skip to main content
research-article
Public Access

Invariance Principle on the Slice

Published: 13 April 2018 Publication History

Abstract

The non-linear invariance principle of Mossel, O’Donnell, and Oleszkiewicz establishes that if f(x1,…,xn) is a multilinear low-degree polynomial with low influences, then the distribution of if f(b1,…,bn) is close (in various senses) to the distribution of f(G1,…,Gn), where BiR {-1,1} are independent Bernoulli random variables and Gi ∼ N(0,1) are independent standard Gaussians. The invariance principle has seen many applications in theoretical computer science, including the Majority is Stablest conjecture, which shows that the Goemans–Williamson algorithm for MAX-CUT is optimal under the Unique Games Conjecture.
More generally, MOO’s invariance principle works for any two vectors of hypercontractive random variables (X1,…,Xn),(Y1,…,Yn) such that (i) Matching moments: Xi and Yi have matching first and second moments and (ii) Independence: the variables X1,…,Xn are independent, as are Y1,…,Yn.
The independence condition is crucial to the proof of the theorem, yet in some cases we would like to use distributions X1,…,Xn in which the individual coordinates are not independent. A common example is the uniform distribution on the slice ([n]k) which consists of all vectors (x1,…,xn)∈{0,1}n with Hamming weight k. The slice shows up in theoretical computer science (hardness amplification, direct sum testing), extremal combinatorics (Erdős–Ko–Rado theorems), and coding theory (in the guise of the Johnson association scheme).
Our main result is an invariance principle in which (X1,…,Xn) is the uniform distribution on a slice ([n]pn and (Y1,…,Yn) consists either of n independent Ber(p) random variables, or of n independent N(p,p(1-p)) random variables. As applications, we prove a version of Majority is Stablest for functions on the slice, a version of Bourgain’s tail theorem, a version of the Kindler–Safra structural theorem, and a stability version of the t-intersecting Erdős–Ko–Rado theorem, combining techniques of Wilson and Friedgut.
Our proof relies on a combination of ideas from analysis and probability, algebra, and combinatorics. In particular, we make essential use of recent work of the first author which describes an explicit Fourier basis for the slice.

