skip to main content
10.1145/3362789.3362934acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesteemConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Digitizing disciplinary contents: A case-study on sub-track competence

Published: 16 October 2019 Publication History

Abstract

Teachers are required a range of digital skills including the ability to adapt the learning contents in order to 'personalizing' the teaching intervention and to support learning processes of students. This 'sophisticated' competence is assumed as the ability to select/modify/manage existing digital resources - linked to a specific area/topic of learning - but, above all, to adaptat/transform/create 'new' didactic resources.
After having focused the ability to adapt resources within the digital competences of the teacher based on the DigCompEdu Framework and clarified the component of the 'personalization' of the intervention - 'Creating and modifying digital resources' (2.2.); 'Differentiation and personalization' (5.2) - the paper reports a case study aimed at describing how 4 teachers in a technological-mechanical course at a vocational-trade school have digitally adapted a disciplinary content ('millimeter measurement'), in order to promote learning of students with different and special needs.
A single case-study has been structured through the Yin's procedures for multiple-case-study protocol: definition of the units of analysis, selection of the comparable 'entities', data analysis and triangulation.
The visual material has been analyzed on three 'units of analysis': content; disciplinary content; digitalized disciplinary content. The study also provides ideas to reflect on the digitized disciplinary contents and rethink the explanatory model of TPCK in the perspective of personalization and adaptation, as well as the construct of rapport au savoir - 'relationship with one's knowledge'.

