research-article

Open access

“It’s Just a Graph” – The Effect of Post-Hoc Rationalisation on InfoVis Evaluation

Authors:

Rosa van Koningsbruggen,

Eva HorneckerAuthors Info & Claims

C&C '21: Proceedings of the 13th Conference on Creativity and Cognition

Article No.: 45, Pages 1 - 10

https://doi.org/10.1145/3450741.3465257

Published: 22 June 2021 Publication History

All formats PDF

Abstract

A growing body of work in InfoVis explores its user experience (UX), however, emotions remain underexplored. Our study reveals barriers for investigating personal connection and emotional reaction to visualisations. This provides an explanation for why the role of emotions so far received little attention in InfoVis. Twenty-four participants viewed two traditional data visualisations, answered UX questionnaires for each, and were interviewed about their experience. Our findings show that traditional visualisations are seen as ‘just a graph’, that represents neutral information. Participants referred to aesthetics, legibility, and usability, instead of the actual topic. Moreover, to make sense of the data, emotions have to be separated from it. We found four possible explanations underlying this belief and argue that a form of post-hoc rationalisation takes place, which obscures people’s initial connections and affective responses to visualisations. Based on these findings, we discuss implications for future research on the UX of visualisations.

References

[1]

American Psychological Association. [n.d.]. personality – APA Dictionary of Psychology. https://dictionary.apa.org/reverse-counterbalancing

[2]

American Psychological Association. 2018. epiphenomenon – APA Dictionary of Psychology. https://dictionary.apa.org/complete-counterbalancing

[3]

Javier Bargas-Avila and Kasper Hornbæk. 2012. Foci and blind spots in user experience research. Interactions 19, 6 (11 2012), 24–27. https://doi.org/10.1145/2377783.2377790

Digital Library

[4]

Allison Barnes and Paul Thagard. 2003. Emotional decisions., 7 pages. http://cogprints.org/619/1/Emot_Decis.html

[5]

Michelle A. Borkin, Azalea A. Vo, Zoya Bylinskii, Phillip Isola, Shashank Sunkavalli, Aude Oliva, and Hanspeter Pfister. 2013. What Makes a Visualization Memorable?IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 19, 12 (12 2013), 2306–2315. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2013.234

Digital Library

[6]

Jeremy Boy, Anshul Vikram Pandey, John Emerson, Margaret Satterthwaite, Oded Nov, and Enrico Bertini. 2017. Showing People Behind Data. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 5462–5474. https://doi.org/10.1145/3025453.3025512

Digital Library

[7]

Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke. 2006. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology 3, 2 (1 2006), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

[8]

Damla Cay, Till Nagel, and Asim Evren Yantac. 2020. Understanding User Experience of COVID-19 Maps through Remote Elicitation Interviews. In 2020 IEEE Workshop on Evaluation and Beyond - Methodological Approaches to Visualization (BELIV). IEEE, 65–73. https://doi.org/10.1109/BELIV51497.2020.00015

[9]

CBS. 2018. StatLine - Geboorte; kerncijfers. https://opendata.cbs.nl/statline//CBS/nl/dataset/37422ned/line?ts=1589282698552

[10]

Antonio Damasio. 1994. Descartes’ error: Emotion, rationality and the human brain. G.P. Putnam’s Sons, New York. 344 pages. https://archive.org/details/descarteserrorem00dama/page/n11/mode/2up

[11]

Díaz-Oreiro, López, Quesada, and Guerrero. 2019. Standardized Questionnaires for User Experience Evaluation: A Systematic Literature Review. Proceedings 31, 1 (2019), 14. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2019031014

[12]

Catherine D’Ignazio and Lauren F. Klein. 2020. Data Feminism. The MIT Press, New York. 328 pages. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/11805.001.0001

[13]

Alan Dix. 2009. Human-Computer Interaction. In Encyclopedia of Database Systems. Springer US, Boston, MA, 1327–1331. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-39940-9_192

[14]

Tommaso Elli, Uta Hinrichs, Adam Bradley, Zachary Hills, Christopher Collins, and Karen Kelsky. 2020. Tied in Knots: A Case Study on Anthropographic Data Visualization About Sexual Harassment in the Academy. In 2020 IEEE VIS Arts Program (VISAP). IEEE, 29–44. https://doi.org/10.1109/VISAP51628.2020.00010

[15]

Eurostat. 2018. Non-EU citizens: 4.4 % of the EU population in 2018 - Product - Eurostat. https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/products-eurostat-news/-/DDN-20190315-1?inheritRedirect=true

[16]

Sarah Faisal, Paul Cairns, and Ann Blandford. 2007. Challenges of Evaluating the Information Visualisation Experience. In Proceedings of the 21st BCS HCI Group Conferenc, Devina Ramduny-Ellis and Dorothy Rachovides (Eds.), Vol. 2. British Computer Society, Lancaster, 4.

