skip to main content
10.1145/3132525.3132532acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesassetsConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Opinions and Preferences of Blind and Low Vision Consumers Regarding Self-Driving Vehicles: Results of Focus Group Discussions

Published: 19 October 2017 Publication History

Abstract

Fully autonomous vehicles, commonly referred to as self-driving vehicles, are an emerging technology that may hold tremendous mobility potential for individuals who are blind or visually impaired who have been previously disadvantaged by an inability to operate conventional motor vehicles. This study explores the opinions of 38 participants who are blind and low vision, through the use of focus group methodology, regarding this emerging self-driving vehicle technology. Participants were overwhelmingly optimistic about the potential for independence and mobility that self-driving vehicles may provide but were concerned that the needs of individuals with visual impairments were not being adequately considered in the development of the technology. Participants also raised questions about how the technology would satisfy their need for situational awareness, how the technology would enable blind or visually impaired operators to verify their arrival at their desired location and a host of issues related to parking, vehicle location and roadside assistance. Participants also expressed a preference for smartphone and speech input capabilities as a primary means of system interaction. These findings suggest that at a minimum more needs to be done to engage individuals with visual impairments in the development of self-driving vehicle technology and to increase awareness of manufacturer efforts.

References

[1]
Alexa: https://developer.amazon.com/alexa. Accessed: 2017-04-17.
[2]
Bansal, P. et al. 2016. Assessing public opinions of and interest in new vehicle technologies: An Austin perspective. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies. 67, (Jun. 2016), 1-14.
[3]
Cusumano, M.A. 2014. How traditional firms must compete in the sharing economy. Communications of the ACM. 58, 1 (Dec. 2014), 32-34.
[4]
Daziano, R.A. et al. 2017. Are consumers willing to pay to let cars drive for them? Analyzing response to autonomous vehicles. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies. 78, (May 2017), 150-164.
[5]
Greenblatt, J.B. and Saxena, S. 2015. Autonomous taxis could greatly reduce greenhouse-gas emissions of US light-duty vehicles. Nature Climate Change. 5, 9 (Jul. 2015), 860-863.
[6]
Howard, D. and Dai, D. 2014. Public perceptions of self-driving cars: The case of Berkeley, California. Transportation Research Board 93rd Annual Meeting (2014).
[7]
iOS - Siri: http://www.apple.com/ios/siri/. Accessed: 2017-04-17.
[8]
KPMG 2013. Self-Driving Cars: Are We Ready?
[9]
Krueger, R.A. and Casey, M.C. 2009. Focus Groups A Practical Guide for Applied Research. Sage Publications.
[10]
Kyriakidis, M. et al. 2015. Public opinion on automated driving: Results of an international questionnaire among 5000 respondents. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour. 32, (Jul. 2015), 127-140.
[11]
Learn About OnStart: https://www.onstar.com/us/en/home.html. Accessed: 2017-04-17.
[12]
Low Vision and Legal Blindness Terms and Descriptions - VisionAware: http://www.visionaware.org/info/your-eye-condition/eye-health/low-vision/low-vision-terms-and-descriptions/1235. Accessed: 2017-04-17.
[13]
Marinik, A. et al. 2014. Human factors evaluation of level 2 and level 3 automated driving concepts: Concepts of operation. (2014).
[14]
MAXQDA: Qualitative Data Analysis Software | Windows & Mac: http://www.maxqda.com/. Accessed: 2017-03-19.
[15]
Microsoft Cortana Dev Center: https://developer.microsoft.com/en-us/cortana. Accessed: 2017-04-15.
[16]
Missel, J. 2014. Ipsos MORI Loyalty Automotive Survey.
[17]
Model S Autopilot Press Kit | Tesla Motors: https://www.teslamotors.com/presskit/autopilot. Accessed: 2016-07-07.
[18]
National Federation of the Blind Resolutions for 2016 | National Federation of the Blind: https://nfb.org/2016-resolutions. Accessed: 2017-01-16.
[19]
Payre, W. et al. 2014. Intention to use a fully automated car: Attitudes and a priori acceptability. Transportation research part F: traffic psychology and behaviour. 27, (2014), 252-263.
[20]
Schoettle, B. and Sivak, M. 2014. A survey of public opinion about autonomous and self-driving vehicles in the US, the UK, and Australia. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Transportation Research Institute: Transportation Research Institute. (2014).
[21]
Schoettle, B. and Sivak, M. 2016. Motorists' Preferences for Different Levels of Vehicle Automation: 2016. University of Michigan Sustainable Worldwide Transportation. (2016).
[22]
Self-Driving Vehicle Focus Group Questions: www.jbrinkley.com/projects/self-driving-vehicle-focus-groups/focus_group_script.pdf. Accessed: 2017-06-15.
[23]
Snyder, R. 2016. Implications of Autonomous Vehicles: A Planner's Perspective. Institute of Transportation Engineers. ITE Journal. 86, 12 (2016), 25.
[24]
Sommer, K. 2013. Continental Mobility Study 2013.
[25]
Vision Accessibility - Mac: https://www.apple.com/accessibility/mac/vision/. Accessed: 2017-04-17.

Cited By

View all

Index Terms

  1. Opinions and Preferences of Blind and Low Vision Consumers Regarding Self-Driving Vehicles: Results of Focus Group Discussions

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Conferences
    ASSETS '17: Proceedings of the 19th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility
    October 2017
    450 pages
    ISBN:9781450349260
    DOI:10.1145/3132525
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Sponsors

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 19 October 2017

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. accessibility
    2. advanced driver assistance systems
    3. blindness
    4. low vision
    5. self-driving vehicles

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article

    Conference

    ASSETS '17
    Sponsor:

    Acceptance Rates

    ASSETS '17 Paper Acceptance Rate 28 of 126 submissions, 22%;
    Overall Acceptance Rate 436 of 1,556 submissions, 28%

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)92
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)3
    Reflects downloads up to 21 Sep 2024

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all

    View Options

    Get Access

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media