skip to main content
10.1145/3173574.3173634acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Let's Hate Together: How People Share News in Messaging, Social, and Public Networks

Published: 19 April 2018 Publication History

Abstract

There are currently a wide variety of ways to share news with others: from sharing in a personal message, to sharing on a social network, to publicly posting. Through a survey with over one thousand people and an artifact analysis of 262 shared articles, we examine differences in motivations and frequency of sharing news on public, social and private platforms. We find that public sharing is more focused on spreading an ideology, while private sharing in messaging is dominated by stories inspired by the recipient's interests or context. The survey revealed three main groups of news sharing practices: those who shared to all channels (public, social, private), those who didn't share at all, and those who shared to private and social. The groups differed in their attitudes toward online discussion; those that shared the most were neutral and those that didn't share had negative attitudes about discussion online. We discuss sharing practices and implications for social systems that support sharing news.

References

[1]
Kanghui Baek, Avery Holton, Dustin Harp, and Carolyn Yaschur. 2011. The links that bind: Uncovering novel motivations for linking on Facebook. Computers in Human Behavior 27, 6: 2243--2248.
[2]
Eytan Bakshy, Solomon Messing, and Lada A. Adamic. 2015. Exposure to ideologically diverse news and opinion on Facebook." Science 348.6239: 11301132.
[3]
Frank R. Bentley, S. Tejaswi Peesapati, and Karen Church. 2016. "I thought she would like to read it": Exploring Sharing Behaviors in the Context of Declining Mobile Web Use. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '16). 1893--1903.
[4]
Frank R. Bentley and S. Tejaswi Peesapati. 2017. SearchMessenger: Exploring the Use of Search and Card Sharing in a Messaging Application. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing (CSCW '17). 1946--1956.
[5]
Frank R. Bentley, Brooke White, Nediyana Daskalova. 2017. Comparing the Reliability of Amazon Mechanical Turk and Survey Monkey to Traditional Market Research Surveys. In Extended Abstracts of the Proceedings of ACM CHI 2017 (Case Study).
[6]
Jonah Berger and Katherine L. Milkman. 2012. What makes online content viral? Journal of marketing research, 49(2), 192--205.
[7]
Pablo J. Boczkowski and Eugenia Mitchelstein. 2012. How users take advantage of different forms of interactivity on online news sites: Clicking, E-Mailing, and commenting. Human Communication Research 38, 1: 1--22.
[8]
Richard W. Budd, Malcolm S. MacLean Jr, and Arthur M. Barnes. 1966. Regularities in the diffusion of two major news events. Journalism Quarterly 43, 2: 221230.
[9]
Moira Burke and Robert E. Kraut. 2014. Growing closer on facebook: changes in tie strength through social network site use. In Proceedings of the 32nd annual ACM conference on Human factors in computing systems, (CHI'14), 4187--4196.
[10]
Juan Pablo Carrascal and Karen Church. 2015. An InSitu Study of Mobile App & Mobile Search Interactions. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '15). 2739--2748.
[11]
Fabio Celli, Arindam Ghosh, Firoj Alam, and Giuseppe Riccardi. 2016. In the mood for sharing contents: Emotions, personality and interaction styles in the diffusion of news. Information Processing & Management 52, 1: 93--98.
[12]
Ying-Yu Chen, Frank R. Bentley, Christian Holz, and Cheng Xu. 2015. Sharing (and Discussing) the Moment: The Conversations that Occur Around Shared Mobile Media. In Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services (MobileHCI '15). 264--273.
[13]
Justin Cheng, Michael Bernstein, Cristian DanescuNiculescu-Mizil, and Jure Leskovec. 2017. Anyone Can Become a Troll: Causes of Trolling Behavior in Online Discussions. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing (CSCW '17). 1217--1230.
[14]
Karen Church, and Rodrigo de Oliveira. 2013. What's up with whatsapp?: comparing mobile instant messaging behaviors with traditional SMS. In Proceedings of the 15th international conference on Human-computer interaction with mobile devices and services (MobileHCI '13). 352--361.
