skip to main content
10.1145/3473856.3473863acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmundcConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Comparing Concepts for Embedding Second-Language Vocabulary Acquisition into Everyday Smartphone Interactions

Published: 13 September 2021 Publication History

Abstract

We present a three-week within-subject field study comparing three mobile language learning (MLL) applications with varying levels of integration into everyday smartphone interactions: We designed a novel (1) UnlockApp that presents a vocabulary task with each authentication event, nudging users towards short frequent learning session. We compare it with a (2) NotificationApp that displays vocabulary tasks in a push notification in the status bar, which is always visible but learning needs to be user-initiated, and a (3) StandardApp that requires users to start in-app learning actively. Our study is the first to directly compare these embedding concepts for MLL, showing that integrating vocabulary learning into everyday smartphone interactions via UnlockApp and NotificationApp increases the number of answers. However, users show individual subjective preferences. Based on our results, we discuss the trade-off between higher content exposure and disturbance, and the related challenges and opportunities of embedding learning seamlessly into everyday mobile interactions.

References

[1]
David P Ausubel and Mohamed Youssef. 1965. The effect of spaced repetition on meaningful retention. The Journal of General Psychology 73, 1 (1965), 147–150.
[2]
Douglas Bates, Martin Mächler, Ben Bolker, and Steve Walker. 2015. Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software 67, 1 (2015), 1–48. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01
[3]
Peter A Bruck, Luvai Motiwalla, and Florian Foerster. 2012. Mobile Learning with Micro-content: A Framework and Evaluation. In Bled eConference. Association for Information Systems (AIS), Atlanta, GA, USA, 2.
[4]
Andrew C Butler and Henry L Roediger. 2008. Feedback enhances the positive effects and reduces the negative effects of multiple-choice testing. Memory & cognition 36, 3 (2008), 604–616.
[5]
Carrie J. Cai, Philip J. Guo, James Glass, and Robert C. Miller. 2014. Wait-Learning: Leveraging Conversational Dead Time for Second Language Education. In CHI ’14 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Toronto, Ontario, Canada) (CHI EA ’14). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 2239–2244. https://doi.org/10.1145/2559206.2581183
[6]
Eun Kyoung Choe, Bongshin Lee, Matthew Kay, Wanda Pratt, and Julie A. Kientz. 2015. SleepTight: Low-Burden, Self-Monitoring Technology for Capturing and Reflecting on Sleep Behaviors. In Proceedings of the 2015 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing (Osaka, Japan) (UbiComp ’15). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 121–132. https://doi.org/10.1145/2750858.2804266
[7]
William L Cull. 2000. Untangling the benefits of multiple study opportunities and repeated testing for cued recall. Applied Cognitive Psychology 14, 3 (2000), 215–235.
[8]
David Dearman and Khai Truong. 2012. Evaluating the Implicit Acquisition of Second Language Vocabulary Using a Live Wallpaper. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Austin, Texas, USA) (CHI ’12). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1391–1400. https://doi.org/10.1145/2207676.2208598
[9]
Frank N Dempster. 1987. Effects of variable encoding and spaced presentations on vocabulary learning.Journal of Educational Psychology 79, 2 (1987), 162.
[10]
Tilman Dingler, Dominik Weber, Martin Pielot, Jennifer Cooper, Chung-Cheng Chang, and Niels Henze. 2017. Language Learning On-the-Go: Opportune Moments and Design of Mobile Microlearning Sessions. In Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services (Vienna, Austria) (MobileHCI ’17). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 28, 12 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3098279.3098565
[11]
Darren Edge, Elly Searle, Kevin Chiu, Jing Zhao, and James A. Landay. 2011. MicroMandarin: Mobile Language Learning in Context. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Vancouver, BC, Canada) (CHI ’11). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 3169–3178. https://doi.org/10.1145/1978942.1979413
[12]
Denzil Ferreira, Jorge Goncalves, Vassilis Kostakos, Louise Barkhuus, and Anind K. Dey. 2014. Contextual Experience Sampling of Mobile Application Micro-Usage. In Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services (Toronto, ON, Canada) (MobileHCI ’14). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 91–100. https://doi.org/10.1145/2628363.2628367
[13]
Pascal E. Fortin, Yuxiang Huang, and Jeremy R. Cooperstock. 2019. Exploring the Use of Fingerprint Sensor Gestures for Unlock Journaling: A Comparison With Slide-to-X. In Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services (Taipei, Taiwan) (MobileHCI ’19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 24, 8 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3338286.3340135
[14]
Marian Harbach, Emanuel Von Zezschwitz, Andreas Fichtner, Alexander De Luca, and Matthew Smith. 2014. It’sa hard lock life: A field study of smartphone (un) locking behavior and risk perception. In 10th Symposium On Usable Privacy and Security ({SOUPS} 2014). USENIX Association, Berkeley, CA, USA, 213–230.
[15]
