skip to main content
research-article

Working for the Invisible Machines or Pumping Information into an Empty Void? An Exploration of Wikidata Contributors' Motivations

Published: 07 April 2022 Publication History

Abstract

Structured data peer production (SDPP) platforms like Wikidata play an important role in knowledge production. Compared to traditional peer production platforms like Wikipedia, Wikidata data is more structured and intended to be used by machines, not (directly) by people; end-user interactions with Wikidata often happen through intermediary "invisible machines." Given this distinction, we wanted to understand Wikidata contributor motivations and how they are affected by usage invisibility caused by the machine intermediaries. Through an inductive thematic analysis of 15 interviews, we find that: (i) Wikidata editors take on two archetypes---Architects who define the ontological infrastructure of Wikidata, and Masons who build the database through data entry and editing; (ii) the structured nature of Wikidata reveals novel editor motivations, such as an innate drive for organizational work; (iii) most Wikidata editors have little understanding of how their contributions are used, which may demotivate some. We synthesize these insights to help guide the future design of SDPP platforms in supporting the engagement of different types of editors.

References

[1]
Ofer Arazy, Felipe Ortega, Oded Nov, Lisa Yeo, and Adam Balila. 2015. Functional roles and career paths in Wikipedia. In Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing. 1092--1105.
[2]
Saeid Asadi, Shadi Ghafghazi, and Hamid R Jamali. 2013. Motivating and discouraging factors for Wikipedians: the case study of Persian Wikipedia. Library Review (2013).
[3]
Yochai Benkler. 2016. Peer production and cooperation. In Handbook on the Economics of the Internet. Edward Elgar Publishing.
[4]
Magnus Bergquist and Jan Ljungberg. 2001. The power of gifts: organizing social relationships in open source communities. Information Systems Journal, Vol. 11, 4 (2001), 305--320.
[5]
Anne Bowser, Derek Hansen, Jennifer Preece, Yurong He, Carol Boston, and Jen Hammock. 2014. Gamifying citizen science: a study of two user groups. In Proceedings of the companion publication of the 17th ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work & social computing. 137--140.
[6]
Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke. 2012. Thematic analysis. (2012).
[7]
Susan L Bryant, Andrea Forte, and Amy Bruckman. 2005. Becoming Wikipedian: transformation of participation in a collaborative online encyclopedia. In Proceedings of the 2005 international ACM SIGGROUP conference on Supporting group work. 1--10.
[8]
Kelly Caine. 2016. Local standards for sample size at CHI. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems. 981--992.
[9]
Langtao Chen, Aaron Baird, and Detmar Straub. 2019. Why do participants continue to contribute? Evaluation of usefulness voting and commenting motivational affordances within an online knowledge community. Decision Support Systems, Vol. 118 (2019), 21--32.
[10]
Cathy C Conrad and Krista G Hilchey. 2011. A review of citizen science and community-based environmental monitoring: issues and opportunities. Environmental monitoring and assessment, Vol. 176, 1 (2011), 273--291.
[11]
Kevin Crowston and James Howison. 2003. The social structure of open source software development teams. (2003).
[12]
Kevin Crowston, Kangning Wei, James Howison, and Andrea Wiggins. 2008. Free/Libre open-source software development: What we know and what we do not know. ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR), Vol. 44, 2 (2008), 1--35.
[13]
Utpal M. Dholakia, Richard P. Bagozzi, and Lisa Klein Pearo. 2004. A social influence model of consumer participation in network- and small-group-based virtual communities. International Journal of Research in Marketing, Vol. 21, 3 (Sept. 2004), 241--263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijresmar.2003.12.004
[14]
