skip to main content
10.1145/3460421.3480429acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesubicompConference Proceedingsconference-collections
poster

Towards Automated Fatigue Assessment using Wearable Sensing and Mixed-Effects Models

Published: 21 September 2021 Publication History

Abstract

Fatigue is a broad, multifactorial concept that includes the subjective perception of reduced physical and mental energy levels. It is also one of the key factors that strongly affect patients’ health-related quality of life. To date, most fatigue assessment methods were based on self-reporting, which may suffer from many factors such as recall bias. To address this issue, in this work, we recorded multi-modal physiological data (including ECG, accelerometer, skin temperature and respiratory rate, as well as demographic information such as age, BMI) in free-living environments, and developed automated fatigue assessment models. Specifically, we extracted features from each modality, and employed the random forest-based mixed-effects models, which can take advantage of the demographic information for improved performance. We conducted experiments on our collected dataset, and very promising preliminary results were achieved. Our results suggested ECG played an important role in the fatigue assessment tasks.

References

[1]
Alaa Althubaiti. 2016. Information bias in health research: Definition, pitfalls, and adjustment methods. Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare 9 (05 2016), 211. https://doi.org/10.2147/JMDH.S104807
[2]
Ashrant Aryal, Ali Ghahramani, and Burcin Becerik-Gerber. 2017. Monitoring fatigue in construction workers using physiological measurements. Automation in Construction 82 (2017), 154–165.
[3]
Yang Bai, Yu Guan, and Wan-Fai Ng. 2020. Fatigue assessment using ECG and actigraphy sensors. In Proceedings of the 2020 International Symposium on Wearable Computers. 12–16.
[4]
Liliana Barrios, Pietro Oldrati, Silvia Santini, and Andreas Lutterotti. 2018. Recognizing Digital Biomarkers for Fatigue Assessment in Patients with Multiple Sclerosis. EAI. https://doi.org/10.4108/eai.20-4-2018.2276340
[5]
Xi Chen, Yu Guan, Jian-Qing Shi, Xiu-Li Du, and Janet Eyre. 2020. Automated Stroke Rehabilitation Assessment using Wearable Accelerometers in Free-Living Environments. arXiv preprint arXiv:2009.08798(2020).
[6]
Yan Gao, Yang Long, Yu Guan, Anna Basu, Jessica Baggaley, and Thomas Ploetz. 2019. Towards Reliable, Automated General Movement Assessment for Perinatal Stroke Screening in Infants Using Wearable Accelerometers. Proc. ACM Interact. Mob. Wearable Ubiquitous Technol. 3, 1, Article 12 (March 2019), 22 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3314399
[7]
Ahlem Hajjem, François Bellavance, and Denis Larocque. 2014. Mixed-effects random forest for clustered data. Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation 84, 6(2014), 1313–1328.
[8]
Shane Halloran, Lin Tang, Yu Guan, Jian Qing Shi, and Janet Eyre. 2019. Remote Monitoring of Stroke Patients’ Rehabilitation Using Wearable Accelerometers. In Proceedings of the 23rd International Symposium on Wearable Computers (London, United Kingdom) (ISWC ’19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 72–77. https://doi.org/10.1145/3341163.3347731
[9]
Nils Y. Hammerla, James M. Fisher, Peter Andras, Lynn Rochester, Richard Walker, and Thomas Plotz. 2015. PD Disease State Assessment in Naturalistic Environments Using Deep Learning. In Proceedings of the Twenty-Ninth AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (Austin, Texas) (AAAI’15). AAAI Press, 1742–1748.
[10]
Shitong Huang, Jia Li, Pengzhu Zhang, and Weiqiang Zhang. 2018. Detection of mental fatigue state with wearable ECG devices. International Journal of Medical Informatics 119 (2018), 39 – 46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2018.08.010
[11]
Arman Iranfar, Adriana Arza, and David Atienza. 2021. ReLearn: A Robust Machine Learning Framework in Presence of Missing Data for Multimodal Stress Detection from Physiological Signals. arXiv preprint arXiv:2104.14278(2021).
[12]
Bethany Little, Ossama Alshabrawy, Daniel Stow, I. Ferrier, Roisin McNaney, Daniel Jackson, Karim Ladha, Cassim Ladha, Thomas Ploetz, Jaume Bacardit, Patrick Olivier, Peter Gallagher, and John O’Brien. 2020. Deep learning-based automated speech detection as a marker of social functioning in late-life depression. Psychological Medicine (01 2020), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291719003994
