research-article

Storytelling Before or After Prototyping with a Toolkit for Designing Classroom Robots

Authors:

Güncel Kırlangıç,

Mohammad Obaid,

Asim Evren YantacAuthors Info & Claims

OzCHI '20: Proceedings of the 32nd Australian Conference on Human-Computer Interaction

Pages 582 - 593

https://doi.org/10.1145/3441000.3441010

Published: 15 February 2021 Publication History

Abstract

Storytelling is an effective approach that is used in interaction design to help align users’ needs throughout the design process. In this paper, we utilize a storytelling approach with hands-on design toolkit activities to investigate how the experimental order effect can have an impact on the overall outcomes. In particular, we focus on a robotic design toolkit that aims to involve children in the process of designing assistant classroom robotic artifacts. We report the findings of a study conducted with 28 children that designed their own classroom robotic assistance using the toolkit before and after storytelling. We conclude the paper with discussion on the order effect and design findings. This paper aims to contribute to the literature with insights on how to implement storytelling along with a prototyping toolkit; approaches that are highly valued in interaction design research and practice recently.

References

[1]

Patrícia Alves-Oliveira, Patrícia Arriaga, Matthew A. Cronin, and Ana Paiva. 2020. Creativity Encounters Between Children and Robots. In Proceedings of the 2020 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (Cambridge, United Kingdom) (HRI ’20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 379–388. https://doi.org/10.1145/3319502.3374817

Digital Library

[2]

Patrícia Alves-Oliveira, Patricia Arriaga, Guy Hoffman, and Ana Paiva. 2016. Boosting children’s creativity through creative interactions with social robots. ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction 2016-April(2016), 591–592. https://doi.org/10.1109/HRI.2016.7451871

[3]

Patrícia Alves-Oliveira, Patrícia Arriaga, Ana Paiva, and Guy Hoffman. 2017. YOLO, a Robot for Creativity: A Co-Design Study with Children. In Proceedings of the 2017 Conference on Interaction Design and Children (Stanford, California, USA) (IDC ’17). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 423–429. https://doi.org/10.1145/3078072.3084304

Digital Library

[4]

Shiri Azenkot, Catherine Feng, and Maya Cakmak. 2016. Enabling Building Service Robots to Guide Blind People: A Participatory Design Approach. In The Eleventh ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human Robot Interaction(Christchurch, New Zealand) (HRI ’16). IEEE Press, New York, NY, USA, 3–10.

[5]

Bradley S Barker and John Ansorge. 2007. Robotics as means to increase achievement scores in an informal learning environment. Journal of research on technology in education 39, 3 (2007), 229–243.

[6]

Jaclyn Barnes, S. Maryam FakhrHosseini, Eric Vasey, Joseph Ryan, Chung Hyuk Park, and Myounghoon Jeon. 2019. Promoting STEAM Education with Child-Robot Musical Theater. In Proceedings of the 14th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (Daegu, Republic of Korea) (HRI ’19). IEEE Press, New York, NY, USA, 366.

Digital Library

[7]

Gökçe Elif Baykal, Maarten Van Mechelen, Tilbe Göksun, and Asım Evren Yantaç. 2018. Designing with and for Preschoolers: A Method to Observe Tangible Interactions with Spatial Manipulatives. In Proceedings of the Conference on Creativity and Making in Education (Trondheim, Norway) (FabLearn Europe’18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 45–54. https://doi.org/10.1145/3213818.3213825

Digital Library

[8]

Tony Belpaeme, James Kennedy, Aditi Ramachandran, Brian Scassellati, and Fumihide Tanaka. 2018. Social robots for education: A review. Science Robotics 3, 21 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1126/scirobotics.aat5954 arXiv:https://robotics.sciencemag.org/content/3/21/eaat5954.full.pdf

[9]

Eduardo Benítez Sandoval and Christian Penaloza. 2012. Children’s Knowledge and Expectations about Robots: A Survey for Future User-Centered Design of Social Robots. In Proceedings of the Seventh Annual ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (Boston, Massachusetts, USA) (HRI ’12). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 107–108. https://doi.org/10.1145/2157689.2157708

Digital Library

[10]

Fabiane Barreto Vavassori Benitti. 2012. Exploring the educational potential of robotics in schools: A systematic review. Computers & Education 58, 3 (2012), 978–988.

Digital Library

[11]

Katherine Elizabeth Bumby and Kerstin Dautenhahn. 1999. Investigating children’s attitudes towards robots: A case study. Proceedings Third Cognitive Technology Conference CT’99 August (1999), 391–410.

