skip to main content
10.1145/3564121.3564810acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesaimlsystemsConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Identification of Causal Dependencies in Multivariate Time Series

Published: 16 May 2023 Publication History

Abstract

Telecommunications networks operate on enormous amount of time-series data, and often exhibit anomalous trends in their behaviour. This is caused due to increased latency and reduced throughput in the network which inevitably leads to poor customer experience [17]. One of the common problems in machine learning in the telecom domain is to predict anomalous behaviour ahead of time. Whilst this is a well-researched problem, there is far less work done in identifying causal structures from the temporal patterns of various Key Performance Indicators (KPI) in the telecom network. The ability to identify causal structures from anomalous behaviours would allow more effective intervention and generalisation of different environments and networks. The tutorial is focused on discussing existing frameworks for establishing causal discovery for time-series data sets. In this hands-on tutorial, we will be covering at least 3 state-of-the-art (SOTA) methods on causal time series analysis including Granger causality[8],convergent cross-mapping [4, 10, 15], Peter-Clark Momentary Conditional Independence (PC-MCI) [6, 14] and Temporal Causal discovery framework (TCDF)[11]. The need for a causation analysis[7], beyond correlation will also be explained using publicly available datasets, such as, double pendulum dataset [1]. The state-of-art methods are chosen to cover various aspects of the causal time series analysis, such as modelling the non-linearity (non-linear Granger Causality), attempting the problem from chaos and dynamic systems (CCM), information-theoretic approaches (PC-MCI, or having a data-driven approach (TCDF). State-of-the-art survey papers [2, 12] show that none of the methods can be said to be ideal for all the possible time series and there are relative advantages and shortcomings for each of these methods.

References

[1]
[n.d.]. The double pendulum — scipython.com. https://scipython.com/blog/the-double-pendulum/. [Accessed 10-Jul-2022].
[2]
Charles K Assaad, Emilie Devijver, and Eric Gaussier. 2022. Survey and Evaluation of Causal Discovery Methods for Time Series. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research 73 (2022), 767–819.
[3]
Yoshua Bengio, Tristan Deleu, Edward J Hu, Salem Lahlou, Mo Tiwari, and Emmanuel Bengio. 2021. Gflownet foundations. arXiv preprint arXiv:2111.09266(2021).
[4]
Edward De Brouwer, Adam Arany, Jaak Simm, and Yves Moreau. 2020. Latent convergent cross mapping. In International Conference on Learning Representations.
[5]
Edward De Brouwer, Jaak Simm, Adam Arany, and Yves Moreau. 2019. GRU-ODE-Bayes: Continuous modeling of sporadically-observed time series. Advances in neural information processing systems 32 (2019).
[6]
Andreas Gerhardus and Jakob Runge. 2020. High-recall causal discovery for autocorrelated time series with latent confounders. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 33 (2020), 12615–12625.
[7]
Madelyn Glymour, Judea Pearl, and Nicholas P Jewell. 2016. Causal inference in statistics: A primer. John Wiley & Sons.
[8]
CWJ Granger. 1969. Investigating Causal Relationships by Econometric Models and Cross-Spectral Methods’, Econom trica. July (1969).
[9]
Scott Lundberg. 2021. Be careful when interpreting predictive models in search of causal insights. https://towardsdatascience.com/be-careful-when-interpreting-predictive-models-in-search-of-causal-insights-e68626e664b6
[10]
Dan Mønster, Riccardo Fusaroli, Kristian Tylén, Andreas Roepstorff, and Jacob F Sherson. 2016. Inferring causality from noisy time series data. arXiv preprint arXiv:1603.01155(2016).
[11]
Meike Nauta, Doina Bucur, and Christin Seifert. 2019. Causal discovery with attention-based convolutional neural networks. Machine Learning and Knowledge Extraction 1, 1 (2019), 19.
[12]
Ana Rita Nogueira, Andrea Pugnana, Salvatore Ruggieri, Dino Pedreschi, and João Gama. 2022. Methods and tools for causal discovery and causal inference. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery 12, 2(2022), e1449.
[13]
Maciej Rosoł, Marcel Młyńczak, and Gerard Cybulski. 2022. Granger causality test with nonlinear neural-network-based methods: Python package and simulation study. Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine 216 (2022), 106669.
[14]
Jakob Runge. 2020. Discovering contemporaneous and lagged causal relations in autocorrelated nonlinear time series datasets. In Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence. PMLR, 1388–1397.
[15]
George Sugihara, Robert May, Hao Ye, Chih-hao Hsieh, Ethan Deyle, Michael Fogarty, and Stephan Munch. 2012. Detecting causality in complex ecosystems. science 338, 6106 (2012), 496–500.
[16]
Alex Tank, Ian Covert, Nicholas Foti, Ali Shojaie, and Emily Fox. 2018. Neural granger causality for nonlinear time series. stat 1050(2018), 16.
[17]
Keli Zhang, Marcus Kalander, Min Zhou, Xi Zhang, and Junjian Ye. 2020. An influence-based approach for root cause alarm discovery in telecom networks. In International Conference on Service-Oriented Computing. Springer, 124–136.

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Other conferences
AIMLSystems '22: Proceedings of the Second International Conference on AI-ML Systems
October 2022
209 pages
ISBN:9781450398473
DOI:10.1145/3564121
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 16 May 2023

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Qualifiers

  • Research-article
  • Research
  • Refereed limited

Conference

AIMLSystems 2022

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • 0
    Total Citations
  • 63
    Total Downloads
  • Downloads (Last 12 months)22
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1
Reflects downloads up to 24 Dec 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format.

HTML Format

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media