skip to main content
10.1145/3366614.3368103acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmiddlewareConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Public Access

Tango of edge and cloud execution for reliability

Published: 09 December 2019 Publication History

Abstract

The increasing cost of cloud services and the need for decentralization of servers has led to a rise of interest in Edge computing. Edge computing brings the servers closer to the end users which helps in reducing network latency. However, the presence of multiple edge servers adversely affects the reliability due to difficulty in maintenance of heterogeneous servers. This paper aims at evaluating the performance of various server configuration models in edge computing using EdgeCloudSim, a popular simulator for edge computing. The performance is evaluated in terms of service time and percentage of failed tasks for an Augmented Reality application.
We evaluated the performance of the following edge computing models, Exclusive: Mobile only, Edge only, Cloud only; and Hybrid: Edge & Cloud hybrid with load-balancing on the Edge, and Mobile & Edge hybrid. We analyzed the impact of variation of different parameters such as WAN bandwidth, cost of cloud resources, heterogeneity of edge servers, etc., on the performance of the edge computing models. We show that due to variation in the above parameters, the exclusive models are not sufficient for computational requirements and there is a need for hybrid edge computing models.

References

[1]
[n.d.]. AWS IoT Greengrass. https://aws.amazon.com/greengrass/.
[2]
[n.d.]. AWS IoT Greengrass Usage. https://discovery.hgdata.com/product/aws-iot-greengrass.
[3]
[n.d.]. CloudFront. https://aws.amazon.com/cloudfront/.
[4]
[n.d.]. Lambda@Edge. https://aws.amazon.com/lambda/edge/.
[5]
Rodrigo N. Calheiros, Rajiv Ranjan, César A. F. De Rose, and Rajkumar Buyya. 2009. CloudSim: A Novel Framework for Modeling and Simulation of Cloud Computing Infrastructures and Services. CoRR abs/0903.2525 (2009).
[6]
Eduardo Cuervo, Aruna Balasubramanian, Dae-ki Cho, Alec Wolman, Stefan Saroiu, Ranveer Chandra, and Paramvir Bahl. 2010. MAUI: Making Smartphones Last Longer with Code Offload. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Mobile Systems, Applications, and Services (MobiSys '10). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 49--62.
[7]
M. T. Diallo, F. Fieau, and J. Hennequin. 2014. Impacts of video Quality of Experience on User Engagement in a live event. In 2014 IEEE International Conference on Multimedia and Expo Workshops (ICMEW). 1--7.
[8]
Hoang T. Dinh, Chonho Lee, Dusit Niyato, and Ping Wang. 2013. A survey of mobile cloud computing: architecture, applications, and approaches. Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing 13, 18 (2013), 1587--1611. arXiv:https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/wcm.1203
[9]
Wenlu Hu, Ying Gao, Kiryong Ha, Junjue Wang, Brandon Amos, Zhuo Chen, Padmanabhan Pillai, and Mahadev Satyanarayanan. 2016. Quantifying the Impact of Edge Computing on Mobile Applications. In Proceedings of the 7th ACM SIGOPS Asia-Pacific Workshop on Systems (APSys '16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, Article 5, 8 pages.
[10]
Y. Jararweh, A. Doulat, O. AlQudah, E. Ahmed, M. Al-Ayyoub, and E. Benkhelifa. 2016. The future of mobile cloud computing: Integrating cloudlets and Mobile Edge Computing. In 2016 23rd International Conference on Telecommunications (ICT). 1--5.
[11]
Michael Nelson, Beng-Hong Lim, and Greg Hutchins. 2005. Fast Transparent Migration for Virtual Machines. In Proceedings of the Annual Conference on USENIX Annual Technical Conference (ATEC '05). USENIX Association, Berkeley, CA, USA, 25--25. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1247360.1247385
[12]
M. Satyanarayanan. 2017. The Emergence of Edge Computing. Computer 50, 1 (Jan 2017), 30--39.
[13]
Mahadev Satyanarayanan, Paramvir Bahl, Ramón Caceres, and Nigel Davies. 2009. The Case for VM-Based Cloudlets in Mobile Computing. IEEE Pervasive Computing 8, 4 (Oct. 2009), 14--23.
[14]
W. Shi, J. Cao, Q. Zhang, Y. Li, and L. Xu. 2016. Edge Computing: Vision and Challenges. IEEE Internet of Things Journal 3, 5 (Oct 2016), 637--646.
[15]
C. Sonmez, A. Ozgovde, and C. Ersoy. 2017. EdgeCloudSim: An environment for performance evaluation of Edge Computing systems. In 2017 Second International Conference on Fog and Mobile Edge Computing (FMEC). 39--44.
[16]
Tim Verbelen, Pieter Simoens, Filip De Turck, and Bart Dhoedt. 2012. Cloudlets: Bringing the Cloud to the Mobile User. In Proceedings of the Third ACM Workshop on Mobile Cloud Computing and Services (MCS '12). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 29--36.
[17]
Paul Wood, Heng Zhang, Muhammad-Bilal Siddiqui, and Saurabh Bagchi. 2017. Dependability in Edge Computing. CoRR abs/1710.11222 (2017). arXiv:1710.11222 http://arxiv.org/abs/1710.11222
[18]
Ran Xu, Jinkyu Koo, Rakesh Kumar, Peter Bai, Subrata Mitra, Sasa Misailovic, and Saurabh Bagchi. 2018. VideoChef: Efficient Approximation for Streaming Video Processing Pipelines. In 2018 USENIX Annual Technical Conference (USENIX ATC 18). USENIX Association, Boston, MA, 43--56. https://www.usenix.org/conference/atc18/presentation/xu-ran
[19]
Y. Yu. 2016. Mobile edge computing towards 5G: Vision, recent progress, and open challenges. China Communications 13, Supplement2 (N 2016), 89--99.

Cited By

View all

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
MECC '19: Proceedings of the 4th Workshop on Middleware for Edge Clouds & Cloudlets
December 2019
21 pages
ISBN:9781450370325
DOI:10.1145/3366614
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Sponsors

In-Cooperation

  • USENIX Assoc: USENIX Assoc
  • IFIP

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 09 December 2019

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. cloud computing
  2. edge computing
  3. hybrid models
  4. performance evaluation
  5. reliability

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Funding Sources

Conference

Middleware '19
Sponsor:
Middleware '19: 20th International Middleware Conference
December 9 - 13, 2019
California, Davis

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 4 of 9 submissions, 44%

Upcoming Conference

MIDDLEWARE '24
25th International Middleware Conference
December 2 - 6, 2024
Hong Kong , Hong Kong

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)102
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)12
Reflects downloads up to 15 Sep 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all

View Options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Get Access

Login options

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media