References

[1]
OECD (2005) Definition and Selection of Key Competencies. Executive Summary (online resource) OECD Publishing.
[2]
UNESCO (2008). ICT competency standards for teachers. Policy Framework (156210). United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. Paris, France.
[3]
European Commision. (2006). Recommendation on key competences for lifelong learning. Council of 18 December 2006 on key competences for lifelong learning, 2006/962/EC, L. 394/15.
[4]
M. Spante S. Sofkova Hashemi, M. Lundin, A. Algers (2018). Digital competence and digital literacy in higher education research: Systematic review of concept use, Cogent Education, 5:1.
[5]
A. Ferrari (2013). DIGCOMP: A framework for developing and understanding digital competence in Europe (Report EUR 26035 EN). JRC Technical Reports. Seville: Institute for Prospective Technological Studies, European Union.
[6]
K. Ala-Mutka (2011). Mapping Digital Competence: Towards a Conceptual Understanding. Seville: JRC-IPTS. Retrieved from: http://ipts.jrc.ec.europa.eu/publications/pub.cfm?id=4699.
[7]
M. Hoechsmann, H. DeWaard (2015). Mapping Digital Literacy Policy and Practice in the Canadian Education Landscape: MediaSmarts. Available at http://mediasmarts.ca/teacher-resources/digital-literacy- framework/mapping-digital-literacy-policy-practice-canadian-education-landscape
[8]
C. Redecker, Y. Punie (2017). European Framework for the Digital Competence of Educators: DigCompEdu (ed). EUR 28775 EN. Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg, p. 9, 16, 20, 21, 22.
[9]
CEDEFOP (2016). Linee guida europee per la convalida dell'apprendimento non formale e informale. Lussemburgo: Ufficio delle pubblicazioni. Cedefop reference series; No 104. http://dx.doi.org/10.2801/280994.
[10]
AICA (2018). Promuovere la competenza digitale dei docenti. Le proposte di AICA in riferimento al framework DigCompEdu - https://www.aicanet.it/documents/10776/1720154/DigCompEdu_AICA.pdf/cfcfee96-7174-4983-b836-8212bb417bda, p. 6.
[11]
P. F. Ravotto (2017). DigComp versione 2.1 e DigCompEdu. AICA-Sie-l, Bricks, 7(3), 113--120.
[12]
Educational Testing Service - ETS (2009). ICritical Thinking. Princeton, New Jersey, p. 3.
[13]
S. Guri-Rosenblit (2018). E-Teaching in Higher Education: An Essential Prerequisite for E-Learning. Journal of New Approaches in Educational Research, 7 (2), 93--97, p. 95.
[14]
ENQA (2015). Standards and Guidelines for Quality Assurance in the European Higher Education Area. Link - http://www.processodibologna.it/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/ESG-2015_IT-DEF.pdf
[15]
L. Perla, L. Agrati, V. Vinci (2019). The 'sophisticated' knowledge of e-teacher. Re-shape digital resources for online courses. In Bugos D. (eds.). HELMeTO 2019. International Workshop on Higher Education. Cham, Springer - in press.
[16]
L. S. Shulman (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15, 4--14.
[17]
M.J. Koehler, P. Mishra (2009). What is technological pedagogical content knowledge? Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 9(1), 60--70.
[18]
M.J. Koehler, P. Mishra, W. Cain (2013). What is technological pedagogical content (TPACK)? Journal of Education, 193(3), 13--19.
[19]
M. Ben-Peretz (2011). Teacher knowledge: what is it? How do we uncover it? What are its implications for schooling? Teaching and Teacher Education, 27(1), 3--9, p. 4.
[20]
M. De Rossi, O. Trevisan O. (2018). Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge in the literature: how TPCK is defined and implemented in initial teacher education. Italian Journal of Educational Technology, 26(1), 7--23.
[21]
M. Terpstra (2015). TPACKtivity: An activity - theory lens for examining TPACK development. In C. Angeli & N. Valanides (Eds.), Technological pedagogical content knowledge. Exploring, developing, and assessing TPCK (pp. 63--88), Springer, New York, NY.
[22]
B. M. Hodge, J. Preston-Sabin (1997). Accommodations-or just good teaching? Strategies for teaching college students with disabilities, Praeger Westport, Conn.
[23]
C.A. Tomlinson, M. Murphy (2015). Leading for differentiation: Growing teachers who grow kids, ASCD, Alexandria, VA.
[24]
S. Walters (2010). Toward an Accessible Pedagogy: Dis/ability, Multimodality, and Universal Design in the Technical Communication Classroom. Technical Communication Quarterly, 19(4), 427--454.
[25]
G. Kress (2010). Multimodality: a social semiotic approach to contemporary communication, Routledge, Abingdon/New York.
[26]
G. Kress, T. Van Leeuwen (2001) Multimodal Discourse: The Modes and Media of Contemporary Communication, Arnold, London.
[27]
T.E. Williams (1987). A multimodal approach to the assessment and treatment of children with learning difficulties. PhD thesis, University of Glasgow.
[28]
E. Efthymiou, Kington A. (2017). The development of inclusive learning relationships in mainstream settings: A multimodal perspective, Student Learning, Childhood & Voice. Published: 22 March 2017https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2017.1304015
[29]
C. Jewitt (2006). Technology, literacy and learning: A multimodal approach, Routledge, Abingdon, Oxon.
[30]
L. Marchetti, P. Cullen (2016). A Multimodal Approach in the Classroom for Creative Learning and Teaching', CASALC Review, Czech and Slovak Association of Language Centres, 41.
[31]
D.A. Sousa, C.A. Tomlinson (2011). Differentiation and the brain: How neuroscience supports the learner-friendly classroom. Bloomington, IN: Solution Tree Press.
[32]