[17]

Sarah Faisal, Brock Craft, Paul Cairns, and Ann Blandford. 2008. Internalization, qualitative methods, and evaluation. In Proceedings of the 2008 conference on BEyond time and errors novel evaLuation methods for Information Visualization - BELIV ’08. ACM Press, New York, New York, USA, 1. https://doi.org/10.1145/1377966.1377973

Digital Library

[18]

Michael Friendly. 2008. A Brief History of Data Visualization. In Handbook of Data Visualization. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 15–56. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-33037-0_2

[19]

Stefan Gradl, Markus Wirth, Tobias Zillig, and Bjoern M. Eskofier. 2018. Visualization of heart activity in virtual reality: A biofeedback application using wearable sensors. In 2018 IEEE 15th International Conference on Wearable and Implantable Body Sensor Networks (BSN). IEEE, Las Vegas, 152–155. https://doi.org/10.1109/BSN.2018.8329681

[20]

Guillaume Gronier, Carine Lallemand, and Adélaïde Chauvet. 2015. Mesurer la formation de la première impression d’une interface à l’aide du test des 5 secondes. In 8ème conférence de Psychologie Ergonomique (EPIQUE 2015). Aix-en-Provence. https://www.list.lu/en/research/scientific-publication/mesurer-la-formation-de-la-premiere-impression-dune-interface-homme-machine-a-laide-du-test-des-5/

[21]

Tobias Grundgeiger, Jörn Hurtienne, and Oliver Happel. 2020. Why and How to Approach User Experience in Safety-Critical Domains: The Example of Health Care. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society XX, X (1 2020), 12. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720819887575

[22]

Steve Haroz, Robert Kosara, and Steven L. Franconeri. 2015. ISOTYPE Visualization. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1191–1200. https://doi.org/10.1145/2702123.2702275

Digital Library

[23]

Marc Hassenzahl. 2004. The interplay of beauty, goodness, and usability in interactive products. Human-Computer Interaction(2004). https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327051hci1904_2

Digital Library

[24]

Marc Hassenzahl. 2008. User experience (UX): Towards an experiential perspective on product quality. ACM International Conference Proceeding Series (2008), 11–15. https://doi.org/10.1145/1512714.1512717

Digital Library

[25]

Marc Hassenzahl, Andreas Beu, and Michael Burmester. 2001. Engineering joy. IEEE Software 18, 1 (2001), 70–76. https://doi.org/10.1109/52.903170

Digital Library

[26]

Marc Hassenzahl, Michael Burmester, and Franz Koller. 2003. AttrakDiff: Ein Fragebogen zur Messung wahrgenommener hedonischer und pragmatischer Qualität. In Mensch & Computer. J.Ziegler & G. Szwillus (Eds.), Stuttgart, 187–196. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-80058-9_19

[27]

Marc Hassenzahl and Noam Tractinsky. 2006. User experience - a research agenda. Behaviour & Information Technology 25, 2 (3 2006), 91–97. https://doi.org/10.1080/01449290500330331

[28]

Uta Hinrichs, Holly Schmidt, and Sheelagh Carpendale. 2008. EMDialog: Bringing Information Visualization into the Museum. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 14, 6 (11 2008), 1181–1188. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2008.127

Digital Library

[29]

Trevor Hogan, Uta Hinrichs, and Eva Hornecker. 2016. The Elicitation Interview Technique: Capturing People’s Experiences of Data Representations. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 22, 12(2016), 2579–2593. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2015.2511718

Digital Library

[30]

Trevor Hogan and Eva Hornecker. 2013. Blending the repertory grid technique with focus groups to reveal rich design relevant insight. In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Designing Pleasurable Products and Interfaces - DPPI ’13. ACM Press, New York, New York, USA, 116. https://doi.org/10.1145/2513506.2513519

Digital Library

[31]

Jessica Hullman, Nicholas Diakopoulos, Elaheh Momeni, and Eytan Adar. 2015. Content, Context, and Critique. In Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1170–1175. https://doi.org/10.1145/2675133.2675207

