abstract

Crowdsourcing Perspectives on Public Policy from Stakeholders

Authors:

Simon T. Perrault,

Juho KimAuthors Info & Claims

CHI EA '19: Extended Abstracts of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

Paper No.: LBW1220, Pages 1 - 6

https://doi.org/10.1145/3290607.3312769

Published: 02 May 2019 Publication History

Abstract

Personal deliberation, the process through which people can form an informed opinion on social issues, serves an important role in helping citizens construct a rational argument in the public deliberation. However, existing information channels for public policies deliver only few stakeholders' voices, thus failing to provide a diverse knowledge base for personal deliberation. This paper presents an initial design of PolicyScape, an online system that supports personal deliberation on public policies by helping citizens explore diverse stakeholders and their perspectives on the policy's effect. Building on literature on crowdsourced policymaking and policy stakeholders, we present several design choices for crowdsourcing stakeholder perspectives. We introduce perspective-taking as an approach for personal deliberation by helping users consider stakeholder perspectives on policy issues. Our initial results suggest that PolicyScape could collect diverse sets of perspectives from the stakeholders of public policies, and help participants discover unexpected viewpoints of various stakeholder groups.

References

[1]

Tanja Aitamurto and Kaiping Chen. 2017. The value of crowdsourcing in public policymaking: Epistemic, democratic and economic value. Theory and Practice of Legislation 5, 1 (2017), 55--72.

[2]

Tanja Aitamurto and Hélène Landemore. 2015. Five design principles for crowdsourced policymaking: assessing the case of crowdsourced off road traffic law in Finland. Journal of Social Media for Organizations 2, 1 (2015), 1--19. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2716769

[3]

Siamak Faridani, Ephrat Bitton, Kimiko Ryokai, and Ken Goldberg. 2010. Opinion Space: A Scalable Tool for Browsing Online Comments. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '10). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1175--1184.

Digital Library

[4]

Cynthia R. Farina, Dmitry Epstein, Josiah Heidt, and Mary J. Newhart. 2014. Designing an Online Civic Engagement Platform: Balancing "More" vs. "Better" Participation in Complex Public Policymaking. International Journal of E-Politics 5, 1 (2014), 16--40.

Digital Library

[5]

Cynthia R. Farina, Mary J. Newhart, and Josiah Heidt. 2014. Rulemaking vs. Democracy: Judging and Nudging Public Participation that Counts. Cornell e-Rulemaking Initiative Publications 17 (2014).

[6]

Travis Kriplean, Jonathan Morgan, Deen Freelon, Alan Borning, and Lance Bennett. 2012. Supporting reflective public thought with considerit. In Proceedings of the ACM 2012 conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW '12). ACM Press, New York, New York, USA, 265.

Digital Library

[7]

Travis Kriplean, Michael Toomim, Jonathan Morgan, Alan Borning, and Andrew Ko. 2012. Is this what you meant?: promoting listening on the web with reflect. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '12). ACM Press, New York, New York, USA, 1559.

Digital Library

[8]

Diana C. Mutz. 2006. Hearing the other side: Deliberative versus participatory democracy. Cambridge University Press.

[9]

Vincent Price. 1989. Social identification and public opinion: Effects of communicating group conflict. Public Opinion Quarterly 53, 2 (1989), 197--224.

[10]

John Prpić, Araz Taeihagh, and James Melton. 2015. The Fundamentals of Policy Crowdsourcing. Policy & Internet 7, 3 (2015), 340--361.

[11]

Mark S. Reed, Anil Graves, Norman Dandy, Helena Posthumus, Klaus Hubacek, Joe Morris, Christina Prell, Claire H. Quinn, and Lindsay C. Stringer. 2009. Who's in and why? A typology of stakeholder analysis methods for natural resource management. Journal of Environmental Management 90, 5 (2009), 1933--1949.

[12]

Lynn M. Sanders. 1997. Against deliberation. Political theory 25, 3 (1997), 347--376.

