skip to main content
10.1145/3545945.3569743acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagessigcseConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Open access

Make-a-Thon for Middle School AI Educators

Published: 03 March 2023 Publication History

Abstract

AI curricula are being developed and tested in classrooms, but wider adoption is premised by teacher professional development and buy-in. When engaging in professional development, curricula are treated as set in stone, static and educators are prepared to offer the curriculum as written instead of empowered to be leaders in efforts to spread and sustain AI education. This limits the degree to which teachers tailor new curricula to student needs and interests, ultimately distancing students from new and potentially relevant content. This paper describes an AI Educator Make-a-Thon, a two-day gathering of 34 educators from across the United States that centered co-design of AI literacy materials as the culminating experience of a year-long professional development program called Everyday AI (EdAI) in which educators studied and practiced implementing an innovative curriculum for Developing AI Literacy (DAILy) in their classrooms. Inspired by the energizing and empowering experiences of Hack-a-Thons, the Make-a-Thon was designed to increase the depth and longevity of the educators' investment in AI education by positively impacting their sense of belonging to the AI community, AI content knowledge, and their self confidence as AI curriculum designers. In this paper we describe the Make-a-Thon design, findings, and recommendations for future educator-centered Make-a-Thons.

Supplementary Material

MP4 File (SIGCSE23-V1fp091.mp4)
A video presenting the design of a professional development event for middle school AI educators, called the Make-a-thon, including six recommendations for those interested in fostering a community of practice as part of teacher training programs on advanced technical concepts.

