The Challenge of Quality Evaluation in Fraud Detection
Article No.: 5, Pages 1 - 4
References
[1]
Isel Moreno-Montes de Oca, Monique Snoeck, Hajo A. Reijers, and Abel Rodríguez-Morffi. 2015. A systematic literature review of studies on business process modeling quality. Information and Software Technology 58 (2015), 187--205.
[2]
Ratbek Dzhumashev. 2014. The two-way relationship between government spending and corruption and its effects on economic growth. Contemporary Economic Policy 32, 2 (2014), 403--419.
[3]
Álvaro García-Recuero, Sérgio Esteves, and Luís Veiga. 2014. Towards quality-of-service driven consistency for big data management. International Journal of Big Data Intelligence 1, 1--2 (2014), 74--88.
[4]
Stephen L. George and Marc Buyse. 2015. Data fraud in clinical trials. Clinical Investigation 5, 2 (2015), 161.
[5]
Pola Hahlweg, Sarah Didi, Levente Kriston, Martin Härter, Yvonne Nestoriuc, and Isabelle Scholl. 2017. Process quality of decision-making in multidisciplinary cancer team meetings: A structured observational study. BMC Cancer 17, 1 (2017), 772.
[6]
Joseph M. Hellerstein, Vikram Sreekanti, Joseph E. Gonzalez, James Dalton, Akon Dey, Sreyashi Nag, Krishna Ramachandran, Sudhanshu Arora, Arka Bhattacharyya, Shirshanka Das, and others. 2017. Ground: A data context service. In 8th Conference on Innovative Data Systems Research.
[7]
Matthew Hollow. 2014. Money, morals and motives: An exploratory study into why bank managers and employees commit fraud at work. Journal of Financial Crime 21, 2 (2014), 174--190.
[8]
Steven A. Israel and Erik Blasch. 2016. Context assumptions for threat assessment systems. In Context-Enhanced Information Fusion. Springer, 99--124.
[9]
Marijn Janssen, Haiko van der Voort, and Agung Wahyudi. 2017. Factors influencing big data decision-making quality. Journal of Business Research 70 (2017), 338--345.
[10]
Andreas Lanz, Barbara Weber, and Manfred Reichert. 2014. Time patterns for process-aware information systems. Requirements Engineering 19, 2 (2014), 113--141.
[11]
Didier G. Leibovici, Julian F. Rosser, Crona Hodges, Barry Evans, Michael J. Jackson, and Chris I. Higgins. 2017. On data quality assurance and conflation entanglement in crowdsourcing for environmental studies. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information 6, 3 (2017), 78.
[12]
Saurabh Nagrecha, Reid A. Johnson, and Nitesh V. Chawla. 2018. FraudBuster: Reducing fraud in an auto insurance market. Big Data 6, 1 (2018), 3--12.
[13]
Association of Certified Fraud Examiners. 2018. Report to the Nations on Occupational Fraud and Abuse. Global Fraud Study. Retrieved May 12, 2018 from https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/acfepublic/2018-report-to-the-nations.pdf.
[14]
Rik Oldenkamp, Rosalie van Zelm, and Mark A. J. Huijbregts. 2016. Valuing the human health damage caused by the fraud of volkswagen. Environmental Pollution 212 (2016), 121--127.
[15]
Duc-Son Pham, Svetha Venkatesh, Mihai Lazarescu, and Saha Budhaditya. 2014. Anomaly detection in large-scale data stream networks. Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery 28, 1 (2014), 145--189.
[16]
Darren Quick and Kim-Kwang Raymond Choo. 2018. Digital forensic intelligence: Data subsets and open source intelligence (DFINT+ OSINT): A timely and cohesive mix. Future Generation Computer Systems 78 (2018), 558--567.
[17]
Marvin Rausand. 2014. Reliability of Safety-Critical Systems: Theory and Applications. John Wiley 8 Sons.
