skip to main content
10.1145/3038535.3038542acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesiuiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Conceptual Motivation Modeling for Students with Dyslexia for Enhanced Assistive Learning

Published: 13 March 2017 Publication History

Abstract

Students with dyslexia often suffer from the lack of academic self-worth and frustration that can even lead to learned helplessness. However, few studies have investigated the impact of incorporating users' motivational factors into user modeling to enhance the learning experience for students with dyslexia. In this paper we attempt to develop a conceptual motivation model for people with dyslexia in their use of assistive learning tools. To this end, we carry out a small-scale empirical study in real-world learning scenarios. Then we conduct individual interviews to gain first-hand data about the key factors and features affecting learning experience. Using coding and thematic analysis methods we discuss main themes regarding motivational factors and their interrelationships identified. Based on these findings, we create a conceptual motivation model tailored towards students with dyslexia, which will help enhance learning experience and improve learning efficiency.

References

[1]
Ajzen, I. and Madden, T.J. 1986. Prediction of goal-directed behavior: attitudes, intentions, and perceived behavioral control. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 22, 5: 453--474.
[2]
Althaus, S.L. and Tewksbury, D. 2000. Patterns of Internet and traditional news media use in a networked community. Political Communication 17, 1: 21--45.
[3]
Arnone, M.P., Small, R. V., Chauncey, S. a., and McKenna, H.P. 201 Curiosity, interest and engagement in technology-pervasive learning environments: a new research agenda. Educational Technology Research and Development 59, 2: 181--198.
[4]
Bandura, A. 1977. Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review 84(2), 191--215.
[5]
Blank, W.E. and Harwell, S.H. 1997. Promising Practices for Connecting High School to the Real World. University of South Florida.
[6]
Chan, S.H. 2009. The roles of user motivation to perform a task and decision support system (DSS) effectiveness and efficiency in DSS use. Computers in Human Behavior 25, 1: 217--228.
[7]
Chang, C.C., Liang, C., Yan, C.F., and Tseng, J.S. 2013. The impact of college students' intrinsic and extrinsic motivation on continuance intention to use english mobile learning systems. Asia-Pacific Education Researcher 22, 2: 181--192.
[8]
Davis, F.D. 1989. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly 13, 3: 319--340.
[9]
Deci, E.L. and Ryan, R.M. 2000. The "what" and "why" of goal pursuits: human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry 11, 4: 227--268.
[10]
Derbali, L. and Frasson, C. 2012. Assessment of learners' motivation during interactions with serious games: a study of some motivational strategies in food-force. Advances in Human-Computer Interaction 2012.
[11]
Dev, P.C. 1997. Intrinsic motivation and academic achievement: what does their relationship imply for the classroom teacher? Remedial and Special Education 18, 1: 12--19.
[12]
Endler, A., Rey, G.D., and Butz, M. V. 2012. Towards motivation-based adaptation of difficulty in e-learning programs. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology 28, 7: 1119--1135.
[13]
Firth, N., Frydenberg, E., Steeg, C., and Bond, L. 2013. Coping successfully with dyslexia: an initial study of an inclusive school-based resilience programme. Dyslexia 19, 2: 113--130.
[14]
Fishbein, M. and Ajzen, I. 1975. Belief, attitude, intention and behavior: an introduction to theory and research. Reading, Mass.?; London (etc.): Addison-Wesley 1975.
[15]
Goodhue, B.D.L. and Thompson, R.L. 1995. Task-technology fit and individual performance. 19, 2: 213--236.
[16]
Hair, J.F., Black, W.C., Babin, B.J., and Anderson, R.E. 2010. Multivariate data analysis. Analysis, 816.
[17]
Hassouneh, D. and Brengman, M.A. 2014. motivation-based typology of social virtual world users. Computers in Human Behavior 33, 1: 330--338.
[18]
Van Der Heijden, H., Verhagen, T., and Creemers, M. 2003. Understanding online purchase intentions: contributions from technology and trust perspectives. European Journal of Information Systems 12, 41--48.
[19]
