skip to main content
10.1145/3362743.3362959acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagessensysConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Finding Dory in the Crowd: Detecting Social Interactions using Multi-Modal Mobile Sensing

Published: 10 November 2019 Publication History

Abstract

Remembering our day-to-day social interactions is challenging even if you aren't a blue memory challenged fish. The ability to automatically detect and remember these types of interactions is not only beneficial for individuals interested in their behavior in crowded situations, but also of interest to those who analyze crowd behavior. Currently, detecting social interactions is often performed using ethnographic studies, computer vision techniques and manual annotation-based data analysis. However, mobile phones offer easier means for data collection that is easy to analyze and can preserve the user's privacy. In this work, we present a system for detecting stationary social interactions inside crowds, leveraging multi-modal mobile sensing data such as Bluetooth Smart (BLE), accelerometer and gyroscope. To inform the development of such system we conducted a study with 24 participants where we asked them to socialize with each other for 45 minutes. We built a machine learning system based on gradient-boosted trees that predicts both 1:1 and group interactions with a 30.2% performance increase compared to a proximity-based approach. By utilizing a community detection-based method, we further detected the various group formation that exist within the crowd. Using mobile phone sensors already carried by the majority of people in a crowd makes our approach particularly well suited to real-life analysis of crowd behavior and influence strategies.

