GlucoMaker: Enabling Collaborative Customization of Glucose Monitors
Authors: 
Sabrina Lakhdhir, Chehak Nayar, Fraser Anderson, Helene Fournier, Liisa Holsti, Irina Kondratova, Charles Perin, Sowmya SomanathAuthors Info & Claims
Sabrina Lakhdhir, Chehak Nayar, Fraser Anderson, Helene Fournier, Liisa Holsti, Irina Kondratova, Charles Perin, Sowmya SomanathAuthors Info & ClaimsArticle No.: 127, Pages 1 - 21
Abstract
Millions of individuals with diabetes use glucose monitors to track blood sugar levels. Research shows that such individuals seek to customize different aspects of their interactions with these devices, including how they engage with, decorate, and wear them. However, it remains challenging to tailor both device form and function to accommodate individual needs. To address this challenge, we introduce GlucoMaker, a system for collaboratively customizing physical design aspects of glucose monitors. Prior to designing GlucoMaker, we conducted a prototyping and focus group study to understand customization preferences and collaboration benefits. GlucoMaker provides individuals with the ability to a) select monitor form and function preferences, b) alter predefined and downloadable digital model files, c) receive feedback on monitor designs from stakeholders, and d) learn technical design aspects. We further demonstrate the versatility and design space of GlucoMaker with three examples of different form and function use cases.
Supplemental Material
MP4 File - Video Preview
Video Preview
- Download
- 60.66 MB
- Download
- 254.54 MB
- Transcript
MP4 File - Supplementary video
This video demonstrates the use of our system, GlucoMaker, for the collaborative design and fabrication of three unique, custom glucose monitors.
- Download
- 291.80 MB
ZIP File - Study materials
This folder contains the set of materials that were used throughout our study. While these materials are referenced and briefly explained in the paper, we include them as supplementary materials to provide a more complete understanding of how our study was designed and conducted, and what types of information were collected. We include a list of prototyping materials participants were provided, the requirements table that participants engaged with, and the workbook that participants worked through during the design phase. The README includes additional details about each of the included files.
- Download
- 260.18 KB
References
[1]
2022. Arduino projects. https://create.arduino.cc/projecthub
[2]
2022. Digital designs for physical objects. https://www.thingiverse.com/
[3]
2022. Fun Electronic Projects. https://learn.adafruit.com/guides/projects
[4]
2022. Yours for the making. https://www.instructables.com/
[5]
[5] 2023. https://www.dexcom.com/en-us/continuous-glucose-monitoring
[6]
[6] 2023. https://www.freestyle.abbott/ca-en/learn/continuous-glucose-monitoring.html
[7]
[7] 2023. https://www.autodesk.ca/en/products/fusion-360/overview
[8]
[8] 2023. https://www.solidworks.com/
[9]
[9] 2023. https://miro.com/
[10]
[10] 2023. https://www.fablabs.io/
[11]
2023. Diabetes treatment - CGM systems. https://www.medtronic.com/ca-en/diabetes/home/products/cgm-systems.html
[12]
Leila Aflatoony and Su Jin (Susan) Lee. 2020. AT Makers: A Multidisciplinary Approach to Co-Designing Assistive Technologies by Co-Optimizing Expert Knowledge. In Proceedings of the 16th Participatory Design Conference 2020 - Participation(s) Otherwise - Volume 2 (Manizales, Colombia) (PDC ’20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 128–132. https://doi.org/10.1145/3384772.3385158
[13]
Leila Aflatoony, Su Jin Lee, and Jon Sanford. 2023. Collective making: Co-designing 3D printed assistive technologies with occupational therapists, designers, and end-users. Assistive Technology 35, 2 (2023), 153–162. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400435.2021.1983070 arXiv:https://doi.org/10.1080/10400435.2021.1983070PMID: 34550049.