Nu?a Fari? and Henry WW Potts. 2014. Motivations for Contributing to Health-Related Articles on Wikipedia: An Interview Study. Journal of Medical Internet Research, Vol. 16, 12 (2014), e260. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.3569 Company: Journal of Medical Internet Research Distributor: Journal of Medical Internet Research Institution: Journal of Medical Internet Research Label: Journal of Medical Internet Research Publisher: JMIR Publications Inc., Toronto, Canada.
[15]
Marylène Gagné and Edward L Deci. 2005. Self-determination theory and work motivation. Journal of Organizational behavior, Vol. 26, 4 (2005), 331--362.
[16]
Andreea D Gorbatai. 2014. The paradox of novice contributions to collective production: Evidence from Wikipedia. Available at SSRN 1949327 (2014).
[17]
Chris Jensen and Walt Scacchi. 2007. Role migration and advancement processes in OSSD projects: A comparative case study. In 29th International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE'07). IEEE, 364--374.
[18]
Corey Jergensen, Anita Sarma, and Patrick Wagstrom. 2011. The onion patch: migration in open source ecosystems. In Proceedings of the 19th ACM SIGSOFT symposium and the 13th European conference on Foundations of software engineering. 70--80.
[19]
Leigh Jin, Daniel Robey, and Marie-Claude Boudreau. 2007. Beyond development: a research agenda for investigating open source software user communities. Information Resources Management Journal (IRMJ), Vol. 20, 1 (2007), 68--80.
[20]
Robert V Kozinets. 1999. E-tribalized marketing?: The strategic implications of virtual communities of consumption. European management journal, Vol. 17, 3 (1999), 252--264.
[21]
Karim R Lakhani and Eric Von Hippel. 2004. How open source software works:?free" user-to-user assistance. In Produktentwicklung mit virtuellen Communities. Springer, 303--339.
[22]
Karim R Lakhani and Robert G Wolf. 2003. Why hackers do what they do: Understanding motivation and effort in free/open source software projects. (2003).
[23]
Claudia Müller-Birn, Benjamin Karran, Janette Lehmann, and Markus Luczak-Rösch. 2015. Peer-production system or collaborative ontology engineering effort: What is Wikidata?. In Proceedings of the 11th International Symposium on Open Collaboration. 1--10.
[24]
Kumiyo Nakakoji, Yasuhiro Yamamoto, Yoshiyuki Nishinaka, Kouichi Kishida, and Yunwen Ye. 2002. Evolution patterns of open-source software systems and communities. In Proceedings of the international workshop on Principles of software evolution. 76--85.
[25]
Dorothy Neufeld. 2021. The 50 Most Visited Websites in the World. https://www.visualcapitalist.com/the-50-most-visited-websites-in-the-world/
[26]
Oded Nov. 2007. What motivates wikipedians? Commun. ACM, Vol. 50, 11 (2007), 60--64.
[27]
Oded Nov, Ofer Arazy, and David Anderson. 2011. Dusting for science: motivation and participation of digital citizen science volunteers. In Proceedings of the 2011 iConference. 68--74.
[28]
Shaul Oreg and Oded Nov. 2008. Exploring motivations for contributing to open source initiatives: The roles of contribution context and personal values. Computers in human behavior, Vol. 24, 5 (2008), 2055--2073.
[29]
Alessandro Piscopo and Elena Simperl. 2018. Who Models the World? Collaborative Ontology Creation and User Roles in Wikidata. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, Vol. 2, CSCW (2018), 1--18.
[30]
Dana Rotman, Jenny Preece, Jen Hammock, Kezee Procita, Derek Hansen, Cynthia Parr, Darcy Lewis, and David Jacobs. 2012. Dynamic changes in motivation in collaborative citizen-science projects. In Proceedings of the ACM 2012 conference on computer supported cooperative work. 217--226.
[31]
Scholia. 2020. Homepage. https://scholia.toolforge.org/
[32]
Pankaj Setia, Balaji Rajagopalan, Vallabh Sambamurthy, and Roger Calantone. 2012. How peripheral developers contribute to open-source software development. Information Systems Research, Vol. 23, 1 (2012), 144--163.
[33]
