skip to main content
10.1145/3292500.3330706acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageskddConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

DuerQuiz: A Personalized Question Recommender System for Intelligent Job Interview

Published: 25 July 2019 Publication History

Abstract

In talent recruitment, the job interview aims at selecting the right candidates for the right jobs through assessing their skills and experiences in relation to the job positions. While tremendous efforts have been made in improving job interviews, a long-standing challenge is how to design appropriate interview questions for comprehensively assessing the competencies that may be deemed relevant and representative for person-job fit. To this end, in this research, we focus on the development of a personalized question recommender system, namely DuerQuiz, for enhancing the job interview assessment. DuerQuiz is a fully deployed system, in which a knowledge graph of job skills, Skill-Graph, has been built for comprehensively modeling the relevant competencies that should be assessed in the job interview. Specifically, we first develop a novel skill entity extraction approach based on a bidirectional Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) with a Conditional Random Field (CRF) layer (LSTM-CRF) neural network enhanced with adapted gate mechanism. In particular, to improve the reliability of extracted skill entities, we design a label propagation method based on more than 10 billion click-through data from the large-scale Baidu query logs. Furthermore, we discover the hypernym-hyponym relations between skill entities and construct the Skill-Graph by leveraging the classifier trained with extensive contextual features. Finally, we design a personalized question recommendation algorithm based on the Skill-Graph for improving the efficiency and effectiveness of job interview assessment. Extensive experiments on real-world recruitment data clearly validate the effectiveness of DuerQuiz, which had been deployed for generating written exercises in the 2018 Baidu campus recruitment event and received remarkable performances in terms of efficiency and effectiveness for selecting outstanding talents compared with a traditional non-personalized human-only assessment approach.