[15]
Fabio Celli, Arindam Ghosh, Firoj Alam, and Giuseppe Riccardi. 2016. In the mood for sharing contents: Emotions, personality and interaction styles in the diffusion of news. Information Processing & Management, 52(1), 93--98.
[16]
Nicholas Conefssore and Daisuke Wakabayashi. 2016. How Russia Harvested American Rage to Reshape U.S. Politics, New York Times, Retrieved September 2017:https://www.nytimes.com/2017/10/09/technology /russia-election-facebook-ads-rage.html
[17]
Melvin L. De Fleur. 1987. The Growth and Decline of Research on the Diffusion of the News, 1945--1985. Communication Research 14, 1: 109--130.
[18]
Bryan T. Gervais. 2015. Incivility online: Affective and behavioral reactions to uncivil political posts in a web-based experiment. Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 12(2), 167--185.
[19]
Jeffrey Gottfried and Elisa Shearer. 2016. News Use Across Social Media Platforms. Retrieved September 2017:http://www.journalism.org/2016/05/26/news-useacross-social-media-platforms-2016/
[20]
Shannon Greenwood, Andrew Perrin and Maeve Duggan. 2016. Social Media Update. Retrieved September 2017: http://www.pewinternet.org/2016/11/11/social-mediaupdate-2016/
[21]
Melanie Grellhesl and Narissra M. Punyanunt-Carter. 2012. Using the uses and gratifications theory to understand gratifications sought through text messaging practices of male and female undergraduate students. Computers in Human Behavior 28, 6: 21752181.
[22]
Ariel Hasell and Brian E. Weeks. 2016. Partisan Provocation: The Role of Partisan News Use and Emotional Responses in Political Information Sharing in Social Media. Hum Commun Res, 42: 641--661.
[23]
Alfred Hermida. 2010. Twittering the news: The emergence of ambient journalism. Journalism practice 4, 3: 297--308.
[24]
Richard J. Hill and Charles M. Bonjean. 1964. News diffusion: A test of the regularity hypothesis. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly 41, 3: 336--342.
[25]
Sanne Hille and Piet Bakker. 2014. Engaging the Social News User: Comments on News Sites and Facebook. Journalism Practice, 8,5: 563--572.
[26]
Jacob Hornik, Rinat Shaanan Satchi, Ludovica Cesareo, and Alberto Pastore. 2015. Information dissemination via electronic word-of-mouth: Good news travels fast, bad news travels faster! Computers in Human Behavior, 45, 273--280.
[27]
Simon Khalaf and Lali Kesiraju. 2017. U.S. Consumers Time-Spent on Mobile Crosses 5 Hours a Day. Flurry Analytics Blog. Retrieved April 27 2017: http://flurrymobile.tumblr.com/post/157921590345/usconsumers-time-spent-on-mobile-crosses-5
[28]
Jocelyn Kiley. 2017. In polarized era, fewer Americans hold a mix of conservative and liberal views, Retrieved October 2017: http://www.pewresearch.org/facttank/2017/10/23/in-polarized-era-fewer-americanshold-a-mix-of-conservative-and-liberal-views/
[29]
Silvia Knobloch-Westerwick, Francesca Dilltnan Carpentier, Andree Blumhoff, and Nico Nickel. 2005. Selective exposure effects for positive and negative news: Testing the robustness of the informational utility model. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 82, 1: 181--195.
[30]
David Knoke 1979. Stratification and the dimensions of American political orientations. AmerJofPolSci, 772--791.
[31]
Anna Sophie Kümpel, Veronika Karnowski, and Till Keyling. 2015. News sharing in social media: A review of current research on news sharing users, content, and networks. Social Media+ Society, 1, 2, 2056305115610141.
[32]
Anders Olof Larsson. 2017. Diversifying Likes: Relating reactions to commenting and sharing on newspaper Facebook pages. Journalism Practice, 1--18.
[33]
Chei Sian Lee, Long Ma, and Dion Hoe-Lian Goh. 2011. Why do people share news in social media?. In International Conference on Active Media Technology, 129--140.
[34]
Scott R. Maier. 2015. Compassion Fatigue and the Elusive Quest for Journalistic Impact A Content and Reader-Metrics Analysis Assessing Audience Response. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 92, 3: 700--722.
[35]
