skip to main content
10.1145/3294109.3295637acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesteiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

ONEDAY Shoes: A Maker Toolkit to Understand the Role of Co-Manufacturing in Personalization

Published: 17 March 2019 Publication History

Abstract

Personalization of shoes is of increasing importance to designers, design researchers, and manufacturers as mass customization progresses towards ultra personalized product service systems. Many attempts have been made to design co-creation platforms that allow end users to personalize their own shoes. Those co-creation platforms primarily concentrate on color selection. This research takes a different approach and designs a toolkit for maker-oriented users to co-manufacture their own shoes. The toolkit was designed in different levels and deployed to makers via crowdsharing worldwide. Backers were surveyed before deployment and interviewed after two years to understand personalization over a larger amount of time with the research product. We find that users who have greater bespoke tools and materials in their toolkits are more likely to personalize their shoes while co-manufacturing. The research provides guidelines for researchers and designers creating toolkits, designing personalization product service systems/configurators and engaging in tangible bespoke processes.

Supplementary Material

suppl.mov (teifp1084.mp4)
Supplemental video

References

[1]
Kevin Almond. 2011. Bespoke tailoring: the luxury and heritage we can afford. The International Journal of Technology, Knowledge and Society 7, 2: 77--88.
[2]
Verónica Baena Gracia and Katharina Winkelhues. 2016. The Next Revolution in Mass Customization: An insight into the sneaker market. International Journal of Marketing, Communication and New Media 4, 6: 2182--9306.
[3]
J Ball and H Rollinson. 1935. Boots and shoes: Their making, Manufacture and selling, Volume VI Bespoke Bootmaking. New Era Publishing, London.
[4]
David Bar-El and Oren Zuckerman. 2016. Maketec: A Makerspace as a Third Place for Children Work-in-Progress. In Proc. of TEI '16.
[5]
Lucy A Beard and Nigel P Beard. 2018. Systems and methods for measuring body parts for designing customized outerwear. U.S. Patent Application No. 14/714,062.
[6]
Steve Benford, Boriana Koleva, William Westwood Preston, Alice Angus, Emily-Clare Thorn, and Kevin Glover. 2018. Customizing Hybrid Products. In Proc of CHI '18:, 1--12.
[7]
Martijn Ten Bhömer, Oscar Tomico, and Stephan Wensveen. 2015. Designing Ultra-Personalised Embodied Smart Textile Services for Well-Being. In Advances in Smart Medical Textiles: Treatments and Health Monitoring. 155--175.
[8]
Bernd Bickel, Moritz Bächer, Miguel a. Otaduy, Hyunho Richard Lee, Hanspeter Pfister, Markus Gross, and Wojciech Matusik. 2010. Design and fabrication of materials with desired deformation behavior. ACM Transactions on Graphics 29, 4: 1.
[9]
Claudio R Boër, Sergio Dulio, and Francesco Jovane. 2004. Editorial: Shoe design and manufacturing. International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing 17, 7: 577--582.
[10]
Leah Buechley and Hannah Perner-Wilson. 2012. Crafting technology. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction 19, 3: 1--21.
[11]
A Chang and Hiroshi Ishii. 2006. Personalized Interactions with Reality Based Interfaces. In CHI 2006 Workshop What is the Next Generation of. Retrieved from http://www.cs.tufts.edu/~jacob/workshop/papers/chang.pdf
[12]
Charu Chaudhari, Anjanakshi Prakash, A. M. Tsaasan, Jed R. Brubaker, and Joshua Tanenbaum. 2016. Penseive Box. Proc. of TEI '16: 398--403.
[13]
Pete L. Clark. 2018. A Note on rings of finite rank. Communications in Algebra 46, 10: 4223--4232.
[14]
Audrey Desjardins and Ron Wakkary. 2016. Living In A Prototype. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI '16, 5274--5285.
[15]
Laura Devendorf and Kimiko Ryokai. 2015. Being the Machine. In Proc. of CHI '15, 2477--2486.
[16]
