skip to main content
10.1145/3401335.3401355acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication Pagesict4sConference Proceedingsconference-collections
short-paper

Automated Sustainability Compliance Checking Using Process Mining and Formal Logic

Published: 31 July 2020 Publication History

Abstract

Business processes need to have certain constraints such that they can lead to sustainable outcomes. These constraints can be manifold and their adherence has to be monitored. In the past compliance checking has been applied in several business domains without considering certain sustainability aspects, such as multi-dimensionality and impact level. With my research I want to contribute to the application of compliance checking techniques for the purpose of sustainability compliance. In order to achieve this, I want to analyse and develop data-driven approaches, which allow to automate the task of compliance checking. The way in which this can be achieved, is be combining methods from process mining with formal languages that can express sustainability rules in a machine-readable manner. The main goal is to develop a compliance engine that can be adapted by ERP systems in order to evaluate sustainability conformance in business processes.

References

[1]
Graeme Auld, Christina Balboa, Steven Bernstein, and Benjamin Cashore, 2009. The emergence of non-state market-driven (NSDM) global environmental governance: a cross-sectoral assessment. Governance for the environment: New perspectives.
[2]
Elham Ramezani, Dirk Fahland, and Will M. P. van der Aalst, 2012. Where did I misbehave? Diagnostic information in compliance checking. In International conference on business process management, 262--278. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-32885-5_21
[3]
Christoph Becker, Ruzanna Chitchyan, Leticia Duboc, Steve Easterbrook, Birgit Penzenstadler, Norbert Seyff, and Colin C. Venters, 2015. Sustainability design and software: the karlskrona manifesto. In 2015 IEEE/ACM 37th IEEE International Conference on Software Engineering, 467--476.
[4]
Jan Martijn E. M. van der Werf, H. M. W. Verbeek, and Will P. M. van Der Aalst, W. M., 2012. Context-aware compliance checking. In International Conference on Business Process Management, 98--113. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-32885-5_7
[5]
Amal Elgammal, Oktay Turetken, Willem-Jan van den Heuvel, and Mike Papazoglou, 2010. On the formal specification of regulatory compliance: a comparative analysis. In International Conference on Service-Oriented Computing, 27--38. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-19394-1_4
[6]
Riyanarto Sarno, Rahadian D. Dewandono, Tohari Ahmad, Mohammad F. Naufal, and Fernandes Sinaga, 2015. Hybrid Association Rule Learning and Process Mining for Fraud Detection. IAENG International Journal of Computer Science, 42(2).
[7]
Frank Wijen, 2014. Means versus ends in opaque institutional fields: Trading off compliance and achievement in sustainability standard adoption. Academy of Management Review, 39(3), 302--323. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2012.0218.
[8]
Selim Larsch, Stefanie Betz, Leticia Duboc, Andréa M. Magdaleno, and Camilla Bomfim, 2016. Integrating sustainability aspects in business process management. In International Conference on Business Process Management, 403--415. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-58457-7_29
[9]
Alexander Nowak, Frank Leymann, Daniel Schleicher, David Schumm, and Sebastian Wagner, 2011. Green business process patterns. In Proceedings of the 18th conference on pattern languages of programs, 1--10. https://doi.org/10.1145/2578903.2579144
[10]
Patrick Lübbecke, Peter Fettke, and Peter Loos, 2016. Sustainability patterns for the improvement of IT-related business processes with regard to ecological goals. In International Conference on Business Process Management, 428--439. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-58457-7_31
[11]
Will M. P. van der Aalst, Huub T. de Beer, and B. F. Dongen, 2005. Process mining and verification of properties: An approach based on temporal logic. In OTM Confederated International Conferences" On the Move to Meaningful Internet Systems", 130--147. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/11575771_11
[12]
Ahmed Awad, Gero Decker, and Mathias Weske, 2008. Efficient compliance checking using BPMN-Q and temporal logic. In International Conference on Business Process Management, 326--341. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-85758-7_24
[13]
Elham Ramezani, Dirk Fahland, Jan M. van der Werf, and Pater Mattheis, 2011. Separating compliance management and business process management. In International Conference on Business Process Management, 459--464. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-28115-0_43
[14]
Tom Butler, 2011. Compliance with institutional imperatives on environmental sustainability: Building theory on the role of Green IS. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 20(1), 6--26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsis.2010.09.006

Cited By

View all

Index Terms

  1. Automated Sustainability Compliance Checking Using Process Mining and Formal Logic

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    ICT4S2020: Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on ICT for Sustainability
    June 2020
    349 pages
    ISBN:9781450375955
    DOI:10.1145/3401335
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    In-Cooperation

    • Univ of the West of England: University of the West of England
    • The University of Bristol: The University of Bristol

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 31 July 2020

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. Association Rule Learning
    2. Formal Logic
    3. Process Mining
    4. Sustainability Compliance Checking

    Qualifiers

    • Short-paper
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

    Conference

    ICT4S2020

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)52
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1
    Reflects downloads up to 15 Sep 2024

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all

    View Options

    Get Access

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media