Irene Costera Meijer and Tim Groot Kormelink. 2015. Checking, sharing, clicking and linking: changing patterns of news use between 2004 and 2014. Digital Journalism, 3,5: 664--679.
[36]
Jessica Gall Myrick and Bartosz W. Wojdynski. 2016. Moody news: The impact of collective emotion ratings on online news consumers' attitudes, memory, and behavioral intentions. New Media & Society, 18, 11: 2576--2594.
[37]
Anne Oeldorf-Hirsch and S. Shyam Sundar. 2015. Posting, commenting, and tagging: Effects of sharing news stories on Facebook. Computers in Human Behavior 44: 240--249.
[38]
Kenton P. O'Hara, Michael Massimi, Richard Harper, Simon Rubens, and Jessica Morris. 2014. Everyday dwelling with WhatsApp. In Proceedings of the 17th ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work & social computing (CSCW '14). 1131--1143.
[39]
Leysia Palen. 2008. Online social media in crisis events. Educause Quarterly, 31, 3: 76--78.
[40]
Pew Internet. 2017. Mobile Fact Sheet. Retrieved September 2017: http://www.pewinternet.org/factsheet/mobile/ Accessed 4/27/17.
[41]
Shir Mohammad Rawan. 2001. Interaction between traditional communication and modern media: Implications for social change in Iran and Pakistan. In K. Hafez (Ed.), Mass media, politics, and society in the Middle East. 175--196. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
[42]
Frances Shaw, Jean Burgess, Kate Crawford, and Axel Bruns. 2013. Sharing news, making sense, saying thanks. Australian Journal of Communication, 40, 1:23.
[43]
Stefan Stieglitz and Linh Dang-Xuan. 2013. Emotions and information diffusion in social media-sentiment of microblogs and sharing behavior. Journal of Management Information Systems, 29, 4: 217--248.
[44]
Natalie Jomini Stroud. 2008. Media Use and Political Predispositions: Revisiting the Concept of Selective Exposure. Polit Behav, 30: 341.
[45]
Jessica Vitak. 2012. The impact of context collapse and privacy on social network site disclosures. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media 56, 4: 451--470.
[46]
Jessica Vitak, Paul Zube, Andrew Smock, Caleb T. Carr, Nicole Ellison, and Cliff Lampe. 2011. It's complicated: Facebook users' political participation in the 2008 election. CyberPsychology, behavior, and social networking 14, 3: 107--114.
[47]
Yang Wang, Gregory Norcie, Saranga Komanduri, Alessandro Acquisti, Pedro Giovanni Leon, and Lorrie Faith Cranor. 2011. I regretted the minute I pressed share: A qualitative study of regrets on Facebook. In Proceedings of the Seventh Symposium on Usable Privacy and Security (SOUPS '11), 10.

Cited By

View all

Index Terms

  1. Let's Hate Together: How People Share News in Messaging, Social, and Public Networks

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Information & Contributors

      Information

      Published In

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CHI '18: Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      April 2018
      8489 pages
      ISBN:9781450356206
      DOI:10.1145/3173574
      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Sponsors

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      Published: 19 April 2018

      Permissions

      Request permissions for this article.

      Check for updates

      Author Tags

      1. diffusion
      2. messaging
      3. news
      4. sharing
      5. social media

      Qualifiers

      • Research-article

      Conference

      CHI '18
      Sponsor:

      Acceptance Rates

      CHI '18 Paper Acceptance Rate 666 of 2,590 submissions, 26%;
      Overall Acceptance Rate 6,199 of 26,314 submissions, 24%

      Contributors

      Other Metrics

      Bibliometrics & Citations

      Bibliometrics

      Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)83
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)3
      Reflects downloads up to 14 Sep 2024

      Other Metrics

      Citations

      Cited By

      View all

      View Options

      Get Access

      Login options

      View options

      PDF

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader

      Media

      Figures

      Other

      Tables

      Share

      Share

      Share this Publication link

      Share on social media