[14]
Erman Akyol, Roberta Cabral Cabral Ramos Mota, and Sowmya Somanath. 2021. DiaFit: Designing Customizable Wearables for Type 1 Diabetes Monitoring. In Extended Abstracts of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Yokohama, Japan) (CHI EA ’21). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 437, 6 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3411763.3451716
[15]
Rahaf Alharbi, Ada Ng, Rawan Alharbi, and Josiah Hester. 2020. "I Am Not an Engineer": Understanding How Clinicians Design & Alter Assistive Technology. In Extended Abstracts of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Honolulu, HI, USA) (CHI EA ’20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1145/3334480.3382982
[16]
Abul Al Arabi, Jiahao Li, Xiang ’Anthony Chen, and Jeeeun Kim. 2022. Mobiot: Augmenting Everyday Objects into Moving IoT Devices Using 3D Printed Attachments Generated by Demonstration. In Proceedings of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (New Orleans, LA, USA) (CHI ’22). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 273, 14 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3491102.3517645
[17]
Lora Arduser. 2018. Impatient Patients: A DIY Usability Approach in Diabetes Wearable Technologies. Commun. Des. Q. Rev 5, 4 (feb 2018), 31–39. https://doi.org/10.1145/3188387.3188390
[18]
Muhammad Asad, Usman Qamar, Aimal Khan, and Rahmat Ullah Safdar. 2019. A Systematic Literature Review of Continuous Blood Glucose Monitoring and Suggesting the Quantity of Insulin or Artificial Pancreas (AP) for Diabetic Type 1 Patients. In Proceedings of the 2019 11th International Conference on Machine Learning and Computing (Zhuhai, China) (ICMLC ’19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 539–545. https://doi.org/10.1145/3318299.3318352
[19]
[19] Autodesk. 2023. https://www.tinkercad.com/
[20]
Amid Ayobi, Katarzyna Stawarz, Dmitri Katz, Paul Marshall, Taku Yamagata, Raul Santos-Rodriguez, Peter Flach, and Aisling Ann O’Kane. 2021. Co-Designing Personal Health? Multidisciplinary Benefits and Challenges in Informing Diabetes Self-Care Technologies. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact. 5, CSCW2, Article 457 (oct 2021), 26 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3479601
[21]
Linden J. Ball, Bo T. Christensen, and Kim Halskov. 2021. Sticky notes as a kind of design material: How sticky notes support design cognition and design collaboration. Design Studies 76 (2021), 101034. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2021.101034
[22]
Katharine D Barnard, Tim Wysocki, Hood Thabit, Mark L Evans, Stephanie Amiel, Simon Heller, Amanda Young, Roman Hovorka, and Angela Consortium. 2015. Psychosocial aspects of closed-and open-loop insulin delivery: closing the loop in adults with Type 1 diabetes in the home setting. Diabetic Medicine 32, 5 (2015), 601–608.
[23]
Andrew B.L. Berry, Catherine Y. Lim, Calvin A. Liang, Andrea L. Hartzler, Tad Hirsch, Dawn M. Ferguson, Zoë A. Bermet, and James D. Ralston. 2021. Supporting Collaborative Reflection on Personal Values and Health. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact. 5, CSCW2, Article 299 (oct 2021), 39 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3476040
[24]
Richard E Boyatzis. 1998. Transforming qualitative information: Thematic analysis and code development. sage.
[25]
Julian Brinkley, Brianna Posadas, Julia Woodward, and Juan E. Gilbert. 2017. Opinions and Preferences of Blind and Low Vision Consumers Regarding Self-Driving Vehicles: Results of Focus Group Discussions. In Proceedings of the 19th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility (Baltimore, Maryland, USA) (ASSETS ’17). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 290–299. https://doi.org/10.1145/3132525.3132532
[26]
Oğuz ’Oz’ Buruk, Çağlar Genç, undefinedhsan Ozan Yıldırım, Mehmet Cengiz Onbaşlı, and Oğuzhan Özcan. 2021. Snowflakes: A Prototyping Tool for Computational Jewelry. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Yokohama, Japan) (CHI ’21). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 636, 15 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3411764.3445173
[27]
Antonella Camilleri, Sanja Dogramadzi, and Praminda Caleb-Solly. 2022. Learning from Carers to Inform the Design of Safe Physically Assistive Robots - Insights from a Focus Group Study. In Proceedings of the 2022 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan) (HRI ’22). IEEE Press, 703–707.