[12]

Fabio Campos, Paulo Blikstein, and Ali Azhar. 2017. The Conference of the Birds: A Collaborative Storytelling Environment for Literacy Development. In Proceedings of the 2017 Conference on Interaction Design and Children (Stanford, California, USA) (IDC ’17). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 729–732. https://doi.org/10.1145/3078072.3091991

Digital Library

[13]

Angela Chang and Cynthia Breazeal. 2011. TinkRBook: Shared Reading Interfaces for Storytelling. In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Interaction Design and Children (Ann Arbor, Michigan) (IDC ’11). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 145–148. https://doi.org/10.1145/1999030.1999047

Digital Library

[14]

Allison Druin. 2002. The role of children in the design of new technology. Behaviour and Information Technology 21, 1 (2002), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/01449290110108659

[15]

Frikk H. Fossdal, Jens Dyvik, Jakob Anders Nilsson, Jon Nordby, Torbjørn Nordvik Helgesen, Rogardt Heldal, and Nadya Peek. 2020. Fabricatable Machines: A Toolkit for Building Digital Fabrication Machines. In Proceedings of the Fourteenth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction (Sydney NSW, Australia) (TEI ’20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 411–422. https://doi.org/10.1145/3374920.3374929

Digital Library

[16]

Terrell Glenn, Ananya Ipsita, Caleb Carithers, Kylie Peppler, and Karthik Ramani. 2020. StoryMakAR: Bringing Stories to Life With An Augmented Reality & Physical Prototyping Toolkit for Youth. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Honolulu, HI, USA) (CHI ’20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376790

Digital Library

[17]

Laurence R Goldman. 1998. Child’s play: Myth, mimesis and make-believe. Routledge, Abingdon, UK.

[18]

Michal Gordon, Eileen Rivera, Edith Ackermann, and Cynthia Breazeal. 2015. Designing a Relational Social Robot Toolkit for Preschool Children to Explore Computational Concepts. In Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Interaction Design and Children (Boston, Massachusetts) (IDC ’15). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 355–358. https://doi.org/10.1145/2771839.2771915

Digital Library

[19]

Jeong-Hye Han, Mi-Heon Jo, Vicki Jones, and Jun-H. Jo. 2008. Comparative Study on the Educational Use of Home Robots for Children. Journal of Information Processing Systems 4 (12 2008), 159–168. Issue 4. https://doi.org/10.3745/jips.2008.4.4.159

[20]

Chuan-Che Huang, Yu-Jen Lin, Xinda Zeng, Mark Newman, and Sile O’Modhrain. 2015. Olegoru: A Soundscape Composition Tool to Enhance Imaginative Storytelling with Tangible Objects. In Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction (Stanford, California, USA) (TEI ’15). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 709–714. https://doi.org/10.1145/2677199.2687895

Digital Library

[21]

Chien-Ming Huang and Bilge Mutlu. 2012. Robot Behavior Toolkit: Generating Effective Social Behaviors for Robots. In Proceedings of the Seventh Annual ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction(Boston, Massachusetts, USA) (HRI ’12). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 25–32. https://doi.org/10.1145/2157689.2157694

Digital Library

[22]

Jeffrey Johnson. 2003. Children, robotics, and education. Artificial Life and Robotics 7, 1-2 (2003), 16–21.

[23]

Takayuki Kanda, Takayuki Hirano, Daniel Eaton, and Hiroshi Ishiguro. 2004. Interactive robots as social partners and peer tutors for children : A field trial. Human-Computer Interaction 19 (2004), 61–84. Issue 1-2. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/229059978

[24]

Jun Kato, Daisuke Sakamoto, and Takeo Igarashi. 2012. Phybots: A Toolkit for Making Robotic Things. In Proceedings of the Designing Interactive Systems Conference (Newcastle Upon Tyne, United Kingdom) (DIS ’12). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 248–257. https://doi.org/10.1145/2317956.2317996

Digital Library

[25]

Sami Kauppinen, Satu Luojus, Julius Tuomisto, and Anu Ahlgren. 2013. Utilizing Gesture Recognition Technology in Children’s Interactive Storybook. In Proceedings of International Conference on Making Sense of Converging Media (Tampere, Finland) (AcademicMindTrek ’13). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 76–79. https://doi.org/10.1145/2523429.2523474

Digital Library

[26]

Ian Lane, Vinay Prasad, Gaurav Sinha, Arlette Umuhoza, Shangyu Luo, Akshay Chandrashekaran, and Antoine Raux. 2012. HRItk: The Human-Robot Interaction ToolKit Rapid Development of Speech-Centric Interactive Systems in ROS. In NAACL-HLT Workshop on Future Directions and Needs in the Spoken Dialog Community: Tools and Data (Montreal, Canada) (SDCTD ’12). Association for Computational Linguistics, USA, 41–44.

