skip to main content
10.1145/3326365.3326380acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicegovConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Public-Private Partnerships in Municipal Wi-Fi: Optimising Public Value

Published: 03 April 2019 Publication History

Abstract

Public-private partnerships (PPP) are the dominant business model for procuring and operating public digital communication networks such as public Wi-Fi and IoT, technologies that play a significant role in providing public internet access and managing urban systems. The literature on partnerships in public infrastructure provision gives much attention to risk in such arrangements, and is largely sceptical of the capacity of public authorities to transfer risk to the private sector. In the limited critical discussion of PPPs or similar arrangements in the field of communications infrastructure, technological capture or lock-in of city governments investing in digital communications networks is hypothesised as a risk factor. In this paper I draw on field research to investigate this hypothesis by analysing risk factors associated with PPP models in the provision of municipal-level public Wi-Fi. Focussing on Australian examples, I argue that the limited expertise and resources of local government authorities (LGAs), along with the regulatory complexity of telecommunications, weigh against direct LGA provision of public Wi-Fi and in favour of partnership arrangements. However, I highlight two concerns associated with PPP models of public Wi-Fi provision: 1) the lack of transparency and accountability relating to digital infrastructure procurement and service evaluation imposed by commercial-in-confidence claims, and 2) the limited attention of LGAs to questions of data access when contracting private providers, subsequently limiting their capacity to obtain and use network metadata for public good purposes. Drawing on the work of Mark H Moore, I frame these concerns as strategic management challenges. Moore's analysis of these challenges through his strategic triangle model assists in optimising the public value of PPP arrangements in the domain of digital infrastructure. While I focus on PWF networks, the discussion has wider relevance for e-governance.