References

[1]
2006. Technology professional development: Long-term effects on teacher self- efficacy. Journal of technology and teacher education. 14, 1 (2006).
[2]
Evrim Baran, Sedef Canbazoglu Bilici, Aylin Albayrak Sari, and Jo Tondeur. 2019. Investigating the impact of teacher education strategies on preservice teachers' TPACK. British Journal of Educational Technology, Vol. 50, 1 (2019), 357--370.
[3]
Nataly Birbeck, Shaun Lawson, Kellie Morrissey, Tim Rapley, and Patrick Olivier. 2017. Self Harmony: rethinking hackathons to design and critique digital technologies for those affected by self-harm. In proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 146--157.
[4]
MIT Media Lab Blakely H. Payne. 2019. An Ethics of Artificial Intelligence Curriculum for Middle School Students. https://www.media.mit.edu/projects/ai-ethics-for-middle-school/overview/ Retrieved August 14, 2022 from
[5]
Gerard Briscoe. 2014. Digital innovation: The hackathon phenomenon. (2014).
[6]
Thomas KF Chiu and Ching-sing Chai. 2020. Sustainable curriculum planning for artificial intelligence education: A self-determination theory perspective. Sustainability, Vol. 12, 14 (2020), 5568.
[7]
Code.org. 2019. AI for Oceans. https://code.org/oceans Retrieved August 14, 2022 from
[8]
Code.org. 2021. AI and Machine Learning Module. https://studio.code.org/s/aiml-2022?redirect_warning=true Retrieved August 14, 2022 from
[9]
Irene Lee Cynthia Breazeal. 2020. Developing AI Literacy (DAILy) Curriculum. https://raise.mit.edu/daily/index.html Retrieved August 14, 2022 from
[10]
Diana Gehlhaus Dahlia Peterson. Kayla Goode. 2021. AI Education in China and the United States: A Comparative Assessment. https://cset.georgetown.edu/wp-content/uploads/CSET-AI-Education-in-China-and-the-United-States-1.pdf Retrieved August 14, 2022 from
[11]
Dena Deglau and Mary O'Sullivan. 2006. The effects of a long-term professional development program on the beliefs and practices of experienced teachers. (2006).
[12]
AI for K12 Initiative. 2020. The Artificial Intelligence (AI) for K-12 National Guidelines. https://ai4k12.org/ Retrieved August 14, 2022 from
[13]
Batya Friedman. 1997. Human values and the design of computer technology. Number 72. Cambridge University Press.
[14]
J Hawkins. 1997. Imagine the possibilities: The world at your fingertips. Learn & live (1997), 212--215.
[15]
W Hawley, L Valli, L Darling-Hammond, and G Sykes. 1999. Teaching as a learning profession: Handbook of policy and practice. San Francisco: Josey-Bass (1999).
[16]
Erin C Henrick, Paul Cobb, William R Penuel, Kara Jackson, and Tiffany Clark. 2017. Assessing Research-Practice Partnerships: Five Dimensions of Effectiveness. William T. Grant Foundation (2017).
[17]
Marybeth Hoffman, Jayne Richmond, Jennifer Morrow, and Kandice Salomone. 2002. Investigating "sense of belonging" in first-year college students. Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory & Practice, Vol. 4, 3 (2002), 227--256.
[18]
Alexis Hope, Catherine D'Ignazio, Josephine Hoy, Rebecca Michelson, Jennifer Roberts, Kate Krontiris, and Ethan Zuckerman. 2019. Hackathons as participatory design: iterating feminist utopias. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1--14.
[19]
Lilly Irani. 2015. Hackathons and the making of entrepreneurial citizenship. Science, Technology, & Human Values, Vol. 40, 5 (2015), 799--824.
[20]
Jacob Kelter, Amanda Peel, Connor Bain, Gabriella Anton, Sugat Dabholkar, Michael S Horn, and Uri Wilensky. 2021. Constructionist co-design: A dual approach to curriculum and professional development. British Journal of Educational Technology, Vol. 52, 3 (2021), 1043--1059.
[21]
Marko Komssi, Danielle Pichlis, Mikko Raatikainen, Klas Kindström, and Janne Järvinen. 2014. What are hackathons for? IEEE Software, Vol. 32, 5 (2014), 60--67.
[22]
Irene Lee, Safinah Ali, Helen Zhang, Daniella DiPaola, and Cynthia Breazeal. 2021. Developing Middle School Students' AI Literacy. In Proceedings of the 52nd ACM technical symposium on computer science education. 191--197.
[23]
Irene Lee, Helen Zhang, Kate Moore, Xiaofei Zhou, Beatriz Perret, Yihong Cheng, Ruiying Zheng, and Grace Pu. 2022. AI Book Club: An Innovative Professional Development Model for AI Education. In Proceedings of the 53rd ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education V. 1. 202--208.
[24]
Phoebe Lin and Jessica Van Brummelen. 2021. Engaging teachers to Co-design integrated AI curriculum for K-12 classrooms. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1--12.
[25]
Annabel Lindner and Marc Berges. 2020. Can you explain AI to me? Teachers' pre-concepts about Artificial Intelligence. In 2020 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE). IEEE, 1--9.
[26]
Duri Long and Brian Magerko. 2020. What is AI literacy? Competencies and design considerations. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems. 1--16.
[27]
Rose Luckin, Wayne Holmes, Mark Griffiths, and Laurie B Forcier. 2016. Intelligence unleashed: An argument for AI in education. (2016).
[28]
Glenn P Malone, David R Pillow, and Augustine Osman. 2012. The general belongingness scale (GBS): Assessing achieved belongingness. Personality and individual differences, Vol. 52, 3 (2012), 311--316.
[29]
Punya Mishra and Matthew J Koehler. 2006. Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers college record, Vol. 108, 6 (2006), 1017--1054.
[30]
Melanie Mitchell. 2019. Artificial intelligence: A guide for thinking humans. Penguin UK.
[31]
Fei-Fei Li Olga Russakovsky. 2022. AI4ALL Open Learning. https://github.com/touretzkyds/ai4k12/wiki/Curriculum%3A-AI4ALL-Open-Learning Retrieved August 14, 2022 from
[32]
