skip to main content
10.1145/3544549.3585801acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Work in Progress

Children’s Trust in Robots and the Information They Provide

Published: 19 April 2023 Publication History

Abstract

Previous work has shown that children tend to trust embodied conversational agents such as social robots. Also, that children have difficulty assessing the credibility of information. The study reported in this paper addresses how children’s attitudes toward and trust in a robot affect their acceptance of information provided by the robot. We conducted a within-subjects study (N=30) where children engaged with a ‘trustworthy’ versus an ‘untrustworthy’ robot. Due to the pandemic period, this interaction was carried out via video call. The children played a quiz with the robot where we measured whether they accepted the information provided by the robot. Results show that the manipulation of trustworthiness was successful. We did not find evidence for a causal relationship between trust in the robot and acceptance of the information. Furthermore, semi-structured interviews offered a more in-depth understanding of how children perceived the two different robots and their preference for the trustworthy robot.

Supplementary Material

MP4 File (3544549.3585801-talk-video.mp4)
Pre-recorded Video Presentation

References

[1]
Samer Al Moubayed, Jonas Beskow, Gabriel Skantze, and Björn Granström. 2012. Furhat: A back-projected human-like robot head for multiparty human-machine interaction. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), Vol. 7403 LNCS. 114–130. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-34584-5_9
[2]
Christoph Bartneck, Dana Kulić, Elizabeth Croft, and Susana Zoghbi. 2009. Measurement Instruments for the Anthropomorphism, Animacy, Likeability, Perceived Intelligence, and Perceived Safety of Robots. International Journal of Social Robotics 1, 1 (Jan. 2009), 71–81. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-008-0001-3
[3]
Igor Bascandziev and Paul L. Harris. 2014. In beauty we trust: Children prefer information from more attractive informants. British Journal of Developmental Psychology 32, 1 (3 2014), 94–99. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjdp.12022
[4]
T. Beelen, E. Velner, R. Ordelman, K. P. Truong, V. Evers, and T. Huibers. 2021. Does your robot know? Enhancing children’s information retrieval through spoken conversation with responsible robots. arXiv:2106.07931 [cs] (June 2021). http://arxiv.org/abs/2106.07931 arXiv:2106.07931.
[5]
Tony Belpaeme, Paul Baxter, Joachim De Greeff, James Kennedy, Robin Read, Rosemarijn Looije, Mark Neerincx, Ilaria Baroni, and Mattia Coti Zelati. 2013. Child-Robot Interaction: Perspectives and Challenges. In International Conference on Social Robotics. Springer, 452–459. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02675-6_45
[6]
Tony Belpaeme, Paul Baxter, Robin Read, Rachel Wood, Heriberto Cuayáhuitl, Bernd Kiefer, Stefania Racioppa, Ivana Kruijff-Korbayová, Georgios Athanasopoulos, Valentin Enescu, Rosemarijn Looije, Mark Neerincx, Yiannis Demiris, Raquel Ros-Espinoza, Aryel Beck, Lola Cañamero, Antione Hiolle, Matthew Lewis, Ilaria Baroni, Marco Nalin, Piero Cosi, Giulio Paci, Fabio Tesser, Giacomo Sommavilla, and Remi Humbert. 2013. Multimodal child-robot interaction: building social bonds. Journal of Human-Robot Interaction 1, 2 (Jan. 2013), 33–53.
[7]
Joyce Berg, John Dickhaut, and Kevin McCabe. 1995. Trust, Reciprocity, and Social History. Games and Economic Behavior 10 (1995), 122–142.
[8]
H. Boeke, L. Dondorp, M. Heitink, and R. Pijpers. 2017. Monitor Jeugd en media 2017. Zoetermeer: Kennisnet (2017).
[9]
Natalia Calvo-Barajas, Giulia Perugia, and Ginevra Castellano. 2020. The Effects of Robot’s Facial Expressions on Children’s First Impressions of Trustworthiness. 29th IEEE International Conference on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, RO-MAN 2020 (8 2020), 165–171. https://doi.org/10.1109/RO-MAN47096.2020.9223456
[10]
Judith H. Danovitch and Reem Alzahabi. 2013. Children Show Selective Trust in Technological Informants. Journal of Cognition and Development 14, 3 (2013), 499–513. https://doi.org/10.1080/15248372.2012.689391
[11]
Ewart J. de Visser, Marieke M. M. Peeters, Malte F. Jung, Spencer Kohn, Tyler H. Shaw, Richard Pak, and Mark A. Neerincx. 2019. Towards a Theory of Longitudinal Trust Calibration in Human–Robot Teams. International Journal of Social Robotics 2019 12:2 12, 2 (11 2019), 459–478. https://doi.org/10.1007/S12369-019-00596-X
[12]
Cinzia Di Dio, Federico Manzi, Giulia Peretti, Angelo Cangelosi, Paul L. Harris, Davide Massaro, and Antonella Marchetti. 2020. Shall I Trust You? From Child–Robot Interaction to Trusting Relationships. Frontiers in Psychology 11 (4 2020). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00469
[13]
Meghann Fior, Sarah Nugent, Tanya N. Beran, Alejandro Ramirez-Serrano, and Roman Kuzyk. 2010. Children’s Relationships with Robots: Robot is Child’s New Friend. Journal of Physical Agents 4, 3 (2010), 9–17.
[14]
Andrew J. Flanagin and Miriam J. Metzger. 2008. Digital media and youth: Unparalleled opportunity and unprecedented responsibility. MacArthur Foundation Digital Media and Learning Initiative.
[15]
Denise Y. Geiskkovitch, Raquel Thiessen, James E. Young, and Melanie R. Glenwright. 2019. What? That’s Not a Chair!: How Robot Informational Errors Affect Children’s Trust Towards Robots. In ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, Vol. 2019-March. IEEE Computer Society, 48–56. https://doi.org/10.1109/HRI.2019.8673024
[16]
Gail D. Heyman. 2008. Children’s critical thinking when learning from others. Current Directions in Psychological Science 17, 5 (10 2008), 344–347. https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1467-8721.2008.00603.X
[17]