[28]
Yoon Jeong Cha, Arpita Saxena, Alice Wou, Joyce Lee, Mark W Newman, and Sun Young Park. 2022. Transitioning Toward Independence: Enhancing Collaborative Self-Management of Children with Type 1 Diabetes. In Proceedings of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (New Orleans, LA, USA) (CHI ’22). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 522, 17 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3491102.3502055
[29]
Yunan Chen. 2010. Take It Personally: Accounting for Individual Difference in Designing Diabetes Management Systems. In Proceedings of the 8th ACM Conference on Designing Interactive Systems (Aarhus, Denmark) (DIS ’10). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 252–261. https://doi.org/10.1145/1858171.1858218
[30]
Loubna Chhiba, Sidqui Mustapha, and Abdelaziz Marzak. 2019. Design of a Non-Invasive Blood Glucose Meter Connected to an Android Diabetes Monitoring Application. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Smart City Applications (Casablanca, Morocco) (SCA ’19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 44, 5 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3368756.3369022
[31]
Bo T. Christensen, Kim Halskov, and Clemens N. Klokmose. 2020. Chapter 1 - The properties of sticky notes for collaborative creativity: An introduction. In Sticky Creativity, Bo T. Christensen, Kim Halskov, and Clemens N. Klokmose (Eds.). Academic Press, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-816566-9.00001-X
[32]
Chia-Fang Chung, Kristin Dew, Allison Cole, Jasmine Zia, James Fogarty, Julie A. Kientz, and Sean A. Munson. 2016. Boundary Negotiating Artifacts in Personal Informatics: Patient-Provider Collaboration with Patient-Generated Data. In Proceedings of the 19th ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing (San Francisco, California, USA) (CSCW ’16). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 770–786. https://doi.org/10.1145/2818048.2819926
[33]
Pooja M. Desai, Elliot G. Mitchell, Maria L. Hwang, Matthew E. Levine, David J. Albers, and Lena Mamykina. 2019. Personal Health Oracle: Explorations of Personalized Predictions in Diabetes Self-Management. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Glasgow, Scotland Uk) (CHI ’19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300600
[34]
Daniel DeSalvo and Bruce Buckingham. 2013. Continuous glucose monitoring: current use and future directions. Current diabetes reports 13 (2013), 657–662.
[35]
L Dowling, EG Wilmot, and P Choudhary. 2020. Do-it-yourself closed-loop systems for people living with type 1 diabetes. Diabetic Medicine 37, 12 (2020), 1977–1980.
[36]
Liam Drew. 2023. A DIY “Bionic Pancreas” is changing diabetes care - what’s next?https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-023-02648-9
[37]
Melissa Eadie and Robert J. Steele. 2017. Non-Invasive Blood Glucose Monitoring and Data Analytics. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Compute and Data Analysis (Lakeland, FL, USA) (ICCDA ’17). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 138–142. https://doi.org/10.1145/3093241.3093283
[38]
[38] International Diabetes Federation. 2023. https://idf.org/about-diabetes/type-1-diabetes/
[39]
Sissi De Flaviis. 2023. Global diabetes cases could soar to 1.3 billion by 2050, New Study says. https://beta.ctvnews.ca/national/health/2023/6/23/1_6454062.amp.html
[40]
Sean Follmer, David Carr, Emily Lovell, and Hiroshi Ishii. 2010. CopyCAD: Remixing Physical Objects with Copy and Paste from the Real World. In Adjunct Proceedings of the 23nd Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (New York, New York, USA) (UIST ’10). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 381–382. https://doi.org/10.1145/1866218.1866230
[41]
Sean Follmer and Hiroshi Ishii. 2012. KidCAD: Digitally Remixing Toys through Tangible Tools. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Austin, Texas, USA) (CHI ’12). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 2401–2410. https://doi.org/10.1145/2207676.2208403
[42]
[42] Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 2022. https://www.cdc.gov/diabetes/managing/manage-blood-sugar.html
[43]
Noreen Frisch, Pat Atherton, Mary M Doyle-Waters, Martha LP MacLeod, Anastasia Mallidou, Vanessa Sheane, John Ward, and Jinelle Woodley. 2020. Patient-oriented research competencies in health (PORCH) for researchers, patients, healthcare providers, and decision-makers: results of a scoping review. Research involvement and engagement 6, 1 (2020), 1–14.
[44]
Satish K Garg and Halis K Akturk. 2017. The future of continuous glucose monitoring.
[45]
F. Gemperle, C. Kasabach, J. Stivoric, M. Bauer, and R. Martin. 1998. Design for wearability. In Digest of Papers. Second International Symposium on Wearable Computers (Cat. No.98EX215). 116–122. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISWC.1998.729537
[46]
Amy M. Gill and Blair Nonnecke. 2012. Think Aloud: Effects and Validity. In Proceedings of the 30th ACM International Conference on Design of Communication (Seattle, Washington, USA) (SIGDOC ’12). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 31–36. https://doi.org/10.1145/2379057.2379065
[47]
Rúben Gouveia and Daniel A. Epstein. 2023. This Watchface Fits with My Tattoos: Investigating Customisation Needs and Preferences in Personal Tracking. In Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Hamburg, Germany) (CHI ’23). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 327, 15 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3544548.3580955
[48]
Luke Hale, Emma Linley, and Deepak M Kalaskar. 2020. A digital workflow for design and fabrication of bespoke orthoses using 3D scanning and 3D printing, a patient-based case study. Scientific reports 10, 1 (2020), 7028.