[27]

Hee Rin Lee, Selma Šabanović, Wan-Ling Chang, Shinichi Nagata, Jennifer Piatt, Casey Bennett, and David Hakken. 2017. Steps Toward Participatory Design of Social Robots: Mutual Learning with Older Adults with Depression. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (Vienna, Austria) (HRI ’17). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 244–253. https://doi.org/10.1145/2909824.3020237

Digital Library

[28]

LEGO. 2020. Lego Mindstorms. Retrieved August 14, 2020 from https://www.lego.com/en-gb/themes/mindstorms

[29]

Lijuan Liu, Junwu Wang, Hebo Gong, Jiahao Guo, Pinhao Wang, Zhangzhi Wang, Lanqing Huang, and Cheng Yao. 2020. ModBot: A Tangible and Modular Making Toolkit for Children to Create Underwater Robots. In Extended Abstracts of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(Honolulu, HI, USA) (CHI EA ’20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1145/3334480.3382907

Digital Library

[30]

Patricia Bianca Lyk and Morten Lyk. 2015. Nao as an Authority in the Classroom: Can Nao Help the Teacher to Keep an Acceptable Noise Level?. In Proceedings of the Tenth Annual ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction Extended Abstracts, Vol. 02-05-March. IEEE Computer Society, New York, NY, USA, 77–78. https://doi.org/10.1145/2701973.2702014

Digital Library

[31]

Jayadev Madyal, Laura Platte, Julia Arndt, Marlon Spangenberg, and Konstantin Zähl. 2020. MoBi - An interactive classroom robot helping children to separate waste. In Companion of the 2020 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction. IEEE Computer Society, New York, NY, USA, 629–630. https://doi.org/10.1145/3371382.3379459

Digital Library

[32]

Richard L. Marsh, Joshua D. Landau, and Jason L. Hicks. 1996. How examples may (and may not) constrain creativity. Memory and Cognition 24, 5 (1996), 669–680. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03201091

[33]

Stylianos Mystakidis, Niki Lambropoulos, Habib M. Fardoun, and Daniyal M. Alghazzawi. 2014. Playful Blended Digital Storytelling in 3D Immersive ELearning Environments: A Cost Effective Early Literacy Motivation Method. In Proceedings of the 2014 Workshop on Interaction Design in Educational Environments (Albacete, Spain) (IDEE ’14). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 97–101. https://doi.org/10.1145/2643604.2643632

Digital Library

[34]

Liora Nasi, Yoel Nasi, Can Aydin, Rana Taki, Batuhan Byaraktar, Ece Tabag, and Sedat Yalcin. 2019. Pomelo, a Collaborative Education Technology Interaction Robot. In ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, Vol. 2019-March. IEEE, New York, NY, USA, 757–758. https://doi.org/10.1109/HRI.2019.8673160

[35]

VA Newhart, M Warschauer, and L Sender. 2016. Virtual inclusion via telepresence robots in the classroom: An exploratory case study. The International Journal of Technologies in Learning 23 (2016), 9–25. Issue 4. https://doi.org/10.18848/2327-0144/CGP

[36]

M. Obaid, W. Barendregt, P. Alves-Oliveira, A. Paiva, and M. Fjeld. 2015. Designing Robotic Teaching Assistants: Interaction Design Students’ and Children’s Views. In Social Robotics, Adriana Tapus, Elisabeth André, Jean-Claude Martin, François Ferland, and Mehdi Ammi(Eds.). Springer International Publishing, Cham, 502–511.

[37]

Mohammad Obaid, Gökçe Elif Baykal, Asım Evren Yantaç, and Wolmet Barendregt. 2017. Developing a Prototyping Method for Involving Children in the Design of Classroom Robots. International Journal of Social Robotics 10 (2017), 279–291. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-017-0450-7

[38]

Mohammad Obaid, Asım Evren Yantaç, Wolmet Barendregt, Güncel Kırlangıç, and Tilbe Göksun. 2016. Robo2Box: A Toolkit to Elicit Children’s Design Requirements for Classroom Robots. In Social Robotics, Arvin Agah, John-John Cabibihan, Ayanna M. Howard, Miguel A. Salichs, and Hongsheng He(Eds.). Springer International Publishing, Cham, 600–610.