Hanna Jochmann-Mannak, Theo Huibers, Leo Lentz, and Ted Sanders. 2010. Children searching information on the Internet: Performance on children’s interfaces compared to Google. In SIGIR, Vol. 10. 27–35.
[18]
Peter H. Kahn Jr., Takayuki Kanda, Hiroshi Ishiguro, Nathan G. Freier, Rachel L. Severson, Brian T. Gill, Jolina H. Ruckert, and Solace Shen. 2012. “Robovie, you’ll have to go into the closet now”: Children’s social and moral relationships with a humanoid robot. Developmental Psychology 48, 2 (2012), 303–314. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027033
[19]
Asheley R. Landrum, Candice M. Mills, and Angie M. Johnston. 2013. When do children trust the expert? Benevolence information influences children’s trust more than expertise. Developmental Science 16, 4 (7 2013), 622–638. https://doi.org/10.1111/desc.12059
[20]
Jonathan D. Lane, Henry M. Wellman, and Susan A. Gelman. 2013. Informants’ Traits Weigh Heavily in Young Children’s Trust in Testimony and in Their Epistemic Inferences. Child Development 84, 4 (7 2013), 1253–1268. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12029
[21]
John D. Lee and Katrina A. See. 2004. Trust in Automation: Designing for Appropriate Reliance. Human Factors 46, 1 (March 2004), 50–80. https://doi.org/10.1518/hfes.46.1.50_30392
[22]
Iolanda Leite, André Pereira, Carlos Martinho, and Ana Paiva. 2008. Are emotional robots more fun to play with?. In RO-MAN 2008-The 17th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication. IEEE, 77–82.
[23]
Jamy Li. 2015. The benefit of being physically present: A survey of experimental works comparing copresent robots, telepresent robots and virtual agents. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 77 (May 2015), 23–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2015.01.001
[24]
Eugène Loos, Loredana Ivan, and Donald Leu. 2018. “Save The Pacific Northwest Tree Octopus”: a hoax revisited. Or: how vulnerable are school children to Fake News?Information and Learning Science (2018). Publisher: Emerald Publishing Limited.
[25]
Miriam J. Metzger, Andrew J. Flanagin, Alex Markov, Rebekah Grossman, and Monica Bulger. 2015. Believing the Unbelievable: Understanding Young People’s Information Literacy Beliefs and Practices in the United States. Journal of Children and Media 9, 3 (July 2015), 325–348. https://doi.org/10.1080/17482798.2015.1056817 Publisher: Routledge _eprint: https://doi.org/10.1080/17482798.2015.1056817.
[26]
Grace W. Murray. 2021. Who is more trustworthy, Alexa or mom?: Children’s selective trust in a digital age.Technology, Mind, and Behavior 2, 3 (9 2021). https://doi.org/10.1037/TMB0000050
[27]
Clifford Nass, Jonathan Steuer, and Ellen R. Tauber. 1994. Computers are social actors. Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems celebrating interdependence - CHI ’94 (1994), 72–78. https://doi.org/10.1145/191666.191703
[28]
Jodi Pilgrim, Sheri Vasinda, Christie Bledsoe, and Elda Martinez. 2019. Critical thinking is critical: Octopuses, online sources, and reliability reasoning. The Reading Teacher 73, 1 (2019), 85–93. Publisher: Wiley Online Library.
[29]
Janet C. Read and Stuart MacFarlane. 2006. Using the fun toolkit and other survey methods to gather opinions in child computer interaction. In Proceedings of the 2006 conference on Interaction design and children(IDC ’06). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 81–88. https://doi.org/10.1145/1139073.1139096
[30]
Kristin E. Schaefer. 2016. Measuring Trust in Human Robot Interactions: Development of the “Trust Perception Scale-HRI”. In Robust Intelligence and Trust in Autonomous Systems, Ranjeev Mittu, Donald Sofge, Alan Wagner, and W.F. Lawless (Eds.). Springer US, Boston, MA, 191–218. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-7668-0_10
[31]
Rebecca Stower and Arvid Kappas. 2020. Oh no, my instructions were wrong! An Exploratory Pilot Towards Children’s Trust in Social Robots. 29th IEEE International Conference on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, RO-MAN 2020 (8 2020), 641–646. https://doi.org/10.1109/RO-MAN47096.2020.9223495
[32]
Yulong Tang, Paul L Harris, Hong Zou, and Qunxia Xu. 2018. The impact of emotional expressions on children’s trust judgments. Cognition and Emotion 33, 2 (2018), 318–331. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2018.1449735
[33]
A. Thijs, P. Fisser, and M. Van der Hoeven. 2014. 21e-eeuwse vaardigheden in het curriculum van het funderend onderwijs [21st century skills in the curriculum of fundamental education].
[34]
Caroline L. van Straten, Rinaldo Kühne, Jochen Peter, Chiara de Jong, and Alex Barco. 2020. Closeness, trust, and perceived social support in child-robot relationship formation. Interaction Studies 21, 1 (1 2020), 57–84. https://doi.org/10.1075/is.18052.str
[35]
Caroline L. van Straten, Jochen Peter, and Rinaldo Kühne. 2020. Child–Robot Relationship Formation: A Narrative Review of Empirical Research. International Journal of Social Robotics 12, 2 (May 2020), 325–344. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-019-00569-0
[36]
Anna-Lisa Vollmer, Robin Read, and Tony Belpaeme. 2018. Children conform, adults resist: A robot group induced peer pressure on normative social conformity. Science Robotics 3 (2018), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1126/scirobotics.aat7111
[37]
Alan R Wagner, Paul Robinette, and Ayanna Howard. 2018. Modeling the Human-Robot Trust Phenomenon: A Conceptual Framework Based on Risk. ACM Trans. Interact. Intell. Syst. 8, 4 (11 2018). https://doi.org/10.1145/3152890
[38]
Shiao Xu, Andrew Shtulman, and Andrew G. Young. 2022. Can Children Detect Fake News?. In Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society.
[39]
Rosemarie E. Yagoda and Douglas J. Gillan. 2012. You Want Me to Trust a ROBOT? The Development of a Human-Robot Interaction Trust Scale. International Journal of Social Robotics 4, 3 (8 2012), 235–248. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-012-0144-0

