skip to main content
10.1145/3293611.3331630acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagespodcConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

On the Complexity of Distributed Splitting Problems

Published: 16 July 2019 Publication History

Abstract

One of the fundamental open problems in the area of distributed graph algorithms is whether randomization is needed for efficient symmetry breaking. While there are poly log n-time randomized algorithms for all the classic symmetry breaking problems, for many of them, the best deterministic algorithms are almost exponentially slower. The following basic local splitting problem, which is known as weak splitting, takes a central role in this context: Each node of a graph G=(V,E) has to be colored red or blue such that each node of sufficiently large degree has at least one neighbor of each color. Ghaffari, Kuhn, and Maus [STOC '17] showed that this seemingly simple problem is complete w.r.t. the above fundamental open question in the following sense: If there is an efficient poly log n-time determinstic distributed algorithm for weak splitting, then there is such an algorithm for all locally checkable graph problems for which an efficient randomized algorithm exists. We investigate the distributed complexity of weak splitting and some closely related problems and we in particular obtain the following results:
We obtain efficient algorithms for special cases of weak splitting in nearly regular graphs. We show that if δ=Ø(log n) and Δ are the minimum and maximum degrees of G, weak splitting can be solved deterministically in time O #916;(√ over δ • poly(log n)). Further, if δ = Ø(log log n) and Δ ≤ 2ε δ, the time complexity is O(Δ over δ⋅poly(log log n)).
We prove that the following two related problems are also complete in the same sense: (I) Color the nodes of a graph with C ≤ poly log n colors such that each node with a sufficiently large polylogarithmic degree has at least 2 log n different colors among its neighbors, and (II) Color the nodes with a large constant number of colors so that for each node of a sufficiently large at least logarithmic degree d(v), the number of neighbors of each color is at most (1-εd(v) for some constant ε > 0.

References

[1]
Philipp Bamberger, Mohsen Ghaffari, Fabian Kuhn, Yannic Maus, and Jara Uitto. 2019. On the Complexity of Distributed Splitting Problems. arXiv:1905.11573
[2]
Leonid Barenboim and Michael Elkin. 2011. Deterministic Distributed Vertex Coloring in Polylog arithmic Time.J. ACM58, 5 (2011), 23:1--23:25.
[3]
Leonid Barenboim and Michael Elkin. 2013. Distributed Graph Coloring: Fundamentals and Recent Developments. Morgan & Claypool Publishers.
[4]
Leonid Barenboim, Michael Elkin, and Fabian Kuhn. 2014. Distributed (Δ + 1)-Coloring in Linear (in Δ) Time. SIAM J. Comput.43, 1 (2014), 72--95.
[5]
Leonid Barenboim, Michael Elkin, Seth Pettie, and Johannes Schneider. 2016. TheLocality of Distributed Symmetry Breaking. J. ACM 63, 3 (2016), 20:1--20:45.
[6]
John Adrian Bondy, Uppaluri Siva Ramachandra Murty, et al. 1976. Graph theory with applications. Vol. 290. Citeseer.
[7]
Sebastian Brandt, Orr Fischer, Juho Hirvonen, Barbara Keller, Tuomo Lempiäinen,Joel Rybicki, Jukka Suomela, and Jara Uitto. 2016. A lower bound for the distributed Lovász local lemma. In Proc. 48th Symp. on Theory of Computing (STOC). 479--488.
[8]
Yi-Jun Chang, Tsvi Kopelowitz, and Seth Pettie. 2016. An Exponential Separation between Randomized and Deterministic Complexity in the LOCAL Model. In 57th IEEE Symp. on Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS). 615--624.
[9]
Yi-Jun Chang and Seth Pettie. 2017. A Time Hierarchy Theorem for the LOCAL Model. In Proc. 58th IEEE Symp. on Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS). 156--167.
[10]
Manuela Fischer and Mohsen Ghaffari. 2017. Sublogarithmic Distributed Algorithms for Lovász Local lemma, and the complexity hierarchy. In Proc. 31st Symp.on Distributed Computing (DISC). 18:1--18:16.
[11]
Manuela Fischer, Mohsen Ghaffari, and Fabian Kuhn. 2017. Deterministic Dis-tributed Edge-Coloring via Hypergraph Maximal Matching. In Proc. 58th IEEE Symp. on Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS).
[12]
Pierre Fraigniaud, Marc Heinrich, and Adrian Kosowski. 2016. Local Conflict Coloring. In Proc. 57th IEEE Symp. on Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS).
[13]
Pierre Fraigniaud, Amos Korman, and David Peleg. 2013. Towards a complexity theory for local distributed computing. J. ACM60, 5 (2013), 35.
[14]
Mohsen Ghaffari, David G. Harris, and Fabian Kuhn. 2016. On Derandomizing Local Distributed Algorithms. In Proc. 59th Symp. on Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS). 662--673.
[15]
Mohsen Ghaffari, David G. Harris, and Fabian Kuhn. 2017. On Derandomizing Local Distributed Algorithms. CoRRabs/1711.02194 (2017). arXiv:1711.02194http://arxiv.org/abs/1711.02194
[16]
Mohsen Ghaffari, Juho Hirvonen, Fabian Kuhn, Yannic Maus, Jukka Suomela,and Jara Uitto. 2017. Improved Distributed Degree Splitting and Edge Coloring. In Proc. 31st Symp. on Distributed Computing (DISC). 19:1--19:15.
[17]
Mohsen Ghaffari, Fabian Kuhn, and Yannic Maus. 2017. On the complexity oflocal distributed graph problems. In Proc. 49th Symp. on Theory of Computing(STOC). 784--797.
[18]
Mohsen Ghaffari, Fabian Kuhn, Yannic Maus, and Jara Uitto. 2018. Deterministic distributed edge-coloring with fewer colors. In Proceedings of the 50th Annual ACM SIGACT Symposium on Theory of Computing. ACM, 418--430.
[19]
Mohsen Ghaffari and Hsin-Hao Su. 2017. Distributed Degree Splitting, Edge Coloring, and Orientations. In Proc. 28th ACM-SIAM Symp. on Discrete Algorithms(SODA). 2505--2523.
[20]
Nathan Linial. 1992. Locality in Distributed Graph Algorithms. SIAM J. Comput. 21, 1 (1992), 193--201.
[21]
Moni Naor and Larry Stockmeyer. 1995. What Can Be Computed Locally? SIAMJ. Comput. 24, 6 (1995), 1259--1277.
[22]
David Peleg. 2000. Distributed Computing: A Locality-Sensitive Approach. SIAM.

Cited By

View all

Index Terms

  1. On the Complexity of Distributed Splitting Problems

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Conferences
    PODC '19: Proceedings of the 2019 ACM Symposium on Principles of Distributed Computing
    July 2019
    563 pages
    ISBN:9781450362177
    DOI:10.1145/3293611
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Sponsors

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 16 July 2019

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. distributed graph algorithms
    2. distributed symmetry breaking
    3. local model
    4. randomness
    5. weak splitting

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article

    Funding Sources

    • European Union's Horizon 2020 Research And Innovation Programme

    Conference

    PODC '19
    Sponsor:
    PODC '19: ACM Symposium on Principles of Distributed Computing
    July 29 - August 2, 2019
    Toronto ON, Canada

    Acceptance Rates

    PODC '19 Paper Acceptance Rate 48 of 173 submissions, 28%;
    Overall Acceptance Rate 740 of 2,477 submissions, 30%

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)8
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
    Reflects downloads up to 03 Jan 2025

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all

    View Options

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media