[49]
Bjoern Hartmann. 2005. d. tools: Visually prototyping physical UIs through statecharts. In Proceedings of UIST 2005.
[50]
Megan Hofmann, Julie Burke, Jon Pearlman, Goeran Fiedler, Andrea Hess, Jon Schull, Scott E Hudson, and Jennifer Mankoff. 2016. Clinical and maker perspectives on the design of assistive technology with rapid prototyping technologies. In Proceedings of the 18th international ACM SIGACCESS conference on computers and accessibility. 251–256.
[51]
Megan Hofmann, Kristin Williams, Toni Kaplan, Stephanie Valencia, Gabriella Hann, Scott E. Hudson, Jennifer Mankoff, and Patrick Carrington. 2019. "Occupational Therapy is Making": Clinical Rapid Prototyping and Digital Fabrication. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Glasgow, Scotland Uk) (CHI ’19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300544
[52]
Anna Holubová, Martina Vlasáková, Jan Mužík, and Jan Brož. 2019. Customizing the types of technologies used by patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus for diabetes treatment: Case series on patient experience. JMIR mHealth and uHealth 7, 7 (2019), e11527.
[53]
Sam James, Miranda Armstrong, Zahraa Abdallah, and Aisling Ann O’Kane. 2023. Chronic Care in a Life Transition: Challenges and Opportunities for Artificial Intelligence to Support Young Adults With Type 1 Diabetes Moving to University. In Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Hamburg, Germany) (CHI ’23). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 559, 16 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3544548.3580901
[54]
Mads Møller Jensen, Roman Rädle, Clemens N. Klokmose, and Susanne Bodker. 2018. Remediating a Design Tool: Implications of Digitizing Sticky Notes. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Montreal QC, Canada) (CHI ’18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3173798
[55]
Lee Jones, Alaa Nousir, Tom Everrett, and Sara Nabil. 2023. Libraries of Things: Understanding the Challenges of Sharing Tangible Collections and the Opportunities for HCI. In Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Hamburg, Germany) (CHI ’23). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 430, 18 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3544548.3581094
[56]
Jscad. 2023. JSCAD/openjscad.org: JSCAD is an open source set of modular, browser and command line tools for creating parametric 2D and 3D designs with JavaScript code. it provides a quick, precise and reproducible method for generating 3D models, and is especially useful for 3D printing applications.https://github.com/jscad/OpenJSCAD.org
[57]
Shaun K. Kane, Amy Hurst, Erin Buehler, Patrick A. Carrington, and Michele A. Williams. 2014. Collaboratively Designing Assistive Technology. Interactions 21, 2 (mar 2014), 78–81. https://doi.org/10.1145/2566462
[58]
Dmitri S. Katz, Blaine A. Price, Simon Holland, and Nicholas Sheep Dalton. 2018. Data, Data Everywhere, and Still Too Hard to Link: Insights from User Interactions with Diabetes Apps. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Montreal QC, Canada) (CHI ’18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3174077
[59]
Xiao Ying Khor, Joseph M Pappachan, and Mohammad Sadiq Jeeyavudeen. 2023. Individualized diabetes care: Lessons from the real-world experience. World Journal of Clinical Cases 11, 13 (2023), 2890.
[60]
Jarrod Knibbe, Tovi Grossman, and George Fitzmaurice. 2015. Smart Makerspace: An Immersive Instructional Space for Physical Tasks. In Proceedings of the 2015 International Conference on Interactive Tabletops & Surfaces (Madeira, Portugal) (ITS ’15). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 83–92. https://doi.org/10.1145/2817721.2817741
[61]
Stacey Kuznetsov and Eric Paulos. 2010. Rise of the Expert Amateur: DIY Projects, Communities, and Cultures. In Proceedings of the 6th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction: Extending Boundaries (Reykjavik, Iceland) (NordiCHI ’10). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 295–304. https://doi.org/10.1145/1868914.1868950
[62]
Matthew Lakier, Michelle Annett, and Daniel Wigdor. 2018. Automatics: Dynamically Generating Fabrication Tasks to Adapt to Varying Contexts. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. 25, 4, Article 22 (aug 2018), 44 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3185065
[63]
Udaya Lakshmi, Megan Hofmann, Stephanie Valencia, Lauren Wilcox, Jennifer Mankoff, and Rosa I. Arriaga. 2019. "Point-of-Care Manufacturing": Maker Perspectives on Digital Fabrication in Medical Practice. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact. 3, CSCW, Article 91 (nov 2019), 23 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3359193
[64]
David Ledo, Fraser Anderson, Ryan Schmidt, Lora Oehlberg, Saul Greenberg, and Tovi Grossman. 2017. Pineal: Bringing Passive Objects to Life with Embedded Mobile Devices. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Denver, Colorado, USA) (CHI ’17). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 2583–2593. https://doi.org/10.1145/3025453.3025652
[65]
David Ledo, Steven Houben, Jo Vermeulen, Nicolai Marquardt, Lora Oehlberg, and Saul Greenberg. 2018. Evaluation Strategies for HCI Toolkit Research. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Montreal QC, Canada) (CHI ’18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3173610
[66]
David Ledo, Jo Vermeulen, Sheelagh Carpendale, Saul Greenberg, Lora Oehlberg, and Sebastian Boring. 2019. Astral: Prototyping Mobile and Smart Object Interactive Behaviours Using Familiar Applications. In Proceedings of the 2019 on Designing Interactive Systems Conference. 711–724.