Cited By

View all

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
CHI EA '23: Extended Abstracts of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
April 2023
3914 pages
ISBN:9781450394222
DOI:10.1145/3544549
Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 19 April 2023

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. children
  2. information assessment
  3. robots
  4. trust

Qualifiers

  • Work in progress
  • Research
  • Refereed limited

Funding Sources

  • Stichting Internet Domeinregistratie Nederland
  • ClickNL

Conference

CHI '23
Sponsor:

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 6,164 of 23,696 submissions, 26%

Upcoming Conference

CHI 2025
ACM CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
April 26 - May 1, 2025
Yokohama , Japan

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)177
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)15
Reflects downloads up to 29 Jan 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)A Systematic Review of Trust Assessments in Human–Robot InteractionACM Transactions on Human-Robot Interaction10.1145/370612314:2(1-35)Online publication date: 29-Nov-2024
  • (2024)‘Uhm... Are you sure?’ An Exploratory Study of Trust Indicators in Robot-Directed Child SpeechProceedings of the 24th ACM International Conference on Intelligent Virtual Agents10.1145/3652988.3673933(1-4)Online publication date: 16-Sep-2024
  • (2024)“It looks useful, works just fine, but will it replace me ?" Understanding Special Educators’ Perception of Social Robots for Autism Care in IndiaProceedings of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613904.3642836(1-23)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
  • (2024)Does conversation lead to better searches? Investigating single-shot and multi-turn spoken searches with childrenInternational Journal of Child-Computer Interaction10.1016/j.ijcci.2024.10066841:COnline publication date: 1-Sep-2024

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Full Text

View this article in Full Text.

Full Text

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format.

HTML Format

Figures

Tables

Media

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media