research-article

Auditing the Biases Enacted by YouTube for Political Topics in Germany

Authors:

Andreas Breiter,

Yannis TheocharisAuthors Info & Claims

MuC '21: Proceedings of Mensch und Computer 2021

Pages 456 - 468

https://doi.org/10.1145/3473856.3473864

Published: 13 September 2021 Publication History

Abstract

With YouTube’s growing importance as a news platform, its recommendation system came under increased scrutiny. Recognizing YouTube’s recommendation system as a broadcaster of media, we explore the applicability of laws that require broadcasters to give important political, ideological, and social groups adequate opportunity to express themselves in the broadcasted program of the service. We present audits as an important tool to enforce such laws and to ensure that a system operates in the public’s interest. To examine whether YouTube is enacting certain biases, we collected video recommendations about political topics by following chains of ten recommendations per video. Our findings suggest that YouTube’s recommendation system is enacting important biases. We find that YouTube is recommending increasingly popular but topically unrelated videos. The sadness evoked by the recommended videos decreases while the happiness increases. We discuss the strong popularity bias we identified and analyze the link between the popularity of content and emotions. We also discuss how audits empower researchers and civic hackers to monitor complex machine learning (ML)-based systems like YouTube’s recommendation system.

References

[1]

Sarkis Abrilian, Laurence Devillers, S Buisine, and Jean-Claude Martin. 2005. EmoTV1: Annotation of real-life emotions for the specification of multimodal affective interfaces. In HCI International, Vol. 401. 407–408.

[2]

Oscar Alvarado, Hendrik Heuer, Vero Vanden Abeele, Andreas Breiter, and Katrien Verbert. 2020. Middle-Aged Video Consumers’ Beliefs About Algorithmic Recommendations on YouTube. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact. 4, CSCW2, Article 121 (Oct. 2020), 24 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3415192

Digital Library

[3]

Oscar Alvarado and Annika Waern. 2018. Towards Algorithmic Experience: Initial Efforts for Social Media Contexts. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI ’18). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 286:1–286:12. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3173860

Digital Library

[4]

Jane Arthurs, Sophia Drakopoulou, and Alessandro Gandini. 2018. Researching YouTube. Convergence 24, 1 (2018), 3–15. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354856517737222 arXiv:https://doi.org/10.1177/1354856517737222

[5]

S.J. Ball-Rokeach and M.L. DeFleur. 1976. A Dependency Model of Mass-Media Effects. Communication Research 3, 1 (1976), 3–21. https://doi.org/10.1177/009365027600300101 arXiv:https://doi.org/10.1177/009365027600300101

[6]

Y. Baveye, E. Dellandréa, C. Chamaret, and L. Chen. 2015. LIRIS-ACCEDE: A Video Database for Affective Content Analysis. IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing 6, 1 (Jan 2015), 43–55. https://doi.org/10.1109/TAFFC.2015.2396531

Digital Library

[7]

Ludovico Boratto, Gianni Fenu, and Mirko Marras. 2019. The Effect of Algorithmic Bias on Recommender Systems for Massive Open Online Courses. In Advances in Information Retrieval, Leif Azzopardi, Benno Stein, Norbert Fuhr, Philipp Mayr, Claudia Hauff, and Djoerd Hiemstra(Eds.). Springer International Publishing, Cham, 457–472.

[8]

Jennings Bryant and Dolf Zillmann. 1984. Using television to alleviate boredom and stress: Selective exposure as a function of induced excitational states. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media 28, 1 (1984), 1–20.

[9]

Yen-Liang Chen, Chia-Ling Chang, and Chin-Sheng Yeh. 2017. Emotion classification of YouTube videos. Decision Support Systems 101 (2017), 40 – 50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2017.05.014

Digital Library

[10]

Elanor Colleoni, Alessandro Rozza, and Adam Arvidsson. 2014. Echo chamber or public sphere? Predicting political orientation and measuring political homophily in Twitter using big data. Journal of communication 64, 2 (2014), 317–332.

