short-paper

Repetition effects in task-driven eye movement analyses after longer time-spans

Authors:

Michael RaschkeAuthors Info & Claims

ETRA '21 Short Papers: ACM Symposium on Eye Tracking Research and Applications

Article No.: 6, Pages 1 - 6

https://doi.org/10.1145/3448018.3458005

Published: 25 May 2021 Publication History

Abstract

Visualizations are an important tool in risk management to support decision-making of recipients of risk reports. Many trainings aim at helping managers to better understand how to read such visualizations. In this paper we present first results of an ongoing large study on the effect of repeated presentation of risk visualizations from annual reports. This is of importance to find out if such repetitions have an effect on accuracy and the behavior of readers. Contrary to other studies we had longer time-spans of months and weeks between two trials. We found that fixation durations are different after second presentation and that the number of fixations generally are lower. We also analyzed scan paths, indicating that regions that are more semantically meaningful are more often in the center of attention. We call for more studies with longer time spans between two trials as we found some interesting patterns.

References

[1]

Robert R. Althoff and Neal J. Cohen. 1999. Eye-movement-based memory effect. A reprocessing effect in face perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 25, 4, 997–1010.

[2]

Edward T. Cokely, Mirta Galesic, Eric Schulz, Saima Ghazal, and Rocío García-Retamero. 2012. Measuring risk literacy. The Berlin Numeracy Test. Judgment and decision making 7, 1, 25–47.

[3]

Stéphane Conversy, Christophe Hurter, and Stéphane Chatty. 2010. A descriptive model of visual scanning. In Proceedings of the 3rd BELIV'10 Workshop on beyond time and errors: novel evaluation methods for Information Visualization - BELIV '10. ACM Press, New York, New York, USA, 35–42.

Digital Library

[4]

Christoph Eisl, Lisa Falschlunger, Peter Hofer, and Michael Jungert. 2013. Reporting design –a systematic literature review. ACRN Journal of Finance and Risk Perspectives 2, 2, 27–47.

[5]

Lisa Falschlunger, Christoph Eisl, and Heimo Losbichler. 2016. Wahrnehmungsoptimierte Berichtsgestaltung auf Basis einer erweiterten Cognitive Fit Theory. In Konferenzband CARF Luzern 2016. Controlling.Accounting.Risiko.Finanzen. Verlag IFZ, Zug, 33–68.

[6]

Tom Foulsham and Geoffrey Underwood. 2008. What can saliency models predict about eye movements? Spatial and sequential aspects of fixations during encoding and recognition. Journal of Vision 8, 2, 6.1-17.

[7]

Mirta Galesic and Rocío García-Retamero. 2011. Graph literacy. A cross-cultural comparison. Medical decision making: an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making 31, 3, 444–457.

[8]

Rocío García-Retamero and Edward T. Cokely. 2013. Communicating health risks with visual aids. Curr Dir Psychol Sci 22, 5, 392–399.

[9]

Dan Gusfield. 2010. Algorithms on strings, trees and sequences. Cambridge University Press.

Digital Library

[10]

Anne P. Hillstrom. 2000. Repetition effects in visual search. Perception & Psychophysics 62, 4, 800–817.

[11]

Jukka Hyönä and Pekka Niemi. 1990. Eye movements during repeated reading of a text. Acta Psychologica 73, 3, 259–280.

[12]

Kai Kaspar and Peter König. 2011a. Overt attention and context factors. The impact of repeated presentations, image type, and individual motivation. PloS one 6, 7, e21719.

[13]

Kai Kaspar and Peter König. 2011b. Viewing behavior and the impact of low-level image properties across repeated presentations of complex scenes. Journal of Vision 11, 13, 26.

[14]

Oryah C. Lancry-Dayan, Ganit Kupershmidt, and Yoni Pertzov. 2019. Been there, seen that, done that: Modification of visual exploration across repeated exposures. Journal of Vision 19, 12, 2.

[15]

David Noton and Lawrence Stark. 1971. Scanpaths in saccadic eye movements while viewing and recognizing patterns. Vision research 11, 9, 929-IN8.

[16]

Rik Pieters and Luk Warlop. 1999. Visual attention during brand choice: The impact of time pressure and task motivation. International Journal of Research in Marketing 16, 1, 1–16.

[17]

Jennifer D. Ryan, Robert R. Althoff, Stephen Whitlow, and Neal J. Cohen. 2000. Amnesia is a deficit in relational memory. Psychological science 11, 6, 454–461.

[18]

Lawrence Stark and Stephen R. Ellis. 2017. Scanpaths revistied: Cognitive models direct active looking. In Eye Movements, Dennis F. Fisher, Richard A. Monty and John W. Senders, Eds. Routledge, 193-226.

