survey

The AI-Based Cyber Threat Landscape: A Survey

Authors:

Nektaria Kaloudi,

Jingyue LiAuthors Info & Claims

ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR), Volume 53, Issue 1

Article No.: 20, Pages 1 - 34

https://doi.org/10.1145/3372823

Published: 06 February 2020 Publication History

Abstract

Recent advancements in artificial intelligence (AI) technologies have induced tremendous growth in innovation and automation. Although these AI technologies offer significant benefits, they can be used maliciously. Highly targeted and evasive attacks in benign carrier applications, such as DeepLocker, have demonstrated the intentional use of AI for harmful purposes. Threat actors are constantly changing and improving their attack strategy with particular emphasis on the application of AI-driven techniques in the attack process, called AI-based cyber attack, which can be used in conjunction with conventional attack techniques to cause greater damage. Despite several studies on AI and security, researchers have not summarized AI-based cyber attacks enough to be able to understand the adversary’s actions and to develop proper defenses against such attacks. This study aims to explore existing studies of AI-based cyber attacks and to map them onto a proposed framework, providing insight into new threats. Our framework includes the classification of several aspects of malicious uses of AI during the cyber attack life cycle and provides a basis for their detection to predict future threats. We also explain how to apply this framework to analyze AI-based cyber attacks in a hypothetical scenario of a critical smart grid infrastructure.

References

[1]

Horizon 2020 Work Programme 2014-2015. 2015. Leadership in Enabling and Industrial Technologies: Information and Communication Technologies. Retrieved November 25, 2019 from http://ec.europa.eu/research/participants/portal4/doc/call/h2020/common/1587758-05i._ict_wp_2014-2015_en.pdf.

[2]

Terrence Adams. 2017. AI-powered social bots. arXiv:1706.05143.

[3]

Dario Amodei, Chris Olah, Jacob Steinhardt, Paul Christiano, John Schulman, and Dan Mané. 2016. Concrete problems in AI safety. arXiv:1606.06565.

[4]

Hyrum S. Anderson, Jonathan Woodbridge, and Bobby Filar. 2016. DeepDGA: Adversarially-tuned domain generation and detection. In Proceedings of the 2016 ACM Workshop on Artificial Intelligence and Security. ACM, New York, NY, 13--21.

Digital Library

[5]

Ross Anderson and Shailendra Fuloria. 2010. Who controls the off switch? In Proceedings of the 2010 1st IEEE International Conference on Smart Grid Communications. IEEE, Los Alamitos, CA, 96--101.

[6]

Daniele Antonioli, Giuseppe Bernieri, and Nils Ole Tippenhauer. 2018. Taking control: Design and implementation of botnets for cyber-physical attacks with CPSBot. arXiv:1802.00152.

[7]

Alejandro Correa Bahnsen, Ivan Torroledo, David Camacho, and Sergio Villegas. 2018. DeepPhish: Simulating malicious AI. In Proceedings of the 2018 APWG Symposium on Electronic Crime Research (eCrime’18). 1--8.

[8]

Oliver Bendel. 2019. The synthetization of human voices. AI 8 Society 34, 1 (2019), 83--89.

[9]

UC Berkeley. 2012. Cyber-Physical Systems—A Concept Map. Retrieved November 25, 2019 from https://ptolemy.berkeley.edu/projects/cps/.

[10]

William Blum. 2017. Neural Fuzzing: Applying DNN to Software Security Testing. Retrieved November 25, 2019 from https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/research/blog/neural-fuzzing/.

[11]

Michael Bossetta. 2018. A simulated cyberattack on Twitter: Assessing partisan vulnerability to spear phishing and disinformation ahead of the 2018 US midterm elections. arXiv:1811.05900.

[12]

Susan M. Bridges and Rayford B. Vaughn. 2000. Fuzzy data mining and genetic algorithms applied to intrusion detection. In Proceedings of the 12th Annual Canadian Information Technology Security Symposium. 109--122.

[13]

Miles Brundage, Shahar Avin, Jack Clark, Helen Toner, Peter Eckersley, Ben Garfinkel, Allan Dafoe, et al. 2018. The malicious use of artificial intelligence: Forecasting, prevention, and mitigation. arXiv:1802.07228.

[14]

Zheng Bu. 2014. Zero-Day Attacks Are Not the Same as Zero-Day Vulnerabilities. Retrieved November 25, 2019 from https://www.fireeye.com/blog/executive-perspective/2014/04/zero-day-attacks-are-not-the-same-as-zero-day-vulnerabilities.html.

