skip to main content
10.1145/3503161.3547898acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmmConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Understanding Political Polarization via Jointly Modeling Users, Connections and Multimodal Contents on Heterogeneous Graphs

Published: 10 October 2022 Publication History

Abstract

Understanding political polarization on social platforms is important as public opinions may become increasingly extreme when they are circulated in homogeneous communities, thus potentially causing damage in the real world. Automatically detecting the political ideology of social media users can help better understand political polarization. However, it is challenging due to the scarcity of ideology labels, complexity of multimodal contents, and cost of time-consuming data collection process. Most previous frameworks either focus on unimodal content or do not scale up well. In this study, we adopt a heterogeneous graph neural network to jointly model user characteristics, multimodal post contents as well as user-item relations in a bipartite graph to learn a comprehensive and effective user embedding without requiring ideology labels. We apply our framework to online discussions about economy and public health topics. The learned embeddings are then used to detect political ideology and understand political polarization. Our framework outperforms the unimodal, early/late fusion baselines, and homogeneous GNN frameworks by a margin of at least 9% absolute gain in the area under the receiver operating characteristic on two social media datasets. More importantly, our work does not require a time-consuming data collection process, which allows faster detection and in turn allows the policy makers to conduct analysis and design policies in time to respond to crises. We also show that our framework learns meaningful user embeddings and can help better understand political polarization. Notable differences in user descriptions, topics, images, and levels of retweet/quote activities are observed. Our framework for decoding user-content interaction shows wide applicability in understanding political polarization. Furthermore, it can be extended to user-item bipartite information networks for other applications such as content and product recommendation.

Supplementary Material

MP4 File (MM22-fp0601.mp4)
Presentation video of "Understanding Political Polarization via Jointly Modeling Users, Connections and Multimodal Contents on Heterogeneous Graph"