Daniel Hintze, Rainhard D. Findling, Sebastian Scholz, and René Mayrhofer. 2014. Mobile Device Usage Characteristics: The Effect of Context and Form Factor on Locked and Unlocked Usage. In Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Advances in Mobile Computing and Multimedia (Kaohsiung, Taiwan) (MoMM ’14). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 105–114. https://doi.org/10.1145/2684103.2684156
[16]
Daniel Hintze, Philipp Hintze, Rainhard D Findling, and René Mayrhofer. 2017. A large-scale, long-term analysis of mobile device usage characteristics. Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies 1, 2 (2017), 1–21.
[17]
Helen M. Hodgetts and Dylan M. Jones. 2006. Contextual cues aid recovery from interruption: The role of associative activation.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 32, 5(2006), 1120–1132. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.32.5.1120
[18]
Jisu Jung, Monica Nour, Margaret Allman-Farinelli, and Judy Kay. 2017. Harnessing the ”Ambience” of the Mobile-Phone Lockscreen for Ultra-Lite Logging. In Proceedings of the 29th Australian Conference on Computer-Human Interaction (Brisbane, Queensland, Australia) (OZCHI ’17). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 21–30. https://doi.org/10.1145/3152771.3152774
[19]
John Keller and Katsuaki Suzuki. 2004. Learner motivation and e-learning design: A multinationally validated process. Journal of educational Media 29, 3 (2004), 229–239.
[20]
Kathy A Krendl and Mary Broihier. 1992. Student responses to computers: A longitudinal study. Journal of Educational Computing Research 8, 2 (1992), 215–227.
[21]
Agnes Kukulska-Hulme. 2012. Chapter One: Language learning defined by time and place: A framework for next generation designs. In Left to my own devices: Learner autonomy and mobile-assisted language learning. Brill, Bingley, UK: Emerald Group., 1–20.
[22]
Alexandra Kuznetsova, Per B. Brockhoff, and Rune H. B. Christensen. 2017. lmerTest Package: Tests in Linear Mixed Effects Models. Journal of Statistical Software 82, 13 (2017), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v082.i13
[23]
Chun Lai and Dongping Zheng. 2018. Self-directed use of mobile devices for language learning beyond the classroom. ReCALL 30, 3 (2018), 299–318.
[24]
Ahmed Mahfouz, Ildar Muslukhov, and Konstantin Beznosov. 2016. Android users in the wild: Their authentication and usage behavior. Pervasive and Mobile Computing 32 (2016), 50–61.
[25]
Elizabeth J Marsh, Pooja K Agarwal, and Henry L Roediger III. 2009. Memorial consequences of answering SAT II questions.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied 15, 1 (2009), 1.
[26]
Lotte Meteyard and Robert A.I. Davies. 2020. Best practice guidance for linear mixed-effects models in psychological science. Journal of Memory and Language 112 (2020), 104092. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2020.104092
[27]
R Core Team. 2020. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. https://www.R-project.org
[28]
Daniel L Schacter. 1999. The seven sins of memory: insights from psychology and cognitive neuroscience.American psychologist 54, 3 (1999), 182.
[29]
Behzad Tabibian, Utkarsh Upadhyay, Abir De, Ali Zarezade, Bernhard Schölkopf, and Manuel Gomez-Rodriguez. 2019. Enhancing human learning via spaced repetition optimization. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 116, 10(2019), 3988–3993.
[30]
Khai N. Truong, Thariq Shihipar, and Daniel J. Wigdor. 2014. Slide to X: Unlocking the Potential of Smartphone Unlocking. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Toronto, Ontario, Canada) (CHI ’14). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 3635–3644. https://doi.org/10.1145/2556288.2557044
[31]
Andrew Trusty and Khai N. Truong. 2011. Augmenting the Web for Second Language Vocabulary Learning. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Vancouver, BC, Canada) (CHI ’11). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 3179–3188. https://doi.org/10.1145/1978942.1979414
[32]
Tingxin Yan, David Chu, Deepak Ganesan, Aman Kansal, and Jie Liu. 2012. Fast App Launching for Mobile Devices Using Predictive User Context. In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Mobile Systems, Applications, and Services(Low Wood Bay, Lake District, UK) (MobiSys ’12). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 113–126. https://doi.org/10.1145/2307636.2307648
[33]
Xiaoyi Zhang, Laura R. Pina, and James Fogarty. 2016. Examining Unlock Journaling with Diaries and Reminders for In Situ Self-Report in Health and Wellness. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (San Jose, California, USA) (CHI ’16). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 5658–5664. https://doi.org/10.1145/2858036.2858360

Cited By

View all

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Other conferences
MuC '21: Proceedings of Mensch und Computer 2021
September 2021
613 pages
ISBN:9781450386456
DOI:10.1145/3473856
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 13 September 2021

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. Embedded Interaction
  2. Micro Interactions
  3. Mobile Language Learning

Qualifiers

  • Research-article
  • Research
  • Refereed limited

Conference

MuC '21
MuC '21: Mensch und Computer 2021
September 5 - 8, 2021
Ingolstadt, Germany

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)6
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 06 Jan 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format.

HTML Format

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media