skip to main content
10.1145/3235765.3235818acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesfdgConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

'Play your own way': adapting a procedural framework for accessibility

Published: 07 August 2018 Publication History

Abstract

Sure Footing is a research project cum commercial product that arose from exploring generative systems for infinite runner games that balanced procedural flexibility with authorial intent. The approach taken as part of the games level generation systems allows not only for the gradual increase in difficulty as players progress, but allow for specific configurations that allow for the unique configurations that embody a level of difficulty or challenge. This paper explores ongoing development of the generation framework to to enable this flexibility, as well as raise consideration for flexible generation in the context of accessibility for players of varying competencies.

References

[1]
Kate Compton and Michael Mateas. 2006. Procedural Level Design for Platform Games. In AIIDE. 109--111.
[2]
Michael Cook. 2015. Formalizing non-formalism: Breaking the rules of automated game design. In Proceedings of the 2015 Foundation of Digital Games (FDG).
[3]
Michael Cook, Squirrel Eiserloh, Justus Robertson, R Michael Young, Tommy Thompson, David Churchill, Martin Cerny, Sergio Poo Hernandez, and Vadim Bulitko. 2015. Playable Experiences at AIIDE 2015. In Eleventh Artificial Intelligence and Interactive Digital Entertainment Conference.
[4]
Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi and Isabella Selega Csikszentmihalyi. 1992. Optimal experience: Psychological studies of flow in consciousness. Cambridge university press.
[5]
Steve Dahlskog and Julian Togelius. 2012. Patterns and procedural content generation: revisiting Mario in world 1 level 1. In Proceedings of the First Workshop on Design Patterns in Games. ACM, 1.
[6]
N Dewsbury, A Nunn, M Syrett, J Tatum, and T Thompson. 2016. Scalable Level Generation for 2D Platforming Games. In Proceedings of the 7th FDG Workshop on Procedural Content Generation.
[7]
Matthew Guzdial and Mark Riedl. 2016. Toward game level generation from gameplay videos. In Proceedings of the 7th FDG Workshop on Procedural Content Generation.
[8]
Christoffer Holmgård, Antonios Liapis, Julian Togelius, and Georgios N Yannakakis. 2015. MiniDungeons 2: An Experimental Game for Capturing and Modeling Player Decisions. In FDG.
[9]
Robin Hunicke. 2005. The case for dynamic difficulty adjustment in games. In Proceedings of the 2005 ACM SIGCHI International Conference on Advances in computer entertainment technology. ACM, 429--433.
[10]
Sergey Karakovskiy and Julian Togelius. 2012. The Mario AI Benchmark and Competitions. IEEE Transactions on Computational Intelligence and AI in Games 4, 1 (2012), 55--67.
[11]
Changchun Liu, Pramila Agrawal, Nilanjan Sarkar, and Shuo Chen. 2009. Dynamic difficulty adjustment in computer games through real-time anxiety-based affective feedback. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction 25, 6 (2009), 506--529.
[12]
M. Martin. 2008. Ubisoft to include subtitles in all in-house titles. https://www.gamesindustry.biz/articles/ubisoft-to-include-subtitles-in-all-in-house-titles. (2008). Online; accessed 19-May-2018.
[13]
Microsoft. 2018. Xbox Accessibility. https://www.xbox.com/en-US/xbox-one/accessibility. (2018). Online; accessed 25-May-2018.
[14]
Olana Missura and Thomas Gärtner. 2009. Player Modeling for Intelligent Difficulty Adjustment. In Discovery Science, João Gama, Vítor Santos Costa, Alípio Mário Jorge, and Pavel B. Brazdil (Eds.). Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 197--211.
[15]
Noor Shaker, Julian Togelius, Georgios N Yannakakis, Ben Weber, Tomoyuki Shimizu, Tomonori Hashiyama, Nathan Sorenson, Philippe Pasquier, Peter Mawhorter, Glen Takahashi, and others. 2011. The 2010 Mario AI championship: Level generation track. IEEE Transactions on Computational Intelligence and AI in Games 3, 4 (2011), 332--347.
[16]
Gillian Smith, Jim Whitehead, Michael Mateas, Mike Treanor, Jameka March, and Mee Cha. 2011. Launchpad: A rhythm-based level generator for 2-d platformers. IEEE Transactions on computational intelligence and AI in games 3, 1 (2011), 1--16.
[17]
Adam Summerville and Michael Mateas. 2016. Super mario as a string: Platformer level generation via LSTMs. In Proceedings of the 1st Joint International Conference of DiGRA and FDG.
[18]
Tommy Thompson. 2016. "What is a Super Mario level anyway?" An Argument For Non-Formalist Level Generation in Super Mario Bros. In The Foundation of Digital Games (FDG) Conference.
[19]
Tommy Thompson and Rob Watling. 2015. Discerning Human and Procedurally Crafted Content for Video Games. In 6th International Symposium for AI & Games, The Society for the Study of Artificial Intelligence, Simulation and Behaviour (AISB).
[20]
Julian Togelius, Georgios N Yannakakis, Kenneth O Stanley, and Cameron Browne. 2011. Search-based procedural content generation: A taxonomy and survey. IEEE Transactions on Computational Intelligence and AI in Games 3, 3 (2011), 172--186.
[21]
Vanessa Volz, Jacob Schrum, Jialin Liu, Simon M. Lucas, Adam M. Smith, and Sebastian Risi. 2018. Evolving Mario Levels in the Latent Space of a Deep Convolutional Generative Adversarial Network. In Proceedings of the Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference (GECCO 2018). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 8.
[22]
G. N. Yannakakis and J. Hallam. 2009. Real-Time Game Adaptation for Optimizing Player Satisfaction. IEEE Transactions on Computational Intelligence and AI in Games 1, 2 (June 2009), 121--133.
[23]
Georgios N Yannakakis and Julian Togelius. 2011. Experience-driven procedural content generation. IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing 2, 3 (2011), 147--161.
[24]
Bei Yuan, Eelke Folmer, and Frederick C Harris. 2011. Game accessibility: a survey. Universal Access in the Information Society 10, 1 (2011), 81--100.

Cited By

View all

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Other conferences
FDG '18: Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on the Foundations of Digital Games
August 2018
503 pages
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 07 August 2018

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. game design
  2. level generation
  3. procedural content generation
  4. video games

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Conference

FDG '18
FDG '18: Foundations of Digital Games 2018
August 7 - 10, 2018
Malmö, Sweden

Acceptance Rates

FDG '18 Paper Acceptance Rate 39 of 95 submissions, 41%;
Overall Acceptance Rate 152 of 415 submissions, 37%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)12
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)2
Reflects downloads up to 18 Jan 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media