Joanne Entwistle. 2015. The Fashioned Body: Fashion, Dress and Social Theory. John Wiley & Sons, 2015.
[17]
Pennie Frow, Suvi Nenonen, Adrian Payne, and Kaj Storbacka. 2015. Managing Co-creation Design: A Strategic Approach to Innovation. British Journal of Management 26, 3: 463--483.
[18]
William Gaver. 2012. What should we expect from research through design? In Proc. of CHI '12, 937.
[19]
Neil Gershenfeld. 2012. How to Make Almost Anything: The Digital Fabrication Revolution. Foreign Affairs 91, 6: 43--57.
[20]
Lars Hallnäs and Johan Redström. 2001. Slow technology--designing for reflection. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing 5, 3: 201--212.
[21]
Scott E Hudson. 2014. Printing Teddy Bears?: A Technique for 3D Printing of Soft Interactive Objects. In Proc. of CHI '14, 459--468.
[22]
Kazuki Kaneko, Yusuke Kishita, and Yasushi Umeda. 2018. Toward Developing a Design Method of Personalization: Proposal of a Personalization Procedure. Procedia CIRP 69: 740--745.
[23]
Daisuke Kokuryo, Toshiya Kaihara, Shota Suginouchi, and Swee Kuik. 2016. A study on value co-creative design and manufacturing system for tailor-made rubber shoes production - Construction of value co-creative smart factory. In Proc. of ISFA '16, 171--174.
[24]
David Ledo, Steven Houben, Jo Vermeulen, Nicolai Marquardt, Lora Oehlberg, and Saul Greenberg. 2018. Evaluation Strategies for HCI Toolkit Research. Proc. of CHI '18: 1--17.
[25]
Rueben Lekkerkerker. Ruit Footwear. Retrieved November 17, 2017 from http://www.rubenlekkerkerker.com/kerkerker/ruitfootwear.html
[26]
Steve Mann. 1997. Smart clothing: The wearable computer and wearcam. Personal Technologies 1, 1: 21--27.
[27]
Fabio Morreale, Giulio Moro, Alan Chamberlain, Steve Benford, and Andrew P. McPherson. 2017. Building a Maker Community Around an Open Hardware Platform. In Proc. of CHI '17, 6948--6959.
[28]
Troy Robert Nachtigall and Kristina Andersen. 2018. Making Secret Pockets. In Proc. of CHI '18, LBW574.
[29]
Troy Robert Nachtigall and Roderick Pieters. 2015. The ONEDAY Shoekit licensed under the Creative Commons 4.0 Open Culture License. Retrieved November 17, 2017 from http://onedayshoe.com/
[30]
Troy Robert Nachtigall, Oscar Tomico, Ron Wakkary, Stephan Wensveen, Pauline van Dongen, and Leonie van Norten. 2018. Towards Ultra Personalized 4D Printed Shoes. In Proc. of CHI '18, CS20.
[31]
Michael Nitsche, Andrew Quitmeyer, Kate Farina, Samuel Zwaan, and Hye Yeon Nam. 2014. Teaching digital craft. In CHI EA '14.
[32]
William Odom, Ron Wakkary, Youn-kyung Lim, Audrey Desjardins, Bart Hengeveld, and Richard Banks. 2016. From Research Prototype to Research Product. In Proc. of CHI '16, 2549--2561.
[33]
Frank T. Piller, Evalotte Lindgens, and Frank Steiner. 2012. Mass Customization at Adidas: Three Strategic Capabilities to Implement Mass Customization. SSRN Electronic Journal.
[34]
Fernando R. Jiménez, Kevin E. Voss, and Gary L. Frankwick. 2013. A classification schema of co-production of goods: an open-systems perspective. European Journal of Marketing 47, 11/12: 1841--1858.
[35]
Davide Rocchesso, Davide A Mauro, and Stefano Delle Monache. 2016. miMic?: The Microphone as a Pencil. Proc. of TEI '16: 357--364.
[36]
L. Sabantina, F. Kinzel, A. Ehrmann, and K. Finsterbusch. 2015. Combining 3D printed forms with textile structures - Mechanical and geometrical properties of multi-material systems. In IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering.
[37]
Elizabeth B.-N. Sanders and Pieter Jan Stappers. 2008. Co-creation and the new landscapes of design. CoDesign 4, 1: 5--18.
[38]
Maximilian Schirmer, Johannes Hartmann, Sven Bertel, Florian Echtler, Simone Minto, Damiano Zanotto, Emily Marie Boggs, and Giulio Rosati. 2015. Shoe me the Way?: A Shoe-Based Tactile Interface for Eyes-Free Urban Navigation. In Proc. of MobileHCI'15.
[39]
Shivanthan Shanthikumar, Zi Low, Eanna Falvey, Paul McCrory, and Andy Franklyn-Miller. 2010. The effect of gait velocity on calcaneal balance at heel strike; Implications for orthotic prescription in injury prevention. Gait & Posture 31, 1: 9--12.