Digital Library

[32]

Ya-Hsin Hung and Paul Parsons. 2017. Assessing User Engagement in Information Visualization. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Vol. Part F1276. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1708–1717. https://doi.org/10.1145/3027063.3053113

Digital Library

[33]

Tobias Kauer, Arran Ridley, Marian Dörk, and Benjamin Bach. 2021. The Public Life of Data: Investigating Reactions to Visualizations on Reddit. In CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’21). 12. https://doi.org/10.1145/3411764.3445720

Digital Library

[34]

Helen Kennedy and Rosemary Lucy Hill. 2018. The Feeling of Numbers: Emotions in Everyday Engagements with Data and Their Visualisation. Sociology 52, 4 (2018), 830–848. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038516674675

[35]

Bettina Laugwitz, Theo Held, and Martin Schrepp. 2008. Construction and evaluation of a user experience questionnaire. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) 5298 LNCS (2008), 63–76. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-89350-9-6

[36]

Effie Lai-Chong Law, Virpi Roto, Marc Hassenzahl, Arnold P.O.S. Vermeeren, and Joke Kort. 2009. Understanding, scoping and defining user experience. In Proceedings of the 27th international conference on Human factors in computing systems - CHI 09. ACM Press, New York, New York, USA, 719. https://doi.org/10.1145/1518701.1518813

Digital Library

[37]

Benjamin Lee, Dave Brown, Bongshin Lee, Christophe Hurter, Steven Drucker, and Tim Dwyer. 2020. Data Visceralization: Enabling Deeper Understanding of Data Using Virtual Reality. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics x, x(2020), 1–1. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2020.3030435

[38]

Pierre Livet. 2010. Rational choice, neuroeconomy and mixed emotions. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 365, 1538 (1 2010), 259–269. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2009.0177

[39]

George Loewenstein and Jennifer S. Lerner. 2003. The Role of Affect in Decision Making. In Handbook of Affective Science. Oxford University Press, New York, 619–642.

[40]

Marianne Lykke and Christian Jantzen. 2016. User Experience Dimensions. In Proceedings of the 2016 ACM on Conference on Human Information Interaction and Retrieval. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 81–90. https://doi.org/10.1145/2854946.2854965

Digital Library

[41]

Sascha Mahlke. 2007. Aesthetic and Symbolic Qualities as Antecedents of Overall Judgements of Interactive Products. In People and Computers XX — Engage. Springer London, London, 57–64. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84628-664-3_5

[42]

Camila Loiola Brito Maia and Elizabeth Sucupira Furtado. 2016. A Systematic Review About User Experience Evaluation. In 5th International Conference, DUXU 2016, Vol. 9746. Springer, Cham., Toronto, 445–455. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-40409-7_42

[43]

Lev Manovich. 2011. What is visualisation?Visual Studies 26, 1 (3 2011), 36–49. https://doi.org/10.1080/1472586X.2011.548488

[44]

Riccardo Mazza and Alessandra Berre. 2007. Focus Group Methodology for Evaluating Information Visualization Techniques and Tools. In 2007 11th International Conference Information Visualization (IV ’07). IEEE, 74–80. https://doi.org/10.1109/IV.2007.51

Digital Library

[45]

Tanja Merčun. 2014. Evaluation of information visualization techniques. In Proceedings of the Fifth Workshop on Beyond Time and Errors Novel Evaluation Methods for Visualization - BELIV ’14. ACM Press, New York, New York, USA, 103–109. https://doi.org/10.1145/2669557.2669565

Digital Library

[46]

Luiz Morais, Yvonne Jansen, Nazareno Andrade, and Pierre Dragicevic. 2020. Showing Data about People: A Design Space of Anthropographics. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics (2020), 1–1. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2020.3023013

[47]

Kawa Nazemi, Dirk Burkhardt, David Hoppe, Mariam Nazemi, and Jörn Kohlhammer. 2015. Web-based Evaluation of Information Visualization. Procedia Manufacturing 3(2015), 5527–5534. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2015.07.718

[48]

Don Norman. 1998. The Design of Everyday Things. MIT, New York. 272 pages.

