skip to main content
10.1145/2901790.2901882acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesdisConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Open access

Situated Encounters with Socially Engaged Art in Community-based Design

Published: 04 June 2016 Publication History

Abstract

With the increased relevance of digital technologies in civil life comes the challenge of how to design research for citizen engagement. Drawing from three reflexive case studies presenting socially engaged arts (SEA) projects, we describe how, as artists, collaborators and researchers, we engaged in socially inclusive community-based projects. We argue that our roles required us to be both flexible and to adopt critical openness in practices of collaborative social facilitation. We conclude with insights to inform community-based research and enable nurturing and inclusive engagement in research design for the exploration of near-future digital technologies.

References

[1]
Liam J. Bannon and Pelle Ehn. 2013. Design: Design Matters in Participatory Design in Jasper Simonsen and Toni Robertson (Eds.) Routledge International Handbook of Participatory Design, London and New York: Routledge. 37--63.
[2]
Jeffrey Bardzell, and Shaowen Bardzell. 2013. What is "critical" about critical design? In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI'13), 3297--3306.
[3]
Shaowen Bardzell and Jeffrey Bardzell. 2011. Towards a feminist HCI methodology: social science, feminism and HCI. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI'11), 675684. http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1978942.1979041
[4]
Claire Bishop. 2012. Artificial Hells: Participatory Art and the Politics of Spectatorship. Verso Books, UK.
[5]
Augusto Boal. 1979. Theatre of the Oppressed. London: Pluto Press
[6]
Jo Briggs 2012.'Weird (Re)View : Informing qualitative HCI methods? Reflections on a personal participatory arts project.' In:'Perspectives on Participation' workshop in association with DIS'12. https://openlab.ncl.ac.uk/participation/activities/dis201 2/
[7]
Jo Briggs, Celia Lury and Sarah Teasley. 2015. Creative Temporal Costings: A collaborative study with Leeds Creative Timebank. AHRC ProtoPublics Research Report. http://nrl.northumbria.ac.uk/24800/1/CTC_research_ report_online.pdf
[8]
Hrönn Brynjarsdóttir Holmer, Carl DiSalvo, Phoebe Sengers and Thomas Lodato. 2015. Constructing and constraining participation in participatory arts and HCI. In Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Stud. 74: 107--123 (2015).
[9]
Judith Butler. 1990. Gender Trouble. London: Routledge.
[10]
John M. Caroll and Mary Beth Rosson. 2013. Wild at Home: The Neighborhood as a Living Laboratory for HCI. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact.20, 3, Article 16 (Jul 2013). http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2491500.2491504
[11]
Rachel Clarke, and Peter Wright. 2012. Evocative of experience: crafting cross-cultural digital narratives through stories and portraits. In Proceedings of the 7th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction (NordiCHI '12) 318--321. http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/2399016.2399066
[12]
Rachel Clarke, Peter Wright, Madeleine Balaam and John McCarthy. 2013. Digital portraits: photo-sharing after domestic violence. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI'13) 2517--2526. http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/2470654.2481348
[13]
Rachel Clarke, Jo Briggs, Ann Light, Sarah Heitlinger and Clara Crivellaro. 2014. Socially engaged arts practice in HCI. In CHI'14 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA'14) 69--74. http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/2559206.2559227
[14]
Rachel Clarke, Paul Dunphy and Peter Wright. 2015. Photo-parshiya: Discursive Assemblages in an International Women's Center. In Proc. Research through Design (RtD '15) available at http://figshare.com/articles/RTD2015_08_Photo_parshi ya_Discursive_Assemblages_in_an_International_Wo men_s_Center/1328007
[15]
Carl DiSalvo, Kirsten Boehner, Nicholas A. Knouf and Phoebe Sengers 2009. Nourishing the ground for sustainable HCI: considerations from ecologically engaged art. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI'09), 385--394. http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1518701.1518763
[16]
Carl DiSalvo, Andrew Clement and Volkmar Pipek. 2013. Communities: Participatory Design for, with and by communities. In Jasper Simonsen and Toni Robertson (Eds.) Routledge International Handbook of Participatory Design, London and New York: Routledge. 182--209.
[17]
William H Dutton, and Grant Blank. 2011. Next Generation Users: The Internet in Britain. Oxford Internet Survey 2011. Oxford, UK: Oxford Internet Institute, University of Oxford.
[18]
Sarah Fox and Christopher Le Dantec. 2014. Community historians: scaffolding community engagement through culture and heritage. In Proceedings of the 2014 conference on Designing interactive systems, (DIS'14) 785--794. http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/2598510.2598563
[19]
Paulo Freire, 1970. Pedagogy of the Oppressed. New York, Continuum.
[20]
Alison Gilchrist. 2009. The well-connected community: A networking approach to community development. Bristol, Polity.
[21]
Donna Haraway. 1988. Situated Knowledges. The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Knowledge. Feminist Studies, Vol 14, No 3:575--599.
[22]
Gillian Hayes. 2011. The relationship of action research to human-computer interaction. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. 18, 3, Article 15 (Aug 2011). http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1993060.1993065
[23]
Pablo Helguera. 2011. Education for Socially Engaged Art: A materials and technique handbook. Jorge Pinto Books, US.
[24]
Larissa Hjorth and Kristen Sharp. 2014. The art of ethnography: The aesthetics or ethics of participation? Visual Studies 29: 2, 128--135.
[25]
bell hooks. 2010. Teaching critical thinking: Practical wisdom. Routledge.
[26]
Helena Karasti, Karen S. Baker and Florence Miller. 2010. Infrastructure Time: Long-term Matters in Collaborative Development. CSCW Vol 19, Issue 3:377--417.
[27]
Grant Kester. 2004. Conversation Pieces: Community and Communication in Modern Art. University of California Press, US.