[13]

Bryan Semaan, Heather Faucett, Scott P. Robertson, Misa Maruyama, and Sara Douglas. 2015. Designing Political Deliberation Environments to Support Interactions in the Public Sphere. Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '15) (2015), 3167--3176.

Digital Library

[14]

Pawel Sobkowicz, Michael Kaschesky, and Guillaume Bouchard. 2012. Opinion mining in social media: Modeling, simulating, and forecasting political opinions in the web. Government Information Quarterly 29, 4 (2012), 470--479.

[15]

Hans Stiegler and Menno D. T. de Jong. 2015. Facilitating personal deliberation online: Immediate effects of two consider it variations. Computers in human behavior 51 (2015), 461--469.

Digital Library

[16]

Hannah M. Tuller, Christopher J. Bryan, Gail D. Heyman, and Nicholas J. S. Christenfeld. 2015. Seeing the other side: Perspective taking and the moderation of extremity. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 59 (2015), 18--23.

[17]

Frank Vanclay, Ana Maria Esteves, Ilse Aucamp, and Daniel M. Franks. 2015. Social Impact Assessment: Guidance for assessing and managing the social impacts of projects. International Association for Impact Assessment 1, April (2015), 98.

Cited By

Yeo SLim GGao JZhang WPerrault S(2024)Help Me Reflect: Leveraging Self-Reflection Interface Nudges to Enhance Deliberativeness on Online Deliberation PlatformsProceedings of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613904.3642530(1-32)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3613904.3642530
Vargas-Murillo ADe La Asuncion Pari-Bedoya IDelgado-Chávez CMenacho Taipe EReyes Cuba CPolo Chavarri L(2024)The Role of ICT in Collaborative Creation of Public Policies: Crowdsourcing Policymaking2024 International Conference on Inventive Computation Technologies (ICICT)10.1109/ICICT60155.2024.10544427(1704-1708)Online publication date: 24-Apr-2024
https://doi.org/10.1109/ICICT60155.2024.10544427
Liscio ELera-Leri RBistaffa FDobbe RJonker CLopez-Sanchez MRodriguez-Aguilar JMurukannaiah PAgmon NAn BRicci AYeoh W(2023)Value Inference in Sociotechnical SystemsProceedings of the 2023 International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems10.5555/3545946.3598838(1774-1780)Online publication date: 30-May-2023
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.5555/3545946.3598838
Show More Cited By

Index Terms

Crowdsourcing Perspectives on Public Policy from Stakeholders
1. Human-centered computing
  1. Collaborative and social computing
    1. Collaborative and social computing systems and tools

Recommendations

Crowdsourcing Law and Policy: A Design-Thinking Approach to Crowd-Civic Systems
CSCW '17 Companion: Companion of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing

Crowdsourcing technologies, strategies and methods offer new opportunities for bridging existing gaps among law, policymaking, and the lived experience of citizens. In recent years, a number of initiatives across the world have applied crowdsourcing to ...
HCI, Civic Engagement & Trust
CHI '15: Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

There is a widespread belief that pervasive technologies will encourage and facilitate partnerships between citizens and civic authorities, enabling individuals to play a greater role in civic planning, service delivery and infrastructure management. ...
To reinforce or to mobilize?: tracing the impact of internet use on civic engagement in Taiwan
ICEGOV '08: Proceedings of the 2nd international conference on Theory and practice of electronic governance

Since the 1990s, Information and Communication Technologies (ICTs) have become popular instruments for delivering government services, encouraging citizen participation, and improving public trust. However, although governments around the globe have ...

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences

CHI EA '19: Extended Abstracts of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

May 2019

3673 pages

ISBN:9781450359719

DOI:10.1145/3290607

General Chairs:
Stephen Brewster
University of Glasgow, Scotland, UK
,
Geraldine Fitzpatrick
TU Wien, Austria
,
Program Chairs:
Anna Cox
University College London, UK
,
Vassilis Kostakos
University of Melbourne, Australia

Copyright © 2019 Owner/Author.

Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

Sponsors

SIGCHI: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer-Human Interaction

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 02 May 2019

Check for updates

Author Tags

Qualifiers

Abstract

Funding Sources

IITP

Conference

CHI '19

Sponsor:

SIGCHI

CHI '19: CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

May 4 - 9, 2019

Glasgow, Scotland Uk

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 6,164 of 23,696 submissions, 26%

Upcoming Conference

CHI 2025

Sponsor:
sigchi

ACM CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

April 26 - May 1, 2025

Yokohama , Japan

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

10
Total Citations
View Citations
295
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)29
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)3

Reflects downloads up to 22 Dec 2024

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

Yeo SLim GGao JZhang WPerrault S(2024)Help Me Reflect: Leveraging Self-Reflection Interface Nudges to Enhance Deliberativeness on Online Deliberation PlatformsProceedings of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613904.3642530(1-32)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3613904.3642530
Vargas-Murillo ADe La Asuncion Pari-Bedoya IDelgado-Chávez CMenacho Taipe EReyes Cuba CPolo Chavarri L(2024)The Role of ICT in Collaborative Creation of Public Policies: Crowdsourcing Policymaking2024 International Conference on Inventive Computation Technologies (ICICT)10.1109/ICICT60155.2024.10544427(1704-1708)Online publication date: 24-Apr-2024
https://doi.org/10.1109/ICICT60155.2024.10544427
Liscio ELera-Leri RBistaffa FDobbe RJonker CLopez-Sanchez MRodriguez-Aguilar JMurukannaiah PAgmon NAn BRicci AYeoh W(2023)Value Inference in Sociotechnical SystemsProceedings of the 2023 International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems10.5555/3545946.3598838(1774-1780)Online publication date: 30-May-2023
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.5555/3545946.3598838
Aitamurto TRoyal PSaldivar J(2023)Disagreement, Agreement, and Elaboration in Crowdsourced Deliberation: Ideation Through Elaborated PerspectivesExtended Abstracts of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3544549.3585708(1-10)Online publication date: 19-Apr-2023
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3544549.3585708
Kim JKim CNam K(2022)ThinkWrite: Design Interventions for Empowering User Deliberation in Online PetitionExtended Abstracts of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3491101.3519644(1-8)Online publication date: 27-Apr-2022
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3491101.3519644
Vasconcelos LTrevisan DViterbo J(2022)Engagement by Design: A Card-based approach to design crowdsourcing initiatives2022 IEEE 25th International Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work in Design (CSCWD)10.1109/CSCWD54268.2022.9776308(353-358)Online publication date: 4-May-2022
https://doi.org/10.1109/CSCWD54268.2022.9776308
Lu K(2021)Designing Democratic Systems for Civic Collective ActionCompanion Publication of the 2021 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing10.1145/3462204.3481792(270-274)Online publication date: 23-Oct-2021
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3462204.3481792
Kim HKim HJo KKim J(2021)StarryThoughtsProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/34491405:CSCW1(1-29)Online publication date: 22-Apr-2021
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3449140
Manuel JCrivellaro CBernhaupt RMueller FVerweij DAndres JMcGrenere JCockburn AAvellino IGoguey ABjørn PZhao SSamson BKocielnik R(2020)Place-Based Policymaking and HCIProceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3313831.3376158(1-16)Online publication date: 21-Apr-2020
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3313831.3376158
Chung JSong JKutty SHong SKim JLasecki W(2019)Efficient Elicitation Approaches to Estimate Collective Crowd AnswersProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/33591643:CSCW(1-25)Online publication date: 7-Nov-2019
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3359164

View Options

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Full Access

Get this Publication

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

eReader

View online with eReader.

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format.

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

View Table of Contents