[40]
Lauren Sherman. 2018. Instagram Killed the Fashion Magazine. What Happens Now? Business of Fashion. Retrieved November 9, 2018 from https://www.businessoffashion.com/articles/professional/instagram-killed-the-fashion-magazine-what-happens-now
[41]
Michael Smyth, Ingi Helgason, Frank Kresin, Mara Balestrini, Andreas B Unteidig, Shaun Lawson, Mark Gaved, Nick Taylor, James Auger, Lone Koefed Hansen, Douglas C Schuler, Mel Woods, and Paul Dourish. 2018. Maker Movements, Do-It-Yourself Cultures and Participatory Design: Implications for HCI Research Background and Questions. In CHI EA '18, 1--7.
[42]
Sowmya Somanath, Laura Morrison, Janette Hughes, Ehud Sharlin, and Mario Costa Sousa. 2016. Engaging "At-Risk" Students through Maker Culture Activities. In Proc. of TEI '16, 150--158.
[43]
Claire Stolwijk and Matthijs Punter. 2018. Going Digital: Field labs to accelerate the digitization of the Dutch Industry.
[44]
Maarten Versteeg, Elise van den Hoven, and Caroline Hummels. 2016. Interactive Jewellery. In Proc. of TEI '16, 44--52.
[45]
Christian Voigt, Calkin Suero Montero, and Massimo Menichinelli. 2016. An empirically informed taxonomy for the maker movement. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), 189--204.
[46]
Ron Wakkary and L Maestri. 2007. The Resourcefulness of Everyday Design. In Proc. of C&C '07, 163--172.
[47]
Ron Wakkary, Doenja Oogjes, Henry W J Lin, and Sabrina Hauser. 2018. Philosophers Living with the Tilting Bowl. In Proc. of CHI '18, 94.
[48]
Ron Wakkary, Markus Lorenz Schilling, Matthew a. Dalton, Sabrina Hauser, Audrey Desjardins, Xiao Zhang, and Henry W.J. Lin. 2015. Tutorial Authorship and Hybrid Designers. Proc. of CHI '15, April: 609--618.
[49]
Anna Waldman-Brown, Juliet Wanyiri, Simeon Oluwafunmilore Adebola, Tim Chege, Marian Muthui Fab, and Lab Nairobi. 2015. Democratising Technology: the Confluence of Makers and Grassroot Innovators. In Proc of ICCIG '15, 22.
[50]
Yu-chian Wu, Te-yen Wu, Paul Taele, Bryan Wang, Jun-you Liu, Ping-sung Ku, Po-en Lai, and Mike Y Chen. 2018. ActiveErgo?: Automatic and Personalized Ergonomics using Self-actuating Furniture. Proc of CHI '18: 1--8.
[51]
Bo Zhou, Harald Koerger, Markus Wirth, Constantin Zwick, Christine Martindale, Heber Cruz, Bjoern Eskofier, and Paul Lukowicz. 2016. Smart Soccer Shoe: Monitoring Foot-Ball Interaction with Shoe Integrated Textile Pressure Sensor Matrix. Proc. of ISWC '16.
[52]
Gender API - Determines the gender of a first name. Retrieved November 17, 2018 from https://gender-api.com/
[53]
2017. Adidas reveals the first 3D-printed shoe it'll mass-produce. Retrieved October 1, 2017 from https://www.theverge.com/2017/4/7/15216724/adidas-3d-printed-sneaker-futurecraft

Cited By

View all

Index Terms

  1. ONEDAY Shoes: A Maker Toolkit to Understand the Role of Co-Manufacturing in Personalization

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Conferences
    TEI '19: Proceedings of the Thirteenth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction
    March 2019
    785 pages
    ISBN:9781450361965
    DOI:10.1145/3294109
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

    Sponsors

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 17 March 2019

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. bespoke shoemaking
    2. co-manufacturing
    3. crowdfunding
    4. personalization
    5. research product
    6. toolkit

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article

    Funding Sources

    Conference

    TEI '19
    Sponsor:

    Acceptance Rates

    TEI '19 Paper Acceptance Rate 36 of 110 submissions, 33%;
    Overall Acceptance Rate 393 of 1,367 submissions, 29%

    Upcoming Conference

    TEI '25

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)48
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)8
    Reflects downloads up to 07 Nov 2024

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all

    View Options

    Get Access

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media