[67]
[67] Howard Look. 2023. https://www.tidepool.org/blog/tidepool-loop-has-received-fda-clearance
[68]
Emily Lovell and Leah Buechley. 2011. LilyPond: An Online Community for Sharing e-Textile Projects. In Proceedings of the 8th ACM Conference on Creativity and Cognition (Atlanta, Georgia, USA) (C&C ’11). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 365–366. https://doi.org/10.1145/2069618.2069698
[69]
Stephanie Ludi. 2007. Introducing Accessibility Requirements through External Stakeholder Utilization in an Undergraduate Requirements Engineering Course. In Proceedings of the 29th International Conference on Software Engineering(ICSE ’07). IEEE Computer Society, USA, 736–743. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSE.2007.46
[70]
Mon Arjay Malbog and Noel Linsangan. 2018. Non-Invasive Glucose Meter for Android-Based Devices. In Proceedings of the 2018 10th International Conference on Computer and Automation Engineering (Brisbane, Australia) (ICCAE 2018). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 161–165. https://doi.org/10.1145/3192975.3192979
[71]
Lena Mamykina, Elizabeth M. Heitkemper, Arlene M. Smaldone, Rita Kukafka, Heather J. Cole-Lewis, Patricia G. Davidson, Elizabeth D. Mynatt, Andrea Cassells, Jonathan N. Tobin, and George Hripcsak. 2017. Personal Discovery in Diabetes Self-Management. J. of Biomedical Informatics 76, C (dec 2017), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbi.2017.09.013
[72]
Gillian M. McCarthy, Edgar R. Rodriguez Ramírez, and Brian J. Robinson. 2017. Participatory Design to Address Stigma with Adolescents with Type 1 Diabetes. In Proceedings of the 2017 Conference on Designing Interactive Systems (Edinburgh, United Kingdom) (DIS ’17). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 83–94. https://doi.org/10.1145/3064663.3064740
[73]
Samantha McDonald, Niara Comrie, Erin Buehler, Nicholas Carter, Braxton Dubin, Karen Gordes, Sandy McCombe-Waller, and Amy Hurst. 2016. Uncovering Challenges and Opportunities for 3D Printing Assistive Technology with Physical Therapists. In Proceedings of the 18th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility (Reno, Nevada, USA) (ASSETS ’16). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 131–139. https://doi.org/10.1145/2982142.2982162
[74]
LH Messer, R Johnson, KA Driscoll, and J Jones. 2018. Best friend or spy: a qualitative meta-synthesis on the impact of continuous glucose monitoring on life with type 1 diabetes. Diabetic Medicine 35, 4 (2018), 409–418.
[75]
L Kurt Midyett. 2023. One Size Fits All Versus Individualized Medicine in Type 1 Diabetes Management. Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics 25, S3 (2023), S–42.
[76]
Betsy Phillips M.S. and Hongxin Zhao Ph.D.1993. Predictors of Assistive Technology Abandonment. Assistive Technology 5, 1 (1993), 36–45. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400435.1993.10132205 arXiv:https://doi.org/10.1080/10400435.1993.10132205PMID: 10171664.