[15]

Tomas Bures, Danny Weyns, Bradley Schmer, Eduardo Tovar, Eric Boden, Thomas Gabor, Ilias Gerostathopoulos, et al. 2017. Software engineering for smart cyber-physical systems: Challenges and promising solutions. ACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes 42, 2 (2017), 19--24.

Digital Library

[16]

Keywhan Chung, Zbigniew T. Kalbarczyk, and Ravishankar K. Iyer. 2019. Availability attacks on computing systems through alteration of environmental control: Smart malware approach. In Proceedings of the 10th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Cyber-Physical Systems. ACM, New York, NY, 1--12.

[17]

Jessica Cussins. 2017. AI Researchers Create Video to Call for Autonomous Weapons Ban at UN. Retrieved November 25, 2019 from https://futureoflife.org/2017/11/14/ai-researchers-create-video-call-autonomous-weapons-ban-un/.

[18]

Moises Danziger and Marco Aurelio Amaral Henriques. 2017. Attacking and defending with intelligent botnets. In Proceedings of XXXV Simpósio Brasileiro de Telecomunicaç oes e Processamento de Sinais-SBrT. 457--461.

[19]

AI-Driven Cyber-Attacks. 2018. The Next Paradigm Shift.

[20]

DARPA. 2016. Cyber Grand Challenge (CGC). Retrieved January 3, 2020 from https://www.darpa.mil/program/cyber-grand-challenge.

[21]

Kenneth De Jong. 1988. Learning with genetic algorithms: An overview. Machine Learning 3, 2--3 (1988), 121--138.

[22]

Dhilung Kirat, Jiyong Jang, and Marc Ph. Stoecklin. 2018. DeepLocker—Concealing targeted attacks with AI Locksmithing. In Proceedings of the Black Hat USA Conference.

[23]

Wenrui Diao, Xiangyu Liu, Zhe Zhou, and Kehuan Zhang. 2014. Your voice assistant is mine: How to abuse speakers to steal information and control your phone. In Proceedings of the 4th ACM Workshop on Security and Privacy in Smartphones and Mobile Devices. ACM, New York, NY, 63--74.

Digital Library

[24]

Selma Dilek, Hüseyin Çakır, and Mustafa Aydın. 2015. Applications of artificial intelligence techniques to combating cyber crimes: A review. arXiv:1502.03552.

[25]

Peter Eder-Neuhauser, Tanja Zseby, Joachim Fabini, and Gernot Vormayr. 2017. Cyber attack models for smart grid environments. Sustainable Energy, Grids and Networks 12 (2017), 10--29.

[26]

ENISA. 2018. ENISA Threat Landscape Report 2017. Retrieved November 25, 2019 from https://www.enisa.europa.eu/publications/enisa-threat-landscape-report-2017.

[27]

ESET. 2018. Can Artificial Intelligence Power Future Malware? White Paper. Retrieved November 25, 2019 from https://www.welivesecurity.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/Can_AI_Power_Future_Malware.pdf.

[28]

Gregory Falco, Arun Viswanathan, Carlos Caldera, and Howard Shrobe. 2018. A master attack methodology for an AI-based automated attack planner for smart cities. IEEE Access 6 (2018), 48360--48373.

[29]

Ming Feng and Hao Xu. 2017. Deep reinforcement learning based optimal defense for cyber-physical system in presence of unknown cyber-attack. In Proceedings of the 2017 IEEE Symposium Series on Computational Intelligence (SSCI ’17). IEEE, Los Alamitos, CA, 1--8.

[30]

Brian E. Finch. 2013. Anything and Everything Can Be Hacked. Retrieved November 25, 2019 from https://www.huffpost.com/entry/caveat-cyber-emptor_b_3748602.

[31]

Luciano Floridi. 2017. Digital’s cleaving power and its consequences. Philosophy 8 Technology 30, 2 (2017), 123--129.

[32]

European Regulators Group for Electricity and Gas. 2010. European Energy Regulators’ Position on Smart Grids. Retrieved November 25, 2019 from http://www.cired.net/publications/workshop2010/pdfs/0092.pdf.

[33]

National Science Foundation. 2015. Cyber-Physical Systems (CPS). Retrieved November 25, 2019 from https://www.nsf.gov/pubs/2015/nsf15541/nsf15541.pdf.

