skip to main content
10.1145/3626772.3657794acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesirConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Open access

Fairness-Aware Exposure Allocation via Adaptive Reranking

Published: 11 July 2024 Publication History

Abstract

In the first stage of a re-ranking pipeline, an inexpensive ranking model is typically deployed to retrieve a set of documents that are highly likely to be relevant to the user's query. The retrieved documents are then re-ranked by a more effective but expensive ranking model, e.g., a deep neural ranker such as BERT. However, in such a standard pipeline, no new documents are typically discovered after the first stage retrieval. Hence, the amount of exposure that a particular group of documents - e.g., documents from a particular demographic category - can receive is limited by the number of documents that are retrieved in the first stage retrieval. Indeed, if too few documents from a group are retrieved in the first stage retrieval, ensuring that the group receives a fair amount of exposure to the user may become infeasible. Therefore, it is useful to identify more documents from underrepresented groups that are potentially relevant to the query during the re-ranking stage. In this work, we investigate how deploying adaptive re-ranking, which enables the discovery of additional potentially relevant documents in the re-ranking stage, can improve the exposure that a given group of documents receives in the final ranking. We propose six adaptive re-ranking policies that can discover documents from underrepresented groups to increase the disadvantaged groups' exposure in the final ranking. Our experiments on the TREC 2021 and 2022 Fair Ranking Track test collections show that our policies consistently improve the fairness of the exposure distribution in the final ranking, compared to standard adaptive re-ranking approaches, resulting in increases of up to ~13% in Attention Weighted Ranked Fairness (AWRF). Moreover, our best performing policy, Policy 6, consistently maintains and frequently increases the utility of the search results in terms of nDCG.