[77]
Hyunjoo Oh, Tung D. Ta, Ryo Suzuki, Mark D. Gross, Yoshihiro Kawahara, and Lining Yao. 2018. PEP (3D Printed Electronic Papercrafts): An Integrated Approach for 3D Sculpting Paper-Based Electronic Devices. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Montreal QC, Canada) (CHI ’18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3174015
[78]
Aisling Ann O’Kane, Amy Hurst, Gerrit Niezen, Nicolai Marquardt, Jon Bird, and Gregory Abowd. 2016. Advances in DIY Health and Wellbeing. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (San Jose, California, USA) (CHI EA ’16). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 3453–3460. https://doi.org/10.1145/2851581.2856467
[79]
Johanna Okerlund and David Wilson. 2019. DIY Assistive Technology for Others: Considering Social Impacts and Opportunities to Leverage HCI Techniques. In Proceedings of FabLearn 2019 (New York, NY, USA) (FL2019). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 152–155. https://doi.org/10.1145/3311890.3311914
[80]
Tom Owen, George Buchanan, and Harold Thimbleby. 2012. Understanding user requirements in take-home diabetes management technologies. In The 26th BCS Conference on Human Computer Interaction 26. 268–273.
[81]
Sharoda A. Paul and Madhu C. Reddy. 2010. Understanding Together: Sensemaking in Collaborative Information Seeking. In Proceedings of the 2010 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (Savannah, Georgia, USA) (CSCW ’10). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 321–330. https://doi.org/10.1145/1718918.1718976
[82]
Belinda Paulovich. 2015. Design to Improve the Health Education Experience: using participatory design methods in hospitals with clinicians and patients. Visible Language 49, 1-2 (2015).
[83]
Matthew Peveler, Jeramey Tyler, Dacoda B. Nelson, Renato Cerqueira, and Hui Su. 2020. Browser Based Digital Sticky Notes for Design Thinking. In Companion Publication of the 2020 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference (Eindhoven, Netherlands) (DIS’ 20 Companion). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 349–352. https://doi.org/10.1145/3393914.3395824
[84]
Isabelle ; T Vaillancourt Vanessa ; Débarges Béatrice ; Poirier Annie ; Prévost Karina ; Spence Claude Poitras, Marie-Eve ; Godbout. 2020. Step-by-step Strategies for an Integrated Patient-Oriented Research: Lessons Learned from a Multicentered Study. Science of Nursing and Health Practices / Science infirmière et pratiques en santé 3, 2 (2020), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.31770/2561-7516.1068
[85]
William H Polonsky and Danielle Hessler. 2013. What are the quality of life-related benefits and losses associated with real-time continuous glucose monitoring? A survey of current users. Diabetes technology & therapeutics 15, 4 (2013), 295–301.
[86]
Christian Quintero. 2022. A review: accessible technology through participatory design. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology 17, 4 (2022), 369–375.
[87]
Shriti Raj, Kelsey Toporski, Ashley Garrity, Joyce M. Lee, and Mark W. Newman. 2019. "My Blood Sugar is Higher on the Weekends": Finding a Role for Context and Context-Awareness in the Design of Health Self-Management Technology. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Glasgow, Scotland Uk) (CHI ’19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300349
[88]
Raf Ramakers, Fraser Anderson, Tovi Grossman, and George Fitzmaurice. 2016. RetroFab: A Design Tool for Retrofitting Physical Interfaces Using Actuators, Sensors and 3D Printing. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (San Jose, California, USA) (CHI ’16). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 409–419. https://doi.org/10.1145/2858036.2858485
[89]
Judy Rashotte, Kelley Tousignant, Christine Richardson, Frances Fothergill-Bourbonnais, Meranda M Nakhla, Patricia Olivier, and Margaret L Lawson. 2014. Living with sensor-augmented pump therapy in type 1 diabetes: adolescents’ and parents’ search for harmony. Canadian journal of diabetes 38, 4 (2014), 256–262.
[90]
Jordyn Reich and Lucy E. Dunne. 2016. Multi-Modal Wearable Ambient Display: An Investigation of Continuous Glucose Monitoring. In Proceedings of the 2016 ACM International Symposium on Wearable Computers (Heidelberg, Germany) (ISWC ’16). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 24–27. https://doi.org/10.1145/2971763.2971801
[91]
[91] UCI Machine Learning Repository. 2023. https://archive.ics.uci.edu/dataset/34/diabetes
[92]
Jan Rod, Chunxiao Li, Dongliang Zhang, and Hyowon Lee. 2016. Designing a 3D Modelling Tool for Novice Users. In Proceedings of the 28th Australian Conference on Computer-Human Interaction (Launceston, Tasmania, Australia) (OzCHI ’16). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 140–144. https://doi.org/10.1145/3010915.3010957
[93]
José A Sacristán. 2013. Patient-centered medicine and patient-oriented research: improving health outcomes for individual patients. BMC medical informatics and decision making 13, 1 (2013), 1–8.