[34]

Jairo Giraldo, Esha Sarkar, Alvaro A. Cardenas, Michail Maniatakos, and Murat Kantarcioglu. 2017. Security and privacy in cyber-physical systems: A survey of surveys. IEEE Design 8 Test 34, 4 (2017), 7--17.

[35]

Ian Goodfellow, Yoshua Bengio, and Aaron Courville. 2016. Deep Learning. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

Digital Library

[36]

Alex Graves. 2013. Generating sequences with recurrent neural networks. arXiv:1308.0850.

[37]

Aaron Hansen, Jason Staggs, and Sujeet Shenoi. 2017. Security analysis of an advanced metering infrastructure. International Journal of Critical Infrastructure Protection 18 (2017), 3--19.

Digital Library

[38]

Simon Hansman and Ray Hunt. 2005. A taxonomy of network and computer attacks. Computers 8 Security 24, 1 (2005), 31--43.

[39]

Haibo He and Jun Yan. 2016. Cyber-physical attacks and defences in the smart grid: A survey. IET Cyber-Physical Systems: Theory 8 Applications 1, 1 (2016), 13--27.

[40]

Paul D. H. Hines, Ian Dobson, and Pooya Rezaei. 2017. Cascading power outages propagate locally in an influence graph that is not the actual grid topology. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems 32, 2 (2017), 958--967.

[41]

Briland Hitaj, Paolo Gasti, Giuseppe Ateniese, and Fernando Perez-Cruz. 2017. PassGAN: A deep learning approach for password guessing. arXiv:1709.00440.

[42]

White House. 2016. Artificial Intelligence, Automation, and the Economy. Executive Office of the President. Executive Retrieved January 4, 2020 from https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/sites/whitehouse.gov/files/documents/Artificial-Intelligence-Automation-Economy.PDF.

[43]

Weiwei Hu and Ying Tan. 2017. Generating adversarial malware examples for black-box attacks based on GAN. arXiv:1702.05983.

[44]

Abdulmalik Humayed, Jingqiang Lin, Fengjun Li, and Bo Luo. 2017. Cyber-physical systems security—A survey. IEEE Internet of Things Journal 4, 6 (2017), 1802--1831.

[45]

Eric M. Hutchins, Michael J. Cloppert, and Rohan M. Amin. 2011. Intelligence-driven computer network defense informed by analysis of adversary campaigns and intrusion kill chains. Leading Issues in Information Warfare 8 Security Research 1, 1 (2011), 80.

[46]

Leslie Pack Kaelbling, Michael L. Littman, and Andrew W. Moore. 1996. Reinforcement learning: A survey. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research 4 (1996), 237--285.

Digital Library

[47]

Rida Khatoun and Sherali Zeadally. 2017. Cybersecurity and privacy solutions in smart cities. IEEE Communications Magazine 55, 3 (2017), 51--59.

Digital Library

[48]

Young Mie Kim, Jordan Hsu, David Neiman, Colin Kou, Levi Bankston, Soo Yun Kim, Richard Heinrich, Robyn Baragwanath, and Garvesh Raskutti. 2018. The stealth media? Groups and targets behind divisive issue campaigns on Facebook. Political Communication 35, 4 (2018), 515--541.

[49]

Thomas C. King, Nikita Aggarwal, Mariarosaria Taddeo, and Luciano Floridi. 2019. Artificial intelligence crime: An interdisciplinary analysis of foreseeable threats and solutions. Science and Engineering Ethics. February 14, 2019. Epub ahead of print.

[50]

Jingyue Li, Jin Zhang, and Nektaria Kaloudi. 2018. Could we issue driving licenses to autonomous vehicles? In Proceedings of the International Conference on Computer Safety, Reliability, and Security. 473--480.

[51]

Tao Liu, Wujie Wen, and Yier Jin. 2018. SIN 2: Stealth infection on neural network—A low-cost agile neural Trojan attack methodology. In Proceedings of the 2018 IEEE International Symposium on Hardware Oriented Security and Trust (HOST’18). IEEE, Los Alamitos, CA, 227--230.

[52]

Natasha Lomas. 2017. Lyrebird Is a Voice Mimic for the Fake News Era. Retrieved November 25, 2019 from https://techcrunch.com/2017/04/25/lyrebird-is-a-voice-mimic-for-the-fake-news-era/.

[53]

William Melicher, Blase Ur, Sean M. Segreti, Saranga Komanduri, Lujo Bauer, Nicolas Christin, and Lorrie Faith Cranor. 2016. Fast, lean, and accurate: Modeling password guessability using neural networks. In Proceedings of the 25th USENIX Conference on Security Symposium (SEC’16). 175--191.

