skip to main content
10.1145/3590003.3590102acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescacmlConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Twitter stance detection using deep learning model with FastText Embedding

Published: 29 May 2023 Publication History

Abstract

The interactivity of social media platforms allows a large number of users to comment on different political or social issues to express their views, and identifying users' stances from online comment texts helps the government to monitor public opinion more effectively. The automatic recognition of stance information in comment text has become a new research hotspot in the field of natural language processing. Most of the existing text stance analysis corpus focuses on political topics in European and American countries, and high-quality stance analysis corpus research on political topics in Southeast Asian countries is relatively scarce. In order to stimulate this research direction, this paper provides a dataset about the 2022 Philippine presidential election, which annotates the stance information of the two popular presidential candidates and provides reliable data support for subsequent stance analysis model research. Next, we build a stance detection model of hybrid deep neural networks based on BiLSTM, CNN, and Attention, and we demonstrate its effectiveness on multiple datasets and obtain the best results on the SemEval-2016 dataset. In addition, we compare FastText and Word2Vec, two pre-trained word embeddings for word encoding, and discuss which word embedding is preferred in stance detection tasks. This result shows that the stance analysis model proposed in this paper can be effectively applied to Twitter text stance data.

References

[1]
ALDayel A, Magdy W. Stance detection on social media: State of the art and trends[J]. Information Processing & Management, 2021, 58(4): 102597.
[2]
Al-Ghadir A I, Azmi A M, Hussain A. A novel approach to stance detection in social media tweets by fusing ranked lists and sentiments[J]. Information Fusion, 2021, 67: 29-40.
[3]
Kawintiranon K, Singh L. Knowledge enhanced masked language model for stance detection[C]//Proceedings of the 2021 conference of the north american chapter of the association for computational linguistics: human language technologies. 2021: 4725-4735.
[4]
Alkhalifa R, Zubiaga A. Capturing stance dynamics in social media: open challenges and research directions[J]. International Journal of Digital Humanities, 2022, 3(1-3): 115-135.
[5]
Elfardy H, Diab M. Cu-gwu perspective at semeval-2016 task 6: Ideological stance detection in informal text[C]//Proceedings of the 10th international workshop on semantic evaluation (SemEval-2016). 2016: 434-439.
[6]
Wojatzki M, Zesch T. ltl. uni-due at semeval-2016 task 6: Stance detection in social media using stacked classifiers[C]//Proceedings of the 10th International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation (SemEval-2016). 2016: 428-433.
[7]
Ghosh S, Singhania P, Singh S, Stance detection in web and social media: a comparative study[C]//Experimental IR Meets Multilinguality, Multimodality, and Interaction: 10th International Conference of the CLEF Association, CLEF 2019, Lugano, Switzerland, September 9–12, 2019, Proceedings 10. Springer International Publishing, 2019: 75-87.
[8]
Pennington J, Socher R, Manning C D. Glove: Global vectors for word representation[C]//Proceedings of the 2014 conference on empirical methods in natural language processing (EMNLP). 2014: 1532-1543.
[9]
Mikolov T, Chen K, Corrado G, Efficient estimation of word representations in vector space[J]. arXiv preprint arXiv:1301.3781, 2013.
[10]
Tang D, Wei F, Yang N, Learning sentiment-specific word embedding for twitter sentiment classification[C]//ACL (1). 2014: 1555-1565.
[11]
Fu X, Liu W, Xu Y, Combine HowNet lexicon to train phrase recursive autoencoder for sentence-level sentiment analysis[J]. Neurocomputing, 2017, 241: 18-27.
[12]
Araque O, Corcuera-Platas I, Sánchez-Rada J F, Enhancing deep learning sentiment analysis with ensemble techniques in social applications[J]. Expert Systems with Applications, 2017, 77: 236-246.
[13]
Ren Y, Wang R, Ji D. A topic-enhanced word embedding for Twitter sentiment classification[J]. Information Sciences, 2016, 369: 188-198.
[14]
Giatsoglou M, Vozalis M G, Diamantaras K, Sentiment analysis leveraging emotions and word embeddings[J]. Expert Systems with Applications, 2017, 69: 214-224.
[15]
Wang Y, Huang M, Zhu X, Attention-based LSTM for aspect-level sentiment classification[C]//Proceedings of the 2016 conference on empirical methods in natural language processing. 2016: 606-615.
[16]
Zhang Y, Wallace B. A sensitivity analysis of (and practitioners' guide to) convolutional neural networks for sentence classification[J]. arXiv preprint arXiv:1510.03820, 2015.
[17]
Zotova E. Automatic stance detection on political discourse in Twitter[J]. 2019.
[18]
Rong X. word2vec parameter learning explained[J]. arXiv preprint arXiv:1411.2738, 2014.
[19]
Bahdanau D, Cho K, Bengio Y. Neural machine translation by jointly learning to align and translate[J]. arXiv preprint arXiv:1409.0473, 2014.
[20]
Goodfellow I, Bengio Y, Courville A. Deep learning[M]. MIT press, 2016.
[21]
Mohammad S, Kiritchenko S, Sobhani P, Semeval-2016 task 6: Detecting stance in tweets[C]//Proceedings of the 10th international workshop on semantic evaluation (SemEval-2016). 2016: 31-41.
[22]
Cherkassky V, Ma Y. Practical selection of SVM parameters and noise estimation for SVM regression[J]. Neural networks, 2004, 17(1): 113-126.

Index Terms

  1. Twitter stance detection using deep learning model with FastText Embedding

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    CACML '23: Proceedings of the 2023 2nd Asia Conference on Algorithms, Computing and Machine Learning
    March 2023
    598 pages
    ISBN:9781450399449
    DOI:10.1145/3590003
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 29 May 2023

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. Deep Learning
    2. Natural Language Processing
    3. Stance Detection
    4. Text Analysis
    5. Word Embeddings

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

    Funding Sources

    • the National Natural Science Foundation of China

    Conference

    CACML 2023

    Acceptance Rates

    CACML '23 Paper Acceptance Rate 93 of 241 submissions, 39%;
    Overall Acceptance Rate 93 of 241 submissions, 39%

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • 0
      Total Citations
    • 57
      Total Downloads
    • Downloads (Last 12 months)41
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1
    Reflects downloads up to 14 Sep 2024

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    View Options

    Get Access

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    HTML Format

    View this article in HTML Format.

    HTML Format

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media