[94]
Elizabeth B-N Sanders and Pieter Jan Stappers. 2008. Co-creation and the new landscapes of design. Co-design 4, 1 (2008), 5–18.
[95]
M Ferri Sanz, B Vallina Acha, and M Ferrando García. 2021. Co-design for people-centred care digital solutions: a literature review. International Journal of Integrated Care 21, 2 (2021).
[96]
Valkyrie Savage, Sean Follmer, Jingyi Li, and Björn Hartmann. 2015. Makers’ Marks: Physical Markup for Designing and Fabricating Functional Objects. In Proceedings of the 28th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software & Technology (Charlotte, NC, USA) (UIST ’15). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 103–108. https://doi.org/10.1145/2807442.2807508
[97]
Valkyrie Savage, Sarah Homewood, and Irina Shklovski. 2023. Objectify: Better Living Through Anticipatory, Just-for-You 3D Printing!. In Extended Abstracts of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Hamburg, Germany) (CHI EA ’23). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 418, 8 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3544549.3582748
[98]
Marcia J Scherer. 1996. Outcomes of assistive technology use on quality of life. Disability and rehabilitation 18, 9 (1996), 439–448.
[99]
Eldon Schoop, Michelle Nguyen, Daniel Lim, Valkyrie Savage, Sean Follmer, and Björn Hartmann. 2016. Drill Sergeant: Supporting Physical Construction Projects through an Ecosystem of Augmented Tools. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (San Jose, California, USA) (CHI EA ’16). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1607–1614. https://doi.org/10.1145/2851581.2892429
[100]
Kristen Shinohara and Jacob O. Wobbrock. 2016. Self-Conscious or Self-Confident? A Diary Study Conceptualizing the Social Accessibility of Assistive Technology. ACM Trans. Access. Comput. 8, 2, Article 5 (jan 2016), 31 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/2827857
[101]
Karin Slegers, Kristel Kouwenberg, Tereza Loučova, and Ramon Daniels. 2020. Makers in Healthcare: The Role of Occupational Therapists in the Design of DIY Assistive Technology. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Honolulu, HI, USA) (CHI ’20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376685
[102]
Jessi Stark, Fraser Anderson, George Fitzmaurice, and Sowmya Somanath. 2020. MakeAware: Designing to Support Situation Awareness in Makerspaces. In Proceedings of the 2020 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference (Eindhoven, Netherlands) (DIS ’20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1005–1016. https://doi.org/10.1145/3357236.3395472
[103]
Wiktoria Staszak, Jonas Chromik, Katarina Braune, and Bert Arnrich. 2021. Impact of Custom Features of Do-it-yourself Artificial Pancreas Systems (DIYAPS) on Glycemic Outcomes of People with Type 1 Diabetes. In 2021 43rd Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine & Biology Society (EMBC). 1472–1475. https://doi.org/10.1109/EMBC46164.2021.9629487
[104]
Cristiano Storni. 2014. Design Challenges for Ubiquitous and Personal Computing in Chronic Disease Care and Patient Empowerment: A Case Study Rethinking Diabetes Self-Monitoring. Personal Ubiquitous Comput. 18, 5 (jun 2014), 1277–1290. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00779-013-0707-6
[105]
Jennifer Sumner, Lin Siew Chong, Anjali Bundele, and Yee Wei Lim. 2021. Co-designing technology for aging in place: A systematic review. The Gerontologist 61, 7 (2021), e395–e409.
[106]
M Tansey, L Laffel, J Cheng, R Beck, J Coffey, E Huang, C Kollman, J Lawrence, J Lee, K Ruedy, 2011. Satisfaction with continuous glucose monitoring in adults and youths with type 1 diabetes. Diabetic Medicine 28, 9 (2011), 1118–1122.
[107]
Rune Thorsen, Denise Cugnod, Marina Ramella, Rosa Maria Converti, and Maurizio Ferrarin. 2023. From patient to maker - a workflow including people with cerebral palsy in co-creating assistive devices using 3D printing technologies. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology 0, 0 (2023), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1080/17483107.2023.2177754 arXiv:https://doi.org/10.1080/17483107.2023.2177754PMID: 36880457.
[108]
Tiffany Tseng and Yoshihiro Kawahara. 2021. Circuit Assemblies: Electronic Modules for Interactive 3D-Prints. In Proceedings of the 2021 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference (Virtual Event, USA) (DIS ’21). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1115–1128. https://doi.org/10.1145/3461778.3462024
[109]
C Lee Ventola. 2014. Medical applications for 3D printing: current and projected uses. Pharmacy and Therapeutics 39, 10 (2014), 704.