C Estelle Smith, Bowen Yu, Anjali Srivastava, Aaron Halfaker, Loren Terveen, and Haiyi Zhu. 2020. Keeping Community in the Loop: Understanding Wikipedia Stakeholder Values for Machine Learning-Based Systems. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1--14.
[34]
Monic Sun and Feng Zhu. 2013. Ad revenue and content commercialization: Evidence from blogs. Management Science, Vol. 59, 10 (2013), 2314--2331.
[35]
Bianca Trinkenreich, Mariam Guizani, Igor Wiese, Anita Sarma, and Igor Steinmacher. 2020. Hidden Figures: Roles and Pathways of Successful OSS Contributors. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, Vol. 4, CSCW2 (2020), 1--22.
[36]
Denny Vrandevc ić and Markus Krötzsch. 2014. Wikidata: a free collaborative knowledgebase. Commun. ACM, Vol. 57, 10 (2014), 78--85.
[37]
Morten Warncke-Wang, Vivek Ranjan, Loren Terveen, and Brent Hecht. 2015. Misalignment Between Supply and Demand of Quality Content in Peer Production Communities. Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media, Vol. 9, 1 (April 2015). https://ojs.aaai.org/index.php/ICWSM/article/view/14631 Number: 1.
[38]
Howard T Welser, Dan Cosley, Gueorgi Kossinets, Austin Lin, Fedor Dokshin, Geri Gay, and Marc Smith. 2011. Finding social roles in Wikipedia. In Proceedings of the 2011 iConference. 122--129.
[39]
Wikidata. 2020 a. Douglas Adams (Q42). https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q42
[40]
Wikidata. 2020 b. Wikidata: Introduction. https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Wikidata:Introduction/en-gb
[41]
Wikidata. 2020 c. Wikidata:Contribute/Suggested and open tasks. https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Wikidata:Contribute/Suggested_and_open_tasks
[42]
Dennis M Wilkinson. 2008. Strong regularities in online peer production. In Proceedings of the 9th ACM conference on Electronic commerce. 302--309.
[43]
Heng-Li Yang and Cheng-Yu Lai. 2010. Motivations of Wikipedia content contributors. Computers in human behavior, Vol. 26, 6 (2010), 1377--1383.
[44]
Yunwen Ye and Kouichi Kishida. 2003. Toward an understanding of the motivation of open source software developers. In 25th International Conference on Software Engineering, 2003. Proceedings. IEEE, 419--429.
[45]
Xiaoquan Zhang and Feng Zhu. 2006. Intrinsic motivation of open content contributors: The case of Wikipedia. In Workshop on Information Systems and Economics, Vol. 10. Evanston, IL, 4.
[46]
Haiyi Zhu, Robert E Kraut, Yi-Chia Wang, and Aniket Kittur. 2011. Identifying shared leadership in Wikipedia. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 3431--3434.
[47]
Haiyi Zhu, Bowen Yu, Aaron Halfaker, and Loren Terveen. 2018. Value-sensitive algorithm design: Method, case study, and lessons. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, Vol. 2, CSCW (2018), 1--23.
[48]
Haiyi Zhu, Amy Zhang, Jiping He, Robert E Kraut, and Aniket Kittur. 2013. Effects of peer feedback on contribution: a field experiment in Wikipedia. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 2253--2262.

Cited By

View all

Index Terms

  1. Working for the Invisible Machines or Pumping Information into an Empty Void? An Exploration of Wikidata Contributors' Motivations

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction
    Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction  Volume 6, Issue CSCW1
    CSCW1
    April 2022
    2511 pages
    EISSN:2573-0142
    DOI:10.1145/3530837
    Issue’s Table of Contents
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 07 April 2022
    Published in PACMHCI Volume 6, Issue CSCW1

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. interview study
    2. peer production
    3. social computing
    4. structured data
    5. wikidata

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article

    Funding Sources

    • National Science Foundation

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)44
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)7
    Reflects downloads up to 09 Jan 2025

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all

    View Options

    Login options

    Full Access

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media