Huitt, W.G. and Cain, S.C. 2005. An overview of the conative domain. In Educational Psychology Interactive. Valdosta, GA: Valdosta State University.
[20]
Klein, M., Mogles, N., and van Wissen, A. 2014. Intelligent mobile support for therapy adherence and behavior change. Journal of Biomedical Informatics 51, 137--151.
[21]
Larsen, T.J., Sørebø, A.M., and Sørebø, Ø. 2009. The role of task-technology fit as users' motivation to continue information system use. Computers in Human Behavior 25, 3: 778--784.
[22]
Lee, Y., Lee, J., and Hwang, Y. 2015. Relating motivation to information and communication technology acceptance: Self-determination theory perspective. Computers in Human Behavior 51, 418--428.
[23]
Leng, G.S., Lada, S., Muhammad, M.Z., Ibrahim, A.A.H.A., and Amboala, T. 2011. An exploration of social networking sites (SNS) adoption in Malaysia using technology acceptance model (TAM), theory of planned behavior (TPB) and intrinsic motivation. Journal of Internet Banking and Commerce 16, 2.
[24]
Mills, L. a, Knezek, G. a, and Wakefield, J.S. 2013. Understanding information seeking behavior in technology pervasive learning environments of the 21st century. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology 12, 4: 200--208.
[25]
Ng, C. 2007. Motivation among older adults in learning computing technologies: A grounded model. Educational Gerontology 34, 1:1--14.
[26]
Oliver, R.L. 1980. A cognitive model of the antecedents and consequences of satisfaction decisions. Journal of Marketing Research 17, 4: 460--470.
[27]
Shane, W. and Prytherch, D. 2008. How is it for you? (a case for recognising user motivation in the design process). In P. Christian and B. Russell, eds., Affect and Emotion in Human-Computer Interaction: From Theory to Applications. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 130--141.
[28]
Shroff, R.H. and Vogel, D.R. 2009. Assessing the factors deemed to support individual student intrinsic motivation in technology supported online and face-to-face discussions. Journal of Information Technology Education 8, 59--85.
[29]
Singer, E. 2005. The strategies adopted by Dutch children with dyslexia to maintain their self-esteem when teased at school. Journal of learning disabilities 38, 5: 411--423.
[30]
Strauss, A.L. and Corbin, J.M. 1998. Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedure and techniques. SAGE Publications.
[31]
Sun, S. 2008. An examination of disposition, motivation, and involvement in the new technology context computers in human behavior. Computers in Human Behavior 24, 6: 2723--2740.
[32]
Venkatesh, V. 2000. Determinants of perceived ease of use: integrating control, intrinsic motivation, and emotion into the technology acceptance model. Information Systems Research 11, 342--365.
[33]
Verhagen, T., Feldberg, F., Van Den Hooff, B., Meents, S., and Merikivi, J. 2012. Understanding users' motivations to engage in virtual worlds: A multipurpose model and empirical testing. Computers in Human Behavior 28, 2: 484--495.
[34]
Vroom, V.H. 1964. Work and Motivation. Wiley, 1964.
[35]
Wilson, P.M., Mack, D.E., and Grattan, K.P. 2008. Understanding motivation for exercise: A self-determination theory perspective. Canadian Psychology/Psychologie canadienne 49, 3: 250--256.

Cited By

View all

Index Terms

  1. Conceptual Motivation Modeling for Students with Dyslexia for Enhanced Assistive Learning

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Conferences
    SmartLearn '17: Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Workshop on Intelligent Interfaces for Ubiquitous and Smart Learning
    March 2017
    50 pages
    ISBN:9781450349048
    DOI:10.1145/3038535
    • Conference Chairs:
    • Ilknur Celik,
    • Ilaria Torre
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Sponsors

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 13 March 2017

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. assistive learning software
    2. conceptual model
    3. dyslexia
    4. motivation

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article

    Conference

    IUI'17
    Sponsor:

    Upcoming Conference

    IUI '25

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)53
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)11
    Reflects downloads up to 06 Jan 2025

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all

    View Options

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media