[39]

Natalia Reich-Stiebert, Friederike Eyssel, and Charlotte Hohnemann. 2020. Exploring university students’ preferences for educational robot design by means of a user-centered design approach. International Journal of Social Robotics 12 (2020), 227–237.

[40]

SoftBank Robotics. 2020. Nao the humanoid and programmable robot. Retrieved October 19, 2020 from https://www.softbankrobotics.com/emea/en/nao

[41]

SoftBank Robotics. 2020. Pepper the humanoid and programmable robot. Retrieved October 19, 2020 from https://www.softbankrobotics.com/emea/en/pepper

[42]

Chris Rogers and Merredith Portsmore. 2004. Bringing engineering to elementary school. Journal of STEM Education: innovations and research 5, 3 (2004), 17–28.

[43]

Elisa Rubegni, Monica Landoni, and Letizia Jaccheri. 2020. Design for Change With and for Children: How to Design Digital StoryTelling Tool to Raise Stereotypes Awareness. In Proceedings of the 2020 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference (Eindhoven, Netherlands) (DIS ’20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 505–518. https://doi.org/10.1145/3357236.3395470

Digital Library

[44]

Natalie Rusk, Mitchel Resnick, Robbie Berg, and Margaret Pezalla-Granlund. 2008. New pathways into robotics: Strategies for broadening participation. Journal of Science Education and Technology 17, 1 (2008), 59–69.

[45]

Martin Saerbeck, Tom Schut, Christoph Bartneck, and Maddy D. Janse. 2010. Expressive robots in education: Varying the degree of social supportive behavior of a robotic tutor. In Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings, Vol. 3. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1613–1622. https://doi.org/10.1145/1753326.1753567

Digital Library

[46]

Mike Scaife and Yvonne Rogers. 1998. Kids as Informants: Telling Us What We Didn’t Know or Confirming What We Knew Already?Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc., San Francisco, CA, USA, 27–50.

[47]

Alessandra Sciutti, Francesco Rea, and Giulio Sandini. 2014. When you are young, (robot’s) looks matter. Developmental changes in the desired properties of a robot friend. In The 23rd IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (Edinburgh, Scotland). IEEE Press, New York, NY, USA, 567–573. https://doi.org/10.1109/ROMAN.2014.6926313

[48]

Gabriel Skantze and Samer Al Moubayed. 2012. IrisTK: A Statechart-Based Toolkit for Multi-Party Face-to-Face Interaction. In Proceedings of the 14th ACM International Conference on Multimodal Interaction (Santa Monica, California, USA) (ICMI ’12). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 69–76. https://doi.org/10.1145/2388676.2388698

Digital Library

[49]

Steven M. Smith, Thomas B. Ward, and Jay S. Schumacher. 1993. Constraining effects of examples in a creative generation task. Memory & Cognition 21, 6 (1993), 837–845. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03202751

[50]

Michael Soenthorn Speek and Maarten Van Mechelen. 2018. Storytelling Shapes: A Toolkit to Enable Children to Express Their Needs and Wishes. In Proceedings of the 17th ACM Conference on Interaction Design and Children (Trondheim, Norway) (IDC ’18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 619–624. https://doi.org/10.1145/3202185.3210785

Digital Library

[51]

Vasant Srinivasan, Robin Murphy, Zachary Henkel, Victoria Groom, and Clifford Nass. 2011. A Toolkit for Exploring the Role of Voice in Human-Robot Interaction. In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (Lausanne, Switzerland) (HRI ’11). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 255–256. https://doi.org/10.1145/1957656.1957758

Digital Library

[52]

Amanda Sullivan and Marina Umaschi Bers. 2016. Robotics in the early childhood classroom: learning outcomes from an 8-week robotics curriculum in pre-kindergarten through second grade. International Journal of Technology and Design Education 26, 1(2016), 3–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-015-9304-5

[53]

Cristina Sylla, Íris Susana Pires Pereira, and Gabriela Sá. 2019. Designing Manipulative Tools for Creative Multi and Cross-Cultural Storytelling. In Proceedings of the 2019 on Creativity and Cognition (San Diego, CA, USA) (C&C ’19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 396–406. https://doi.org/10.1145/3325480.3325501

Digital Library

[54]