William R Penuel, Jeremy Roschelle, and Nicole Shechtman. 2007. Designing formative assessment software with teachers: An analysis of the co-design process. Research and practice in technology enhanced learning, Vol. 2, 01 (2007), 51--74.
[33]
Drew Polly. 2011--11. Teachers' learning while constructing technology-based instructional resources. British journal of educational technology., Vol. 42, 6 (2011--11). 2002238700
[34]
Emily Porter, Chris Bopp, Elizabeth Gerber, and Amy Voida. 2017. Reappropriating hackathons: the production work of the CHI4Good day of service. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 810--814.
[35]
C Aaron Price and Lauren Applebaum. 2022. Measuring a Sense of Belonging at Museums and Cultural Centers. Curator: The Museum Journal, Vol. 65, 1 (2022), 135--160.
[36]
Jeremy Roschelle, William Penuel, and Nicole Shechtman. 2006. Co-design of innovations with teachers: Definition and dynamics. (2006).
[37]
Steven H Shaha, Kelly F Glassett, Heather Ellsworth, et al. 2015. Long-term impact of on-demand professional development on student performance: A longitudinal multi-state study. Journal of International Education Research (JIER), Vol. 11, 1 (2015), 29--34.
[38]
Emily Shaw. 2014. Civic wants, civic needs, civic tech. Retrieved January, Vol. 4 (2014), 2019.
[39]
David Peter Stroh. 2015. Systems thinking for social change: A practical guide to solving complex problems, avoiding unintended consequences, and achieving lasting results. Chelsea Green Publishing.
[40]
Joshua Tauberer. 2014. How to run a successful hackathon. Retrieved from the world wide web https://hackathon. guide (2014).
[41]
Nick Taylor and Loraine Clarke. 2018. Everybody's hacking: Participation and the mainstreaming of hackathons. In CHI 2019. Association for Computing Machinery, 1--2.
[42]
Esau Tovar and Merril A Simon. 2010. Factorial structure and invariance analysis of the sense of belonging scales. Measurement and evaluation in counseling and development, Vol. 43, 3 (2010), 199--217.
[43]
Jessica Van Brummelen and Phoebe Lin. 2020. Engaging teachers to co-design integrated AI curriculum for K-12 classrooms. arXiv preprint arXiv:2009.11100 (2020).
[44]
Wilma van der Westen. 2008. ?Elke docent voor taalrendement!'Taalbeleid op het Rijswijks Lyceum. Deel 2. Levende Talen Magazine, Vol. 95, 3 (2008), 12--15.
[45]
Maartje Visser. 2008. Fast Lane English. Versterkt Engels op het Stella Maris College Meerssen. Levende Talen Magazine, Vol. 95, 5 (2008), 17--20.
[46]
Hanna Westbroek, Bregje de Vries, Amber Walraven, Adam Handelzalts, and Susan McKenney. 2019. Teachers as co-designers: Scientific and colloquial evidence on teacher professional development and curriculum innovation. In Collaborative curriculum design for sustainable innovation and teacher learning. Springer, Cham, 35--54.
[47]
Randi Williams, Hae Won Park, Lauren Oh, and Cynthia Breazeal. 2019. PopBots: Designing an Artificial Intelligence Curriculum for Early Childhood Education. Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Vol. 33, 01 (Jul. 2019), 9729--9736. https://doi.org/10.1609/aaai.v33i01.33019729
[48]
King Woon Yau, CS Chai, Thomas KF Chiu, Helen Meng, Irwin King, and Yeung Yam. 2022. A phenomenographic approach on teacher conceptions of teaching Artificial Intelligence (AI) in K-12 schools. Education and Information Technologies (2022), 1--24.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)"Artificial intelligence is a very broad term": How educators perceive Artificial Intelligence?Proceedings of the 2024 International Conference on Information Technology for Social Good10.1145/3677525.3678677(315-323)Online publication date: 4-Sep-2024
  • (2024)Assessing EFL learners’ attitudes on Generative Artificial Intelligence: Development and validation of Generative Artificial Intelligence attitude scale for EFL learners (GenAIAS)Journal of Research on Technology in Education10.1080/15391523.2024.2437744(1-21)Online publication date: 6-Dec-2024

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
SIGCSE 2023: Proceedings of the 54th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education V. 1
March 2023
1481 pages
ISBN:9781450394314
DOI:10.1145/3545945
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution International 4.0 License.

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 03 March 2023

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. ai literacy
  2. hackathons
  3. k-12 education
  4. teacher professional development

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Funding Sources

  • National Science Foundation

Conference

SIGCSE 2023
Sponsor:

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 1,595 of 4,542 submissions, 35%

Upcoming Conference

SIGCSE TS 2025
The 56th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education
February 26 - March 1, 2025
Pittsburgh , PA , USA

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)385
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)52
Reflects downloads up to 23 Dec 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)"Artificial intelligence is a very broad term": How educators perceive Artificial Intelligence?Proceedings of the 2024 International Conference on Information Technology for Social Good10.1145/3677525.3678677(315-323)Online publication date: 4-Sep-2024
  • (2024)Assessing EFL learners’ attitudes on Generative Artificial Intelligence: Development and validation of Generative Artificial Intelligence attitude scale for EFL learners (GenAIAS)Journal of Research on Technology in Education10.1080/15391523.2024.2437744(1-21)Online publication date: 6-Dec-2024

View Options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Login options

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media