Contemporary online course design recommendations to support women's cognitive development
Article No.: 30, Pages 1 - 4
Abstract
Originally, online higher education was imagined to be a utopia for women because gender would be less salient when learners were not physically co-present and thus gender power issues would be lessened. Unfortunately, gender power is present in online classes, hindering women from experiencing the benefits of an equitable learning environment. One approach to eliminating gender power in online classes is to design courses with gender equity in mind. The existing best practices for designing online courses, however, were not developed for the specific purpose of upending gender power. In this poster, I synthesize the best practices for online course design and pose recommendations informed by feminist pedagogy. As more faculty are encouraged to teach online, an updated set of design recommendations that best supports women online learners is valuable both for practitioners and researchers.
References
[1]
Akyol, Z., & Garrison, D. (Eds.). (2013). Educational communities of inquiry: Theoretical framework, research, and practice. Hershey, PA.: Information Science Reference.
[2]
Belenky, M. F., Clinchy, B., Goldberger, N. R., & Tarule, J. M. (1986). Women's ways of knowing: The development of self, voice, and mind. New York: Basic Books.
[3]
Chick, N., & Hassel, H. (2009). Don't hate me because I'm virtual: Feminist pedagogy in the online classroom. Feminist Teacher, 19(3), 195--215.
[4]
Chickering, A. W., & Gamson, Z. F. (1987). Seven principles for good practice in undergraduate education. AAHE bulletin, 3, 7.
[5]
Eudey, B. (2012). Civic engagement, cyberfeminism, and online learning: Activism and service learning in women's and gender studies courses. Feminist Teacher, 22(3), 233--250.
[6]
Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2000). Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: Computer conferencing in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 2(2--3), 87--105.
[7]
Herman, C., & Kirkup, G. (2018). Combining feminist pedagogy and transactional distance to create gender-sensitive technology-enhanced learning. Gender and Education, 29(6), 781--795.
[8]
Herring S.C. (1993) Gender and democracy in computer- mediated communication. Electronic Journal of Communication {Online}, 3(2).
[9]
Luttrell, W. (1989). Working-class women's ways of knowing: Effects of gender, race, and class. Source: Sociology of Education Special Issue on Gender and Education, 62(1), 33--46.
[10]
MarylandOnline. (2018). About. Retrieved from https://www.qualitymatters.org/about
[11]
Perkowski, J. (2012). The role of gender in distance learning: A meta-analytic review of gender differences in academic performance and self-efficacy in distance learning. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 41(3), 267--278.
[12]
Pruitt, R. (2017). Constructivist approaches online and face-to-face: The essential role of trust. Curriculum and Teaching Dialogue, 19(2), 105--127.
[13]
Snyder, T.D., de Brey, C., and Dillow, S.A. (2016). Digest of education statistics 2015 (NCES 2016--014). National Center for Education Statistics, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education. Washington, DC.
[14]
von Prümmer, C. (2004). Gender issues and learning online. In J. E. Brindley, C. Walti, & O. Zawacki-Richter (Eds.), Learner support in open, distance, and online learning environments (179--192). Oldenburg: Biblioteks- und Informations system der Universität Oldenburg.
[15]
Wojahn, P. G. (1994). Computer-mediated communication: The great equalizer between men and women? Technical Communication, 41 (Fourth Quarter), 747--752.
Recommendations
Supporting learners' self-regulated learning in Massive Open Online Courses
AbstractIn MOOCs, learners are typically presented with great autonomy over their learning process. Therefore, learners should engage in self-regulated learning (SRL) in order to successfully study in a MOOC. Learners however often struggle to self-...
Highlights- Learners struggle to regulate their learning in massive open online courses (MOOCs).
- A self-regulated learning (SRL) intervention was implemented in three MOOCs.
- Learners' SRL was measured with trace data variables.
- ...
Design of SQ3R-Based Support Method for Course Contents Provision in Distance Learning Systems
ICDCSW '01: Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Distributed Computing SystemsAbstract: In this paper, we propose a learning support method for course provision in distance learning system, based on effective study method SQ3R. SQ3R is developed based on educational psychology. It is proved that SQ3R can improve learner's ...
Dynamic management of tutors' roles in an online learning system
In online learning environments, the tutor's role is essential. The tutor has several roles and consequently has several functions according to the context and the target community. In existing learning systems, these roles are fixed once and for all ...
Comments
Information & Contributors
Information
Published In
June 2018
391 pages
ISBN:9781450358866
DOI:10.1145/3231644
- Conference Chair:
- Rose Luckin,
- Program Chairs:
- Scott Klemmer,
- Kenneth Koedinger
Copyright © 2018 ACM.
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].
Publisher
Association for Computing Machinery
New York, NY, United States
Publication History
Published: 26 June 2018
Check for updates
Author Tags
Qualifiers
- Short-paper
Conference
L@S '18
Acceptance Rates
L@S '18 Paper Acceptance Rate 24 of 58 submissions, 41%;
Overall Acceptance Rate 117 of 440 submissions, 27%
Contributors
Other Metrics
Bibliometrics & Citations
Bibliometrics
Article Metrics
- 0Total Citations
- 137Total Downloads
- Downloads (Last 12 months)6
- Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 14 Sep 2024
Other Metrics
Citations
View Options
Get Access
Login options
Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.
Sign in