skip to main content
10.1145/3291940.3291968acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmobicomConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

New non-reference image quality evaluation method for underwater turbulence blurred images

Published: 03 December 2018 Publication History

Abstract

Turbulence is an important cause of image distortion in an underwater ocean environment, along with light scattering and color reduction. Turbulence blur is a universal phenomenon of underwater image degradation, and causes a loss of high frequency portion and image detail. We need a metric to evaluate underwater image quality and provide a reference for the restoration of turbulence-blurred images. It is difficult to obtain clear original images, and a subjective quality metric is time-consuming and impractical for real-time implementation, so we propose a new no-reference, objective quality evaluation algorithm, by employing CIELab color space features and mean subtracted contrast normalized (MSCN) statistical features to assess the quality of blurred images. The experimental results illustrate that our metric outperforms the other advanced image-quality metrics in the underwater turbulent-image dataset, and has a comparable performance in other datasets. Importantly, besides being highly in line with human perception, the proposed metric can effectively predict image quality with low computational complexity and meet the requirement of a real-time system.

References

[1]
Mei Cao, Huixing Sheng, L. I. Qingwu, Yaling Cheng, and Yan Zhou. 2016. Underwater color image enhancement algorithm based on prior dark-channel model. Chinese Journal of Quantum Electronics (2016).
[2]
Rony Ferzli and Lina J. Karam. 2009. A No-Reference Objective Image Sharpness Metric Based on the Notion of Just Noticeable Blur (JNB). IEEE Transactions on Image Processing A Publication of the IEEE Signal Processing Society 18, 4 (2009), 717.
[3]
Frank Hanson and Mark Lasher. 2010. Effects of underwater turbulence on laser beam propagation and coupling into single-mode optical fiber. Applied Optics 49, 16 (2010), 3224--30.
[4]
K. He, J. Sun, and X. Tang. 2010. Guided Image Filtering. In European Conference on Computer Vision. 1--14.
[5]
R. J. Hill. 1978. Optical propagation in turbulent water. Journal of the Optical Society of America 68, 8 (1978), 1067--1072.
[6]
Weilin Hou, Wesley Goode, and Andrey Kanaev. 2012. Underwater image quality degradation by scattering. In Oceans. 1--5.
[7]
C. Y. hopen L. C. Andrews, R. L. Phillips. 2001. Laser Beam Scintillation with Applications. Washington: SPIE Press.
[8]
Lixiong Liu, Bao Liu, Hua Huang, and Alan Conrad Bovik. 2014. No-reference image quality assessment based on spatial and spectral entropies. Signal Processing: Image Communication 29, 8 (2014), 856--863.
[9]
N. D. Narvekar and L. J. Karam. 2011. A no-reference image blur metric based on the cumulative probability of blur detection (CPBD). IEEE Transactions on Image Processing 20, 9 (2011), 2678--2683.
[10]
J. C. Owens. 1967. Optical refractive index of air: dependence on pressure, temperature and composition. Applied Optics 6, 1 (1967), 51.
[11]
Karen Panetta, Chen Gao, and Sos Agaian. 2016. Human-Visual-System-Inspired Underwater Image Quality Measures. IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering 41, 3 (2016), 541--551.
[12]
Daniel L Ruderman. 2009. The statistics of natural images. Network Computation in Neural Systems 5, 4 (2009), 517--548.
[13]
Y. Y. Schechner and N. Karpel. 2006. Recovery of underwater visibility and structure by polarization analysis. IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering 30, 3 (2006), 570--587.
[14]
Raimondo Schettini and Silvia Corchs. 2010. Underwater Image Processing: State of the Art of Restoration and Image Enhancement Methods. Eurasip Journal on Advances in Signal Processing 2010, 1 (2010), 746052.
[15]
Shijian Tang, Xuedan Zhang, and Yuhan Dong. 2013. Temporal statistics of irradiance in moving turbulent ocean. In Oceans. 1--4.
[16]
J. P Tarel and N Hautiere. 2010. Fast visibility restoration from a single color or gray level image. In IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision. 2201--2208.
[17]
Miao Yang and Cheng Long Gong. 2012. Underwater image restoration by turbulence model based on image gradient distribution. In International Conference on Uncertainty Reasoning and Knowledge Engineering. 296--299.
[18]
Miao Yang and Arcot Sowmya. 2014. New Image Quality Evaluation Metric for Underwater Video. IEEE Signal Processing Letters 21, 10 (2014), 1215--1219.
[19]
M. Yang and A Sowmya. 2015. An Underwater Color Image Quality Evaluation Metric. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing 24, 12 (2015), 6062--6071.
[20]
ZHANG Yi-xin and ZHU. 2004. Study of the Optical Resolution of Imaging System in Turbulence. Optics & Optoelectronic Technology 2, 4 (2004), 1--4.

Cited By

View all

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Other conferences
WUWNet '18: Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Underwater Networks & Systems
December 2018
261 pages
ISBN:9781450361934
DOI:10.1145/3291940
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 03 December 2018

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. CIELab
  2. mean subtracted contrast normalized (MSCN)
  3. no-reference objective quality evaluation
  4. turbulence blur

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Funding Sources

  • the National Natural Science Foundation of China
  • the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities

Conference

WUWNet'18

Acceptance Rates

WUWNet '18 Paper Acceptance Rate 11 of 23 submissions, 48%;
Overall Acceptance Rate 84 of 180 submissions, 47%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)13
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)3
Reflects downloads up to 06 Nov 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all

View Options

Get Access

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media