63-77. 
[41]
Greg Walsh, Alison Druin, Mona Leigh Guha, Elizabeth Bonsignore, Elizabeth Foss, Jason Yip, Evan Golub, Tamara Clegg, Quincy Brown, Robin Brewer, Asmi Joshi, and Richelle Brown. 2012. DisCo: A co-design online tool for asynchronous distributed child and adult design partners. In Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Interaction Design and Children (IDC ’12). New York: ACM.
[42]
World Wildlfe Fund. 2015. 11 of the world's most threatened forests. Retrieved May 2023 from https://www.worldwildlife.org/stories/11-of-the-world-s-most-threatened-forests
[43]
Kevin B. Wright. 2005. Researching Internet-Based Populations: Advantages and Disadvantages of Online Survey Research, Online Questionnaire Authoring Software Packages, and Web Survey Services. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 10, 3, JCMC1034. 
[44]
Ceylan Yeginsu. 2018. UK Appoints a Minister for Loneliness. Retrieved May 2023 from https://www.nytimes.com/2018/01/17/world/europe/uk-britain-loneliness.html
[45]
Jingwen Zhang, Christopher Calabrese, Jiey Ding, Mingxuan Liu, and Biying Zhang. 2018. Advantages and challenges in using mobile apps for field experiments: A systematic review and a case study. Mobile Media Commun. 6, 2, 179-196. https://doi.org/10.1177/2050157917725550

Index Terms

  1. Broadening Participation and Insight in Codesign through Online Connectivity

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    OzCHI '23: Proceedings of the 35th Australian Computer-Human Interaction Conference
    December 2023
    733 pages
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 10 May 2024

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. Collaborative digital platforms
    2. Community engagement
    3. Learning codesign
    4. Online codesign
    5. Remote participation

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

    Conference

    OzCHI 2023
    OzCHI 2023: OzCHI 2023
    December 2 - 6, 2023
    Wellington, New Zealand

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate 362 of 729 submissions, 50%

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • 0
      Total Citations
    • 115
      Total Downloads
    • Downloads (Last 12 months)115
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)19
    Reflects downloads up to 05 Feb 2025

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    View Options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    HTML Format

    View this article in HTML Format.

    HTML Format

    Login options

    Figures

    Tables

    Media

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media