[19]

Hans A. Trukenbrod, Simon Barthelmé, Felix A. Wichmann, and Ralf Engbert. 2019. Spatial statistics for gaze patterns in scene viewing: Effects of repeated viewing. Journal of Vision 19, 6, 5.

[20]

Melissa L.-H. Võ and Jeremy M. Wolfe. 2012. When does repeated search in scenes involve memory? Looking at versus looking for objects in scenes. Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance 38, 1, 23–41.

[21]

Jeremy M. Wolfe, Nicole Klempen, and Kari Dahlen. 2000. Postattentive vision. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 26, 2, 693–716.

Cited By

Malpica SMartin DSerrano AGutierrez DMasia B(2023)Task-Dependent Visual Behavior in Immersive Environments: A Comparative Study of Free Exploration, Memory and Visual SearchIEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics10.1109/TVCG.2023.332025929:11(4417-4425)Online publication date: 3-Oct-2023
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1109/TVCG.2023.3320259
Berger THooge ITrivedi P(2022)Processing of Information from Risk Maps in India and Germany: The Influence of Cognitive Reflection, Numeracy, and ExperienceAsia-Pacific Journal of Risk and Insurance10.1515/apjri-2021-002217:1(63-85)Online publication date: 17-Nov-2022
https://doi.org/10.1515/apjri-2021-0022

Index Terms

Repetition effects in task-driven eye movement analyses after longer time-spans

Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

Recommendations

The Biomechanical Effects of Eye Movement
Age-Related Effects of Multi-screen Setup on Task Performance and Eye Movement Characteristics
2018 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics (SMC)
Multi-screens or wide screen setup is becoming increasingly popular in many work places and training environments. However, there has been limited studies of their effect on human health and performance. In this study, we investigate individuals ...
User Eye Fatigue Detection via Eye Movement Behavior
CHI EA '15: Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems

In this study we propose and evaluate a novel approach that allows detection of physical eye fatigue. The proposed approach is based on the analysis of the recorded eye movements via what is called behavioral scores. These easy-to-compute scores can be ...

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences

ETRA '21 Short Papers: ACM Symposium on Eye Tracking Research and Applications

May 2021

232 pages

ISBN:9781450383455

DOI:10.1145/3448018

Editors:
Andreas Bulling
University of Stuttgart, Germany
,
Anke Huckauf
Ulm University, Germany
,
Hans Gellersen
Aarhus University, Denmark
,
Daniel Weiskopf
University of Stuttgart, Germany
,
Mihai Bace
ETH Zürich, Switzerland
,
Teresa Hirzle
Ulm University, Germany
,
Florian Alt
Bundeswehr University Munich, Germany
,
Thies Pfeiffer
Hochschule Emden/Leer, Germany
,
Roman Bednarik
University of Eastern Finland, Finland
,
Krzysztof Krejtz
SWPS University of Social Sciences and Humanities, Poland
,
Tanja Blascheck
University of Stuttgart, Germany
,
Michael Burch
University of Applied Sciences, Chur, Switzerland
,
Peter Kiefer
ETH Zurich, Switzerland
,
Michael Dodd
University of Nebraska-Lincoln, USA
,
Bonita Sharif
University of Nebraska-Lincoln, USA

Copyright © 2021 ACM.

Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

Sponsors

SIGGRAPH: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 25 May 2021

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Request Permissions

Check for updates

Qualifiers

Short-paper
Research
Refereed limited

Funding Sources

Verein der Freunde und Förderer der DHBW Stuttgart e.V.

Conference

ETRA '21

Sponsor:

SIGGRAPH

ETRA '21: 2021 Symposium on Eye Tracking Research and Applications

May 25 - 27, 2021

Virtual Event, Germany

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 69 of 137 submissions, 50%

Upcoming Conference

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

2
Total Citations
View Citations
70
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)17
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1

Reflects downloads up to 27 Jan 2025

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

Malpica SMartin DSerrano AGutierrez DMasia B(2023)Task-Dependent Visual Behavior in Immersive Environments: A Comparative Study of Free Exploration, Memory and Visual SearchIEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics10.1109/TVCG.2023.332025929:11(4417-4425)Online publication date: 3-Oct-2023
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1109/TVCG.2023.3320259
Berger THooge ITrivedi P(2022)Processing of Information from Risk Maps in India and Germany: The Influence of Cognitive Reflection, Numeracy, and ExperienceAsia-Pacific Journal of Risk and Insurance10.1515/apjri-2021-002217:1(63-85)Online publication date: 17-Nov-2022
https://doi.org/10.1515/apjri-2021-0022

View Options

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Full Access

Get this Publication

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

eReader

View online with eReader.

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format.

Figures

Tables

Media

View Table of Conten