[54]

Harel Menashri and Gil Baram. 2015. Critical infrastructures and their interdependence in a cyber attack—The case of the US. Military and Strategic Affairs 7, 1 (2015), 22.

[55]

MITRE. 2017. Enterprise Matrix. Retrieved November 25, 2019 from https://attack.mitre.org/matrices/enterprise/.

[56]

Jefferson Seide Molléri, Kai Petersen, and Emilia Mendes. 2016. Survey guidelines in software engineering: An annotated review. In Proceedings of the 10th ACM/IEEE International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement. ACM, New York, NY, 58.

Digital Library

[57]

Thanh Thi Nguyen and Vijay Janapa Reddi. 2019. Deep reinforcement learning for cyber security. arXiv:1906.05799.

[58]

NIST. 2018. NIST Framework and Roadmap for Smart Grid Interoperability Standards, Release 4.0. Retrieved November 25, 2019 from https://www.nist.gov/engineering-laboratory/smart-grid/smart-grid-framework.

[59]

Ivan Novikov. 2018. How AI Can Be Applied to Cyberattacks. Retrieved November 25, 2019 from https://www.forbes.com/sites/forbestechcouncil/2018/03/22/how-ai-can-be-applied-to-cyberattacks/.

[60]

OASIS. 2017. OASIS Open Command and Control (OpenC2) TC. Retrieved November 25, 2019 from https://www.oasis-open.org/committees/tc_home.php?wg_abbrev=openc2.

[61]

Dan Patterson. 2018. How Weaponized AI Creates a New Breed of Cyber-Attacks. Retrieved November 25, 2019 from https://www.techrepublic.com/article/how-weaponized-ai-creates-a-new-breed-of-cyber-attacks/.

[62]

Frederic Petit, Duane Verner, David Brannegan, William Buehring, David Dickinson, Karen Guziel, Rebecca Haffenden, Julia Phillips, and James Peerenboom. 2015. Analysis of Critical Infrastructure Dependencies and Interdependencies. Technical Report. Argonne National Lab (ANL), Argonne, IL.

[63]

D. Petro and B. Morris. 2017. Weaponizing machine learning: Humanity was overrated anyway. In Proceedings of DEF CON 25.

[64]

Federico Pistono and Roman V. Yampolskiy. 2016. Unethical research: How to create a malevolent artificial intelligence. arXiv:1605.02817.

[65]

Ashis Pradhan. 2012. Support vector machine-A survey. International Journal of Emerging Technology and Advanced Engineering 2, 8 (2012), 82--85.

[66]

Alec Radford, Jeffrey Wu, Rewon Child, David Luan, Dario Amodei, and Ilya Sutskever. 2019. Language models are unsupervised multitask learners. OpenAI Blog 1, 8 (2019).

[67]

Mohit Rajpal, William Blum, and Rishabh Singh. 2017. Not all bytes are equal: Neural byte sieve for fuzzing. arXiv:1711.04596.

[68]

Patrick Reidy and K. Randal. 2013. Combating the insider threat at the FBI: Real world lessons learned. In Proceedings of the RSA Conference.

[69]

Bruce Schneier. 1999. Attack trees. Dr. Dobb’s Journal 24, 12 (1999), 21--29.

[70]

Bruce Schneier. 2018. Artificial intelligence and the attack/defense balance. IEEE Security 8 Privacy 2 (2018), 96.

[71]

John Seymour and Philip Tully. 2016. Weaponizing data science for social engineering: Automated E2E spear phishing on Twitter. Black Hat USA 37 (2016), 1--39.

[72]

John Seymour and Philip Tully. 2018. Generative models for spear phishing posts on social media. arXiv:1802.05196.

[73]

Shahaboddin Shamshirband, Nor Badrul Anuar, Miss Laiha Mat Kiah, and Ahmed Patel. 2013. An appraisal and design of a multi-agent system based cooperative wireless intrusion detection computational intelligence technique. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence 26, 9 (2013), 2105--2127.

Digital Library

[74]

Manish Shrestha, Christian Johansen, and Josef Noll. 2017. Security Classification for Smart Grid Infra Structures (Long Version). Retrieved January 4, 2020 from https://www.duo.uio.no/handle/10852/60948.

[75]

Leslie F. Sikos. 2018. AI in Cybersecurity. Vol. 151. Springer.