References

[1]
Apple Inc. Getting Started with iBeacon v1.0. https://developer.apple.com/ibeacon/Getting-Started-with-iBeacon.pdf, 2014. [Online; accessed 07-April-2018].
[2]
L. Bazzani, M. Cristani, and V. Murino. Decentralized particle filter for joint individual-group tracking. In Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 2012 IEEE Conference on, pages 1886--1893, June 2012.
[3]
V. D. Blondel, J.-L. Guillaume, R. Lambiotte, and E. Lefebvre. Fast unfolding of communities in large networks. Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment, 2008(10):P10008, 2008.
[4]
L. Breiman. Random forests. Mach. Learn., 45(1):5--32, Oct. 2001.
[5]
T. Chen and C. Guestrin. XGBoost: a scalable tree boosting system. In Proc. of the ACM SIGKDD Int. Conf. on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD), pages 785--794, 2016.
[6]
T. Choudhury and A. Pentland. Sensing and modeling human networks using the sociometer. In Proceedings of the 7th IEEE International Symposium on Wearable Computers, ISWC '03, pages 216--, Washington, DC, USA, 2003. IEEE Computer Society.
[7]
M. Cristani, L. Bazzani, G. Paggetti, A. Fossati, D. Tosato, A. Del Bue, G. Menegaz, and V. Murino. Social interaction discovery by statistical analysis of f-formations. In Proceedings of the British Machine Vision Conference, pages 23.1--23.12. BMVA Press, 2011. http://dx.doi.org/10.5244/C.25.23.
[8]
J. Davis and M. Goadrich. The relationship between precision-recall and roc curves. In Proceedings of the 23rd international conference on Machine learning, pages 233--240. ACM, 2006.
[9]
N. Deng, Y. Tian, and C. Zhang. Support Vector Machines: Optimization Based Theory, Algorithms, and Extensions. Chapman & Hall/CRC, 1st edition, 2012.
[10]
E. T. Hall. The hidden dimension. Doubleday & Co, 1966.
[11]
S. A. Hoseinitabatabaei, A. Gluhak, and R. Tafazolli. udirect: A novel approach for pervasive observation of user direction with mobile phones. In Pervasive Computing and Communications (PerCom), 2011 IEEE International Conference on, pages 74--83, March 2011.
[12]
W. Huang, Y.-S. Kuo, P. Pannuto, and P. Dutta. Opo: A wearable sensor for capturing high-fidelity face-to-face interactions. In Proceedings of the 12th ACM Conference on Embedded Network Sensor Systems, SenSys '14, pages 61--75, New York, NY, USA, 2014. ACM.
[13]
H. Hung and B. Kröse. Detecting f-formations as dominant sets. In Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Multimodal Interfaces, ICMI '11, pages 231--238, New York, NY, USA, 2011. ACM.
[14]
F. Ichikawa, J. Chipchase, and R. Grignani. Where's the phone? a study of mobile phone location in public spaces. In 2005 2nd Asia Pacific Conference on Mobile Technology, Applications and Systems, pages 1--8, Nov 2005.
[15]
K. Katevas, H. Haddadi, and L. Tokarchuk. SensingKit: Evaluating the sensor power consumption in ios devices. In Intelligent Environments (IE), 2016 12th International Conference on, pages 222--225. IEEE, 2016.
[16]
K. Katevas, H. Haddadi, L. Tokarchuk, and R. G. Clegg. Detecting group formations using iBeacon technology. In Proceedings of the 2016 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing: Adjunct, UbiComp '16, pages 742--752, New York, NY, USA, 2016. ACM.
[17]
A. Kendon. Conducting interaction: Patterns of behavior in focused encounters, volume 7. CUP Archive, 1990.
[18]
R. Lambiotte, J.-C. Delvenne, and M. Barahona. Laplacian dynamics and multi-scale modular structure in networks. arXiv preprint arXiv:0812.1770, 1, 12 2008.
[19]
A. Matic, V. Osmani, A. Maxhuni, and O. Mayora. Multi-modal mobile sensing of social interactions. In Pervasive Computing Technologies for Healthcare (PervasiveHealth), 2012 6th International Conference on, pages 105--114, May 2012.
[20]
A. Montanari, S. Nawaz, C. Mascolo, and K. Sailer. A study of bluetooth low energy performance for human proximity detection in the workplace. In 2017 IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communications (PerCom), pages 90--99, March 2017.
[21]
A. Montanari, Z. Tian, E. Francu, B. Lucas, B. Jones, X. Zhou, and C. Mascolo. Measuring interaction proxemics with wearable light tags. Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies, 2(1):25, 2018.
[22]
J. A. Nelder and R. J. Baker. Generalized linear models. Wiley Online Library, 1972.
[23]
D. O. Olguín and A. S. Pentland. Social sensors for automatic data collection. AMCIS 2008 Proceedings, page 171, 2008.
[24]
N. Palaghias, S. A. Hoseinitabatabaei, M. Nati, A. Gluhak, and K. Moessner. Accurate detection of real-world social interactions with smartphones. In Communications (ICC), 2015 IEEE International Conference on, pages 579--585, June 2015.
[25]
F. Pedregosa, G. Varoquaux, A. Gramfort, V. Michel, B. Thirion, O. Grisel, M. Blondel, P. Prettenhofer, R. Weiss, V. Dubourg, J. Vanderplas, A. Passos, D. Cournapeau, M. Brucher, M. Perrot, and E. Duchesnay. Scikit-learn: Machine learning in Python. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 12:2825--2830, 2011.
[26]
T. Saito and M. Rehmsmeier. The precision-recall plot is more informative than the roc plot when evaluating binary classifiers on imbalanced datasets. PloS one, 10(3):e0118432, 2015.
[27]
P. Wittenburg, H. Brugman, A. Russel, A. Klassmann, and H. Sloetjes. Elan: a professional framework for multimodality research. In Proceedings of LREC, volume 2006, page 5th, 2006.
[28]
H. Zhang, W. Du, P. Zhou, M. Li, and P. Mohapatra. Dopenc: Acoustic-based encounter profiling using smartphones. In Proceedings of the 22Nd Annual International Conference on Mobile Computing and Networking, MobiCom '16, pages 294--307, New York, NY, USA, 2016. ACM.

Cited By

View all

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
SenSys-ML 2019: Proceedings of the 1st Workshop on Machine Learning on Edge in Sensor Systems
November 2019
47 pages
ISBN:9781450370110
DOI:10.1145/3362743
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 10 November 2019

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Qualifiers

  • Research-article
  • Research
  • Refereed limited

Conference

Acceptance Rates

SenSys-ML 2019 Paper Acceptance Rate 7 of 14 submissions, 50%;
Overall Acceptance Rate 7 of 14 submissions, 50%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)38
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)2
Reflects downloads up to 03 Jan 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media