[11]

Michael D. Conover, Bruno Goncalves, Jacob Ratkiewicz, Alessandro Flammini, and Filippo Menczer. 2011. Predicting the Political Alignment of Twitter Users. In 2011 IEEE Third International Conference on Privacy, Security, Risk and Trust and 2011 IEEE Third International Conference on Social Computing. 192–199. https://doi.org/10.1109/PASSAT/SocialCom.2011.34

[12]

Dan Cosley, Shyong K. Lam, Istvan Albert, Joseph A. Konstan, and John Riedl. 2003. Is Seeing Believing?: How Recommender System Interfaces Affect Users’ Opinions. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI ’03). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 585–592. https://doi.org/10.1145/642611.642713

Digital Library

[13]

Paul Covington, Jay Adams, and Emre Sargin. 2016. Deep Neural Networks for YouTube Recommendations. In Proceedings of the 10th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems (Boston, Massachusetts, USA) (RecSys ’16). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 191–198. https://doi.org/10.1145/2959100.2959190

Digital Library

[14]

Kate Crawford. 2016. Can an Algorithm be Agonistic? Ten Scenes from Life in Calculated Publics. Science, Technology, & Human Values 41, 1 (2016), 77–92. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243915589635 arXiv:https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243915589635

[15]

Amit Datta, Michael Carl Tschantz, and Anupam Datta. 2015. Automated Experiments on Ad Privacy Settings. Proceedings on Privacy Enhancing Technologies 2015, 1(2015), 92 – 112. https://doi.org/10.1515/popets-2015-0007

[16]

M.X. Delli Carpini and S. Keeter. 1997. What Americans Know About Politics and Why it Matters. Yale University Press, New Haven.

[17]

Daantje Derks, Agneta H. Fischer, and Arjan E.R. Bos. 2008. The role of emotion in computer-mediated communication: A review. Computers in Human Behavior 24, 3 (2008), 766 – 785. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2007.04.004 Instructional Support for Enhancing Students’ Information Problem Solving Ability.

Digital Library

[18]

Abhinav Dhall, O.V. Ramana Murthy, Roland Goecke, Jyoti Joshi, and Tom Gedeon. 2015. Video and Image Based Emotion Recognition Challenges in the Wild: EmotiW 2015. In Proceedings of the 2015 ACM on International Conference on Multimodal Interaction (Seattle, Washington, USA) (ICMI ’15). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 423–426. https://doi.org/10.1145/2818346.2829994

Digital Library

[19]

Graham Dove, Kim Halskov, Jodi Forlizzi, and John Zimmerman. 2017. UX Design Innovation: Challenges for Working with Machine Learning As a Design Material. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Denver, Colorado, USA) (CHI ’17). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 278–288. https://doi.org/10.1145/3025453.3025739

Digital Library

[20]

Robert M Entman. 2007. Framing bias: Media in the distribution of power. Journal of communication 57, 1 (2007), 163–173.

[21]

Robert Epstein and Ronald E. Robertson. 2015. The search engine manipulation effect (SEME) and its possible impact on the outcomes of elections. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 112, 33(2015), E4512–E4521. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1419828112 arXiv:https://www.pnas.org/content/112/33/E4512.full.pdf

[22]

Motahhare Eslami, Aimee Rickman, Kristen Vaccaro, Amirhossein Aleyasen, Andy Vuong, Karrie Karahalios, Kevin Hamilton, and Christian Sandvig. 2015. ”I Always Assumed That I Wasn’T Really That Close to [Her]”: Reasoning About Invisible Algorithms in News Feeds. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI ’15). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 153–162. https://doi.org/10.1145/2702123.2702556

Digital Library

[23]

Federal Republic of Germany. 2016. Interstate Broadcasting Agreement (Rundfunkstaatsvertrag). https://germanlawarchive.iuscomp.org/?p=655

[24]

Emilio Ferrara and Zeyao Yang. 2015. Quantifying the effect of sentiment on information diffusion in social media. PeerJ Computer Science 1(2015), e26.

[25]

Max Fisher and Katrin Bennhold. 2018. As Germans Seek News, YouTube Delivers Far-Right Tirades. https://www.nytimes.com/2018/09/07/world/europe/youtube-far-right-extremism.html

[26]

Sheera Frenkel. 2018. Facebook to Let Users Rank Credibility of News. https://www.nytimes.com/2018/01/19/technology/facebook-news-feed.html

[27]

Tarleton Gillespie. 2010. The politics of ‘platforms’. New Media & Society 12, 3 (2010), 347–364. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444809342738 arXiv:https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444809342738

[28]

James J Gross. 1998. The emerging field of emotion regulation: An integrative review. Review of general psychology 2, 3 (1998), 271–299.