[28]
Miwon Kwon. 2002. One Place After Another: site specific art and locational identity. MIT Press.
[29]
John Law and Annemarie Mol (Eds.). 2002. Complexities: Social Studies of Knowledge Practices. Duke University Press.
[30]
John Law. 2004. After Method: Mess in Social Science Research. Routledge.
[31]
Chris Le Dantec and Sarah Fox. 2015. Strangers at the Gate: Gaining Access, Building Rapport, and CoConstructing Community-Based Research. In Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing (CSCW'15), 1348--1358. http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/2675133.2675147
[32]
Ann Light. 2002. Users as Designers- Challenge of the Network Age (08 May 2002), Usability News.
[33]
Ann Light, Lois Weaver, Pat Healey and Gini Simpson. 2008. Adventures in the Not Quite Yet: using performance techniques to raise design awareness about digital networks. In. Undisciplined! Design Research Society Conference 2008 (DRS'08).
[34]
Ann Light, Gini Simpson Lois Weaver and Pat Healey. 2009. Geezers, Turbines, Fantasy Personas: Making the Everyday into the Future. In Proceedings of Creativity and Cognition 2009, 39--48. http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1640233.1640243
[35]
Ann Light. 2011. Democratising Technology: Inspiring Transformation with Design, Performance and Props. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI'11) 2239--2242. http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1978942.1979269
[36]
Ann Light and Yoko Akama. 2012. The human touch: participatory practice and the role of facilitation in designing with communities. Proceedings of the 12th Participatory Design Conference (PDC'12). 61--70 http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1978942.1979269
[37]
Ann Light. 2014. Citizen Innovation: ActiveEnergy and the Quest for Sustainable Design, in Boler, M. and Ratto, M. (Eds.) DIY Citizenship: Critical Making and Social Media. MIT Press
[38]
John McCarthy and Peter Wright, P. 2015. Take {A}part: The Politics and Aesthetics of Participation in Experience-centerd Design. MIT Press.
[39]
Annemarie Mol. 2008. The logic of care: Health and the Problem of Patient Choice. Routledge.
[40]
Valentina Nisi and Mads Haahr. 2004. Weird View: Interactive Multilinear Narratives and Real-Life Community Stories' in Crossings: eJournal of Art and Technology 4.1, Dec 2004.
[41]
Valentina Nisi, Ian Oakley and Mads Haahr, 2006 Inner City Locative Media: Design and Experience of a Location- Aware Mobile Narrative for the Dublin Liberties Neighborhood, Intelligent Agent 6 (2).
[42]
Valentina Nisi, Alison Wood, Glorianna Davenport and Ian Oakley, 2004. Hopstory: An interactive, location-based narrative distributed in space and time. Technologies for Interactive Digital Storytelling and Entertainment pp132--141.
[43]
Gillian Rose. 1997. Situating knowledges: positionality, reflexivities and other tactics. Progress in Human Geography. June 1997, Vol. 21 No.3: 305--320.
[44]
Arnd Schneider and Christopher Wright (Eds.). 2010. Between Art and Anthropology. Contemporary Ethnographic Practice. Berg Press.
[45]
Nick Taylor, Keith Cheverst, Peter Wright and Patrick Olivier. 2013. Leaving the wild: lessons from community technology handovers. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI'13), 1549--1558. http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/2470654.2466206
[46]
Alex Taylor, Siân Lindley, Tim Regan. David Sweeney, Vasillis Vlachokyriakos, Lillie Grainger and Jessica Lingel. 2015. Data-in-Place: Thinking through the Relations Between Data and Community. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI'15) 2863--2872. http://doi.acm.org/ 10.1145/2702123.2702558
[47]
Tenantspin http://superflex.net/activities/2002/05/01/superchannel _-_tenantspin
[48]
John Vines, Rachel Clarke, Peter Wright and Patrick Olivier. 2013. Configuring participation: on how we involve people in design. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI'13) 429--438. http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/2470654.2470716
[49]
Lois Weaver. 2007. Make Something: a manifesto for making performance about making change. In Elaine Aston and Sue-Ellen Case (Eds). Performing Global Feminisms. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
[50]
Peter Wright. 2011. Reconsidering the H, the C and the I: Some Thoughts on Reading Lucy Suchman's Human-Machine Reconfigurations. interactions 18, 5 (September 2011), 28--31. DOI=http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2008176.2008185
[51]
Peter Wright and John McCarthy. 2010. Experience Centerd Design: Designers, Users and Communities in Dialogue. Morgan & Claypool: USA.

Cited By

View all

Index Terms

  1. Situated Encounters with Socially Engaged Art in Community-based Design

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Conferences
    DIS '16: Proceedings of the 2016 ACM Conference on Designing Interactive Systems
    June 2016
    1374 pages
    ISBN:9781450340311
    DOI:10.1145/2901790
    This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution International 4.0 License.

    Sponsors

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 04 June 2016

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. civic engagement
    2. community-based design
    3. participation
    4. social change
    5. socially engaged art

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article

    Funding Sources

    • Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council

    Conference

    DIS '16
    Sponsor:
    DIS '16: Designing Interactive Systems Conference 2016
    June 4 - 8, 2016
    QLD, Brisbane, Australia

    Acceptance Rates

    DIS '16 Paper Acceptance Rate 107 of 418 submissions, 26%;
    Overall Acceptance Rate 1,158 of 4,684 submissions, 25%

    Upcoming Conference

    DIS '25
    Designing Interactive Systems Conference
    July 5 - 9, 2025
    Funchal , Portugal

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)178
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)61
    Reflects downloads up to 23 Jan 2025

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all

    View Options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Login options

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media