Digital Library

[49]

Donald A. Norman. 2004. Emotional design. Ubiquity 2004, January (1 2004), 1–1. https://doi.org/10.1145/985600.966013

Digital Library

[50]

Stanislaw Nowak, Lyn Bartram, and Thecla Schiphorst. 2018. A Micro-Phenomenological Lens for Evaluating Narrative Visualization. In 2018 IEEE Evaluation and Beyond - Methodological Approaches for Visualization (BELIV). IEEE, 11–18. https://doi.org/10.1109/BELIV.2018.8634072

[51]

Evan M. Peck, Sofia E. Ayuso, and Omar El-Etr. 2019. Data is Personal. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300474

Digital Library

[52]

Rosalind W. Picard. 1997. Affective Computing. The MIT Press, New York. 306 pages.

[53]

Bahador Saket, Alex Endert, and John Stasko. 2016. Beyond usability and performance: A review of user experience-focused evaluations in Visualization. ACM International Conference Proceeding Series 24-October (2016), 133–142. https://doi.org/10.1145/2993901.2993903

Digital Library

[54]

Bahador Saket, Carlos Scheidegger, and Stephen Kobourov. 2016. Comparing Node-Link and Node-Link-Group Visualizations From An Enjoyment Perspective. Computer Graphics Forum 35, 3 (2016), 41–50. https://doi.org/10.1111/cgf.12880

[55]

Dominique L. Scapin, Bernard Senach, Brigitte Trousse, and Marc Pallot. 2012. User experience: Buzzword or new paradigm?ACHI 2012 - 5th International Conference on Advances in Computer-Human InteractionsFebruary 2015(2012), 336–341.

[56]

Edward Segel and Jeffrey Heer. 2010. Narrative visualization: Telling stories with data. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 16, 6(2010), 1139–1148. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2010.179

Digital Library

[57]

Duaa Shaalan and Shaidah Jusoh. 2020. Visualization in Medical System Interfaces: UX Guidelines. In 2020 12th International Conference on Electronics, Computers and Artificial Intelligence (ECAI). IEEE, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1109/ECAI50035.2020.9223236

[58]

SoSci GmhB. [n.d.]. SoSci Survey - the Professional Solution for Your Online Survey. https://www.soscisurvey.de/

[59]

John Stasko. 2014. Value-driven evaluation of visualizations. ACM International Conference Proceeding Series 10-Novembe (2014), 46–53. https://doi.org/10.1145/2669557.2669579

Digital Library

[60]

Robert Sylwester. 1994. How emotions affect learning. Educational Leadership 52, 2 (1994), 60–65. http://www.ascd.org/publications/educational-leadership/oct94/vol52/num02/How-Emotions-Affect-Learning.aspx

[61]

Alice Thudt, Dominikus Baur, Samuel Huron, and Sheelagh Carpendale. 2016. Visual Mementos: Reflecting Memories with Personal Data. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 22, 1 (1 2016), 369–378. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2015.2467831

Digital Library

[62]

Melanie Tory and Torsten Möller. 2005. Evaluating visualizations: Do expert reviews work?, 8–11 pages. https://doi.org/10.1109/MCG.2005.102

Digital Library

[63]

Paul van Schaik and Jonathan Ling. 2008. Modelling user experience with web sites: Usability, hedonic value, beauty and goodness. Interacting with Computers 20, 3 (5 2008), 419–432. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intcom.2008.03.001

Digital Library

[64]

Sara Värlander. 2008. The role of students’ emotions in formal feedback situations. Teaching in Higher Education 13, 2 (4 2008), 145–156. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562510801923195

[65]

Pierre Vermersch. 2014. L’entretien d’explicitation. ESF, Strasbourg Cedex. 100 pages. https://doi.org/10.14375/NP.9782710127055

[66]

Yun Wang, Adrien Segal, Roberta Klatzky, Daniel F. Keefe, Petra Isenberg, Jorn Hurtienne, Eva Hornecker, Tim Dwyer, Stephen Barrass, and Theresa-Marie Rhyne. 2019. An Emotional Response to the Value of Visualization. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications 39, 5 (9 2019), 8–17. https://doi.org/10.1109/MCG.2019.2923483

Digital Library

[67]

David Watson, Lee Anna Clark, and Auke Tellegen. 1988. Development and Validation of Brief Measures of Positive and Negative Affect: The PANAS Scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 54, 6(1988), 1063–1070. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.54.6.1063