References

[1]
Cristina Angelico, Juri Marcucci, Marcello Miccoli, and Filippo Quarta. 2021. Can we measure inflation expectations using Twitter? Bank of Italy Temi di Discussione (Working Paper) No, Vol. 1318 (2021).
[2]
David M Blei, Andrew Y Ng, and Michael I Jordan. 2003. Latent dirichlet allocation. the Journal of machine Learning research, Vol. 3 (2003), 993--1022.
[3]
Javier Borge-Holthoefer, Walid Magdy, Kareem Darwish, and Ingmar Weber. 2015. Content and network dynamics behind Egyptian political polarization on Twitter. In Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing. 700--711.
[4]
Long Chen, Hanjia Lyu, Tongyu Yang, Yu Wang, and Jiebo Luo. 2021. Fine-grained analysis of the use of neutral and controversial terms for COVID-19 on social media. In International Conference on Social Computing, Behavioral-Cultural Modeling and Prediction and Behavior Representation in Modeling and Simulation. Springer, 57--67.
[5]
Tianlang Chen, Yuxiao Chen, and Jiebo Luo. 2017a. A selfie is worth a thousand words: Mining personal patterns behind user selfie-posting behaviours. In Proceedings of the 26th international conference on world wide web companion. 23--31.
[6]
Wei Chen, Xiao Zhang, Tengjiao Wang, Bishan Yang, and Yi Li. 2017b. Opinion-aware Knowledge Graph for Political Ideology Detection. In IJCAI, Vol. 17. 3647--3653.
[7]
Michael D Conover, Bruno Goncc alves, Jacob Ratkiewicz, Alessandro Flammini, and Filippo Menczer. 2011a. Predicting the political alignment of twitter users. In 2011 IEEE third international conference on privacy, security, risk and trust and 2011 IEEE third international conference on social computing. IEEE, 192--199.
[8]
Michael D Conover, Jacob Ratkiewicz, Matthew Francisco, Bruno Goncc alves, Filippo Menczer, and Alessandro Flammini. 2011b. Political polarization on twitter. In Fifth international AAAI conference on weblogs and social media.
[9]
Paul DiMaggio, John Evans, and Bethany Bryson. 1996. Have American's social attitudes become more polarized? American journal of Sociology, Vol. 102, 3 (1996), 690--755.
[10]
Stanley Feldman. 2013. Political ideology. (2013).
[11]
Dieter Frey. 1986. Recent research on selective exposure to information. Advances in experimental social psychology, Vol. 19 (1986), 41--80.
[12]
R Kelly Garrett. 2009. Politically motivated reinforcement seeking: Reframing the selective exposure debate. Journal of communication, Vol. 59, 4 (2009), 676--699.
[13]
Jennifer Golbeck and Derek Hansen. 2014. A method for computing political preference among Twitter followers. Social Networks, Vol. 36 (2014), 177--184.
[14]
Jeffrey Gottfried and Elisa Shearer. 2016. News use across social media platforms 2016. (2016).
[15]
Palash Goyal and Emilio Ferrara. 2018. Graph embedding techniques, applications, and performance: A survey. Knowledge-Based Systems, Vol. 151 (2018), 78--94.
[16]
Anatoliy Gruzd and Jeffrey Roy. 2014. Investigating political polarization on Twitter: A Canadian perspective. Policy & internet, Vol. 6, 1 (2014), 28--45.
[17]
Stefano Guarino, Noemi Trino, Alessandro Celestini, Alessandro Chessa, and Gianni Riotta. 2020. Characterizing networks of propaganda on twitter: a case study. Applied Network Science, Vol. 5, 1 (2020), 1--22.
[18]
Mihai Gurban, Jean-Philippe Thiran, Thomas Drugman, and Thierry Dutoit. 2008. Dynamic modality weighting for multi-stream hmms inaudio-visual speech recognition. In Proceedings of the 10th international conference on Multimodal interfaces. 237--240.
[19]
Kaiming He, Xiangyu Zhang, Shaoqing Ren, and Jian Sun. 2016. Deep residual learning for image recognition. In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition. 770--778.
[20]
Sepp Hochreiter and Jürgen Schmidhuber. 1997. Long short-term memory. Neural computation, Vol. 9, 8 (1997), 1735--1780.
[21]
Homa Hosseinmardi, Amir Ghasemian, Aaron Clauset, Markus Mobius, David M Rothschild, and Duncan J Watts. 2021. Examining the consumption of radical content on YouTube. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Vol. 118, 32 (2021).
[22]
Binxuan Huang and Kathleen M Carley. 2019. Syntax-aware aspect level sentiment classification with graph attention networks. arXiv preprint arXiv:1909.02606 (2019).
[23]
Qi Huang, Junshuai Yu, Jia Wu, and Bin Wang. 2020. Heterogeneous graph attention networks for early detection of rumors on twitter. In 2020 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN). IEEE, 1--8.
[24]
Xiaowei Jia, Handong Zhao, Zhe Lin, Ajinkya Kale, and Vipin Kumar. 2020. Personalized image retrieval with sparse graph representation learning. In Proceedings of the 26th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining. 2735--2743.
