skip to main content
10.1145/3365610.3365623acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmumConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Exploring visualizations for digital reading augmentation to support grammar learning

Published: 26 November 2019 Publication History

Abstract

Reading foreign language texts is a frequently used strategy for language learning. Visual text augmentation methods further support the learning experience, e.g., by annotating vocabulary or grammar. Common approaches are integrated dictionaries or static grammar highlights. This work investigates how we can further support grammar learning with the dynamic visualization and interaction opportunities offered by digital reading devices. In collaboration with teachers and potential learners, we identify difficulties learners experience with English grammar and gather ideas for suitable interactive text augmentations. Based on this, we design four different concepts that augment adjectives and adverbs in English-language texts using typographic cues and interactive information displays. The concepts are evaluated in a within-subject study (N = 16). Results show that participants preferred concepts that presented case-specific support, did not distract too much from the text, and gave details on demand. We conclude with design recommendations for designing text augmentation for language learning.

References

[1]
John Brooke et al. 1996. SUS-A quick and dirty usability scale. Usability evaluation in industry 189, 194 (1996), 4--7.
[2]
Lewis Carroll. 1983. Alice's adventures in wonderland. Collins.
[3]
Maria Chinkina and Detmar Meurers. 2016. Linguistically aware information retrieval: providing input enrichment for second language learners. In Proceedings of the 11th workshop on innovative use of NLP for building educational applications. 188--198.
[4]
Richard R Day, Carole Omura, and Motoo Hiramatsu. 1992. Incidental EFL vocabulary learning and reading. Reading in a foreign language 7 (1992), 541--541.
[5]
Burkhard Dretzke and Margaret Dretzke. 2015. Englisch üben fürs Lehramt: Fehler erkennen, korrigieren, vermeiden. UTB.
[6]
Samantha P Fan, Zoe Liberman, Boaz Keysar, and Katherine D Kinzler. 2015. The exposure advantage: Early exposure to a multilingual environment promotes effective communication. Psychological Science 26, 7 (2015), 1090--1097. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0956797615574699
[7]
Cyrus K. Foroughi, Nicole E. Werner, Daniela Barragán, and Deborah A. Boehm-Davis. 2015. Interruptions disrupt reading comprehension. 144, 3 (2015), 704--709.
[8]
ZhaoHong Han, Eun Sung Park, and Charles Combs. 2008. Textual Enhancement of Input: Issues and Possibilities. Applied Linguistics 29, 4 (05 2008), 597--618.
[9]
Marc Hassenzahl, Michael Burmester, and Franz Koller. 2003. AttrakDiff: Ein Fragebogen zur Messung wahrgenommener hedonischer und pragmatischer Qualität. (2003), 187--196.
[10]
Marc Hassenzahl and Andrew Monk. 2010. The inference of perceived usability from beauty. Human-Computer Interaction 25, 3 (2010), 235--260.
[11]
Marion Koelle, Katrin Wolf, and Susanne Boll. 2018. Beyond LED Status Lights-Design Requirements of Privacy Notices for Body-worn Cameras. In Proc. of the Twelfth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction. ACM, 177--187.
[12]
Nate Kornell. 2009. Optimising learning using flashcards: Spacing is more effective than cramming. 23, 9 (2009), 1297--1317.
[13]
Stephen Krashen. 1989. We acquire vocabulary and spelling by reading: Additional evidence for the input hypothesis. The modern language journal 73, 4 (1989), 440--464.
[14]
Ryan M LaBrozzi. 2016. The effects of textual enhancement type on L2 form recognition and reading comprehension in Spanish. 20, 1 (2016), 75--91.
[15]
Zoe Liberman, Amanda L Woodward, Boaz Keysar, and Katherine D Kinzler. 2017. Exposure to multiple languages enhances communication skills in infancy. Developmental science 20, 1 (2017), e12420.
[16]
Detmar Meurers, Ramon Ziai, Luiz Amaral, Adriane Boyd, Aleksandar Dimitrov, Vanessa Metcalf, and Niels Ott. 2010. Enhancing authentic web pages for language learners. In Proceedings of the NAACL HLT 2010 Fifth Workshop on Innovative Use of NLP for Building Educational Applications. Association for Computational Linguistics, 10--18.
[17]
Henry L Roediger III and Jeffrey D Karpicke. 2006. The power of testing memory: Basic research and implications for educational practice. Perspectives on Psychological Science 1, 3 (2006), 181--210.
[18]
Daphnée Simard. 2009. Differential effects of textual enhancement formats on intake. 37, 1 (2009), 124--135.
[19]
Ross Sundberg and Walcir Cardoso. 2019. Learning French through music: the development of the Bande à Part app. Computer Assisted Language Learning 32, 1--2 (Jan. 2019), 49--70.
[20]
Alan M Taylor. 2014. Glossing frequency and L2 reading comprehension: the influence of CALL glossing. 31, 3 (2014), 374--389.
[21]
Kelli Taylor and Doug Rohrer. 2010. The effects of interleaved practice. Applied Cognitive Psychology 24, 6 (2010), 837--848.
[22]
Andrew Trusty and Khai N. Truong. 2011. Augmenting the web for second language vocabulary learning. In Proceedings of the 2011 annual conference on Human factors in computing systems - CHI '11. ACM Press, 3179.
[23]
Rafael Veras, Erik Paluka, Meng-Wei Chang, Vivian Tsang, Fraser Shein, and Christopher Collins. 2014. Interaction for reading comprehension in mobile devices. In Proceedings of the 16th international conference on Human-computer interaction with mobile devices & services - MobileHCI '14. ACM Press, Toronto, ON, Canada, 157--161.
[24]
Leonardo Zilio, Rodrigo Wilkens, and Cédrick Fairon. 2017. Enhancing grammatical structures in web-based texts. CALL in a climate of change: adapting to turbulent global conditions (2017), 345.

Cited By

View all

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Other conferences
MUM '19: Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Mobile and Ubiquitous Multimedia
November 2019
462 pages
ISBN:9781450376242
DOI:10.1145/3365610
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 26 November 2019

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. grammar
  2. language learning
  3. reading
  4. textual enhancement

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Funding Sources

Conference

MUM 2019

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 190 of 465 submissions, 41%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)12
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1
Reflects downloads up to 05 Feb 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Figures

Tables

Media

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media