References

[1]
Rudolf Ahlswede and Levon H. Khachatrian. 1997. The complete intersection theorem for systems of finite sets. Eur. J. Comb. 18, 2 (1997), 125--136
[2]
Rudolf Ahlswede and Levon H. Khachatrian. 1998. The diametric theorem in hamming spaces—Optimal anticodes. Adv. Appl. Math. 20, 4 (1998), 429--449.
[3]
Rudolf Ahlswede and Levon H. Khachatrian. 1999. A pushing-pulling method: New proofs of intersection theorems. Combinatorica 19, 1 (1999), 1--15.
[4]
Eiichi Bannai and Tatsuro Ito. 1984. Algebraic Combinatorics I: Association Schemes. Benjamin/Cummings Pub. Co.
[5]
C. Borell. 1985. Geometric bounds on the Ornstein--Uhlenbeck velocity process. Z. Wahrsch. Verw. Gebiete 70, 1 (1985), 1--13.
[6]
Roee David, Irit Dinur, Elazar Goldenberg, Guy Kindler, and Igor Shinkar. 2015. Direct sum testing. In ITCS 2015.
[7]
Anindya De, Elchanan Mossel, and Joe Neeman. 2013. Majority is stablest: Discrete and SoS. In 45th ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing. 477--486.
[8]
Irit Dinur and Shmuel Safra. 2005. On the hardness of approximating minimum vertex cover. Ann. Math. 162, 1 (2005), 439--485.
[9]
Charles F. Dunkl. 1976. A Krawtchouk polynomial addition theorem and wreath products of symmetric groups. Indiana Univ. Math. J. 25 (1976), 335--358.
[10]
Charles F. Dunkl. 1979. Orthogonal functions on some permutation groups. In Relations Between Combinatorics and Other Parts of Mathematics (Proc. Symp. Pure Math.), Vol. 34. Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI, 129--147.
[11]
David Ellis, Nathan Keller, and Noam Lifshitz. 2016. Stability for the complete intersection theorem, and the forbidden intersection problem of Erdős and Sós. arXiv:1604.06135.
[12]
David Ellis, Nathan Keller, and Noam Lifshitz. 2016. Stability versions of Erdős--Ko--Rado type theorems, via Isoperimetry. arXiv:1604.02160.
[13]
Paul Erdős, Chao Ko, and Richard Rado. 1961. Intersection theorems for systems of finite sets. Quart. J. Math. Oxford 12, 2 (1961), 313--320.
[14]
Yuval Filmus. 2013. Spectral Methods in Extremal Combinatorics. Ph.D. dissertation. University of Toronto.
[15]
Yuval Filmus. 2016. An orthogonal basis for functions over a slice of the boolean hypercube. Elec. J. Comb. 23, 1 (2016), P1.23.
[16]
Yuval Filmus and Ferdinand Ihringer. 2018. Boolean constant degree functions on the slice are juntas. CoRR abs/1801.06338 (2018). arxiv:1801.06338 http://arxiv.org/abs/1801.06338
[17]
Péter Frankl. 1987. Erdős-Ko-Rado theorem with conditions on the maximal degree. J. Comb. Theory A 46 (1987), 252--263.
[18]
Peter Frankl, Sang June Lee, Mark Siggers, and Norihide Tokushige. 2014. An Erdős--Ko--Rado theorem for cross--intersecting families. J. Combin. Th., Ser. A 128 (2014), 207--249.
[19]
Peter Frankl and Norihide Tokushige. 1992. Some best-possible inequalities concerning cross-intersecting families. J. Combin. Th., Ser. A 61 (1992), 87--97.
[20]
Ehud Friedgut. 2008. On the measure of intersecting families, uniqueness and stability. Combinatorica 28, 5 (2008), 503--528.
[21]
Marcus Isaksson and Elchanan Mossel. 2012. Maximally stable Gaussian partitions with discrete applications. Israel J. Math. 189, 1 (2012), 347--396.
[22]
Nathan Keller and Ohad Klein. 2017. Kindler--Safra theorem for the slice. In Preparation.
[23]
Subhash Khot. 2010. Inapproximability of NP-complete problems, discrete Fourier analysis, and geometry. In Proceedings of the International Congress of Mathematicians.
[24]
Guy Kindler. 2002. Property Testing, PCP and Juntas. Ph.D. dissertation. Tel-Aviv University.
[25]
Guy Kindler, Naomi Kirshner, and Ryan O’Donnell. 2014. Gaussian noise sensitivity and Fourier tails. http://www.cs.cmu.edu/∼odonnell/papers/gaussian-noise-sensitivity.pdf.
[26]
Guy Kindler and Shmuel Safra. 2004. Noise-resistant Boolean functions are juntas. Unpublished manuscript.
[27]
Tzong-Yau Lee and Horng-Tzer Yau. 1998. Logarithmic Sobolev inequality for some models of random walks. Ann. Prob. 26, 4 (1998), 1855--1873.
[28]
László Lovász. 1979. On the Shannon capacity of a graph. IEEE Trans. Inform. Theory 25 (1979), 1--7.
[29]
Elchanan Mossel and Yuval Filmus. 2016. Harmonicity and invariance on slices of the Boolean cube. In 31st Conference on Computational Complexity.
[30]
Elchanan Mossel and Yuval Filmus. 2017. Harmonicity and Invariance on Slices of the Boolean Cube. Submitted.
[31]
Elchanan Mossel, Ryan O’Donnell, and Krzysztof Oleszkiewicz. 2010. Noise stability of functions with low influences: Invariance and optimality. Ann. Math. 171 (2010), 295--341.
[32]
Noam Nisan and Mario Szegedy. 1994. On the degree of Boolean functions as real polynomials. Comput. Complexity 4, 4 (1994), 301--313.
[33]
Ryan O’Donnell. 2014. Analysis of Boolean Functions. Cambridge University Press.
[34]
Li Qiu and Xingzhi Zhan. 2007. On the span of Hadamard products of vectors. Linear Algebra Appl. 422 (2007), 304--307.
[35]
Murali K. Srinivasan. 2011. Symmetric chains, Gelfand--Tsetlin chains, and the Terwilliger algebra of the binary Hamming scheme. J. Algebr. Comb. 34, 2 (2011), 301--322.
[36]
Hajime Tanaka. 2009. A note on the span of Hadamard products of vectors. Linear Algebra Appl. 430 (2009), 865--867.
[37]
Richard M. Wilson. 1984. The exact bound in the Erdős-Ko-Rado theorem. Combinatorica 4 (1984), 247--257.
[38]
Karl Wimmer. 2014. Low influence functions over slices of the Boolean hypercube depend on few coordinates. In CCC.

Cited By

View all

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Transactions on Computation Theory
ACM Transactions on Computation Theory  Volume 10, Issue 3
September 2018
98 pages
ISSN:1942-3454
EISSN:1942-3462
DOI:10.1145/3208319
Issue’s Table of Contents
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 13 April 2018
Accepted: 01 January 2018
Revised: 01 January 2018
Received: 01 April 2017
Published in TOCT Volume 10, Issue 3

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. Analysis of Boolean functions
  2. Johnson scheme
  3. invariance principle
  4. slice

Qualifiers

  • Research-article
  • Research
  • Refereed

Funding Sources

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)64
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)14
Reflects downloads up to 25 Dec 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all

View Options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Login options

Full Access

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media