[76]

Kaj Sotala and Roman V. Yampolskiy. 2014. Responses to catastrophic AGI risk: A survey. Physica Scripta 90, 1 (2014), 018001.

[77]

Marc Ph. Stoecklin. 2018. DeepLocker: How AI Can Power a Stealthy New Breed of Malware. Retrieved November 25, 2019 from https://securityintelligence.com/deeplocker-how-ai-can-power-a-stealthy-new-breed-of-malware/.

[78]

Ilya Sutskever, James Martens, and Geoffrey E. Hinton. 2011. Generating text with recurrent neural networks. In Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML-11). 1017--1024.

[79]

Pablo Torres, Carlos Catania, Sebastian Garcia, and Carlos Garcia Garino. 2016. An analysis of recurrent neural networks for botnet detection behavior. In Proceedings of the 2016 IEEE Biennial Congress of Argentina (ARGENCON’16). IEEE, Los Alamitos, CA, 1--6.

[80]

Khoa Trieu and Yi Yang. 2018. Artificial intelligence-based password brute force attacks. In Proceedings of the 13th Annual Conference of the Midwest AIS (MWAIS’18).

[81]

Alexey Turchin. 2015. A Map: AGI Failures Modes and Levels. Retrieved November 25, 2019 from https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/hMQ5iFiHkChqgrHiH/.

[82]

Alexey Turchin and David Denkenberger. 2018. Classification of global catastrophic risks connected with artificial intelligence. AI 8 Society (2018), 1--17.

[83]

Jian-Wei Wang and Li-Li Rong. 2009. Cascade-based attack vulnerability on the US power grid. Safety Science 47, 10 (2009), 1332--1336.

[84]

Claes Wohlin. 2014. Guidelines for snowballing in systematic literature studies and a replication in software engineering. In Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Evaluation and Assessment in Software Engineering. 38.

Digital Library

[85]

Roman V. Yampolskiy. 2016. Taxonomy of pathways to dangerous artificial intelligence. In Proceedings of the Workshops at the 30th AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence.

[86]

Roman V. Yampolskiy and M. S. Spellchecker. 2016. Artificial intelligence safety and cybersecurity: A timeline of AI failures. arXiv:1610.07997.

[87]

Jun Yan, Haibo He, Xiangnan Zhong, and Yufei Tang. 2017. Q-learning-based vulnerability analysis of smart grid against sequential topology attacks. IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security 12, 1 (2017), 200--210.

Digital Library

[88]

Yuanshun Yao, Bimal Viswanath, Jenna Cryan, Haitao Zheng, and Ben Y. Zhao. 2017. Automated crowdturfing attacks and defenses in online review systems. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security. ACM, New York, NY, 1143--1158.

[89]

Rongjunchen Zhang, Xiao Chen, Jianchao Lu, Sheng Wen, Surya Nepal, and Yang Xiang. 2018. Using AI to hack IA: A new stealthy spyware against voice assistance functions in smart phones. arXiv:1805.06187.

[90]

Yihai Zhu, Jun Yan, Yan Lindsay Sun, and Haibo He. 2014. Revealing cascading failure vulnerability in power grids using risk-graph. IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems 25, 12 (2014), 3274--3284.

Cited By

Arun MBarik DChandran SPraveenkumar STudu K(2025)Economic, policy, social, and regulatory aspects of AI-driven smart buildingsJournal of Building Engineering10.1016/j.jobe.2024.11166699(111666)Online publication date: Apr-2025
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2024.111666
Khanna AKhanna A(2025)Threat LandscapeSecuring an Enterprise10.1007/979-8-8688-1029-9_2(19-45)Online publication date: 1-Jan-2025
https://doi.org/10.1007/979-8-8688-1029-9_2
Alanezi MAL-Azzawi R(2024)AI-Powered Cyber Threats: A Systematic ReviewMesopotamian Journal of CyberSecurity10.58496/MJCS/2024/0214:3(166-188)Online publication date: 6-Dec-2024
https://doi.org/10.58496/MJCS/2024/021
Show More Cited By

Index Terms

The AI-Based Cyber Threat Landscape: A Survey
1. General and reference
  1. Document types
    1. Surveys and overviews

Recommendations

Adversarial attacks on machine learning-based cyber security systems: a survey of techniques and defences

Machine learning (ML) has been increasingly adopted in the field of cyber security to enhance the detection and prevention of cyber threats. However, recent studies have demonstrated that ML-based cyber security systems are vulnerable to adversarial ...
Security beyond cybersecurity: side-channel attacks against non-cyber systems and their countermeasures
Abstract
Side-channels are unintended pathways within target systems that leak internal information, exploitable via side-channel attack techniques that extract the target information, compromising the system’s security and privacy. Side-channel attacks ...
A quantum-based approach for offensive security against cyber attacks in electrical infrastructure
Abstract
Deciding the correct offensive security strategy for safeguarding the electrical physical infrastructures of smart grids is a challenging task. The offensive security training against various cyber-attacks focuses on a multitude of ...
Highlights
- In this research investigation, a formal modeling of security strategy is proposed using Lambda calculus with both classical and quantum perspectives.