B. Eilam (2015). Promoting pre service teachers' meta-representational (visual) competencies: the need for a new pedagogy. Craig C., Orland-Barak L., International teacher education: promising pedagogies. (Part C), Emerald, Binglei.
[33]
R.K. Yin (2003). Case Study Research Design and Methods. Third edition, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.
[34]
R.K. Yin (2012). Applications of case study research (3rd ed.). Washington DC: SAGE Publications, Inc.
[35]
M. W. Fraser, J. M. Richman, M. J. Galinsky, S. H. Day (2009). Pocket guides to social work research methods. Intervention research: Developing social programs, Oxford University Press, New York, NY.
[36]
S. Gorard (2006). Towards a judgement-based statistical analysis. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 27, 1: 67--80.
[37]
L. Agrati (2019). Co-constructing the teacher's digital competences. A case study on adaptation of digital resources. In Singh B., Kaur M., Professionalism in Education. Co-Constructing Professional Knowledge: Learning, Across disciplines. New Delhi Publisher, New Delhi, India.
[38]
W. Foddy (1993). Constructing Questions for Interviews and Questionnaires. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
[39]
Delli Zotti G. (2004). Introduzione alla ricerca sociale. Problemi e qualche soluzione. Milano: Franco Angeli.
[40]
G.A. Bowen (2009). Document Analysis as a Qualitative Research Method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27--40.
[41]
J.W. Cresswell., V.L. Plano Clark (2011). Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research. Thousand Oaks, California: SAGE.
[42]
G. Cunsolo (2012). Tecnologia meccanica per Meccanica, Meccatronica ed Energia, Zanichelli, Milano - http://online.scuola.zanichelli.it/cunsolotecnologia/wpcontent/uploads/Zanichelli_Cunsolo_Misurazione.pdf p. 1, 2, 3.
[43]
A. F. Burstall (1965). A History of Mechanical Engineering. The MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts (USA).
[44]
E. Oberg, D. J. Franklin, L. H. Holbrook, H. Henry Ryffel, C. McCauley (2016). Machinery's Handbook (30th ed.), Industrial Press Inc., New York.
[45]
C. Di Gennaro, A. Chiappetta (2015). Corso di tecnologia meccanica, Hoepli, Milano.
[46]
C. Gaggia, S. Gaggia (1981). Tecnologia meccanica. Terza edizione. Milano, Zanichelli.
[47]
J. M. Clark, A. Paivio (1991). Dual coding theory and education. Educational Psychology Review, 3(3), 149--170.
[48]
G. Ganino (2018). Video didattica. Comunicazione visiva, apprendimento multimediale e processi cognitive, PensaMultimedia, Lecce, p. 119.
[49]
R. Mayer (2005), The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning, Cambridge University Press, New York.
[50]
R. F. Newby, J. Caldwell, D. R. Recht (1989). Improving the reading comprehension of children with dysphonetic and dyseidetic dyslexia using story grammar. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 22(6), 373--380.
[51]
J. Lopez, J. Campoverde (2018). Development of reading comprehension with graphic organizers for students with dyslexia, Journal of Technology and Science Education, vol. 8, n. 2, pp. 105--114 -
[52]
G. Paoletti (2011). Comprendere testi con figure. Immagini, diagrammi e grafici nel design per l'istruzione, FrancoAngeli, Milano.
[53]
L. d'Alonzo (2016). La differenziazione didattica per l'inclusione. Metodo, strategie, attività, Erickson, Trento.
[54]
L. Perla (2013) (a cura di). Per una didattica dell'inclusione. Prove di formalizzazione, Multimedia, Lecce.
[55]
E. Damiano (2013). La mediazione didattica. Per una teoria dell'insegnamento, FrancoAngeli, Milano.
[56]
J. Rézeau (2002). Médiation, médiatisation et instruments d'enseignement: du triangle au "carré pédagogique, Asp, 35--36(1), 183--200.
[57]
J. Rézeau (2004). Médiatisation et médiation pédagogique dans un environnement multimédia. Le cas de l'apprentissage de l'anglais en Histoire de l'art à l'université, in http://jose- ph.rezeau.pagesperso-orange.fr.
[58]
C.A. Tomlinson (2017). How to Differentiate Instruction in Academically Diverse Classroom? ASCD, Alexandria, VA.
[59]
B. Charlot (1997). Du rapport au savoir. Éléments pour une théorie, Anthropos, Paris, France.
[60]
B. Charlot (2003). La problématisation du rapport au savoir. In S. Maury, M. Caillot (Éd.), Rapportau savoir et didactiques, Fabert, Paris, France.
[61]
C. Nafti-Malherbe, G. Samson (2013). Rapport au savoir. Esprit Critique. Vol. 17, 70--93.
[62]
B. Tversky, J. Morrison, J., M. Bertrancourt (2002). Animation: can it facilitate? International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 57, 247--262.

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Other conferences
TEEM'19: Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Technological Ecosystems for Enhancing Multiculturality
October 2019
1085 pages
ISBN:9781450371919
DOI:10.1145/3362789
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

In-Cooperation

  • University of Salamanca: University of Salamanca

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 16 October 2019

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. Digital resources
  2. Disciplinary contents
  3. Teachers'digital competences

Qualifiers

  • Research-article
  • Research
  • Refereed limited

Conference

TEEM'19

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 496 of 705 submissions, 70%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • 0
    Total Citations
  • 68
    Total Downloads
  • Downloads (Last 12 months)3
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 15 Jan 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media