References

[1]
Hervé Abdi. 2010. Coefficient of variation. Encyclopedia of research design, Vol. 1, 5 (2010).
[2]
Qingyao Ai, Keping Bi, Cheng Luo, Jiafeng Guo, and W Bruce Croft. 2018. Unbiased learning to rank with unbiased propensity estimation. In Proc. of SIGIR.
[3]
Kevin Clark, Minh-Thang Luong, Quoc V Le, and Christopher D Manning. 2019. ELECTRA: Pre-training Text Encoders as Discriminators Rather Than Generators. In Proc. of ICLR.
[4]
Nick Craswell, Onno Zoeter, Michael Taylor, and Bill Ramsey. 2008. An experimental comparison of click position-bias models. In Proc. of WSDM.
[5]
Van Dang and W Bruce Croft. 2012. Diversity by proportionality: an election-based approach to search result diversification. In Proc. of SIGIR.
[6]
Jacob Devlin, Ming-Wei Chang, Kenton Lee, and Kristina Toutanova. 2019. BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understanding. In Proc. of NAACL.
[7]
Fernando Diaz, Bhaskar Mitra, Michael D Ekstrand, Asia J Biega, and Ben Carterette. 2020. Evaluating stochastic rankings with expected exposure. In Proc. of CIKM.
[8]
Michael D Ekstrand, Robin Burke, and Fernando Diaz. 2019. Fairness and discrimination in retrieval and recommendation. In Proc. of SIGIR.
[9]
Michael D. Ekstrand, Graham McDonald, Amifa Raj, and Isaac Johnson. 2022a. Overview of the TREC 2021 Fair Ranking Track. In Proc. of TREC.
[10]
Michael D. Ekstrand, Graham McDonald, Amifa Raj, and Isaac Johnson. 2022b. Overview of the TREC 2022 Fair Ranking Track. In Proc. of TREC.
[11]
Erlend Frayling, Sean MacAvaney, Craig Macdonald, and Iadh Ounis. 2024. Effective Adhoc Retrieval Through Traversal of a Query-Document Graph. In Proc. of ECIR.
[12]
Maria Heuss, Fatemeh Sarvi, and Maarten de Rijke. 2022. Fairness of Exposure in Light of Incomplete Exposure Estimation. In Proc. of SIGIR.
[13]
Sebastian Hofst"atter and Allan Hanbury. 2019. Let's measure run time! Extending the IR replicability infrastructure to include performance aspects. In Proc. of OSIRRC @ SIGIR.
[14]
Sebastian Hofst"atter, Sheng-Chieh Lin, Jheng-Hong Yang, Jimmy Lin, and Allan Hanbury. 2021. Efficiently teaching an effective dense retriever with balanced topic aware sampling. In Proc. of SIGIR.
[15]
Thomas Jaenich, Graham McDonald, and Iadh Ounis. 2023. ColBERT-FairPRF: Towards Fair Pseudo-Relevance Feedback in Dense Retrieval. In Proc. of ECIR.
[16]
Thomas Jaenich, Graham McDonald, and Iadh Ounis. 2024. Query Exposure Prediction for Groups of Documents in Rankings. In Proc. of ECIR.
[17]
Kalervo J"arvelin and Jaana Kek"al"ainen. 2002. Cumulated gain-based evaluation of IR techniques. ACM Transactions on Information Systems (TOIS), Vol. 20, 4 (2002), 422--446.
[18]
Thorsten Joachims, Adith Swaminathan, and Tobias Schnabel. 2017. Unbiased learning-to-rank with biased feedback. In Proc. of WSDM.
[19]
Solomon Kullback and Richard A Leibler. 1951. On information and sufficiency. The annals of mathematical statistics, Vol. 22, 1 (1951), 79--86.
[20]
Jimmy Lin, Rodrigo Nogueira, and Andrew Yates. 2022. Pretrained transformers for text ranking: Bert and beyond. Springer Nature.
[21]
Sean MacAvaney, Nicola Tonellotto, and Craig Macdonald. 2022a. Adaptive Re-Ranking as an Information-Seeking Agent. In Proc. of PASIR @ CIKM.
[22]
Sean MacAvaney, Nicola Tonellotto, and Craig Macdonald. 2022b. Adaptive re-ranking with a corpus graph. In Proc. of CIKM.
[23]
Craig Macdonald, Rodrygo LT Santos, and Iadh Ounis. 2013. The whens and hows of learning to rank for web search. Information Retrieval, Vol. 16 (2013), 584--628.
[24]
Craig Macdonald, Nicola Tonellotto, Sean MacAvaney, and Iadh Ounis. 2021. PyTerrier: Declarative experimentation in Python from BM25 to dense retrieval. In Proc. of CIKM.
[25]
Graham McDonald, Craig Macdonald, and Iadh Ounis. 2022. Search results diversification for effective fair ranking in academic search. Information Retrieval Journal, Vol. 25, 1 (2022), 1--26.
[26]
Marco Morik, Ashudeep Singh, Jessica Hong, and Thorsten Joachims. 2020. Controlling fairness and bias in dynamic learning-to-rank. In Proc. of SIGIR.
[27]
Rodrigo Nogueira, Zhiying Jiang, Ronak Pradeep, and Jimmy Lin. 2020. Document Ranking with a Pretrained Sequence-to-Sequence Model. In Proc. of Findings of EMNLP.
[28]
Rodrigo Nogueira, Wei Yang, Kyunghyun Cho, and Jimmy Lin. 2019. Multi-stage document ranking with BERT. arXiv preprint arXiv:1910.14424 (2019).
[29]
Harrie Oosterhuis and Maarten de Rijke. 2020. Policy-aware unbiased learning to rank for top-k rankings. In Proc. of SIGIR.
[30]
Dino Pedreshi, Salvatore Ruggieri, and Franco Turini. 2008. Discrimination-aware data mining. In Proc. of KDD.
[31]
Stephen E Robertson, Steve Walker, Susan Jones, Micheline M Hancock-Beaulieu, Mike Gatford, et al. 1995. Okapi at TREC-3. Nist Special Publication Sp, Vol. 109 (1995), 109.
[32]
LT Rodrygo, Craig Macdonald, and Iadh Ounis. 2015. Search result diversification. Foundations and Trends in Information Retrieval, Vol. 9, 1 (2015), 1--90.
[33]
Piotr Sapiezynski, Wesley Zeng, Ronald E Robertson, Alan Mislove, and Christo Wilson. 2019. Quantifying the impact of user attentionon fair group representation in ranked lists. In Proc. of Companion Proceedings of WWW.
[34]
Fatemeh Sarvi, Maria Heuss, Mohammad Aliannejadi, Sebastian Schelter, and Maarten de Rijke. 2022. Understanding and Mitigating the Effect of Outliers in Fair Ranking. In Proc. of WSDM.
[35]
Ashudeep Singh and Thorsten Joachims. 2018. Fairness of exposure in rankings. In Proc. of KDD.
[36]
Nicola Tonellotto, Craig Macdonald, Iadh Ounis, et al. 2018. Efficient query processing for scalable web search. Foundations and Trends® in Information Retrieval, Vol. 12, 4--5 (2018), 319--500.
[37]
Nicolas Usunier, Virginie Do, and Elvis Dohmatob. 2022. Fast online ranking with fairness of exposure. In Proc. of FAccT.
[38]
Xuanhui Wang, Nadav Golbandi, Michael Bendersky, Donald Metzler, and Marc Najork. 2018. Position bias estimation for unbiased learning to rank in personal search. In Proc. of ICWSM.
[39]
Haolun Wu, Bhaskar Mitra, Chen Ma, Fernando Diaz, and Xue Liu. 2022. Joint multisided exposure fairness for recommendation. In Proc. of SIGIR.
[40]
Meike Zehlike, Francesco Bonchi, Carlos Castillo, Sara Hajian, Mohamed Megahed, and Ricardo Baeza-Yates. 2017. Fa*ir: A fair top-k ranking algorithm. In Proc. of CIKM.

Index Terms

  1. Fairness-Aware Exposure Allocation via Adaptive Reranking

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Conferences
    SIGIR '24: Proceedings of the 47th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval
    July 2024
    3164 pages
    ISBN:9798400704314
    DOI:10.1145/3626772
    This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution International 4.0 License.

    Sponsors

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 11 July 2024

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. adaptive re-ranking
    2. exposure
    3. group fairness

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article

    Conference

    SIGIR 2024
    Sponsor:

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate 792 of 3,983 submissions, 20%

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • 0
      Total Citations
    • 181
      Total Downloads
    • Downloads (Last 12 months)181
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)73
    Reflects downloads up to 14 Sep 2024

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    View Options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Get Access

    Login options

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media