[29]

Sara Hajian, Francesco Bonchi, and Carlos Castillo. 2016. Algorithmic Bias: From Discrimination Discovery to Fairness-Aware Data Mining. In Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (San Francisco, California, USA) (KDD ’16). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 2125–2126. https://doi.org/10.1145/2939672.2945386

Digital Library

[30]

Daniel Halpern and Jennifer Gibbs. 2013. Social media as a catalyst for online deliberation? Exploring the affordances of Facebook and YouTube for political expression. Computers in Human Behavior 29, 3 (2013), 1159–1168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2012.10.008

Digital Library

[31]

Tony Harcup and Deirdre O’Neill. 2017. What is News?Journalism Studies 18, 12 (2017), 1470–1488. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2016.1150193 arXiv:https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2016.1150193

[32]

Tauel Harper. 2017. The big data public and its problems: Big data and the structural transformation of the public sphere. New Media & Society 19, 9 (2017), 1424–1439. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444816642167 arXiv:https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444816642167

[33]

Hendrik Heuer and Andreas Breiter. 2018. Trust in News on Social Media. In Proceedings of the 10th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction (Oslo, Norway) (NordiCHI ’18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 137–147. https://doi.org/10.1145/3240167.3240172

Digital Library

[34]

Hendrik Heuer, Juliane Jarke, and Andreas Breiter. 2021. Machine learning in tutorials – Universal applicability, underinformed application, and other misconceptions. Big Data & Society 8, 1 (2021), 20539517211017593. https://doi.org/10.1177/20539517211017593 arXiv:https://doi.org/10.1177/20539517211017593

[35]

Martin Hilbert, Saifuddin Ahmed, Jaeho Cho, Billy Liu, and Jonathan Luu. 2018. Communicating with Algorithms: A Transfer Entropy Analysis of Emotions-based Escapes from Online Echo Chambers. Communication Methods and Measures 12, 4 (2018), 260–275. https://doi.org/10.1080/19312458.2018.1479843 arXiv:https://doi.org/10.1080/19312458.2018.1479843

[36]

Eslam Hussein, Prerna Juneja, and Tanushree Mitra. 2020. Measuring Misinformation in Video Search Platforms: An Audit Study on YouTube. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact. 4, CSCW1, Article 048 (May 2020), 27 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3392854

Digital Library

[37]

Mike Isaac. 2016. Facebook Mounts Effort to Limit Tide of Fake News. https://www.nytimes.com/2016/12/15/technology/facebook-fake-news.html

[38]

Dietmar Jannach, Lukas Lerche, Iman Kamehkhosh, and Michael Jugovac. 2015. What recommenders recommend: an analysis of recommendation biases and possible countermeasures. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction 25, 5 (2015), 427–491.

Digital Library

[39]

Joshua L. Kalla and David E. Broockman. 2018. The Minimal Persuasive Effects of Campaign Contact in General Elections: Evidence from 49 Field Experiments. American Political Science Review 112, 1 (2018), 148–166. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055417000363

[40]

Joseph A. Konstan and John Riedl. 2012. Recommender systems: from algorithms to user experience. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction 22, 1 (01 Apr 2012), 101–123. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11257-011-9112-x

[41]

Adam D. I. Kramer, Jamie E. Guillory, and Jeffrey T. Hancock. 2014. Experimental evidence of massive-scale emotional contagion through social networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 111, 24(2014), 8788–8790. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1320040111 arXiv:https://www.pnas.org/content/111/24/8788.full.pdf

[42]

Rinaldo Kühne and Christian Schemer. 2015. The Emotional Effects of News Frames on Information Processing and Opinion Formation. Communication Research 42, 3 (apr 2015), 387–407. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650213514599

[43]

J. Richard Landis and Gary G. Koch. 1977. The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data. Biometrics 33, 1 (1977), 159–174. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2529310

[44]

David MJ Lazer, Matthew A Baum, Yochai Benkler, Adam J Berinsky, Kelly M Greenhill, Filippo Menczer, Miriam J Metzger, Brendan Nyhan, Gordon Pennycook, David Rothschild, and others. 2018. The science of fake news. Science 359, 6380 (2018), 1094–1096.

