skip to main content
10.1145/2939672.2939685acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageskddConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Open access

Dynamic and Robust Wildfire Risk Prediction System: An Unsupervised Approach

Published: 13 August 2016 Publication History

Abstract

Ability to predict the risk of damaging events (e.g. wildfires) is crucial in helping emergency services in their decision making processes, to mitigate and reduce the impact of such events. Today, wildfire rating systems have been in operation extensively in many countries around the world to estimate the danger of wildfires. In this paper we propose a data-driven approach to predict wildfire risk using weather data. We show how we address the inherent challenge arising due to the temporal dynamicity of weather data. Weather observations naturally change in time, with finer-scale variation (e.g. stationary day or night) or large variations (nonstationary day or night), and this determines a temporal variation of the predicted wildfire danger. We show how our dynamic wildfire danger prediction model addresses the aforementioned challenge using context-based anomaly detection techniques. We call our predictive model a Context-Based Fire Risk (CBFR) model. The advantage of our model is that it maintains multiple historical models for different temporal variations (e.g. day versus night), and uses ensemble learning techniques to predict wildfire risk with high accuracy. In addition, it is completely unsupervised and does not rely on expert knowledge, which makes it flexible and easily applied to any region of interest. Our CBFR model is also scalable and can potentially be parallelised to speed up computation. We have considered multiple wildfire locations in the Blue Mountains, Australia as a case study, and compared the results of our system with the existing well-established Australian wildfire rating system. The experimental results show that our predictive model has a substantially higher accuracy in predicting wildfire risk, which makes it an effective model to supplement the operational Australian wildfire rating system.

Supplementary Material

MP4 File (kdd2016_rusu_unsupervised_approach_01-acm.mp4)

References

[1]
Australian bureau of meteorology weather stations. http://www.bom.gov.au/climate/cdo/about/sites.shtml.
[2]
Australian bureau of meteorology weather stations. http://www.bom.gov.au/vic/forecasts/fire-map.shtml.
[3]
Australian emergency management knowledge hub. https://www.emknowledge.gov.au/resource/4781/2013/ bushfire-new-south-wales-2013.
[4]
Australian fire danger ratings. http://www.esa.act.gov.au/wp-content/uploads/fire-danger-ratings.pdf.
[5]
Black saturday bushfires. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/black saturday bushfires.
[6]
Emergency management victoria strategic action plan. https://www.emv.vic.gov.au/plans/strategic-action-plan/.
[7]
Google maps. https://www.google.com.au/maps.
[8]
The human cost of natural disasters 2015: a global perspective, http://reliefweb.int/report/world/human-cost-natural-disasters-2015-global-perspective.
[9]
Natural resources canada. http://cwfis.cfs.nrcan.gc.ca/background/summary/fwi.
[10]
The united nations office for disaster risk reduction, http://www.unisdr.org/archive/42814.
[11]
Wildland fire assessment system. fire danger rating. http://www.wfas.net/index.php/fire-danger-rating-fire-potential--danger-32.
[12]
P. L. Andrews, D. O. Loftsgaarden, and L. S. Bradshaw. Evaluation of fire danger rating indexes using logistic regression and percentile analysis. International Journal of Wildland Fire, 12(2):213--226, 2003.
[13]
E. Cohen and M. Strauss. Maintaining time-decaying stream aggregates. In ACM SIGMOD symposium on Principles of database systems, pages 223--233, 2003.
[14]
D. Dee, S. Uppala, A. Simmons, P. Berrisford, P. Poli, S. Kobayashi, U. Andrae, M. Balmaseda, G. Balsamo, P. Bauer, et al. The era-interim reanalysis: Configuration and performance of the data assimilation system. Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, 137(656):553--597, 2011.
[15]
C. A. Farris, C. Pezeshki, and L. F. Neuenschwander. A comparison of fire probability maps derived from gis modeling and direct simulation techniques. In Joint Fire Science Conference and Workshop, pages 131--138, 1999.
[16]
M. A. Finney. The challenge of quantitative risk analysis for wildland fire. Forest Ecology and Management, 211(1):97--108, 2005.
[17]
A. G. McArthur. Fire behaviour in eucalypt forests. 1967.
[18]
C. Miller and A. A. Ager. A review of recent advances in risk analysis for wildfire management. International journal of wildland fire, 22(1):1--14, 2013.
[19]
M. Moshtaghi, T. C. Havens, J. C. Bezdek, L. Park, C. Leckie, S. Rajasegarar, J. M. Keller, and M. Palaniswami. Clustering ellipses for anomaly detection. Pattern Recognition, 44(1):55--69, 2011.
[20]
M. Moshtaghi, S. Rajasegarar, C. Leckie, and S. Karunasekera. An efficient hyperellipsoidal clustering algorithm for resource-constrained environments. Pattern Recognition, 44(9):2197--2209, 2011.
[21]
I. Noble, A. Gill, and G. Bary. Mcarthur's fire-danger meters expressed as equations. Australian Journal of Ecology, 5(2):201--203, 1980.
[22]
B. Saglam, E. Bilgili, B. Dincdurmaz, A. I. Kadiogulari, and Ö. Küçük. Spatio-temporal analysis of forest fire risk and danger using landsat imagery. Sensors, 8(6):3970--3987, 2008.
[23]
M. Salehi, C. A. Leckie, M. Moshtaghi, and T. Vaithianathan. A relevance weighted ensemble model for anomaly detection in switching data streams. In Advances in Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, pages 461--473. 2014.
[24]
C. Vasilakos, K. Kalabokidis, J. Hatzopoulos, and I. Matsinos. Identifying wildland fire ignition factors through sensitivity analysis of a neural network. Natural hazards, 50(1):125--143, 2009.
[25]
B. Vidakovic. Statistics for bioengineering sciences: with MATLAB and WinBUGS support. Springer Science & Business Media, 2011.
[26]
L. Yu, N. Wang, and X. Meng. Real-time forest fire detection with wireless sensor networks. In International Conference on Wireless Communications, Networking and Mobile Computing, volume 2, pages 1214--1217, 2005.

Cited By

View all

Index Terms

  1. Dynamic and Robust Wildfire Risk Prediction System: An Unsupervised Approach

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Conferences
    KDD '16: Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining
    August 2016
    2176 pages
    ISBN:9781450342322
    DOI:10.1145/2939672
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

    Sponsors

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 13 August 2016

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. bushfires
    2. context-based anomaly detection
    3. data stream mining
    4. risk prediction
    5. unsupervised learning
    6. wildfires

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article

    Conference

    KDD '16
    Sponsor:

    Acceptance Rates

    KDD '16 Paper Acceptance Rate 66 of 1,115 submissions, 6%;
    Overall Acceptance Rate 1,133 of 8,635 submissions, 13%

    Upcoming Conference

    KDD '25

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)187
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)29
    Reflects downloads up to 25 Dec 2024

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all

    View Options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Login options

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media