References

[1]
Hodge G, Greve C. Public Private Patnerships: Governance Scheme or Language Game? Aust J Public Adm. 2010;69(1):8--22.
[2]
Hodge G. Privatization: An International Review of the Evidence. Boulder CO: Westview Press; 2000.
[3]
Nucciarelli A, Sadowski BM, Achard PO. Emerging models of public-private interplay for European broadband access: Evidence from the Netherlands and Italy. Telecomm Policy {Internet}. Elsevier; 2010 Oct {cited 2013 Feb 6};34(9):513--27. Available from: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0308596110000819
[4]
Hudon P-A. A Critique of Public-Private Partnerships in Quebec. Public Integr. 2011;13(3):257--74.
[5]
United Nations. United Nations E-Government Survey 2018: Gearing E-Government to Support Transformation Towards Sustainable And Resilient Socities {Internet}. 2018. 300 p. Available from: https://publicadministration.un.org/egovkb/Portals/egovkb/Documents/un/2018-Survey/E-Government Survey 2018_FINAL for web.pdf
[6]
Wettenhall R, McMaster J, Collyer F. Public Enterprise Divestment-Australian Case Studies. Wettenhall R, McMaster J, Collyer F, editors. Suva: Pacific Institute of Management and Development, University of South Pacific; 2001.
[7]
Given J. Take your partners: Public private interplay in Australian and New Zealand plans for next generation broadband. Telecomm Policy {Internet}. Elsevier; 2010 Oct {cited 2013 Feb 6};34(9):540--9. Available from: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0308596110000893
[8]
Falch M, Henten A. Investment dimensions in a universal service perspective: next generation networks, alternative funding mechanisms and public-private partnerships. Feijoo C, editor. info {Internet}. Emerald Group Publishing Limited; 2008 Aug 15 {cited 2018 Nov 27};10(5/6):33--45. Available from:
[9]
Lemstra W, Hayes V, Groenewegen J. The Innovation Journey of Wi-Fi - The Road to Global Success. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2011.
[10]
New South Wales Government. Digital NSW - Designing our Digital Future {Internet}. Sydney; 2017. Available from: https://www.digital.nsw.gov.au/sites/default/files/DigitalStrategy.pdf
[11]
Australian Government. myagedcare.gov.au {cited 2018 Nov 27}.
[12]
Thomas J, Barraket J, Wilson CK, Cook K, Louie YM, Holcombe-James I, et al. Measuring Australia ' s Digital Divide: Australian Digital Inclusion Index 2018 {Internet}. Melbourne; 2018. Available from: https://digitalinclusionindex.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/Australian-Digital-Inclusion-Index-2017_v2.pdf
[13]
McShane I, Gregory MA, Wilson CK. Practicing safe public wi-fi: Assessing and managing data-security risks {Internet}. Melbourne; 2016 {cited 2017 Jan 7}. Available from: https://apo.org.au/node/72057
[14]
Humphry J. Homeless and Connected Mobile phones and the Internet in the lives of homeless Australians {Internet}. Sydney: Australian Communications Consumer Action Network; 2014 {cited 2017 Jun 5}. Available from: https://accan.org.au/files/Grants/homelessandconnected/Homeless_and_Connected_web.pdf
[15]
Garson GD. Public Information Technology and E-Governance: Managing the Virtual State. Sudbury MA: Jones and Bartlett; 2006.
[16]
Hughes TP. Networks of Power: Electrification in Western Society 1880--1930. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press; 1983.
[17]
Star SL. The ethnography of infrastructure. Am Behav Sci. 1999;43(3):377--91.
[18]
Graham S, Marvin S. Telecommunications and the City: Electronic Spaces, Urban Places. London: Routledge; 1996.
[19]
Parks L, Starosielski N, editors. Signal Traffic: Critical Studies of Media Infrastructures. Champaign IL: University of Ilinois Press; 2015.
[20]
Shumow M. Searching for a Signal: Digital Literacy, Civic Engagement, and the Building of a Community Wi-Fi Network in Miami's Urban Core. In: De Abreau BS, Mihailidis P, Lee AYL, Melki J, McDougall J, editors. International Handbook of Media Literacy Education. Abingdon, UK: Routledge; 2017. p. 225--42.
[21]
Alizadeh T. Planning Deficiencies and Telecommunication Infrastructure. disP - Plan Rev {Internet}. Routledge; 2017 Jul 3 {cited 2017 Dec 14};53(3):43--57. Available from:
[22]
Graham S, Marvin S. Splintering Urbanism: Technological Mobilities and the Urban Condition. London: Routledge; 2001.
[23]
Barns S, Cosgrave E, Acuto M, McNeill D. Digital Infrastructures and Urban Governance. Urban Policy Res {Internet}. Routledge; 2017;35(1):20--31. Available from:
[24]
McShane I, Wilson CK. Public Wi-Fi in Australian Cities: Are there Lessons for "Smart City" Government? In: State of Australian Cities National Conference. Adelaide; 2017.
[25]
Osborne D, Gaebler T. Reinventing Government: How the Entrepreneurial Spirit is Transforming the Public Sector. New York: Penguin; 1992.
[26]
Moore, MH. Creating Public Value: Strategic Management in Government. Cambridge MA; Harvard University Press; 1997.
[27]
Girth AM. What Drives the Partnership Decision? Examining Structural Factors Influencing Public-Private Partnerships for Municipal Wireless Broadband. Int Public Manag J. 2014;17(3).
