skip to main content
10.1145/3527974.3545724acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescommConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Open access

Towards assessing effects of isolation on determinism in multi-application scenarios

Published: 23 September 2022 Publication History

Abstract

In addition to the already present heterogeneity in the network service and application ecosystem, new challenges come in the form of emerging applications which require deterministic delay performance characteristics that go beyond traditional SLAs. While hard network slicing with strict isolation is a promising candidate for addressing such requirements, it might be overly restrictive and hard to scale, hence leading to an inefficient use of available resources.
In contrast, soft slicing can help balancing isolation and determinism by allowing a configurable degree of resource sharing between slices. In this work, we follow a simulation-driven approach to study and quantify the trade-offs between variable isolation and the degree of delay-related determinism in a single-hop environment with multiple applications. The results from this scenario will serve as a foundation towards assessing the end-to-end problem.

References

[1]
ITU-T Study Group 12. 2015. ITU-T Recommendation G.107: The E-model: a computational model for use in transmission planning. Technical Report. International Telecommunication Union.
[2]
ITU-T Study Group 12. 2017. ITU-T Recommendation P.1203: Parametric bitstream-based quality assessment of progressive download and adaptive audiovisual streaming services over reliable transport. Technical Report. International Telecommunication Union.
[3]
Ibrahim Afolabi, Tarik Taleb, Konstantinos Samdanis, Adlen Ksentini, and Hannu Flinck. 2018. Network slicing and softwarization: A survey on principles, enabling technologies, and solutions. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials 20, 3 (2018), 2429--2453.
[4]
Andreas Blenk, Arsany Basta, Martin Reisslein, and Wolfgang Kellerer. 2015. Survey on network virtualization hypervisors for software defined networking. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials 18, 1 (2015), 655--685.
[5]
Marcin Bosk, Marija Gajić, Susanna Schwarzmann, Stanislav Lange, Riccardo Trivisonno, Clarissa Marquezan, and Thomas Zinner. 2021. Using 5G QoS Mechanisms to Achieve QoE-Aware Resource Allocation. In International Conference on Network and Service Management (CNSM). IEEE.
[6]
Marcin Bosk, Marija Gajić, Susanna Schwarzmann, Stanislav Lange, and Thomas Zinner. 2021. HTBQueue: A Hierarchical Token Bucket Implementation for the OMNeT++/INET Framework. In OMNeT++ Community Summit.
[7]
Chia-Yu Chang, Manuel A Jiménez, Molka Gharbaoui, Javier Sacido, Fabio Ubaldi, Chrysa Papagianni, Aitor Zabala, Luca Valcarenghi, Davide Scano, Konstantin Tomakh, et al. 2021. Slice Isolation for 5G Transport Networks. In International Conference on Network Softwarization (NetSoft). IEEE, 366--368.
[8]
Ferenc Fejes, Szilveszter Nádas, Gergő Gombos, and Sándor Laki. 2022. DeepQoS: Core-Stateless Hierarchical QoS in Programmable Switches. IEEE Transactions on Network and Service Management (2022).
[9]
Alessio Giorgetti, Davide Scano, and Luca Valcarenghi. 2021. Guaranteeing Slice Performance Isolation With SDN. Communications Letters 25, 11 (2021), 3537--3541.
[10]
Andres J Gonzalez, Jose Ordonez-Lucena, Bjarne E Helvik, Gianfranco Nencioni, Min Xie, Diego R Lopez, and Pål Grønsund. 2020. The Isolation Concept in the 5G Network Slicing. In European Conference on Networks and Communications (EuCNC). IEEE, 12--16.
[11]
Aihua Guo, Luis M. Contreras, Sergio Belotti, Reza Rokui, Yunbin Xu, Yang Zhao, and Xufeng Liu. 2022. Framework and Data Model for OTN Network Slicing. Internet-Draft draft-ietf-ccamp-yang-otn-slicing-01. Internet Engineering Task Force. https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-ccamp-yang-otn-slicing-01 Work in Progress.
[12]
Zbigniew Kotulski, Tomasz Nowak, Mariusz Sepczuk, Marcin Tunia, Rafal Artych, Krzysztof Bocianiak, Tomasz Osko, and Jean-Philippe Wary. 2017. On end-to-end approach for slice isolation in 5G networks. Fundamental challenges. In Federated conference on computer science and information systems (FedCSIS). IEEE, 783--792.
[13]
Sameer G Kulkarni, Wei Zhang, Jinho Hwang, Shriram Rajagopalan, KK Ramakrishnan, Timothy Wood, Mayutan Arumaithurai, and Xiaoming Fu. 2020. NFVnice: Dynamic backpressure and scheduling for NFV service chains. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking 28, 2 (2020), 639--652.
[14]
Stanislav Lange, Jane Pajo Frances, Thomas Zinner, Hakon Lonsethagen, and Min Xie. 2022. QoS-Aware Inter-Domain Connectivity: Control Plane Design and Operational Considerations. In International workshop on Fully-Flexible Internet Architectures and Protocols for the Next-Generation Tactile Internet (FlexNGIA).
[15]
Jieyu Li, Jiang Liu, Tao Huang, and Yunjie Liu. 2020. DRA-IG: the balance of performance isolation and resource utilization efficiency in network slicing. In International Conference on Communications (ICC). IEEE, 1--6.
[16]
Xu Li, Rui Ni, Jun Chen, Yibo Lyu, Zhichao Rong, and Rui Du. 2020. End-to-end network slicing in radio access network, transport network and core network domains. IEEE Access 8 (2020), 29525--29537.
[17]
Leonardo Linguaglossa, Stanislav Lange, Salvatore Pontarelli, Gábor Rétvári, Dario Rossi, Thomas Zinner, Roberto Bifulco, Michael Jarschel, and Giuseppe Bianchi. 2019. Survey of performance acceleration techniques for network function virtualization. Proc. IEEE 107, 4 (2019), 746--764.
[18]
Dania Marabissi and Romano Fantacci. 2019. Highly flexible RAN slicing approach to manage isolation, priority, efficiency. IEEE Access 7 (2019), 97130--97142.
[19]
Sebastien Martin, Paolo Medagliani, and Jeremie Leguay. 2021. Network Slicing for Deterministic Latency. In 2021 17th International Conference on Network and Service Management (CNSM). IEEE, 572--577.
[20]
Davide Scano, Luca Valcarenghi, Koteswararao Kondepu, Piero Castoldi, and Alessio Giorgetti. 2020. Network slicing in SDN networks. In International Conference on Transparent Optical Networks (ICTON). IEEE, 1--4.
[21]
Ricard Vilalta, Raul Muñoz, Ramon Casellas, Ricardo Martínez, Victor López, Oscar González de Dios, Antonio Pastor, Georgios P Katsikas, Felix Klaedtke, Paolo Monti, et al. 2021. TeraFlow: Secured Autonomic Traffic Management for a Tera of SDN Flows. In Joint European Conference on Networks and Communications & 6G Summit (EuCNC/6G Summit). IEEE, 377--382.
[22]
Qiang Ye, Junling Li, Kaige Qu, Weihua Zhuang, Xuemin Sherman Shen, and Xu Li. 2018. End-to-end quality of service in 5G networks: Examining the effectiveness of a network slicing framework. Vehicular Technology Magazine 13, 2 (2018), 65--74.
[23]
Qi Zhang, Jianhui Liu, and Guodong Zhao. 2018. Towards 5G Enabled Tactile Robotic Telesurgery. arXiv preprint arXiv:1803.03586 (2018).