[45]

Mark Ledwich and Anna Zaitsev. 2019. Algorithmic Extremism: Examining YouTube’s Rabbit Hole of Radicalization. arxiv:1912.11211 [cs.SI]

[46]

Chei Sian Lee. 2012. Exploring emotional expressions on YouTube through the lens of media system dependency theory. New Media & Society 14, 3 (2012), 457–475. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444811419829 arXiv:https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444811419829

[47]

Shu-Yueh Lee, Sara Steffes Hansen, and Jin Kyun Lee. 2016. What makes us click “like” on Facebook? Examining psychological, technological, and motivational factors on virtual endorsement. Computer Communications 73 (2016), 332–341.

Digital Library

[48]

Rebecca Lewis. 2018. Alternative influence: Broadcasting the reactionary right on YouTube. Data & Society 18(2018).

[49]

George E Marcus, W Russell Neuman, and Michael B MacKuen. 2017. Measuring emotional response: Comparing alternative approaches to measurement. Political Science Research and Methods 5, 4 (2017), 733–754.

[50]

Alice Marwick and Rebecca Lewis. 2017. Media manipulation and disinformation online. New York: Data & Society Research Institute (2017).

[51]

Katerina Matsa and Elisa Shearer. 2018. News Use Across Social Media Platforms 2018.

[52]

Nic Newman, Richard Fletcher, Anne Schulz, Simge Andı, and Rasmus Kleis Nielsen. 2020. Reuters Institute Digital News Report 2020. http://www.digitalnewsreport.org/survey/2020/overview-key-findings-2020/

[53]

Derek O’Callaghan, Derek Greene, Maura Conway, Joe Carthy, and Pádraig Cunningham. 2015. Down the (White) Rabbit Hole: The Extreme Right and Online Recommender Systems. Social Science Computer Review 33, 4 (2015), 459–478. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439314555329 arXiv:https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439314555329

Digital Library

[54]

E. Pariser. 2011. The Filter Bubble: How the New Personalized Web Is Changing What We Read and How We Think. Penguin Publishing Group. https://books.google.de/books?id=wcalrOI1YbQC

Digital Library

[55]

Emilee Rader and Rebecca Gray. 2015. Understanding User Beliefs About Algorithmic Curation in the Facebook News Feed. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI ’15). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 173–182. https://doi.org/10.1145/2702123.2702174

Digital Library

[56]

Manoel Horta Ribeiro, Raphael Ottoni, Robert West, Virgílio A. F. Almeida, and Wagner Meira. 2019. Auditing Radicalization Pathways on YouTube. arxiv:1908.08313 [cs.CY]

[57]

Ronald E. Robertson, Shan Jiang, Kenneth Joseph, Lisa Friedland, David Lazer, and Christo Wilson. 2018. Auditing Partisan Audience Bias within Google Search. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact. 2, CSCW, Article 148 (Nov. 2018), 22 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3274417

Digital Library

[58]

Kevin Roose. 2019. YouTube’s Product Chief on Online Radicalization and Algorithmic Rabbit Holes. https://www.nytimes.com/2019/03/29/technology/youtube-online-extremism.html

[59]

Ira J Roseman. 1991. Appraisal determinants of discrete emotions. Cognition & Emotion 5, 3 (1991), 161–200.

[60]

Christian Sandvig, Kevin Hamilton, Karrie Karahalios, and Cedric Langbort. 2014. Auditing algorithms: Research methods for detecting discrimination on internet platforms. Data and discrimination: converting critical concerns into productive inquiry 22(2014).

[61]

Jannick Schou and Johan Farkas. 2016. Algorithms, interfaces, and the circulation of information: Interrogating the epistemological challenges of Facebook. KOME: An International Journal of Pure Communication Inquiry 4, 1(2016), 36–49.

[62]

David O Sears and Jonathan L Freedman. 1967. Selective exposure to information: A critical review. Public Opinion Quarterly 31, 2 (1967), 194–213.

