skip to main content
10.1145/3510513.3510517acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicnccConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Fair Personalized Recommendation through Improved Matrix Factorization by Neural Networks

Published: 10 May 2022 Publication History

Abstract

Existing recommendation systems mainly focus on the improvement of accuracy but neglect to involve non-popular items, which leads to the unfairness problem of recommendation results. More specifically, the low exposure rate of non-popular items impairs the diversity of recommendation results and thus weakens the customer experience for online e-commerce platforms. To address this problem, we propose a Fair Personalized Recommendation Algorithm(FPRA) combining improved Matrix Factorization and Back-Propagation Neural Network, which can simultaneously acquire both the accuracy and the fairness of recommendation results. In the FPRA, popular items and non-popular items are separated according to a pre-defined proportion. On the one hand, we consider that the influence of scenario factors (i.e., browsing location, clicking number, etc.) will generate users’ assessment bias for popular items, and we leverage BP Neural Networks to train the bias when recommending popular items. On the other hand, we design a new function, namely Fairness & Accuracy function, to achieve the goal that non-popular items will be presented to customers more frequently. Using this function, the goal can be achieved by searching for the optimal solution under the condition constraints. Experimental results show that the effectiveness of our proposed that FPRA greatly outperforms other baseline methods.

Supplementary Material

Presentation slides (p19-fang-supplement.pptx)

References

[1]
[1] Bauer J, Biolo G, Cederholm T, et al. Evidence-based recommendations for optimal dietary protein intake in older people: a position paper from the PROT-AGE Study Group[J]. Journal of the american Medical Directors association, 2013, 14(8): 542-559.
[2]
[2] S. B. Roy, S. Amer-Yahia, A. Chawla, G. Das, and C. Yu, “Space efficiency in group recommendation,” The VLDB Journal, vol. 19, no. 6, pp. 877–900, 2010.
[3]
[3] S. Amer-Yahia, S. B. Roy, A. Chawlat, G. Das, and C. Yu, “Group recommendation: Semantics and efficiency,” Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 754–765, 2009.
[4]
[4] T. N. Nguyen and F. Ricci, “Situation-dependent combination of long-term and session-based preferences in group recommendations: an experimental analysis,” in Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Symposium on Applied Computing, 2018, pp. 1366–1373.
[5]
[5] N. Capuano, F. Chiclana, E. Herrera-Viedma, H. Fujita, and V. Loia, “Fuzzy group decision making for influence-aware recommendations,” Computers in Human Behavior, vol. 101, pp. 371–379, 2019.
[6]
[6] J. Castro, J. Lu, G. Zhang, Y. Dong, and L. Martínez, “Opinion dynamics-based group recommender systems,” IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems, vol. 48, no. 12, pp. 2394–2406, 2017.
[7]
[7] Christensen I, Schiaffino S, Armentano M. Social group recommendation in the tourism domain[J]. Journal of Intelligent Information Systems, 2016, 47(2): 209-231.
[8]
[8] B.-H. Li, A.-M. Zhang, W. Zheng, S. Wan, X.-L. Qin, X. Li, and H.-L. Yin, “Grip: a group recommender based on interactive preference model,” Journal of Computer Science and Technology, vol. 33, no. 5, pp. 1039–1055, 2018.
[9]
[9] H. Xu, Y. Ding, J. Sun, K. Zhao, and Y. Chen, “Dynamic group recommendation based on the attention mechanism,” Future Internet, vol. 11, no. 9, p. 198, 2019.
[10]
[10] H. Steck, “Calibrated recommendations,” in Proceedings of the 12th ACM conference on recommender systems, 2018, pp. 154–162.
[11]
[11] M. Kaya and D. Bridge, “A comparison of calibrated and intent-aware recommendations,” in Proceedings of the 13th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems, 2019, pp. 151–159.
[12]
[12] R. Konishi, F. Nakamura, and Y. Kiyoki, “Calibrated web personalization with adaptive recurrent computing,” in 2020 IEEE 14th International Conference on Semantic Computing (ICSC).   IEEE, 2020, pp. 9–16.
[13]
[13] I. Rabiu, N. Salim, A. Da’u, and A. Osman, “Recommender system based on temporal models: a systematic review,” Applied Sciences, vol. 10, no. 7, p. 2204, 2020.
[14]
[14] Z. Farahi, A. Moeini, and A. Kamandi, “Bloofi representation for item/user in recommender systems,” in 2019 5th International Conference on Web Research (ICWR).   IEEE, 2019, pp. 67–73.
[15]
[15] K. Huang, Y. Liu, S. Nepal, Y. Fan, S. Chen, and W. Tan, “A novel equitable trustworthy mechanism for service recommendation in the evolving service ecosystem,” in International Conference on Service-Oriented Computing.   Springer, 2014, pp. 510–517.
[16]
[16] Z. Jia, Y. Yang, W. Gao, and X. Chen, “User-based collaborative filtering for tourist attraction recommendations,” in 2015 IEEE International Conference on Computational Intelligence & Communication Technology.   IEEE, 2015, pp. 22–25.
[17]
[17] Zhao, Zhi-Dan, and Ming-Sheng Shang. ”User-based collaborative-filtering recommendation algorithms on hadoop.” 2010 third international conference on knowledge discovery and data mining. IEEE, 2010.
[18]
[18] H. Abdollahpouri and R. Burke, “Multi-stakeholder recommendation and its connection to multi-sided fairness,” arXiv preprint arXiv:1907.13158, 2019.
[19]
[19] Burke R. Multisided fairness for recommendation[J]. arXiv preprint arXiv:1707.00093, 2017.

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Other conferences
ICNCC '21: Proceedings of the 2021 10th International Conference on Networks, Communication and Computing
December 2021
146 pages
ISBN:9781450385848
DOI:10.1145/3510513
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 10 May 2022

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. Fair Personalized Recommendation
  2. Matrix Factorization
  3. Neural Networks
  4. Non-popular items recommendation

Qualifiers

  • Research-article
  • Research
  • Refereed limited

Conference

ICNCC 2021

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • 0
    Total Citations
  • 59
    Total Downloads
  • Downloads (Last 12 months)10
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1
Reflects downloads up to 03 Jan 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format.

HTML Format

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media