Cited By

View all
  • (2023)End-to-End Inter-domain Transport Network Slice Management Using DLT-enabled Cloud-based SDN Controllers2023 Optical Fiber Communications Conference and Exhibition (OFC)10.23919/OFC49934.2023.10116427(1-3)Online publication date: Mar-2023
  • (2023)End-to-End Inter-domain Transport Network Slice Management Using DLT-enabled Cloud-based SDN ControllersOptical Fiber Communication Conference (OFC) 202310.1364/OFC.2023.Tu3D.3(Tu3D.3)Online publication date: 2023

Index Terms

  1. Towards assessing effects of isolation on determinism in multi-application scenarios

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Information & Contributors

        Information

        Published In

        cover image ACM Conferences
        FIRA '22: Proceedings of the ACM SIGCOMM Workshop on Future of Internet Routing & Addressing
        August 2022
        105 pages
        ISBN:9781450393287
        DOI:10.1145/3527974
        This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution International 4.0 License.

        Sponsors

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        Published: 23 September 2022

        Check for updates

        Author Tags

        1. determinism
        2. multi-application
        3. slice isolation
        4. soft slicing

        Qualifiers

        • Research-article

        Funding Sources

        Conference

        SIGCOMM '22
        Sponsor:
        SIGCOMM '22: ACM SIGCOMM 2022 Conference
        August 22, 2022
        Amsterdam, Netherlands

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate 6 of 9 submissions, 67%

        Contributors

        Other Metrics

        Bibliometrics & Citations

        Bibliometrics

        Article Metrics

        • Downloads (Last 12 months)90
        • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)18
        Reflects downloads up to 14 Sep 2024

        Other Metrics

        Citations

        Cited By

        View all
        • (2023)End-to-End Inter-domain Transport Network Slice Management Using DLT-enabled Cloud-based SDN Controllers2023 Optical Fiber Communications Conference and Exhibition (OFC)10.23919/OFC49934.2023.10116427(1-3)Online publication date: Mar-2023
        • (2023)End-to-End Inter-domain Transport Network Slice Management Using DLT-enabled Cloud-based SDN ControllersOptical Fiber Communication Conference (OFC) 202310.1364/OFC.2023.Tu3D.3(Tu3D.3)Online publication date: 2023

        View Options

        View options

        PDF

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader

        Get Access

        Login options

        Media

        Figures

        Other

        Tables

        Share

        Share

        Share this Publication link

        Share on social media