skip to main content
10.1145/3177457.3177465acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesiccmsConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Prediction of Business Process Outcome based on Historical Log

Published: 08 January 2018 Publication History

Abstract

With the development of data mining and machine learning, we can get much useful information from historical data. For a business process system, it maintains large amount of process execution data, especially records of events corresponding to the execution of activities, which can also be called event log. Predictive business process monitoring methods exploit logs of completed cases of a process in order to make predictions and recommendation about current running cases. This paper proposes an improved approach for process outcome prediction and next activity recommendation. It estimates the accuracy that a given goal will be fulfilled upon completion of a current running process case through three different methods. Each method includes both clustering phase and classification phase. However, different levels of historical data (business level and control flow level) in event log are used, and the size of data and number of features also differs. We show our improved approach to deal with historical log, encode each feature vector, train predictive model and how to use trained models for predicting the outcome of current case and recommending the next event. Finally, through a series of experiment, we compare three different method and existing approach.

References

[1]
Fabrizio Maria Maggi, Chiara Di Francescomarino, Marlon Dumas, And Chiara Ghidini, "Predictive monitoring of business processes," In: CAiSE Advanced Information Systems Engineering. pp. 457--472. Springer (2014).
[2]
Francescomarino, C.D, Dumas, M., And Maggi, F.M., Teinemaa, "Clustering-based predictive process monitoring," CoRR abs/1506.01428 (2015), http://arxiv.org/abs/1506.01428, to appear in Transactions on Services Computing.
[3]
Pnueli, A.: The temporal logic of programs. In: SFCS. pp. 46--57 (1977).
[4]
Raffaele Conforti, Massimiliano de Leoni, Marcello La Rosa," A recommendation system for predicting risks across multiple business process instances," Decision Support System. pp. 1--19. Volume 69, January 2015.
[5]
Leontjeva, A., Conforti, R., Di Francescomarino, C., Dumas, M., And Maggi, F.M, "Complex symbolic sequence encodings for predictive monitoring of business processes," In: BPM Business Process Management, pp. 297--313. Springer (2015).
[6]
Marco Federici, Williams Rizzi, and Chiara Di Francescomarino, "A ProM Operational Support Provider for Predictive Monitoring of Business Processes".
[7]
Raffaele Conforti, Marcello La Rosaa, And Giancarlo Fortino," Real-time risk monitoring in business processes: A sensor-based approach" Journal of Systems and Software, pp. 2939--2965. Volume 86, Issue 11, November 2013.
[8]
Aekyung Kim, Josue Obregon, and Jae-Yoon Jung, "Constructing Decision Trees from Process Logs for Performer Recommendation," In BPM 2013: Business Process Management Workshops. pp. 224--236. Springer (2014).
[9]
Niek Tax, Ilya Verenich, Marcello La Rosa, And Marlon Dumas, "Predictive Business Process Monitoring with LSTM Neural Networks," In CAiSE 2017: Advanced Information Systems Engineering. pp. 477--492. Springer (2017).
[10]
Francescomarino, C.D., Dumas, M., Federici, M., Ghidini, C., Maggi, F.M., and Rizzi, W, "Predictive business process monitoring framework with hyperparameter optimization," In: CAiSE Advanced Information Systems Engineering. pp. 361--376. Springer (2016).
[11]
Ilya Verenich, Marlon Dumas, Marcello La Rosa, Fabrizio Maria Magg, And Chiara Di Francescomarino," Minimizing Overprocessing Waste in Business Processes via Predictive Activity Ordering," In CAiSE 2016: Advanced Information Systems Engineering. pp. 186--202. Springer (2016).

Cited By

View all

Index Terms

  1. Prediction of Business Process Outcome based on Historical Log

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    ICCMS '18: Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Computer Modeling and Simulation
    January 2018
    310 pages
    ISBN:9781450363396
    DOI:10.1145/3177457
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    In-Cooperation

    • University of Canberra: University of Canberra
    • University of Technology Sydney

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 08 January 2018

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. Classification
    2. Clustering
    3. Process goal
    4. Process prediction

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

    Conference

    ICCMS 2018

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)13
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)2
    Reflects downloads up to 26 Jan 2025

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all

    View Options

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Figures

    Tables

    Media

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media