skip to main content
10.1145/3357155.3358455acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesihcConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

A proposal to adapt the semiotic inspection method to analyze screen reader mediated interaction

Published: 22 October 2019 Publication History

Abstract

An interactive system with high accessibility and communicability provides many benefits to users' experience. These benefits are mainly related to visually impaired users so that they can achieve their goals in a given context of use. This study presents an analysis of the communication process of the Semiotic Engineering theory applied in the context of visually impaired people who use screen readers. The screen reader mediates the user interaction with the designer's metamessage, acting as a translator. However, the translation can often introduce problems that are not experienced by users who do not use screen readers to interact with the systems. Thus, this paper presents a proposal to adapt the Semiotic Inspection Method (SIM) to analyze the screen reader mediated interaction (SIM-SR). The method includes new steps in the segmented SIM analysis to examine the screen reader translation and the its contrast with the designer's intended metamessage. Hence, SIM-SR allows the evaluator to identify potential accessibility and communicability issues that may impact the personal experience of users interacting through screen reader mediation.

References

[1]
Fernando Alonso, José Luis Fuertes, Ángel Lucas González, and Loïc Martínez. 2010. On the Testability of WCAG 2.0 for Beginners. In Proceedings of the 2010 International Cross Disciplinary Conference on Web Accessibility (W4A) (W4A '10). ACM, New York, NY, USA, Article 9, 9 pages.
[2]
Glívia A. R. Barbosa, Raquel O. Prates, and Luiz P. D. Corrêa. 2011. AnÃLise Da Sociabilidade De Comunidades Online Para Os UsuÁRios Surdos: Um Estudo De Caso Do Orkut. In Proceedings of the 10th Brazilian Symposium on Human Factors in Computing Systems and the 5th Latin American Conference on Human-Computer Interaction (IHC+CLIHC '11). Brazilian Computer Society, Porto Alegre, Brazil, Brazil, 237--246. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2254436.2254478
[3]
Simone Barbosa and Bruno Silva. 2010. Interação humano-computador. Elsevier Brasil, Brazil.
[4]
Giorgio Brajnik. 2006. Web Accessibility Testing: When the Method is the Culprit. In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Computers Helping People with Special Needs (ICCHP'06). Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, 156--163.
[5]
Giorgio Brajnik. 2008. A Comparative Test of Web Accessibility Evaluation Methods. In Proceedings of the 10th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility (Assets '08). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 113--120.
[6]
Lucas Pedroso Carvalho, Caíque Bruno Fortunato, Raquel Oliveira Prates, and André Pimenta Freire. 2018. Análise de Acessibilidade no Ambiente Virtual de Aprendizagem Moodle: Um Estudo de Caso do Uso do MIS com Leitores de Tela. In Conferência Internacional sobre Informática na Educação, Vol. 14. University of Chile, Chile, 174--185.
[7]
Lucas Pedroso Carvalho, Bruno Piovesan Melchiori Peruzza, Flávia Santos, Lucas Pereira Ferreira, and André Pimenta Freire. 2016. Accessible Smart Cities?: Inspecting the Accessibility of Brazilian Municipalities' Mobile Applications. In Proceedings of the 15th Brazilian Symposium on Human Factors in Computer Systems (IHC '16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, Article 17, 10 pages.
[8]
Luiz Paulo Damilton Corrêa, Flávio R. S. Coutinho, Raquel Oliveira Prates, and Luiz Chaimowicz. 2012. Uso Do MIS Para Avaliar Signos Sonoros: Quando Um Problema de Comunicabilidade se Torna Um Problema de Acessibilidade. In Proceedings of the 11th Brazilian Symposium on Human Factors in Computing Systems (IHC '12). Brazilian Computer Society, Porto Alegre, Brazil, Brazil, 47--56. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2393536.2393543
[9]
Flávio Coutinho, Raquel O Prates, and Luiz Chaimowicz. 2012. Evaluating and Investigating Game Accessibility for Deaf Players with the Semiotic Inspection Method.
[10]
Presidência da República. 2004. Decreto n°5.296/2004. Brasil. Casa Civil - Subchefia para Assuntos Jurídicos, Brasília.
[11]
Presidência da República. 2015. Lei Brasileira de Inclusão da Pessoa com Deficiência. Brasil. Casa Civil - Subchefia para Assuntos Jurídicos, Brasília.
[12]
Clarisse Sieckenius de Souza. 2005. The Semiotic Engineering of Human-Computer Interaction (Acting with Technology). The MIT Press, London, England.
[13]
Clarisse Sieckenius de Souza, Carla Faria Leitão, Raquel Oliveira Prates, and Elton José da Silva. 2006. The Semiotic Inspection Method. In Proceedings of VII Brazilian Symposium on Human Factors in Computing Systems (IHC '06). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 148--157.
[14]
Clarisse Sieckenius De Souza and Carla Faria Leitão. 2009. Semiotic engineering methods for scientific research in HCI. Synthesis Lectures on Human-Centered Informatics 2, 1 (2009), 1--122.
[15]
Andres Gonzalez and Loretta Guarino Reid. 2005. Platform-independent Accessibility API: Accessible Document Object Model. In Proceedings of the 2005 International Cross-Disciplinary Workshop on Web Accessibility (W4A) (W4A '05). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 63--71.
[16]
ISO. 2008. ISO 9241-171: Ergonomics of Human-System Interaction - Part 171: Guidance on Software Accessibility.
[17]
Andrew Kirkpatrick, Joshue O Connor, Alastair Campbell, and Michael Cooper. 2018. Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.1. Disponível em https://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG21/. Último acesso em 7 junho de 2019. World Wide Web Consortium (W3C).
[18]
Aron Daniel Lopes, Vinicius Carvalho Pereira, and Cristiano Maciel. 2017. An analysis of deictic signs in computer interfaces: contributions to the Semiotic Inspection Method. Journal of Visual Languages & Computing 40 (2017), 51--64. Semiotics, Human-Computer Interaction and End-User Development.
[19]
Charles Sanders Peirce. 1992, 1998. The essential Peirce: selected philosophical writings. Vol. 1, 2. Indiana University Press, Bloomington, IN, USA.
[20]
Christopher Power, André Freire, Helen Petrie, and David Swallow. 2012. Guidelines Are Only Half of the Story: Accessibility Problems Encountered by Blind Users on the Web. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '12). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 433--442.
[21]
Raquel O. Prates, Clarisse S. de Souza, and Simone D. J. Barbosa. 2000. Methods and Tools: A Method for Evaluating the Communicability of User Interfaces. interactions 7, 1 (Jan. 2000), 31--38.
[22]
Soraia Reis and Raquel O. Prates. 2011. Applicability of the Semiotic Inspection Method: A Systematic Literature Review. In Proceedings of the 10th Brazilian Symposium on Human Factors in Computing Systems and the 5th Latin American Conference on Human-Computer Interaction (IHC+CLIHC '11). Brazilian Computer Society, Porto Alegre, Brazil, Brazil, 177--186. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2254436.2254468
[23]
Eduardo Hideki Tanaka. 2009. Método baseado em heurísticas para avaliação de acessibilidade em sistemas de informação. Ph.D. Dissertation. Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Campinas.
[24]
Francisco A. M. Valério, Tatiane G. Guimarães, Raquel O. Prates, and Heloisa Candello. 2017. Here's What I Can Do: Chatbots' Strategies to Convey Their Features to Users. In Proceedings of the XVI Brazilian Symposium on Human Factors in Computing Systems (IHC 2017). ACM, New York, NY, USA, Article 28, 10 pages.
[25]
WebAIM. 2017. Screen Reader User Survey #7 Results. Disponível em https://webaim.org/projects/screenreadersurvey7/.
[26]
Yeliz Yesilada, Giorgio Brajnik, and Simon Harper. 2009. How Much Does Expertise Matter?: A Barrier Walkthrough Study with Experts and Non-experts. In Proceedings of the 11th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility (Assets '09). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 203--210.