[25]
Zhiwei Jin, Juan Cao, Han Guo, Yongdong Zhang, and Jiebo Luo. 2017. Multimodal fusion with recurrent neural networks for rumor detection on microblogs. In Proceedings of the 25th ACM international conference on Multimedia. 795--816.
[26]
Thomas N Kipf and Max Welling. 2016. Semi-Supervised Classification with Graph Convolutional Networks. arXiv preprint arXiv:1609.02907 (2016).
[27]
Kaitlin Kirasich, Trace Smith, and Bivin Sadler. 2018. Random forest vs logistic regression: binary classification for heterogeneous datasets. SMU Data Science Review, Vol. 1, 3 (2018), 9.
[28]
Alex Krizhevsky, Ilya Sutskever, and Geoffrey E Hinton. 2012. Imagenet classification with deep convolutional neural networks. Advances in neural information processing systems, Vol. 25 (2012), 1097--1105.
[29]
Weijian Li, Yuhang Lu, Kang Zheng, Haofu Liao, Chihung Lin, Jiebo Luo, Chi-Tung Cheng, Jing Xiao, Le Lu, Chang-Fu Kuo, et al. 2020. Structured landmark detection via topology-adapting deep graph learning. In European Conference on Computer Vision. Springer, 266--283.
[30]
Hongzhan Lin, Jing Ma, Mingfei Cheng, Zhiwei Yang, Liangliang Chen, and Guang Chen. 2021. Rumor Detection on Twitter with Claim-Guided Hierarchical Graph Attention Networks. arXiv preprint arXiv:2110.04522 (2021).
[31]
Qingsong Lv, Ming Ding, Qiang Liu, Yuxiang Chen, Wenzheng Feng, Siming He, Chang Zhou, Jianguo Jiang, Yuxiao Dong, and Jie Tang. 2021. Are We Really Making Much Progress? Revisiting, Benchmarking and Refining Heterogeneous Graph Neural Networks. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1150--1160. https://doi.org/10.1145/3447548.3467350
[32]
Hanjia Lyu, Long Chen, Yu Wang, and Jiebo Luo. 2020. Sense and sensibility: Characterizing social media users regarding the use of controversial terms for covid-19. IEEE Transactions on Big Data (2020).
[33]
Hanjia Lyu, Yangxin Fan, Ziyu Xiong, Mayya Komisarchik, and Jiebo Luo. 2021. Understanding Public Opinion Toward the #StopAsianHate Movement and the Relation With Racially Motivated Hate Crimes in the US. IEEE Transactions on Computational Social Systems (2021).
[34]
Hanjia Lyu, Junda Wang, Wei Wu, Viet Duong, Xiyang Zhang, Timothy D Dye, and Jiebo Luo. 2022a. Social media study of public opinions on potential COVID-19 vaccines: informing dissent, disparities, and dissemination. Intelligent medicine, Vol. 2, 01 (2022), 1--12.
[35]
Hanjia Lyu, Zihe Zheng, and Jiebo Luo. 2022b. Misinformation versus Facts: Understanding the Influence of News regarding COVID-19 Vaccines on Vaccine Uptake. Health Data Science, Vol. 2022 (2022).
[36]
Tomas Mikolov, Kai Chen, Greg Corrado, and Jeffrey Dean. 2013. Efficient estimation of word representations in vector space. arXiv preprint arXiv:1301.3781 (2013).
[37]
Brendan O'Connor, Ramnath Balasubramanyan, Bryan R Routledge, and Noah A Smith. 2010. From tweets to polls: Linking text sentiment to public opinion time series. In Fourth international AAAI conference on weblogs and social media.
[38]
Aaron van den Oord, Yazhe Li, and Oriol Vinyals. 2018. Representation learning with contrastive predictive coding. arXiv preprint arXiv:1807.03748 (2018).
[39]
Anmol Panda, Divya Siddarth, and Joyojeet Pal. 2020. COVID, BLM, and the polarization of US politicians on Twitter. arXiv preprint arXiv:2008.03263 (2020).
[40]
Pew Research Center. 2015. 2014 U.S. Religious Landscape Study. (2015). https://www.pewforum.org/religious-landscape-study/
[41]
Daniel Preoct iuc-Pietro, Ye Liu, Daniel Hopkins, and Lyle Ungar. 2017. Beyond binary labels: political ideology prediction of twitter users. In Proceedings of the 55th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers). 729--740.
[42]
Nils Reimers and Iryna Gurevych. 2019. Sentence-BERT: Sentence Embeddings using Siamese BERT-Networks. In Proceedings of the 2019 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. Association for Computational Linguistics. https://arxiv.org/abs/1908.10084
[43]
Peter J Rousseeuw. 1987. Silhouettes: a graphical aid to the interpretation and validation of cluster analysis. Journal of computational and applied mathematics, Vol. 20 (1987), 53--65.
[44]
Weiping Song, Zhiping Xiao, Yifan Wang, Laurent Charlin, Ming Zhang, and Jian Tang. 2019. Session-based social recommendation via dynamic graph attention networks. In Proceedings of the Twelfth ACM international conference on web search and data mining. 555--563.
[45]
Andranik Tumasjan, Timm Sprenger, Philipp Sandner, and Isabell Welpe. 2010. Predicting elections with twitter: What 140 characters reveal about political sentiment. In Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media, Vol. 4.