References

[1]
Tobias Baur, Ionut Damian, Patrick Gebhard, Kaska Porayska-Pomsta, and Elisabeth André. 2013. A job interview simulation: Social cue-based interaction with a virtual character. In Social Computing (SocialCom), 2013 International Conference on. IEEE, 220--227.
[2]
Jason PC Chiu and Eric Nichols. 2016. Named entity recognition with bidirectional LSTM-CNNs. Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Vol. 4 (2016), 357--370.
[3]
Amy JC Cuddy, Caroline A Wilmuth, Andy J Yap, and Dana R Carney. 2015. Preparatory power posing affects nonverbal presence and job interview performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 100, 4 (2015), 1286.
[4]
Hamish Cunningham, Diana Maynard, Kalina Bontcheva, and Valentin Tablan. 2002. A framework and graphical development environment for robust NLP tools and applications. In Proceedings of the 40th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics. 168--175.
[5]
Jenny Rose Finkel, Trond Grenager, and Christopher Manning. 2005. Incorporating non-local information into information extraction systems by gibbs sampling. In Proceedings of the 43rd annual meeting on association for computational linguistics. Association for Computational Linguistics, 363--370.
[6]
Ruiji Fu, Jiang Guo, Bing Qin, Wanxiang Che, Haifeng Wang, and Ting Liu. 2014. Learning semantic hierarchies via word embeddings. Proceedings of the 52nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics.
[7]
Ruiji Fu, Bing Qin, and Ting Liu. 2013. Exploiting multiple sources for open-domain hypernym discovery. In Proceedings of the 2013 conference on empirical methods in natural language processing. 1224--1234.
[8]
Xavier Glorot and Yoshua Bengio. 2010. Understanding the difficulty of training deep feedforward neural networks. In Proceedings of the thirteenth international conference on artificial intelligence and statistics. 249--256.
[9]
Marti A Hearst. 1992. Automatic acquisition of hyponyms from large text corpora. In Proceedings of the 14th conference on Computational Linguistics.
[10]
Allen I Huffcutt and David J Woehr. 1999. Further analysis of employment interview validity: a quantitative evaluation of interviewer-related structuring methods. Journal of Organizational Behavior: The International Journal of Industrial, Occupational and Organizational Psychology and Behavior (1999).
[11]
Guillaume Lample, Miguel Ballesteros, Sandeep Subramanian, Kazuya Kawakami, and Chris Dyer. 2016. Neural architectures for named entity recognition. arXiv preprint arXiv:1603.01360 (2016).
[12]
D. H. Lee and Peter Brusilovsky. 2007. Fighting Information Overflow with Personalized Comprehensive Information Access: A Proactive Job Recommender. In Third International Conference on Autonomic and Autonomous Systems.
[13]
Jinyang Li, Chengyu Wang, Xiaofeng He, Rong Zhang, and Ming Gao. 2015. User generated content oriented chinese taxonomy construction. In Proceedings of the 17th Asia-Pacific Web Conference. Springer, 623--634.
[14]
Qi Li and Heng Ji. 2014. Incremental joint extraction of entity mentions and relations. In Proceedings of the 52nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers), Vol. 1. 402--412.
[15]
Xiao Li, Ye-Yi Wang, and Alex Acero. 2008. Learning query intent from regularized click graphs. In Proceedings of the 31st annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval. ACM, 339--346.
[16]
Shotaro Misawa, Motoki Taniguchi, Yasuhide Miura, and Tomoko Ohkuma. 2017. Character-based Bidirectional LSTM-CRF with words and characters for Japanese Named Entity Recognition. In Proceedings of the First Workshop on Subword and Character Level Models in NLP. 97--102.
[17]
Iftekhar Naim, M Iftekhar Tanveer, Daniel Gildea, and Mohammed Ehsan Hoque. 2015. Automated prediction and analysis of job interview performance: The role of what you say and how you say it. In Automatic Face and Gesture Recognition (FG), 2015 11th IEEE International Conference and Workshops on, Vol. 1. IEEE, 1--6.
[18]
Alexandre Passos, Vineet Kumar, and Andrew McCallum. 2014. Lexicon infused phrase embeddings for named entity resolution. arXiv:1404.5367 (2014).
[19]
Karolina Piwiec. 2018. 65+ recruitment stats HR pros must know in 2018. https://devskiller.com/65-recruitment-stats-hr-pros-must-know-2018/. (2018).
[20]
Chuan Qin, Hengshu Zhu, Tong Xu, Chen Zhu, Liang Jiang, Enhong Chen, and Hui Xiong. 2018. Enhancing person-job fit for talent recruitment: An ability-aware neural network approach. In The 41st International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research & Development in Information Retrieval. ACM, 25--34.
[21]
Lev Ratinov and Dan Roth. 2009. Design challenges and misconceptions in named entity recognition. In Proceedings of the Thirteenth Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning. Association for Computational Linguistics, 147--155.
[22]
Frank L Schmidt and Ryan D Zimmerman. 2004. A counterintuitive hypothesis about employment interview validity and some supporting evidence. Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 89, 3 (2004), 553.
[23]
Dazhong Shen, Hengshu Zhu, Chen Zhu, Tong Xu, Chao Ma, and Hui Xiong. 2018. A Joint Learning Approach to Intelligent Job Interview Assessment. In Proceedings of the 27th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence.
[24]
Rion Snow, Daniel Jurafsky, and Andrew Y Ng. 2005. Learning syntactic patterns for automatic hypernym discovery. In Advances in neural information processing systems. 1297--1304.
[25]
Fabian M Suchanek, Gjergji Kasneci, and Gerhard Weikum. 2007. Yago: a core of semantic knowledge. In Proceedings of the 16th international conference on World Wide Web. ACM, 697--706.
[26]
Mihai Surdeanu, Julie Tibshirani, Ramesh Nallapati, and Christopher D Manning. 2012. Multi-instance multi-label learning for relation extraction. In Proceedings of the 2012 joint conference on empirical methods in natural language processing and computational natural language learning. 455--465.
[27]
Liling Tan, Rohit Gupta, and Josef van Genabith. 2015. Usaar-wlv: Hypernym generation with deep neural nets. In Proceedings of the 9th International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation (SemEval 2015). 932--937.
[28]
Daniel W Turner III. 2010. Qualitative interview design: A practical guide for novice investigators. The qualitative report, Vol. 15, 3 (2010), 754--760.
[29]
Chengyu Wang and Xiaofeng He. 2016. Chinese hypernym-hyponym extraction from user generated categories. In Proceedings of COLING 2016, the 26th International Conference on Computational Linguistics: Technical Papers. 1350--1361.
[30]
Wentao Wu, Hongsong Li, Haixun Wang, and Kenny Q Zhu. 2012. Probase: A probabilistic taxonomy for text understanding. In Proceedings of the 2012 ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data. ACM, 481--492.
[31]
Tong Xu, Hengshu Zhu, Chen Zhu, Pan Li, and Hui Xiong. 2018. Measuring the popularity of job skills in recruitment market: A multi-criteria approach. In Proceedings of the 32nd AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence. 2572--2579.
[32]
Josuke Yamane, Tomoya Takatani, Hitoshi Yamada, Makoto Miwa, and Yutaka Sasaki. 2016. Distributional hypernym generation by jointly learning clusters and projections. In Proceedings of COLING 2016, the 26th International Conference on Computational Linguistics: Technical Papers. 1871--1879.
[33]
Jie Yang, Yue Zhang, and Fei Dong. 2017. Neural word segmentation with rich pretraining. arXiv preprint arXiv:1704.08960 (2017).
[34]
Daojian Zeng, Kang Liu, Yubo Chen, and Jun Zhao. 2015. Distant supervision for relation extraction via piecewise convolutional neural networks. In Proceedings of the 2015 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing.
[35]
Yue Zhang and Jie Yang. 2018. Chinese NER Using Lattice LSTM. In Proceedings of the 56th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics.
[36]
GuoDong Zhou and Jian Su. 2002. Named entity recognition using an HMM-based chunk tagger. In proceedings of the 40th Annual Meeting on Association for Computational Linguistics. Association for Computational Linguistics, 473--480.
[37]
Chen Zhu, Hengshu Zhu, Hui Xiong, Pengliang Ding, and Fang Xie. 2016. Recruitment market trend analysis with sequential latent variable models. In Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining. ACM, 383--392.
[38]
Chen Zhu, Hengshu Zhu, Hui Xiong, Chao Ma, Fang Xie, Pengliang Ding, and Pan Li. 2018. Person-Job Fit: Adapting the Right Talent for the Right Job with Joint Representation Learning. ACM Transactions on Management Information Systems (TMIS), Vol. 9, 3 (2018), 12.

Cited By

View all

Index Terms

  1. DuerQuiz: A Personalized Question Recommender System for Intelligent Job Interview

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Conferences
    KDD '19: Proceedings of the 25th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining
    July 2019
    3305 pages
    ISBN:9781450362016
    DOI:10.1145/3292500
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Sponsors

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 25 July 2019

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. intelligence interview system
    2. question recommendation

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article

    Funding Sources

    Conference

    KDD '19
    Sponsor:

    Acceptance Rates

    KDD '19 Paper Acceptance Rate 110 of 1,200 submissions, 9%;
    Overall Acceptance Rate 1,133 of 8,635 submissions, 13%

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)115
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)17
    Reflects downloads up to 06 Nov 2024

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all

    View Options

    Get Access

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media