[28]
Grechyn V, McShane I. Public Wi-Fi Provision by Australian Local Authorities: National Survey Results {Internet}. Melbourne; 2018. Available from: http://cur.org.au/cms/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/public-wi-fi_lga_survey-1.pdf
[29]
Wang X, Li X, Zhen F, Zhang J. How Smart is your Tourist Attraction? Measuring Tourist Preferences of Smart Tourism Attractions via a FCEM-AHP and IPA Approach. Tour Manag. 2016;54:309--20.
[30]
Jaeger PT, Bertot JC, Thompson KM, Katz SM, De Coster EJ. The Intersection of Public Policy and Public Access: Digital Divides, Digital Literacy, Digital Inclusion, and Public Libraries. Public Libr Q. 2012;31(1):1--20.
[31]
Buhalis D, Law R. Progress in Information Technology and Tourism Management: 20 Years on and 10 Years after the Internet. Tour Manag. 2008;29(4):609--23.
[32]
SWIFT. South West Integrated Fibre Technology: Ultra-high Speed Broadband for Everyone. {Internet}. 2017 {cited 2018 Nov 26}. Available from: https://swiftnetwork.ca
[33]
Australian Smart Communities Association. About Us {Internet}. 2018 {cited 2018 Nov 26}. Available from: https://www.australiansmartcommunities.org.au
[34]
Clarke RY, Brooks A. IDC Maturityscape: Smart City. Framingham; 2015.
[35]
Australian Parliament. Telecommunications (Interception and Access) Amendment (Data Retention) Act 2015 {Internet}. Australia; 2015. Available from: Telecommunications (Interception and Access) Amendment (Data Retention) Act 2015
[36]
Baye M, Morgan J, Scholten P. Price Dispersion in the Small and the Large: Evidence from an Internet Price Comparison Site. J Ind Econ. 2001;52(4):463--96.
[37]
ANZSOG (Australian New Zealand School of Government). Public Admin Explainer - What is Public Value? {Internet}. 2017. Available from: https://www.anzsog.edu.au/resource-library/research/what-is-public-value
[38]
Potts J. Economics of Public Wi-Fi. Aust J Telecommun Digit Econ {Internet}. 2014 {cited 2018 Aug 17};2(1). Available from:
[39]
Council of Australian Governments. Competition Principles Agreement. {Internet}. 1995. Available from: https://www.coag.gov.au/sites/default/files/agreements/competition-principles-agreement-amended-2007.pdf
[40]
Barraket J, Keast R, Furneaux C, editors. Social Procurement and the New Public Governance. Abingdon UK and New York: Routledge; 2016.
[41]
Australian Government Department of Infrastructure and Local Government. National Public Private Partnership Guidelines Overview {Internet}. 2008. Available from: https://infrastructure.gov.au/infrastructure/ngpd/files/Overview-Dec-2008-FA.pdf
[42]
Ahlgren B, Hidell M, Ngai E. Internet of Things for Smart Cities: Interoperability and Open Data. IEEE Internet Comput. 2016;20(6):52--6.
[43]
Kitchin R. The real-time city? Big data and smart urbanism. GeoJournal. 2014;79(1):1--14.
[44]
Morozov E. To Save Everything, Click Here: The Folly of Technological Solutionism. New York: Public Affairs; 2013.
[45]
Siemiatycki M. What's the secret? Confidentiality in planning infrastructure using public/private partnerships. J Am Plan Assoc. 2007;73(4):388--403.
[46]
Jassem HC. Municipal WiFi: The Coda. J Urban Technol {Internet}. 2010 Aug {cited 2012 Sep 3};17(2):3--20. Available from:
[47]
Hui G, Hayllar, M. Creating Public Value in E-Government: A Public-Private-Citizen Collaboration Framework in Web 2.0. Aust. J. Public Admin. 2010;69(1):S120-S131.
[48]
Oxendine A, Sullivan J, Borgida E, Riedel E, Jackson M, Dial J. The Importance of Political Context for Understanding Civic Engagement: A Longitudinal Analysis. Polit Behav. 2007;29(1):31--67.
[49]
McShane I, Wilson CK, Meredyth D. Digital Inteventions in Declining Regions. In: Pink S, Ardevol E, Lanzeni D {Eds}. Digital Materialities - Design and Anthropology. London: Bloomsbury; 2016:195--212.

Index Terms

  1. Public-Private Partnerships in Municipal Wi-Fi: Optimising Public Value

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    ICEGOV '19: Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance
    April 2019
    538 pages
    ISBN:9781450366441
    DOI:10.1145/3326365
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 03 April 2019

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. Australia
    2. Public-private partnerships
    3. data privatization
    4. local government
    5. public Wi-Fi
    6. public value

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

    Conference

    ICEGOV2019

    Acceptance Rates

    ICEGOV '19 Paper Acceptance Rate 81 of 171 submissions, 47%;
    Overall Acceptance Rate 350 of 865 submissions, 40%

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • 0
      Total Citations
    • 162
      Total Downloads
    • Downloads (Last 12 months)16
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
    Reflects downloads up to 14 Jan 2025

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    View Options

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media