[110]
Mary Webster, Emma Foster, Rob Comber, Simon Bowen, Tim Cheetham, and Madeline Balaam. 2015. Understanding the Lived Experience of Adolescents with Type 1 Diabetes: Opportunities for Design. In Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Interaction Design and Children (Boston, Massachusetts) (IDC ’15). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 140–149. https://doi.org/10.1145/2771839.2771854
[111]
Christian Weichel, Manfred Lau, David Kim, Nicolas Villar, and Hans W. Gellersen. 2014. MixFab: A Mixed-Reality Environment for Personal Fabrication. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Toronto, Ontario, Canada) (CHI ’14). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 3855–3864. https://doi.org/10.1145/2556288.2557090
[112]
Anusha Withana. 2023. Co-Designing Personalized Assistive Devices Using Personal Fabrication. Commun. ACM 66, 7 (jun 2023), 89–90. https://doi.org/10.1145/3589150
[113]
Tim Wysocki, Fiona Hirschfeld, Louis Miller, Neil Izenberg, Steven A Dowshen, Alex Taylor, Amy Milkes, Michelle T Shinseki, Carolina Bejarano, Chelsea Kozikowski, 2016. Consideration of insulin pumps or continuous glucose monitors by adolescents with type 1 diabetes and their parents: stakeholder engagement in the design of web-based decision aids. The Diabetes educator 42, 4 (2016), 395–407.
[114]
Yihan Yu and David W. McDonald. 2023. Conflicts of Control: Continuous Blood Glucose Monitoring and Coordinated Caregiving for Teenagers with Type 1 Diabetes. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact. 7, CSCW2, Article 306 (oct 2023), 32 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3610097
[115]
W Patrick Zeller, Rachel DeGraff, and William Zeller. 2020. Customized treatment for Type 1 diabetes patients using novel software. Journal of Clinical and Translational Endocrinology: Case Reports 16 (2020), 100057.
[116]
Li Zhu. 2011. Cultivating Collaborative Design: Design for Evolution. In Procedings of the Second Conference on Creativity and Innovation in Design (Eindhoven, Netherlands) (DESIRE ’11). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 255–266. https://doi.org/10.1145/2079216.2079253
Index Terms
- GlucoMaker: Enabling Collaborative Customization of Glucose Monitors
Recommendations
QoS customization in distributed object systems
Special issue: MiddlewareApplications built on networked collections of computers are increasingly using distributed object platforms such as CORBA, Java Remote Method Invocation (RMI), and DCOM to standardize object interactions. With this increased use comes the increased ...
DiaFit: Designing Customizable Wearables for Type 1 Diabetes Monitoring
CHI EA '21: Extended Abstracts of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing SystemsResearch has highlighted the need for customization of health-related technologies. However, few studies have examined its impact on wearable healthcare devices. We present a co-design study where we learned about people’s preferences and ideas for ...
Design charrettes as pedagogical method in a multimedia design course
SIGDOC '09: Proceedings of the 27th ACM international conference on Design of communicationCommunication design students working in new media or digital media fields require training in the design process to create powerful and professional projects. However, even though collaborative design work is common in media industries, many graduate ...
Comments
Information & Contributors
Information
Published In
May 2024
18961 pages
ISBN:9798400703300
DOI:10.1145/3613904
Copyright © 2024 ACM.
Publication rights licensed to ACM. ACM acknowledges that this contribution was co-authored by an affiliate of the Crown in Right of Canada. As such, the Crown in Right of Canada retains an equal interest in the copyright. Reprint requests should be forwarded to ACM, and reprints must include clear attribution to ACM and Crown in Right of Canada.
Sponsors
Publisher
Association for Computing Machinery
New York, NY, United States
Publication History
Published: 11 May 2024
Check for updates
Badges
Author Tags
Qualifiers
- Research-article
- Research
- Refereed limited
Conference
Acceptance Rates
Overall Acceptance Rate 6,199 of 26,314 submissions, 24%
Upcoming Conference
CHI '25
- Sponsor:
- sigchi
Contributors
Other Metrics
Bibliometrics & Citations
Bibliometrics
Article Metrics
- 0Total Citations
- 610Total Downloads
- Downloads (Last 12 months)610
- Downloads (Last 6 weeks)129
Reflects downloads up to 06 Nov 2024
Other Metrics
Citations
View Options
Get Access
Login options
Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.
Sign inFull Access
View options
View or Download as a PDF file.
PDFeReader
View online with eReader.
eReaderFull Text
View this article in Full Text.
Full TextHTML Format
View this article in HTML Format.
HTML Format