skip to main content
10.1145/3004323.3004335acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesautomotiveuiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Work in Progress

Encouraging the Use of ADAS through Personalized Persuasion

Published: 24 October 2016 Publication History

Abstract

Broad adoption of intelligent systems is a condition for achieving the aims of these systems such as increasing safety and efficiency. This requires taking into consideration that each driver has his or her own needs, interests and motivations while driving. Persuasive strategies that are intended to increase the adoption of intelligent systems may influence one type of driver, but may not work at all for another type of driver. This paper presents an exploration of the design potential for applications that aims to increase the acceptance of Advanced Driver Assistance Systems (ADAS) for both careful and risky drivers.

References

[1]
Ray Fuller. 2005. Towards a general theory of driver behaviour. Accident Analysis and Prevention 37, 3: 461--472. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2004.11.003
[2]
Julie Hatfield and Ralston Fernandes. 2009. The role of risk-propensity in the risky driving of younger drivers. Accident; analysis and prevention 41, 1: 25--35. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2008.08.023
[3]
Hanneke Hooft van Huysduynen, Jacques Terken, Jean Bernard Martens, and Berry Eggen. 2015. Measuring driving styles: a validation of the multidimensional driving style inventory. Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications - AutomotiveUI '15, ACM Press, 257--264. http://doi.org/10.1145/2799250.2799266
[4]
A. Hamish Jamson, Daryl L. Hibberd, and Natasha Merat. 2015. Interface design considerations for an in-vehicle eco-driving assistance system. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies 58: 642--656. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2014.12.008
[5]
David B. Kaber, Yulan Liang, Yu Zhang, Meghan L. Rogers, and Shruti Gangakhedkar. 2012. Driver performance effects of simultaneous visual and cognitive distraction and adaptation behavior. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour 15, 5: 491--501. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2012.05.004
[6]
Maurits Kaptein and Dean Eckles. 2010. Selecting Effective Means to Any End: Futures and Ethics of Persuasion Profiling. In Persuasive Technology, Thomas Ploug, Per Hasle and Harri Oinas-Kukkonen (eds.). Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 82--93. http://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-13226-1
[7]
Risto Kulmala. 2010. Ex-ante assessment of the safety effects of intelligent transport systems. Accident; analysis and prevention 42, 4: 1359--69. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2010.03.001
[8]
Timo Lajunen and Heikki Summala. 1995. Driving experience, personality, and skill and safety-motive dimensions in drivers' self-assessments. Personality and Individual Differences 19, 3: 307--318. http://doi.org/10.1016/0191-8869(95)00068
[9]
Ben Lewis-Evans and Talib Rothengatter. 2009. Task difficulty, risk, effort and comfort in a simulated driving task - Implications for Risk Allostasis Theory. Accident Analysis & Prevention 41, 5: 1053--1063. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2009.06.011
[10]
Alexander Meschtscherjakov, Christine Döttlinger, Christina Rödel, and Manfred Tscheligi. 2015. ChaseLight: ambient LED stripes to control driving speed. Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications - AutomotiveUI '15, ACM Press, 212--219. http://doi.org/10.1145/2799250.2799279
[11]
Alfonso Montella, Massimo Aria, Antonio D'Ambrosio, Francesco Galante, Filomena Mauriello, and Mariano Pernetti. 2011. Simulator evaluation of drivers' speed, deceleration and lateral position at rural intersections in relation to different perceptual cues. Accident; analysis and prevention 43, 6: 2072--84. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2011.05.030
[12]
Yi Lu Murphey, Robert Milton, and Leonidas Kiliaris. 2009. Driver's style classification using jerk analysis. 2009 IEEE Workshop on Computational Intelligence in Vehicles and Vehicular Systems, CIVVS 2009 - Proceedings: 23--28. http://doi.org/10.1109/CIVVS.2009.4938719
[13]
Richard M. Ryan and Edward L. Deci. 200AD. Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology 25, 1: 54--67.
[14]
Wouter J Schakel, Bart Van Arem, and Bart D Netten. 2010. Effects of Cooperative Adaptive Cruise Control on Traffic Flow Stability. Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC), 2010 13th International IEEE Conference on, Idm: 759--764. http://doi.org/10.1109/ITSC.2010.5625133
[15]
Ronald Schroeter, Jim Oxtoby, and Daniel Johnson. 2014. AR and Gamification Concepts to Reduce Driver Boredom and Risk Taking Behaviours. Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications - AutomotiveUI '14, ACM Press, 1--8. http://doi.org/10.1145/2667317.2667415
[16]
Johannes Tulusan, Lito Soi, Johannes Paefgen, Marc Brogle, and Thorsten Staake. 2011. Eco-efficient feedback technologies: Which eco-feedback types prefer drivers most? 2011 IEEE International Symposium on a World of Wireless, Mobile and Multimedia Networks, IEEE, 1--8. http://doi.org/10.1109/WoWMoM.2011.5986187

Cited By

View all

Index Terms

  1. Encouraging the Use of ADAS through Personalized Persuasion

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    AutomotiveUI '16 Adjunct: Adjunct Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications
    October 2016
    245 pages
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

    In-Cooperation

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 24 October 2016

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. Advanced Driver Assistance Systems (ADAS)
    2. Design Space
    3. Driving Styles
    4. Persuasive Technologies

    Qualifiers

    • Work in progress
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

    Conference

    AutomotiveUI'16

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate 248 of 566 submissions, 44%

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)5
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
    Reflects downloads up to 07 Nov 2024

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all

    View Options

    Get Access

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media