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Computing Surveys

ACM Computing Surveys Volume 53, Issue 1

January 2021

781 pages

ISSN:0360-0300

EISSN:1557-7341

DOI:10.1145/3382040

Editor:
Albert Zomaya
University of Sydney, Australia

Issue’s Table of Contents

Copyright © 2020 ACM.

Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 06 February 2020

Accepted: 01 November 2019

Revised: 01 October 2019

Received: 01 May 2019

Published in CSUR Volume 53, Issue 1

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Request Permissions

Check for updates

Author Tags

Qualifiers

Survey
Survey
Refereed

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

158
Total Citations
View Citations
10,075
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)2,020
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)156

Reflects downloads up to 13 Jan 2025

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

Arun MBarik DChandran SPraveenkumar STudu K(2025)Economic, policy, social, and regulatory aspects of AI-driven smart buildingsJournal of Building Engineering10.1016/j.jobe.2024.11166699(111666)Online publication date: Apr-2025
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2024.111666
Khanna AKhanna A(2025)Threat LandscapeSecuring an Enterprise10.1007/979-8-8688-1029-9_2(19-45)Online publication date: 1-Jan-2025
https://doi.org/10.1007/979-8-8688-1029-9_2
Alanezi MAL-Azzawi R(2024)AI-Powered Cyber Threats: A Systematic ReviewMesopotamian Journal of CyberSecurity10.58496/MJCS/2024/0214:3(166-188)Online publication date: 6-Dec-2024
https://doi.org/10.58496/MJCS/2024/021
Mohamed NTaherdoost HMadanchian M(2024)Enhancing Spear Phishing Defense with AI: A Comprehensive Review and Future DirectionsICST Transactions on Scalable Information Systems10.4108/eetsis.610911Online publication date: 10-Dec-2024
https://doi.org/10.4108/eetsis.6109
S SA SVignesh VP S(2024)Assessment of Zero-Day Vulnerability using Machine Learning ApproachEAI Endorsed Transactions on Internet of Things10.4108/eetiot.497810Online publication date: 30-Jan-2024
https://doi.org/10.4108/eetiot.4978
Hameed KTayyab MJhanjhi NMuzammal SMumtaz M(2024)Dynamic Defense Strategies With Generative AIUtilizing Generative AI for Cyber Defense Strategies10.4018/979-8-3693-8944-7.ch003(83-136)Online publication date: 13-Sep-2024
https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3693-8944-7.ch003
T. VG. HA. N. KSangers B(2024)Future Trends and Trials in Cybersecurity and Generative AIReshaping CyberSecurity With Generative AI Techniques10.4018/979-8-3693-5415-5.ch013(465-490)Online publication date: 26-Jul-2024
https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3693-5415-5.ch013
Tariq M(2024)Enhancing Cybersecurity Protocols in Modern Healthcare SystemsTransformative Approaches to Patient Literacy and Healthcare Innovation10.4018/979-8-3693-3661-8.ch011(223-241)Online publication date: 9-Feb-2024
https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3693-3661-8.ch011
قاسم عالعنزى ت(2024)فاعلية برنامج إرشادي في تنمية الوعي بالأمن السيبراني لدى مستخدمي الإنترنت من طلاب المرحلة الثانوية بمنطقة جازانمجلة جامعة الشارقة للعلوم الانسانية والاجتماعية10.36394/jhss/21/3/1921:3Online publication date: 12-Sep-2024
https://doi.org/10.36394/jhss/21/3/19
Ametepey SAigbavboa CThwala WAddy H(2024)The Impact of AI in Sustainable Development Goal Implementation: A Delphi StudySustainability10.3390/su1609385816:9(3858)Online publication date: 5-May-2024
https://doi.org/10.3390/su16093858
Show More Cited By

View Options

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Full Access

Get this Article

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

eReader

View online with eReader.

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format.

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

View Issue’s Table of Contents