[13]
Hongyu Luo, Pierre-Alexandre Lee, Ieuan Clay, Martin Jaggi, and Valeria De Luca. 2020. Assessment of Fatigue Using Wearable Sensors: A Pilot Study. Digital biomarkers 4, 1 (2020), 59–72.
[14]
Zahra Sedighi Maman, Ying-Ju Chen, Amir Baghdadi, Seamus Lombardo, Lora A Cavuoto, and Fadel M Megahed. 2020. A data analytic framework for physical fatigue management using wearable sensors. Expert Systems with Applications(2020), 113405.
[15]
Helen J Michielsen, Jolanda De Vries, and Guus L Van Heck. 2003. Psychometric qualities of a brief self-rated fatigue measure: The Fatigue Assessment Scale. Journal of psychosomatic research 54, 4 (2003), 345–352.
[16]
Michalis Papakostas, Varun Kanal, Maher Abujelala, Konstantinos Tsiakas, and Fillia Makedon. 2019. Physical fatigue detection through EMG wearables and subjective user reports: a machine learning approach towards adaptive rehabilitation. 475–481. https://doi.org/10.1145/3316782.3322772
[17]
Thomas Plötz, Nils Y. Hammerla, Agata Rozga, Andrea Reavis, Nathan Call, and Gregory D. Abowd. 2012. Automatic Assessment of Problem Behavior in Individuals with Developmental Disabilities. In Proceedings of the 2012 ACM Conference on Ubiquitous Computing (Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania) (UbiComp ’12). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 391–400. https://doi.org/10.1145/2370216.2370276
[18]
Rana zia ur Rehman, Silvia Din, Yu Guan, Alison Yarnall, Jian Shi, and Lynn Rochester. 2019. Selecting Clinically Relevant Gait Characteristics for Classification of Early Parkinson’s Disease: A Comprehensive Machine Learning Approach. Scientific Reports 9 (12 2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-53656-7
[19]
Zahra Sedighi Maman, Mohammad Ali Alamdar Yazdi, Lora Cavuoto, and Fadel Megahed. 2017. A data-driven approach to modeling physical fatigue in the workplace using wearable sensors. Applied Ergonomics 65 (03 2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2017.02.001
[20]
Kai-Quan Shen, Xiao-Ping Li, Chong-Jin Ong, Shi-Yun Shao, and Einar PV Wilder-Smith. 2008. EEG-based mental fatigue measurement using multi-class support vector machines with confidence estimate. Clinical Neurophysiology 119, 7 (2008), 1524–1533.
[21]
EMA Smets, Bert Garssen, B de Bonke, and JCJM De Haes. 1995. The Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory (MFI) psychometric qualities of an instrument to assess fatigue. Journal of psychosomatic research 39, 3 (1995), 315–325.
[22]
Benjamin Tag, Andrew W Vargo, Aman Gupta, George Chernyshov, Kai Kunze, and Tilman Dingler. 2019. Continuous alertness assessments: Using EOG glasses to unobtrusively monitor fatigue levels In-The-Wild. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–12.
[23]
Lin Tang, Shane Halloran, Jian Qing Shi, Yu Guan, Chunzheng Cao, and Janet Eyre. [n.d.]. Evaluating upper limb function after stroke using the free-living accelerometer data. Statistical Methods in Medical Research([n. d.]), 2020.
[24]
Weblink:. [n.d.]. ActiGraph. https://www.actigraphcorp.com/.
[25]
Weblink:. [n.d.]. MedibioSense. https://www.medibiosense.com/.
[26]
Lichen Zhang, Mohsen Diraneyya, Juhyeong Ryu, Carl Haas, and Eihab Abdel-Rahman. 2019. Jerk as an indicator of physical exertion and fatigue. Automation in Construction 104 (05 2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2019.04.016

Cited By

View all

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
ISWC '21: Proceedings of the 2021 ACM International Symposium on Wearable Computers
September 2021
220 pages
ISBN:9781450384629
DOI:10.1145/3460421
Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 21 September 2021

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. fatigue assessment
  2. mixed effects model
  3. personalization
  4. wearable sensing

Qualifiers

  • Poster
  • Research
  • Refereed limited

Conference

UbiComp '21

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 38 of 196 submissions, 19%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)25
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)5
Reflects downloads up to 04 Feb 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format.

HTML Format

Figures

Tables

Media

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media