skip to main content
10.1145/3568562.3568659acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagessoictConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Open access

Identifying A Target Scope of Complaints on Social Media

Published: 01 December 2022 Publication History

Abstract

A complaint is uttered when reality violates one’s expectations. Research on complaints, which contributes to our understanding of basic human behavior, has been conducted in the fields of psychology, linguistics, and marketing. Although several approaches have been implemented to the study of complaints, studies have yet focused on a target scope of complaints. Examination of a target scope of complaints is an important topic because the functions of complaints, such as evocation of emotion, use of grammar, and intention, are different when the target scope of complaints is different. We first tackle the construction and release of a complaint dataset of 6,418 tweets by annotating Japanese texts collected from Twitter with labels of the target scope. Our dataset is available at https://github.com/sociocom/JaGUCHI. We then benchmark the annotated dataset with several machine learning baselines and obtain the best performance of 90.4 F1-score in detecting whether a text was a complaint or not, and a micro-F1 score of 72.2 in identifying the target scope label. Finally, we conducted case studies using our model to demonstrate that identifying a target scope of complaints is useful for sociological analysis.

References

[1]
Mark Alicke, James C. Braun, J Glor, Mary Lou Klotz, Jon Magee, Heather Sederhoim, and Robin Siegel. 1992. Complaining Behavior in Social Interaction. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 18 (1992), 286 – 295.
[2]
Ron Artstein and Massimo Poesio. 2008. Survey Article: Inter-Coder Agreement for Computational Linguistics. Computational Linguistics 34, 4 (2008), 555–596. https://doi.org/10.1162/coli.07-034-R2
[3]
Valerio Basile, Cristina Bosco, Elisabetta Fersini, Debora Nozza, Viviana Patti, Francisco Manuel Rangel Pardo, Paolo Rosso, and Manuela Sanguinetti. 2019. SemEval-2019 Task 5: Multilingual Detection of Hate Speech Against Immigrants and Women in Twitter. In Proceedings of the 13th International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation. Association for Computational Linguistics, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA, 54–63. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/S19-2007
[4]
David M Blei, Andrew Y Ng, and Michael I Jordan. 2003. Latent dirichlet allocation. the Journal of machine Learning research 3 (2003), 993–1022.
[5]
Jacob Devlin, Ming-Wei Chang, Kenton Lee, and Kristina Toutanova. 2018. Bert: Pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding. arXiv preprint arXiv:1810.04805(2018).
[6]
João Filgueiras, Luís Barbosa, Gil Rocha, Henrique Lopes Cardoso, Luís Paulo Reis, João Pedro Machado, and Ana Maria Oliveira. 2019. Complaint Analysis and Classification for Economic and Food Safety. In Proceedings of the Second Workshop on Economics and Natural Language Processing. Association for Computational Linguistics, Hong Kong, 51–60. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/D19-5107
[7]
Sepp Hochreiter and Jürgen Schmidhuber. 1997. Long short-term memory. Neural computation 9, 8 (1997), 1735–1780.
[8]
Mali Jin and Nikolaos Aletras. 2020. Complaint Identification in Social Media with Transformer Networks. In Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Computational Linguistics. International Committee on Computational Linguistics, Barcelona, Spain (Online), 1765–1771. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2020.coling-main.157
[9]
Mali Jin and Nikolaos Aletras. 2021. Modeling the Severity of Complaints in Social Media. In Proceedings of the 2021 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies. Association for Computational Linguistics, Online, 2264–2274. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2021.naacl-main.180
[10]
Robin M. Kowalski. 1996. Complaints and complaining: functions, antecedents, and consequences.Psychological bulletin 119 2 (1996), 179–96.
[11]
Chul min Kim, Shinhong Kim, Subin Im, and Changhoon Shin. 2003. The effect of attitude and perception on consumer complaint intentions. Journal of Consumer Marketing 20 (2003), 352–371.
[12]
Kensuke Mitsuzawa, Maito Tauchi, Mathieu Domoulin, Masanori Nakashima, and Tomoya Mizumoto. 2016. FKC Corpus : a Japanese Corpus from New Opinion Survey Service. In In proceedings of the Novel Incentives for Collecting Data and Annotation from People: types, implementation, tasking requirements, workflow and results. Portorož, Slovenia, 11–18.
[13]
Elite Olshtain and Liora Weinbach. 1987. 10. Complaints: A study of speech act behavior among native and non-native speakers of Hebrew.
[14]
Robert Plutchik. 1980. Chapter 1 - A GENERAL PSYCHOEVOLUTIONARY THEORY OF EMOTION. In Theories of Emotion, Robert Plutchik and Henry Kellerman (Eds.). Academic Press, 3–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-558701-3.50007-7
[15]
Daniel Preoţiuc-Pietro, Mihaela Gaman, and Nikolaos Aletras. 2019. Automatically Identifying Complaints in Social Media. In Proceedings of the 57th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics. Association for Computational Linguistics, Florence, Italy, 5008–5019. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/P19-1495
[16]
Anna Trosborg. 2011. Interlanguage Pragmatics: Requests, Complaints, and Apologies. De Gruyter Mouton. https://doi.org/
[17]
Camilla Vásquez. 2011. Complaints online: The case of TripAdvisor. Journal of Pragmatics 43, 6 (2011), 1707–1717. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2010.11.007 Postcolonial pragmatics.
[18]
Zeerak Waseem and Dirk Hovy. 2016. Hateful Symbols or Hateful People? Predictive Features for Hate Speech Detection on Twitter. In Proceedings of the NAACL Student Research Workshop. Association for Computational Linguistics, San Diego, California, 88–93. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/N16-2013
[19]
Marcos Zampieri, Shervin Malmasi, Preslav Nakov, Sara Rosenthal, Noura Farra, and Ritesh Kumar. 2019. SemEval-2019 Task 6: Identifying and Categorizing Offensive Language in Social Media (OffensEval). In Proceedings of the 13th International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation. Association for Computational Linguistics, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA, 75–86. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/S19-2010

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Other conferences
SoICT '22: Proceedings of the 11th International Symposium on Information and Communication Technology
December 2022
474 pages
ISBN:9781450397254
DOI:10.1145/3568562
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 01 December 2022

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. Twitter
  2. annotation
  3. complaint
  4. dataset
  5. social media

Qualifiers

  • Research-article
  • Research
  • Refereed limited

Conference

SoICT 2022

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 147 of 318 submissions, 46%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • 0
    Total Citations
  • 720
    Total Downloads
  • Downloads (Last 12 months)228
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)31
Reflects downloads up to 06 Nov 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

View Options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format.

HTML Format

Get Access

Login options

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media