[18]
Rafael Ramos Regis Barbosa, Ramin Sadre, and Aiko Pras. 2016. Exploiting traffic periodicity in industrial control networks. International Journal of Critical Infrastructure Protection 13 (2016), 52--62.
[19]
Ian Ross. 2015. Exposing Fraud: Skills, Process and Practicalities. John Wiley 8 Sons.
[20]
Manali Sharma, Kamalika Das, Mustafa Bilgic, Bryan Matthews, David Nielsen, and Nikunj Oza. 2016. Active learning with rationales for identifying operationally significant anomalies in aviation. In Joint European Conference on Machine Learning and Knowledge Discovery in Databases. Springer, 209--225.
[21]
Dallas Thornton, Michel Brinkhuis, Chintan Amrit, and Robin Aly. 2015. Categorizing and describing the types of fraud in healthcare. Procedia Computer Science 64 (2015), 713--720.
[22]
Ion-George Todoran, Laurent Lecornu, Ali Khenchaf, and Jean-Marc Le Caillec. 2015. A methodology to evaluate important dimensions of information quality in systems. Journal of Data and Information Quality 6, 2--3, Article 11 (2015), 23 pages.
[23]
Véronique Van Vlasselaer, Cristián Bravo, Olivier Caelen, Tina Eliassi-Rad, Leman Akoglu, Monique Snoeck, and Bart Baesens. 2015. APATE: A novel approach for automated credit card transaction fraud detection using network-based extensions. Decision Support Systems 75 (2015), 38--48.
[24]
Amrapali Zaveri, Anisa Rula, Andrea Maurino, Ricardo Pietrobon, Jens Lehmann, and Sören Auer. 2016. Quality assessment for linked data: A survey. Semantic Web 7, 1 (2016), 63--93.
Index Terms
- The Challenge of Quality Evaluation in Fraud Detection
Recommendations
Digital twin for credit card fraud detection: opportunities, challenges, and fraud detection advancements
AbstractCredit cards are widely used for payments due to their convenience and broad acceptance. Their popularity comes with the critical challenge of safeguarding personal and payment information from fraud and unauthorized access. Robust security ...
Highlights- Explore credit card fraud risk factors and current fraud detection techniques.
- Address fraud challenges with digital twin implementation.
- Explore digital twin in credit card fraud detection: advantages & role.
- Explain the flow ...
Research on Credit Card Fraud Detection Model Based on Distance Sum
JCAI '09: Proceedings of the 2009 International Joint Conference on Artificial IntelligenceAlong with increasing credit cards and growing trade volume in China, credit card fraud rises sharply. How to enhance the detection and prevention of credit card fraud becomes the focus of risk control of banks. This paper proposes a credit card fraud ...
Data mining application for cyber credit-card fraud detection system
ICDM'13: Proceedings of the 13th international conference on Advances in Data Mining: applications and theoretical aspectsSince the evolution of the internet, many small and large companies have moved their businesses to the internet to provide services to customers worldwide. Cyber credit card fraud or no card present fraud is increasingly rampant in the recent years for ...
Comments
Information & Contributors
Information
Published In
June 2018
31 pages
Copyright © 2018 ACM.
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]
Publisher
Association for Computing Machinery
New York, NY, United States
Publication History
Published: 07 September 2018
Accepted: 01 May 2018
Revised: 01 May 2018
Received: 01 August 2017
Published in JDIQ Volume 10, Issue 2
Check for updates
Author Tags
Qualifiers
- Research-article
- Research
- Refereed
Funding Sources
- Chair of Naval Cybersecurity, funded by École Navale, IMT Atlantique, Thales and Naval Group
Contributors
Other Metrics
Bibliometrics & Citations
Bibliometrics
Article Metrics
- 0Total Citations
- 295Total Downloads
- Downloads (Last 12 months)1
- Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1
Reflects downloads up to 28 Jan 2025
Other Metrics
Citations
View Options
Login options
Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.
Sign inFull Access
View options
View or Download as a PDF file.
PDFeReader
View online with eReader.
eReaderHTML Format
View this article in HTML Format.
HTML Format