skip to main content
10.1145/3501409.3501518acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageseitceConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Comparison of Concrete Detection Results with Different Ultrasonic Excitation Signals

Published: 31 December 2021 Publication History

Abstract

Concrete ultrasonic testing has always been a research hotspot. In order to compare the differences of the concrete ultrasonic imaging effects under different excitation signals, three signals are selected as detection excitation signals respectively, and the received array detection echo signal is imaged by 12 aperture signal arrangement. In order to avoid the error caused by delay and phase, the aperture signal excited by sinusoidal pulse signal and Gaussian pulse signal is enveloped; The aperture signal excited by the sinusoidal pulse signal compiled by 13 bit Barker code is processed by pulse compression and sidelobe suppression. The processed aperture signal has a narrow pulse width and improves the imaging resolution. Finally, the imaging image is processed by dB amplitude processing, and the imaging quality is significantly improved.

References

[1]
Zhang X Q, Wang Z J (2017). Development and application of nondestructive testing methods for concrete. Nondestructive Testing, 39(04), 1--5.
[2]
Shen J H, Li Z J, Zhang Z Y (2000). Nondestructive testing techniques and their applications in civil engineering. Nondestructive Testing, 22(11), 497--501.
[3]
Peng Y H, Song F L (2003). Development and application of non-destructive testing technology for concrete. Journal of Dalian Institute of Nationalities, 5(3):52--54.
[4]
TODA Katsuya, HATANAKA Hiroaki, HAYASHI oshitaka (2004). Diagnosis of concrete deterioration by nondestructive evaluation. IHI Engineering Review, 37(3), 97--103.
[5]
Shang T P (2002). Ultrasonic detection method of concrete crack depth, Nondestructive Testing, 24(1), 6--8.
[6]
Li Q, Ma H, Chen W (2012). Application of Improved Computerized Tomography Algorithm in Concrete Ultrasonic Imaging. Failure Analysis and Prevention, 7(2), 104--108.
[7]
Li Q F, Shi L H, Liang D K (2010). Research on 2D imaging technique for concrete cross section. Chinese Journal of Acoustics, 29(01), 85--96.
[8]
Li Q F, Wang Y, Liu R M (2015). Ultrasonic Computed Tomography Imaging Method of Concrete Materials Based on Simulated Annealing Genetic Algorithm. Transactions of Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 32(03), 341--347.
[9]
CHEN G, SUN Y, CHEN W, LI Q (2013). Application of HHT in Ultrasonic Testing of Coarse Grain Materials. Failure Analysis and Prevention, 8(3), 141--144.
[10]
Zhou Z G, Ma B Q, Sun Z M (2014). Application of phase-encoded pulse compression method in air-coupled ultrasonic detection signal processing. Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 50(02), 48--54.
[11]
Mao Q Q, Chen Y, SHI W Z (2020). Frequency-domain phase-coherent synthetic aperture focused ultrasound imaging. Journal of Instrumentation, 41(02), 135--145.
[12]
Wang G, Chen Y, Li Q (2019). Ultrasonic Computerized Tomography Imaging Method With Combinatorial Optimization Algorithm for Concrete Pile Foundation. IEEE ACCESS, 7, 132395--132405.
[13]
Wei X, Chen Y, Lu C (2020). Acoustic emission source localization method for high-speed train bogie. Multimed Tools Appl, 79, 14933--14949.
[14]
Mao Q, Chen Y, Chen M (2020). A Fast Interface Reconstruction Method for Frequency-Domain Synthetic Aperture Focusing Technique Imaging of Two-Layered Systems with Non-planar Interface Based on Virtual Points Measuring. Journal of Nondestructive Evaluation, 39, 41.
[15]
Su, F (2020). Hourly broadband wide-product linear FM signal distance side flap suppression. Modern Radar, 42(09), 53--56.
[16]
Li Q, Qi T, Shi L (2020). Intelligent recognition of acoustic emission signals from damage of glass fiber-reinforced plastics. Advanced Composites Letters, 29, 1--10.
[17]
Wang G, Huang L X, Wang Z G (2020). A method to improve the imaging quality of frequency domain synthetic aperture ultrasound arrays. Journal of Sensing Technology, 33(09), 1285--1291.

Index Terms

  1. Comparison of Concrete Detection Results with Different Ultrasonic Excitation Signals

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    EITCE '21: Proceedings of the 2021 5th International Conference on Electronic Information Technology and Computer Engineering
    October 2021
    1723 pages
    ISBN:9781450384322
    DOI:10.1145/3501409
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 31 December 2021

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. Image quality
    2. Structure imaging
    3. concrete
    4. excitation signal
    5. signal-to-noise ratio

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

    Conference

    EITCE 2021

    Acceptance Rates

    EITCE '21 Paper Acceptance Rate 294 of 531 submissions, 55%;
    Overall Acceptance Rate 508 of 972 submissions, 52%

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • 0
      Total Citations
    • 25
      Total Downloads
    • Downloads (Last 12 months)9
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)2
    Reflects downloads up to 14 Sep 2024

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    View Options

    Get Access

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media