Maarten Van Mechelen, Alice Schut, Mathieu Gielen, and Remke Klapwijk. 2018. Developing Children’s Empathy in Co-Design Activities: A Pilot Case Study. In Proceedings of the 17th ACM Conference on Interaction Design and Children (Trondheim, Norway) (IDC ’18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 669–674. https://doi.org/10.1145/3202185.3210797

Digital Library

[55]

Torben Wallbaum, Swamy Ananthanarayan, Shadan Sadeghian Borojeni, Wilko Heuten, and Susanne Boll. 2017. Towards a Tangible Storytelling Kit for Exploring Emotions with Children. In Proceedings of the on Thematic Workshops of ACM Multimedia 2017 (Mountain View, California, USA) (Thematic Workshops ’17). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 10–16. https://doi.org/10.1145/3126686.3126702

Digital Library

[56]

Sarah Woods. 2006. Exploring the design space of robots: Children’s perspectives. Interacting with Computers 18, 6 (06 2006), 1390–1418. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intcom.2006.05.001 arXiv:https://academic.oup.com/iwc/article-pdf/18/6/1390/1997635/iwc18-1390.pdf

[57]

Sarah Woods, Megan Davis, Kerstin Dautenhahn, and Joerg Schulz. 2005. Can robots be used as a vehicle for the projection of socially sensitive issues? Exploring children’s attitudes towards robots through stories. Proceedings - IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication 2005(2005), 384–389. https://doi.org/10.1109/ROMAN.2005.1513809

[58]

Wonder Workshop. 2010. Dash, Cue & Dot. Retrieved August 14, 2020 from https://www.makewonder.com/

[59]

Yan Xu, Hyungsung Park, and Youngkyun Baek. 2011. A New Approach Toward Digital Storytelling: An Activity Focused on Writing Self-efficacy in a Virtual Learning Environment. Journal of Educational Technology & Society 14, 4 (2011), 181–191. http://www.jstor.org/stable/jeductechsoci.14.4.181

Cited By

Almeida FCanedo Ede Oliveira Albuquerque Rde Deus FSandoval Orozco AGarcía Villalba L(2022)A Model for the Definition, Prioritization and Optimization of IndicatorsElectronics10.3390/electronics1106096711:6(967)Online publication date: 21-Mar-2022
https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics11060967

Storytelling Before or After Prototyping with a Toolkit for Designing Classroom Robots
1. Computer systems organization
  1. Embedded and cyber-physical systems
2. Computing methodologies
  1. Artificial intelligence
    1. Planning and scheduling

Recommendations

Designing for Children's Mobile Storytelling

Mobile technologies offer novel opportunities for children to express themselves in-context, seamlessly, without disrupting the flow of their formal learning activities or informal play. Most contemporary mobile devices are equipped with multimedia ...
Storytelling shapes: a toolkit to enable children to express their needs and wishes
IDC '18: Proceedings of the 17th ACM Conference on Interaction Design and Children

This paper presents a co-design toolkit, Storytelling Shapes, that enables children to tell personal stories using various wooden shapes. Starting from these stories, designers can engage in a conversation about children's needs and wishes. The toolkit ...
Understanding and fostering children's storytelling during game narrative design
IDC '14: Proceedings of the 2014 conference on Interaction design and children

Children typically have extensive expertise and experiences of computer games, which can enable them to make valuable contributions when involved in the design of games. Within this paper we discuss our approach to the involvement of children in the ...

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Other conferences

OzCHI '20: Proceedings of the 32nd Australian Conference on Human-Computer Interaction

December 2020

764 pages

ISBN:9781450389754

DOI:10.1145/3441000

Copyright © 2020 ACM.

Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 15 February 2021

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Request Permissions

Check for updates

Author Tags

Qualifiers

Research-article
Research
Refereed limited

Conference

OzCHI '20

OzCHI '20: 32nd Australian Conference on Human-Computer-Interaction

December 2 - 4, 2020

NSW, Sydney, Australia

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 362 of 729 submissions, 50%

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

1
Total Citations
View Citations
162
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)30
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)5

Reflects downloads up to 02 Feb 2025

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

Almeida FCanedo Ede Oliveira Albuquerque Rde Deus FSandoval Orozco AGarcía Villalba L(2022)A Model for the Definition, Prioritization and Optimization of IndicatorsElectronics10.3390/electronics1106096711:6(967)Online publication date: 21-Mar-2022
https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics11060967

View Options

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Full Access

Get this Publication

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

eReader

View online with eReader.

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format.

Figures

Tables

Media

View Table of Conten