[63]

Craig Silverman. 2016. This Analysis Shows How Viral Fake Election News Stories Outperformed Real News On Facebook. https://www.buzzfeed.com/craigsilverman/viral-fake-election-news-outperformed-real-news-on-facebook

[64]

Aaron Smith, Skye Toor, and Patrick van Kessel. 2018. Many Turn to YouTube for Children’s Content, News, How-To Lessons | Pew Research Center. https://www.pewinternet.org/2018/11/07/many-turn-to-youtube-for-childrens-content-news-how-to-lessons/

[65]

Joan E. Solsman. 2018. YouTube’s AI is the puppet master over most of what you watch. https://www.cnet.com/news/youtube-ces-2018-neal-mohan/

[66]

Robert L Stevenson, Richard A Eisinger, Barry M Feinberg, and Alan B Kotok. 1973. Untwisting the news twisters: A replication of Efron’s study. Journalism Quarterly 50, 2 (1973), 211–219.

[67]

Stefan Stieglitz and Linh Dang-Xuan. 2013. Emotions and information diffusion in social media—sentiment of microblogs and sharing behavior. Journal of management information systems 29, 4 (2013), 217–248.

[68]

Latanya Sweeney. 2013. Discrimination in Online Ad Delivery. Commun. ACM 56, 5 (May 2013), 44–54. https://doi.org/10.1145/2447976.2447990

Digital Library

[69]

Yannis Theocharis, Joost de Moor, and Jan W van Deth. 2021. Digitally networked participation and lifestyle politics as new modes of political participation. Policy & Internet 13, 1 (2021), 30–53.

[70]

Zeynep Tufekci. 2018. Opinion | YouTube, the Great Radicalizer - The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2018/03/10/opinion/sunday/youtube-politics-radical.html

[71]

Peter van Aelst, Jesper Stromback, Toni Aalberg, Frank Esser, Claes H. de Vreese, Jörg Matthes, David Hopmann, Susana Salgado, Nicolas Hube, Agnieszka Stepinska, Stylianos Papathanassopoulos, Rosa Berganza, Guido Legnante, Carsten Reinemann, Tamir Sheafer, and James Stanyer. 2017. Political Communication in a High-Choice Media Environment: A Challenge for Democracy?Annals of the International Communication Association 41, 1(2017), 3–27.

[72]

Paul Waldman and James Devitt. 1998. Newspaper photographs and the 1996 presidential election: The question of bias. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly 75, 2 (1998), 302–311.

[73]

Charlie Warzel. 2017. Here’s How YouTube Is Spreading Conspiracy Theories About The Vegas Shooting. https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/charliewarzel/heres-how-youtube-is-spreading-conspiracy-theories-about

[74]

WDR. 2018. ARD-DeutschlandTrend - Flüchtlingspolitik nimmt für Mehrheit zu viel Raum ein; andere Themen kommen zu kurz - Presselounge - WDR. https://t1p.de/um6t

[75]

Wikipedia contributors. 2019. Echo chamber (media) — Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Echo_chamber_(media)&oldid=929184425 [Online; accessed 13-December-2019].

[76]

Siqi Wu, Marian-Andrei Rizoiu, and Lexing Xie. 2019. Estimating Attention Flow in Online Video Networks. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact. 3, CSCW, Article 183 (Nov. 2019), 25 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3359285

Digital Library

[77]

YouTube. 2017. Creators: How YouTube’s Home Screen Works. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=69tpVNunQEU

[78]

YouTube. 2017. Creators: ’The Algorithm’ - How YouTube Search & Discovery Works. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hPxnIix5ExI

[79]

YouTube. 2019. Press. https://www.youtube.com/intl/en-GB/yt/about/press/

[80]

Dolf Zillmann. 1988. Mood management through communication choices. American Behavioral Scientist 31, 3 (1988), 327–340.

Cited By

Schmitt JWinkler J(2024)Populistische Stimmen in extremistischen Online-Videos – eine Inhaltsanalyse von rechtsextremen und islamistischen YouTube-VideosZRex – Zeitschrift für Rechtsextremismusforschung10.3224/zrex.v4i2.054:2-2024(209-229)Online publication date: 23-Oct-2024
https://doi.org/10.3224/zrex.v4i2.05
Levy H(2024)Trans vocabularies: topics, clashes, and affordances in YouTube streaming warsInformation, Communication & Society10.1080/1369118X.2024.2311252(1-18)Online publication date: 5-Feb-2024
https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2024.2311252
Klimashevskaia AJannach DElahi MTrattner C(2024)A survey on popularity bias in recommender systemsUser Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction10.1007/s11257-024-09406-0Online publication date: 1-Jul-2024
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11257-024-09406-0
Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Political Will and Strategic Use of YouTube to Advancing Government Transparency: An Analysis of Jakarta Government-Generated YouTube Videos
EGOV 2013: Proceedings of the 12th IFIP WG 8.5 International Conference on Electronic Government - Volume 8074