[46]
Aleksandra Urman. 2020. Context matters: political polarization on Twitter from a comparative perspective. Media, culture & society, Vol. 42, 6 (2020), 857--879.
[47]
Laurens Van der Maaten and Geoffrey Hinton. 2008. Visualizing data using t-SNE. Journal of machine learning research, Vol. 9, 11 (2008).
[48]
Petar Velivc ković, Guillem Cucurull, Arantxa Casanova, Adriana Romero, Pietro Liò, and Yoshua Bengio. 2018. Graph Attention Networks. In International Conference on Learning Representations. https://openreview.net/forum?id=rJXMpikCZ
[49]
Isaac Waller and Ashton Anderson. 2021. Quantifying social organization and political polarization in online platforms. Nature (2021), 1--5.
[50]
Kai Wang, Weizhou Shen, Yunyi Yang, Xiaojun Quan, and Rui Wang. 2020. Relational graph attention network for aspect-based sentiment analysis. arXiv preprint arXiv:2004.12362 (2020).
[51]
Yu Wang, Yang Feng, Zhe Hong, Ryan Berger, and Jiebo Luo. 2017a. How polarized have we become? a multimodal classification of trump followers and clinton followers. In International conference on social informatics. Springer, 440--456.
[52]
Yu Wang, Jiebo Luo, and Xiyang Zhang. 2017b. When follow is just one click away: Understanding twitter follow behavior in the 2016 us presidential election. In International Conference on Social Informatics. Springer, 409--425.
[53]
Galen Weld, Maria Glenski, and Tim Althoff. 2021. Political Bias and Factualness in News Sharing across more than 100,000 Online Communities. arXiv preprint arXiv:2102.08537 (2021).
[54]
Svante Wold, Kim Esbensen, and Paul Geladi. 1987. Principal component analysis. Chemometrics and intelligent laboratory systems, Vol. 2, 1--3 (1987), 37--52.
[55]
Zhiping Xiao, Weiping Song, Haoyan Xu, Zhicheng Ren, and Yizhou Sun. 2020. Timme: Twitter ideology-detection via multi-task multi-relational embedding. In Proceedings of the 26th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining. 2258--2268.
[56]
Rex Ying, Ruining He, Kaifeng Chen, Pong Eksombatchai, William L Hamilton, and Jure Leskovec. 2018. Graph convolutional neural networks for web-scale recommender systems. In Proceedings of the 24th ACM SIGKDD international conference on knowledge discovery & data mining. 974--983.
[57]
Ben P Yuhas, Moise H Goldstein, and Terrence J Sejnowski. 1989. Integration of acoustic and visual speech signals using neural networks. IEEE Communications Magazine, Vol. 27, 11 (1989), 65--71.
[58]
Chuxu Zhang, Dongjin Song, Chao Huang, Ananthram Swami, and Nitesh V Chawla. 2019. Heterogeneous graph neural network. In Proceedings of the 25th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining. 793--803.
[59]
Zhongping Zhang, Tianlang Chen, Zheng Zhou, Jiaxin Li, and Jiebo Luo. 2018. How to become Instagram famous: Post popularity prediction with dual-attention. In 2018 IEEE international conference on big data (big data). IEEE, 2383--2392.

Cited By

View all

Index Terms

  1. Understanding Political Polarization via Jointly Modeling Users, Connections and Multimodal Contents on Heterogeneous Graphs

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Information & Contributors

      Information

      Published In

      cover image ACM Conferences
      MM '22: Proceedings of the 30th ACM International Conference on Multimedia
      October 2022
      7537 pages
      ISBN:9781450392037
      DOI:10.1145/3503161
      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Sponsors

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      Published: 10 October 2022

      Permissions

      Request permissions for this article.

      Check for updates

      Author Tags

      1. heterogeneous graph
      2. multimedia
      3. political polarization
      4. user-content interaction

      Qualifiers

      • Research-article

      Conference

      MM '22
      Sponsor:

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate 2,145 of 8,556 submissions, 25%

      Contributors

      Other Metrics

      Bibliometrics & Citations

      Bibliometrics

      Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)96
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)18
      Reflects downloads up to 13 Jan 2025

      Other Metrics

      Citations

      Cited By

      View all

      View Options

      Login options

      View options

      PDF

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader

      Media

      Figures

      Other

      Tables

      Share

      Share

      Share this Publication link

      Share on social media