Cited By

Goree SAppleby GCrandall DSu N(2024)Attention is All They Need: Exploring the Media Archaeology of the Computer Vision Research PaperProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36869558:CSCW2(1-25)Online publication date: 8-Nov-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3686955
Cockburn AHills DChen ZGutwin C(2024)User Interface Evaluation Through Implicit-Association TestsProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36646368:EICS(1-23)Online publication date: 17-Jun-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3664636
Silva PMartins PMachado P(2024) PhDs—Portugal has Doctors : A Visualization of Academia Achievements in Portugal From 1970 to 2022 IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications10.1109/MCG.2024.340565644:5(114-126)Online publication date: Sep-2024
https://doi.org/10.1109/MCG.2024.3405656
Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Effect of Personality Traits on UX Evaluation Metrics: A Study on Usability Issues, Valence-Arousal and Skin Conductance
CHI EA '19: Extended Abstracts of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

Personality affects the way someone feels or acts. This paper examines the effect of personality traits, as operationalized by the Big-five questionnaire, on the number, type and severity of identified usability issues, physiological signals (skin ...
The effect of language in answering qualitative questions in user experience evaluation web-surveys
OzCHI '13: Proceedings of the 25th Australian Computer-Human Interaction Conference: Augmentation, Application, Innovation, Collaboration

We investigated the effect of language in answering qualitative questions in user experience (UX) evaluation web-surveys. Two cross-cultural case studies of high tech sports watches with altogether 176 participants were carried out. Comparisons in ...
Combining interviews and scales in the multidimensional evaluation of user experience: a case study in 3D games
ECCE '11: Proceedings of the 29th Annual European Conference on Cognitive Ergonomics

Motivation -- To study the convergence between different methods evaluating two dimensions of User Experience: usability and emotions.

Research approach -- A prospective experimental approach was used, in which 20 participants were asked to express ...

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences

C&C '21: Proceedings of the 13th Conference on Creativity and Cognition

June 2021

581 pages

ISBN:9781450383769

DOI:10.1145/3450741

General Chairs:
Corina Sas
Lancaster University, UK
,
Neil Maiden
City, University of London, UK

Copyright © 2021 ACM.

Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

Sponsors

SIGCHI: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer-Human Interaction

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 22 June 2021

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Request Permissions

Check for updates

Author Tags

Qualifiers

Research-article
Research
Refereed limited

Funding Sources

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft

Conference

C&C '21

Sponsor:

SIGCHI

C&C '21: Creativity and Cognition

June 22 - 23, 2021

Virtual Event, Italy

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 108 of 371 submissions, 29%

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

7
Total Citations
View Citations
747
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)180
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)9

Reflects downloads up to 24 Dec 2024

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

Goree SAppleby GCrandall DSu N(2024)Attention is All They Need: Exploring the Media Archaeology of the Computer Vision Research PaperProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36869558:CSCW2(1-25)Online publication date: 8-Nov-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3686955
Cockburn AHills DChen ZGutwin C(2024)User Interface Evaluation Through Implicit-Association TestsProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36646368:EICS(1-23)Online publication date: 17-Jun-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3664636
Silva PMartins PMachado P(2024) PhDs—Portugal has Doctors : A Visualization of Academia Achievements in Portugal From 1970 to 2022 IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications10.1109/MCG.2024.340565644:5(114-126)Online publication date: Sep-2024
https://doi.org/10.1109/MCG.2024.3405656
Hornecker EHogan THinrichs UVan Koningsbruggen R(2023)A Design Vocabulary for Data PhysicalizationACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction10.1145/361736631:1(1-62)Online publication date: 29-Nov-2023
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3617366
Lan XWu YCao N(2023)Affective Visualization Design: Leveraging the Emotional Impact of DataIEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics10.1109/TVCG.2023.332738530:1(1-11)Online publication date: 30-Oct-2023
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1109/TVCG.2023.3327385
Dodani AVan Koningsbruggen RHornecker E(2022)Birdbox: Exploring the User Experience of Crossmodal, Multisensory Data RepresentationsProceedings of the 21st International Conference on Mobile and Ubiquitous Multimedia10.1145/3568444.3568455(12-21)Online publication date: 27-Nov-2022
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3568444.3568455
Lee-Robbins EAdar E(2022)Affective Learning Objectives for Communicative VisualizationsIEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics10.1109/TVCG.2022.3209500(1-11)Online publication date: 2022
https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2022.3209500

View Options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

eReader

View online with eReader.

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format.

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Full Access

Get this Publication

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

View Table of Contents