skip to main content
10.1145/3311927.3325328acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesidcConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Searching for spellcheckers: What kids want, what kids need

Published: 12 June 2019 Publication History

Abstract

Misspellings in queries used to initiate online searches is an everyday occurrence. When this happens, users either rely on the search engine's ability to understand their query or they turn to spellcheckers. Spellcheckers are usually based on popular dictionaries or past query logs, leading to spelling suggestions that often better resonate with adult users because that data is more readily available. Based on an educational perspective, previous research reports, and initial analyses of sample search logs, we hypothesize that existing spellcheckers are not suitable for young users who frequently encounter spelling challenges when searching for information online. We present early results of our ongoing research focused on identifying the needs and expectations children have regarding spellcheckers.

References

[1]
Donald R Bear, Marcia Invernizzi, Shane Templeton, Francine R Johnston, et al. 2012. Words their way: Word study for phonics, vocabulary, and spelling instruction. Pearson/Allyn and Bacon.
[2]
Allison Druin. 1999. Cooperative Inquiry: Developing New Technologies for Children with Children. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '99). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 592--599.
[3]
Jerry Alan Fails, Mona Leigh Guha, and Allison Druin. 2013. Methods and Techniques for Involving Children in the Design of New Technology for Children. Now Publishers Inc., Hanover, MA, USA.
[4]
Jianfeng Gao, Xiaolong Li, Daniel Micol, Chris Quirk, and Xu Sun. 2010. A large scale ranker-based system for search query spelling correction. In Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Computational Linguistics. Association for Computational Linguistics, 358--366.
[5]
Tatiana Gossen, Thomas Low, and Andreas Nürnberger. 2011. What are the real differences of children's and adults' web search. In Proceedings of the 34th international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in Information Retrieval. ACM, 1115--1116.
[6]
Mona Leigh Guha, Allison Druin, and Jerry Alan Fails. 2013. Cooperative Inquiry revisited: Reflections of the past and guidelines for the future of intergenerational co-design. International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction 1, 1 (Jan. 2013), 14--23.
[7]
Matthias Hagen, Martin Potthast, Marcel Gohsen, Anja Rathgeber, and Benno Stein. 2017. A Large-Scale Query Spelling Correction Corpus. In Proceedings of the 40th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval. ACM, 1261--1264.
[8]
R Malatesha Joshi, Rebecca Treiman, Suzanne Carreker, and Louisa C Moats. 2008. How words cast their spell. American Educator 32, 4 (2008), 6--16.
[9]
Yvonne Kammerer and Maja Bohnacker. 2012. Children's web search with Google: the effectiveness of natural language queries. In proceedings of the 11th international conference on interaction design and children. ACM, 184--187.
[10]
Yanen Li, Huizhong Duan, and ChengXiang Zhai. 2012. A generalized hidden markov model with discriminative training for query spelling correction. In Proceedings of the 35th international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval. ACM, 611--620.
[11]
Ion Madrazo Azpiazu, Nevena Dragovic, Oghenemaro Anuyah, and Maria Soledad Pera. 2018. Looking for the Movie Seven or Sven from the Movie Frozen?: A Multi-perspective Strategy for Recommending Queries for Children. In Proceedings of the 2018 Conference on Human Information Interaction&Retrieval. ACM, 92--101.
[12]
Adriana Riano and Sara J Margolin. 2017. But spell checker always corrects witch words eye misspelled. Written Language & Literacy 20, 2 (2017), 129--146.
[13]
Peter Westwood. 2018. Learning to spell: enduring theories, recent research and current issues. Australian Journal of Learning Difficulties 23, 2 (2018), 137--152.

Cited By

View all

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
IDC '19: Proceedings of the 18th ACM International Conference on Interaction Design and Children
June 2019
787 pages
ISBN:9781450366908
DOI:10.1145/3311927
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 12 June 2019

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Badges

  • Best Poster

Author Tags

  1. children
  2. participatory design
  3. spelling
  4. web search

Qualifiers

  • Research-article
  • Research
  • Refereed limited

Conference

IDC '19
Sponsor:
IDC '19: Interaction Design and Children
June 12 - 15, 2019
ID, Boise, USA

Acceptance Rates

IDC '19 Paper Acceptance Rate 41 of 124 submissions, 33%;
Overall Acceptance Rate 172 of 578 submissions, 30%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)12
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)2
Reflects downloads up to 06 Jan 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media