Government transparency is critical to cut government bureaucracy and corruption, which diminish political accountability and legitimacy, erode trust in government, and hinder citizen engagement and government performance. Previously, Jakarta's local ...
Exploring the user-generated content (UGC) uploading behavior on youtube
WWW '14 Companion: Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on World Wide Web

YouTube is the world's largest video sharing platform where both professional and non-professional users participate in creating, uploading, and viewing content. In this work, we analyze content in the music category created by the non-professionals, ...
Investigating the Impacts of YouTube's Content Policies on Journalism and Political Discourse
CSCW

Social media has become a primary mode of journalism and political discourse as evidenced by recent online political movements. Platforms like YouTube, by monetizing content through advertising revenue, have fostered a new group of online political ...

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Other conferences

MuC '21: Proceedings of Mensch und Computer 2021

September 2021

613 pages

ISBN:9781450386456

DOI:10.1145/3473856

Copyright © 2021 ACM.

Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 13 September 2021

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Request Permissions

Check for updates

Author Tags

Qualifiers

Research-article
Research
Refereed limited

Funding Sources

German Research Council

Conference

MuC '21

MuC '21: Mensch und Computer 2021

September 5 - 8, 2021

Ingolstadt, Germany

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

8
Total Citations
View Citations
428
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)81
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)8

Reflects downloads up to 10 Feb 2025

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

Schmitt JWinkler J(2024)Populistische Stimmen in extremistischen Online-Videos – eine Inhaltsanalyse von rechtsextremen und islamistischen YouTube-VideosZRex – Zeitschrift für Rechtsextremismusforschung10.3224/zrex.v4i2.054:2-2024(209-229)Online publication date: 23-Oct-2024
https://doi.org/10.3224/zrex.v4i2.05
Levy H(2024)Trans vocabularies: topics, clashes, and affordances in YouTube streaming warsInformation, Communication & Society10.1080/1369118X.2024.2311252(1-18)Online publication date: 5-Feb-2024
https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2024.2311252
Klimashevskaia AJannach DElahi MTrattner C(2024)A survey on popularity bias in recommender systemsUser Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction10.1007/s11257-024-09406-0Online publication date: 1-Jul-2024
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11257-024-09406-0
Bukhari SAfandi WMaqsood TKhan M(2023)Encrypted video identification - Normalization and activation function perspective2023 International Conference on Communication, Computing and Digital Systems (C-CODE)10.1109/C-CODE58145.2023.10139861(1-6)Online publication date: 17-May-2023
https://doi.org/10.1109/C-CODE58145.2023.10139861
Bukhari SAfandi WKhan MMaqsood TQureshi MFayyaz MNawaz R(2022)E-Ensemble: A Novel Ensemble Classifier for Encrypted Video IdentificationElectronics10.3390/electronics1124407611:24(4076)Online publication date: 8-Dec-2022
https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics11244076
Zhou TMengoni P(2022)Reexamining the Echo Chamber Effect of COVID-19 Vaccine Videos on YouTube2022 IEEE/WIC/ACM International Joint Conference on Web Intelligence and Intelligent Agent Technology (WI-IAT)10.1109/WI-IAT55865.2022.00068(415-422)Online publication date: Nov-2022
https://doi.org/10.1109/WI-IAT55865.2022.00068
Hassan SBukhari SKhan MMaqsood T(2022)YouTube Video Identification in Encrypted Network Traffic —A Case of Attacking Assumptions2022 19th International Bhurban Conference on Applied Sciences and Technology (IBCAST)10.1109/IBCAST54850.2022.9990455(243-248)Online publication date: 16-Aug-2022
https://doi.org/10.1109/IBCAST54850.2022.9990455
Heuer H(2021)The Explanatory Gap in Algorithmic News CurationDisinformation in Open Online Media10.1007/978-3-030-87031-7_1(1-15)Online publication date: 21-Sep-2021
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1007/978-3-030-87031-7_1

View Options

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Full Access

Get this Publication

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

eReader

View online with eReader.

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format.

Figures

Tables

Media

View Table of Conten