Cited By

View all

Index Terms

  1. A proposal to adapt the semiotic inspection method to analyze screen reader mediated interaction

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    IHC '19: Proceedings of the 18th Brazilian Symposium on Human Factors in Computing Systems
    October 2019
    679 pages
    ISBN:9781450369718
    DOI:10.1145/3357155
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Sponsors

    • SBC: Brazilian Computer Society

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 22 October 2019

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. accessibility
    2. blind users
    3. communicability
    4. low vision
    5. screen reader
    6. semiotic inspection method

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article

    Conference

    IHC '19
    Sponsor:
    • SBC
    IHC '19: XVIII Brazilian Symposium on Human Factors in Computing Systems
    October 22 - 25, 2019
    Espírito Santo, Vitória, Brazil

    Acceptance Rates

    IHC '19 Paper Acceptance Rate 56 of 165 submissions, 34%;
    Overall Acceptance Rate 331 of 973 submissions, 34%

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)15
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)3
    Reflects downloads up to 28 Dec 2024

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2024)A Set of Professional Tools to Support the Design and Evaluation of Real-Time Payment Systems and Emergent UsersJournal on Interactive Systems10.5753/jis.2024.420715:1(790-809)Online publication date: 1-Aug-2024
    • (2024)Investigating Accessibility at the Brazilian Symposium on Human Factors in Computing Systems (IHC)Proceedings of the XXIII Brazilian Symposium on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3702038.3702098(1-18)Online publication date: 7-Oct-2024
    • (2023)Digital Accessibility at the Brazilian Symposium on Human Factors in Computing Systems (IHC): An Updated Systematic Literature ReviewProceedings of the XXII Brazilian Symposium on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3638067.3638075(1-15)Online publication date: 16-Oct-2023
    • (2023)SIM-SR—Semiotic Inspection Method Mediated by Screen Reader: Analysing the Benefits of Bringing Communicability to the Accessibility Evaluation TableInteracting with Computers10.1093/iwc/iwad02335:2(276-300)Online publication date: 4-Mar-2023
    • (2021)Beyond BarriersProceedings of the XX Brazilian Symposium on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3472301.3484365(1-11)Online publication date: 18-Oct-2021

    View Options

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media